Dan Stahler photo. USFWS 2013 EIA Predator-prey models.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 North Bighorn Sero-Positive Tests in Elk. Bald Mountain Bear Creek.
Advertisements

Mule Deer Plan Population Objective Strategies h & k Implement a method to collect annual adult doe and fawn mortality estimates on representative units.
Clearwater Region Elk. Clearwater Elk Harvest Clearwater Region Elk Harvest by Zone, 2008.
Carrion: It’s what’s for dinner
Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forest Canyon Lakes Ranger District
PREDATION One of the least well developed areas of ecological theory Management problems occur with a lack of information –Biological data on predators.
Polar bears of western Hudson Bay and climate change: Are warming spring air temperatures the ‘‘ultimate’’survival control factor? John Garcia Luisa Ricaurte.
Potential Interaction between predation risk, food limitation and disease Prey limitation Food Limitation predation Risk Disease.
Interactions between predators and prey. What is a predator? Masked Shrew Sorex cinereus Mountain lion Puma concolor Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis.
Food Webs and Trophic Cascades
Lecture 24: Thurs., April 8th
Sustainable harvest of Finnish moose population? Esa Ranta, Anne Luoma, Veijo Kaitala &FGFRI.
VORTEX POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS 7/2/ Introduction  It is the use of quantitative methods to predict the likely future status of a population.
Chapter 19-1 Populations A part of a pod of dolphins.
Fish and Wildlife Population Ecology: The End Game…
VOLUNTEER CARNIVORE TRACK SURVEYS - Part of an Integrated Approach to Monitoring Wisconsin Wolves by Jane E. Wiedenhoeft.
Integrating Concepts in Biology
Abstract Predation and winter range have often dominated debates about caribou population dynamics. However, climate has direct and indirect impacts on.
“.  America’s first National Park  Established in 1872  Located in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho  Home to a large variety of wildlife, including grizzly.
Global population dynamics and climate change: Comparing species-level impacts on two contrasting large mammals Mark Hebblewhite 1*, Eric S. Post 2, Steven.
Population Viability Analysis. Critically Endangered Threatened Endangered Criterion Reduction in population size 10 yrs 3 generations >80% >50% >30%
Biological Status Review for the Gray Wolf in Oregon and Evaluation of Delisting Criteria April 24, 2015 Russ Morgan Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife.
Vulnerability of moose and roe deer to wolf predation in Scandinavia - does habitat matter? Contact Lisette Fritzon
Exam #2 F 6/27 in class (bring cheat sheet). Ecology: We are all connected and interdependent.
Western Arctic Caribou Herd. Population Information.
Population Ecology. Population All the organisms of a species that live in a an area at a certain time Populations change when – new members are added.
FORAGING ECOLOGY, VIGILANCE OF COYOTES, AND “BEHAVIORAL CASCADES” IN RESPONSE TO GRAY WOLF REINTRODUCTION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK T. Adam Switalski.
Figure 1: Age Structure and Sex Ratio PMWHR Spring 2004 Total Herd Size = 161 Horses Known Age to 8 years Estimated Age 9-25 years.
Simple Linear Regression. The term linear regression implies that  Y|x is linearly related to x by the population regression equation  Y|x =  +  x.
Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Kim Poole Wildlife Discipline Lead Aurora Wildlife Research Jess Dunford Wildlife Biologist Gartner Lee Limited.
Population Ecology Questions: 1. Why are there many or few individuals in a population? 2. Why do the numbers of individuals in a population change (or.
Wolves play a key role in keeping ecosystems healthy. They help keep deer and elk populations in check, which can benefit many other plant and animal.
Analysis of a Predator-Prey Relationship Ecological Study at Isle Royale, Michigan, U.S.
LIFE HISTORY AND HARVESTING READINGS: FREEMAN, 2005 Chapter 52 Pages Chapter 54 Pages
Remote Sensing Tools for Assessing Large Scale Habitat Quality for Ungulates Brad Griffith USGS, Alsaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Institute.
POPULATION-LEVEL EFFECTS OF PREDATION
Click SLIDE SHOW button on bottom right Then click screen again to begin If an error message appears at top, your computer may require the “Active X control”
Exam #4 W 4/23 in class (bring cheat sheet) Review T 4/22 at 5pm in PAI 3.02.
Environmental Science Chapter 8: Understanding Populations
Do Resident and Non-resident Northern Bobwhite Hunters Self- Regulate their Harvest Based on Population Size? Chris Williams 1 and Roger Applegate 2 1.
Not every animal, either adult or juvenile, lives for ever; hard concept for many people to appreciate Carrying Capacity – ability of the habitat and distribution.
The impact of reintroduced wolves on the elk population in Yellowstone (proposal) Hunter Roberts.
FOUR CHAPTERS: Wildlife, Predator Management, Fisheries, and Sensitive Species Bill James Utah Div. of Wildlife Resources.
ASSESSMENT OF THE ANNUAL VARIATION OF MALARIA AND THE CLIMATE EFFECT BASED ON KAHNOOJ DATA BETWEEN 1994 AND 2001 Conclusions 1. One month lag between predictors.
Amplitude of Tolerance is the Range of Environmental Conditions that a Species Can Withstand (p 38 # 2) A changing of conditions can cause a species to.
The relative importance of direct predation and risk effects for population dynamics.
Limiting Factors and Carrying Capacity DO NOW WEDNESDAY Explain what limiting factors are. Give some examples. What is carrying capacity?
Red Hake Urophycis chuss Red Hake Urophycis chuss.
SYNTHESIS APPROACH FOUR EXAMPLES
Elk of the Northern Herd
Research and Conservation on the Lower Brule Indian Reservation
43 Global Ecology and Conservation Biology
Keystone Species Species that have a large effect on an ecosystem
The impacts of predation on elk populations in the East Kootenay.
Demographic vital rates and population growth:
- first line of
Using GAMs in Wildlife management
Why are species going extinct?
Kristi Hannam SUNY-Geneseo
Nearly Extinct Species: maybe only 100 individuals exist
Make your voice heard: Engaging in Federal Decision-making including Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) Wendy Loya Coordinator,
Analysis of count data 1.
Science Unit 1: Introduction to Bison Have you “Herd” of Bison
* TOTAL POPULATION SIZE & EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE * SPATIAL EXTENT.
Status - Yellowstone Bison Population

by Wei-Ping Chan, I-Ching Chen, Robert K
Sampling locations and IDs for accessions sequenced in this study.
Fig. 2 The 100-year extinction risk of northern ortolan bunting breeding populations with respect to various scenarios of increased survival probability.
Presentation transcript:

Dan Stahler photo

USFWS 2013

EIA Predator-prey models

Central YellowstoneGallatin Northern Range Tobacco Root

12 herd units where elk were annually counted and classified in midwinter (calves/100 cows) by agencies and/or published studies from 1978 to herds recolonized by wolves (with pre-post data), 6 herds continuously uncolonized by resident packs as of 2010 GYA elk herds Outer elk herds M O N T A N A W Y O M I N G I D A H O

Calf recruitment is widely-recognized as a strong driver of dynamics in elk (and other ungulates)

GYA HerdsOuter Herds Calves per 100 cows

Wolves Bears Offtake Risk

Schwartz et al. 2006, Wildlife Monographs 161: 1-68 Do changes in GRIZZLY BEAR NUMBERS explain observed changes in calf recruitment?

Adjusted Estimate Count Schwartz et al. 2006, Wildlife Monographs 161: 1-68 Changes in Grizzly Bear Numbers

“Figure 5. Counts of unique female grizzly bears with cubs-of-year from 1983 to 2002 inside Yellowstone National Park (YNP) (open triangles) and outside YNP (solid squares). The slope of the fitted line inside YNP (dashed line) was not different from zero, whereas the slope for counts outside YNP (solid line) was significantly different from zero (P ≤ 0.001). “ Changes in Grizzly Bear Numbers Within YNP Outside YNP Schwartz et al. 2006, Wildlife Monographs 161: 1-68

Can changes in CLIMATE explain the observed differences in calf recruitment? UNCOLONIZED HERDS WOLF COLONIZED HERDS WINTER SNOW ACCUMULATION GROWING SEASON PRECIPITATION Christianson & Creel 2014 PLoS One 9(7): e102330

Uncolonized Herds Wolf-colonized Herds Can HARVEST patterns explain the observed differences in calf recruitment?

Creel & Christianson 2008 Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: Griffin et al. (2011) review of 1,999 radio-collared calves in 12 populations found that “wolf predation was low and most likely a compensatory source of mortality”.

What are the relative magnitudes of direct and risk effects?

Christianson & Creel 2008 Behav Ecol 19: 1258 – 1266 Christianson & Creel 2010 Ecology 91:

Fecal progesterone decreases with increasing predation risk… Samples at 2 week intervals after 15 March 1495 fecal samples Symbol types denote annual population means Tests controlled for herd composition Low Risk High Risk

… and progesterone concentration predicts calf recruitment. Calves/100 Cows In following season

1.Additive direct mortality is too small to yield this pattern. For 2,746 radio-collared elk in 45 populations, Brodie et al. (2013) found that “wolves and all carnivore species combined had additive effects on elk mortality, but only reduced survival by <2%”. 2.Widespread reductions in pregnancy rate have been >10X larger than observed effects on mortality, spatiotemporally aligned with wolf recolonization and changes in elk dynamics. 3.Other plausible limiting factors have not shown the spatiotemporal patterns of change that would produce these changes in elk dynamics. GYA elk herds Outer elk herds M O N T A N A W Y O M I N G I D A H O