USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Evidence for Reduced Climate Sensitivity Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D Principal Research Scientist The University of Alabama In Huntsville March 4, 2008.
Advertisements

© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
Slide 1 IPWG, Beijing, October 2008 Slide 1 Assimilation of rain and cloud-affected microwave radiances at ECMWF Alan Geer, Peter Bauer, Philippe.
ECMWF CO 2 Data Assimilation at ECMWF Richard Engelen European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reading, United Kingdom Many thanks to Phil Watts,
ATS 351 Lecture 8 Satellites
Atmospheric Emission.
CIRA & NOAA/NESDIS/RAMM Meteorological Sounders Dr. Bernie Connell CIRA/NOAA-RAMMT March 2005.
MWR Algorithms (Wentz): Provide and validate wind, rain and sea ice [TBD] retrieval algorithms for MWR data Between now and launch (April 2011) 1. In-orbit.
Recent Progress on High Impact Weather Forecast with GOES ‐ R and Advanced IR Soundings Jun Li 1, Jinlong Li 1, Jing Zheng 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Hui Liu.
Improved NCEP SST Analysis
ECMWF – 1© European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Developments in the use of AMSU-A, ATMS and HIRS data at ECMWF Heather Lawrence, first-year.
Data assimilation of polar orbiting satellites at ECMWF
ATMS 373C.C. Hennon, UNC Asheville Observing the Tropics.
The CrIS Instrument on Suomi-NPP Joel Susskind NASA GSFC Sounder Research Team (SRT) Suomi-NPP Workshop June 21, 2012 Washington, D.C. National Aeronautics.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Long-Term Upper Air Temperature.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Short Course on Satellite Meteorology 11 January 1998 Phoenix, Arizona Applications and Interpretation: Part 3 - Sounder Products and Applications Donald.
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
Slide 1 Sakari Uppala and Dick Dee European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ECMWF reanalysis: present and future.
Intercomparisons of AIRS and NAST retrievals with Dropsondes During P- TOST (Pacific Thorpex Observational System Test) NASA ER-2 NOAA G-IV Dropsonde.
AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) Instrument Characteristics.
Lessons on Satellite Meteorology Part VII: Metop Introduction to Metop Instruments The sounders with focus on IASI The GRAS instrument The ASCAT scatterometer.
Development of AMSU-A Fundamental CDR’s Huan Meng 1, Wenze Yang 2, Ralph Ferraro 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/CoRP/Satellite Climate Studies Branch 2 NOAA Corporate.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES Microwave Products Presented.
Assessment of the Usefulness of Atmospheric Satellite Sounder-Based Cloud Retrievals for Climate Studies Gyula I. Molnar Joel.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
1 Hyperspectral Infrared Water Vapor Radiance Assimilation James Jung Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies Lars Peter Riishojgaard.
ISCCP at 30, April 2013 Backup Slides. ISCCP at 30, April 2013 NVAP-M Climate Monthly Average TPW Animation Less data before 1993.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
Trends & Variability of Liquid Water Clouds from Eighteen Years of Microwave Satellite Data: Initial Results 6 July 2006 Chris O’Dell & Ralf Bennartz University.
Jinlong Li 1, Jun Li 1, Christopher C. Schmidt 1, Timothy J. Schmit 2, and W. Paul Menzel 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS AIRS Profile Assimilation - Case Study results Shih-Hung Chou, Brad Zavodsky Gary Jedlovec,
Cloud Properties from MODIS, AIRS, and MODIS/AIRS observations S. A. Ackerman, D. Tobin, P. Anotonelli, P. Menzel CRYSTAL meeting.
Satellite based instability indices for very short range forecasting of convection Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Contributions from Marianne.
Layered Water Vapor Quick Guide by NASA / SPoRT and CIRA Why is the Layered Water Vapor Product important? Water vapor is essential for creating clouds,
Radiative transfer in the thermal infrared and the surface source term
SPoRT’s Current and Planned Data Assimilation Activities Inaugural SPoRT/NWS Collaborative Partners Workshop 3-4 March 2010 Bradley Zavodsky Shih-Hung.
Early Results from AIRS and Risk Reduction Benefits for other Advanced Infrared Sounders Mitchell D. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications.
Radio Occultation. Temperature [C] at 100 mb (16km) Evolving COSMIC Constellation.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Geophysical Ocean Products from AMSR-E & WindSAT Chelle L. Gentemann, Frank Wentz, Thomas Meissner, Kyle Hilburn, Deborah Smith, and Marty Brewer
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center, NASA/GSFC, Code 902, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA INTRODUCTION  NASA Goddard Earth Sciences.
Retrieval of cloud parameters from the new sensor generation satellite multispectral measurement F. ROMANO and V. CUOMO ITSC-XII Lorne, Victoria, Australia.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
The NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Long Term Strategy of Hyper Spectral Fundamental Climate Data Records and Environmental Climate Variables Antonia Gambacorta, Chris.
AIRS Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Validation Bob Knuteson Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson, Chia Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison Space.
Synthesis of work on Budget of Water Vapor and Trace gases in Amazonia Transport and Impacts of Moisture, Aerosols and Trace Gases into and out of the.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
1 Moisture Profile Retrievals from Satellite Microwave Sounders for Weather Analysis Over Land and Ocean John M. Forsythe, Stanley Q. Kidder*, Andrew S.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
CAPACITY User Requirements by Albert P H Goede 7 April 2004, KNMI Objective of Work Package 1000 Definition of User Requirements for Operational Monitoring.
NOAA Near Real-Time AIRS Processing and Distribution System Walter Wolf Mitch Goldberg Lihang Zhou NESDIS/ORA/CRAD.
Workshop on Soundings from High Spectral Resolution Infrared Observations May 6-8, 2003 University of Wisconsin-Madison.
© Crown copyright Met Office Assimilating infra-red sounder data over land John Eyre for Ed Pavelin Met Office, UK Acknowledgements: Brett Candy DAOS-WG,
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course
1. Титульный..
Tony Reale ATOVS Sounding Products (ITSVC-12)
Precipitation Classification and Analysis from AMSU
NASA Aqua.
M. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Z. Cheng (QSS)
Changes in the Free Atmosphere
Use of ATOVS at DAO Joanna Joiner, Donald Frank, Arlindo da Silva,
Initialization of Numerical Forecast Models with Satellite data
Infrared Satellite Data Assimilation at NCAR
Satellite Foundational Course for JPSS (SatFC-J)
Presentation transcript:

USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005

USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH AIRS/AMSU/HSB launched on EOS Aqua May 5, 2002 AIRS is a multi-detector array grating spectrometer 2378 channels between 650 cm -1 and 2760 cm -1 Channel spacing (0.25 cm cm -1 ) Resolving power (0.5 cm cm -1 ) Footprint 13 km at nadir 3 x 3 array within AMSU A footprint - collocated with HSB One sounding produced per AMSU A footprint HSB failed on February 5, 2003

OBJECTIVES OF AIRS/AMSU Provide data to improve operational weather forecasting Required global accuracy in up to 80% cloud cover: 1 K RMS error in 1 km layer mean tropospheric temperature 20% RMS error in tropospheric 1 km layer precipitable water Provide long-term global coverage of surface and atmospheric parameters Monitor climate variability and trends Study processes affecting climate change Extend 25 year TOVS Pathfinder data set

AIRS/AMSU PRODUCTS Surface and Atmospheric Products - one set per FOR (45 km) Sea/land skin temperature Temperature profile T(p) to 1 mb Water vapor profile q(p) to 100 mb O 3, CO, CH 4 profiles Cloud Cleared Radiances Cloud Products - one set per FOV (13 km) Effective cloud fraction for up to two cloud layers is geometric fractional cloud cover is cloud emissivity at 11  m Cloud top pressure for up to two cloud layers OLR Computed using and retrieved parameters Clear Sky OLR Computed using retrieved parameters with Each product has a quality flag

PROPERTIES OF CHANNELS = effective average temperature within weighting function At night radiance is weighted value (brightness temperature) is weighted average between and As decreases, decreases because see less of warm surface and more of. Also decreases as peak of weighting function rises, but increases in stratosphere increases brightness temperature, primarily for Brightness temperatures can be higher than physical temperature

OVERVIEW OF AIRS/AMSU RETRIEVAL METHODOLOGY Physically based system Independent of GCM except for surface pressure Uses cloud cleared radiances to produce solution represents what AIRS would have seen in the absence of clouds Basic steps Microwave product parameters – solution agrees with AMSU A radiances Initial cloud clearing using microwave product: produces AIRS regression guess parameters based on cloud cleared radiances Update cloud clearing using AIRS regression guess parameters: produces Sequentially determine surface parameters, T(p), q(p), O 3 (p), CO(p), CH 4 (p), using Apply quality control Select retrieved state - coupled AIRS/AMSU or AMSU only retrieval parameters Determine cloud parameters consistent with retrieved state and observed radiances Compute OLR, CLR sky OLR from all parameters via radiative transfer

QUALITY FLAGS Order of increasing difficulty to pass 1)Stratospheric Temperature Test - temperature profile good above 200 mb 90% and cloud clearing passes minimal quality control Use coupled AIRS/AMSU retrieval state if Stratospheric Temperature Test is passed 2)Constituent profile test Slightly more stringent cloud clearing quality control 3)Mid-tropospheric Temperature Test - T(p) good above 3 km Tighter quality control on cloud clearing and T(p) convergence flagged good 4)Lower Troposphere Temperature Test - T(p) good above surface 5)SST test - for non frozen ocean only 6)Tight SST test - for non frozen ocean only

USE OF AIRS OBSERVATIONS FOR DATA ASSIMILATION Could be (used by ECMWF, NCEP) or T(p),q(p) (used by Bob Atlas) Accuracy of T(p),q(p) degrades slowly with increasing cloud fraction There is a trade-off between accuracy and spatial coverage ECMWF, NCEP uses radiances “unaffected by clouds” Passes internal threshold tests They should try assimilating clear column radiances “unaffected by clouds” Bob Atlas assimilated T(p) for all levels flagged as good Treats AIRS T(p) as radiosonde reports

AIRS EXPERIMENTS WITH FVSSI Global data assimilation system used: fvSSI: fvGCM - Resolution: 1x1.25 SSI (NCEP) analysis-T62 Period of assimilation: 1 January - 31 January, 2003 Experiments: Control: All Conventional Data + ATOVS Radiance (NOAA-14, 15, 16) + CTW + SSM/I TPW+ SSM/I Wind Speed + QuikScat + SBUV Ozone Control + AIRS Retrieved Temperature Profiles (Global, passing level quality control) Forecasts: 25 forecasts run every day beginning on January,

AIRS LEVEL 3 PRODUCTS Different geophysical parameters are gridded according to different tests Stratospheric Temperature Test T(p) 200 mb and above Constituent Profile Test q(p), O 3 (p), CO(p) at all p Mid-Tropospheric Temperature Test T(p) beneath 200 mb, MSU2R/MSU4, land (including ice and coasts) surface skin temperature (and emissivity) Sea Surface Temperature Test Non-frozen ocean surface skin temperature (and emissivity) Cloud parameters, OLR and clear sky OLR use all AIRS cases

Interannual Differences of T(P) AIRS AIRS-ECMWF AIRS-TOVS Jan Jan Jan mean STD mean STD correlation mean STD correlation 1000 mb mb mb mb mb mb mb mb mb mb mb mb mb mb mb MSU2R MSU AIRS AIRS-Spencer-Christy AIRS-TOVS Interannual Difference of MSU2R/MSU4

DATA AVAILABILITY Results shown are based on the AIRS Version 4.0 algorithm We (SRT) currently have results for January 2003 and January, August, September 2004 Goddard DAAC began analyzing AIRS/AMSU data near real time April 1, 2004 DAAC is also processing backwards from March 31, 2004 at 5 days per day Level 1B (radiances), Level 2 (spot by spot retrievals), and Level 3 (gridded) data is available Level 3 is 1°x 1° daily, 8 day mean, and monthly mean Ascending (1:30 pm local time) and descending (1:30 am local time) data are separate To order data to go Use collection 003 (Version 4.0) Earlier DAAC products (collection 002) used AIRS Version 3.0 Do not use earlier results