Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Testing for STAAR/EOC, TAKS Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support
NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Spring 2009 Training End-of-Course Field Test. Schedule of Important Dates for 2009 Field Test Event Spring Field Test Window -- April 27 – May 15 EventSchedule.
PARCC – Regular Administration Grades 3-8 Administration Dates April 4, 2016 – May 13, 2016 (Paper-based administration: April 11, 2016 – April 22, 2016)
Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children David Holdzkom Assistant Superintendent - Evaluation & Research Ken Branch Senior Director.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
School Performance Score Elementary School - October 2013 i LEAP Grade 3 LEAP Grade 4 Assessment Points * 150Advanced 125Mastery 100Basic 0Approaching.
Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2013.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
September 11,  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) ◦ Reading and math were tested every year in grades 3 through 8. ◦ Writing was tested in.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
2015 MAP Scores Fulton 58 School District MAP Facts  Grades 3-8 and English II, Biology, Government and Algebra I and II  First year for online.
LAKE HAMILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 2006 SCORE REPORT: ITBS AND BENCHMARK NRT: National Reference Test given to grades K-9 = MC only = ITBS (Iowa Test of Basic.
High School Common Exam Implementation Proposal Spring 2013 NHCS.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
Accountability Updates NCAEE Region 1 May 2, 2014 M. E. (Butch) Hudson, Jr. Regional Accountability Coordinator Accountability Region 4.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
By Brian Patrick Federal Programs Director Whiteriver Unified School District #20 WHITERIVER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 I.ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2015.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
CHS State Assessment Data % Advanced & Proficient Algebra 1 End of Course Exams % Advanced & Proficient.
Moving Forward With Assessment and Accountability August 2011 High School.
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 11, 2012.
Kansas City Public Schools BOE Meeting Wednesday, August 8th.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
STAR Testing Presented by: Caitlin Cline Theresa Anson EDUC 472.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HACKETTSTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS JANUARY 20, 2016.
Student Data Review Title VII Indian Education Parent Meeting March 4, 2013.
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 9, 2014.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Eustis High School Scheduling School Year Upcoming Juniors and Seniors Cohorts: 2012 and 2013.
State Testing Program Update Sharon Nobis CHHS Assistant Principal Grapevine-Colleyville ISD November 7, 2011.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
HCS Spring 2013 Assessment Cycle % of Time Dedicated to Standardized Assessments.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
Testing Students with Disabilities. Resources Appendix C of Test Administration Manuals – SCPASS Science and Social Studies – End-of-Course English 1.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
End of Course Exams  In February, 2007 the Missouri State Board of Education approved End of Course (EOC) exams.  WHY?
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Next Generation Learners Session 1: Introduction of Next Generation Learners.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness
Millbrae Elementary School District
Jackson County school district 2015
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
2015 End of Course Examinations
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC
Education Services October 3, 2017.
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
Glen Ridge District Testing Report
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Presentation transcript:

Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010

Communication Arts, Math and Science Missouri Assessment Program (MAP) Grades 3-8 Scores are shown by “cohort” or by “program” – Cohort: Same group of students year to year – Program: Same grade level test given year to year MAP Index Points are used to illustrate performance and to calculate our overall points on the APR (Annual Performance Report)

Program Data Communication Arts rd Grade rd Grade (Different students each year)

Cohort Data: Communication Arts rd Grade th Grade th Grade (Same students each year)

Cohort Data: Communication Arts th Grade th Grade th Grade (Same students each year)

Cohort Data: Communication Arts th Grade th Grade th Grade (Same students each year)

Cohort Data: Communication Arts th Grade th Grade th Grade (Same students each year)

Program Data Mathematics rd Grade rd Grade (Different Students each year)

Cohort Data: Mathematics rd Grade th Grade th Grade (Same students each year)

Comparative Data: Mathematics th Grade th Grade th Grade (Same students each year)

Cohort Data: Mathematics th Grade th Grade th Grade (Same students each year)

Cohort Data: Mathematics th Grade th Grade th Grade (Same students each year)

Science MAP (5 th /8 th ) and End-of-Course Exams in Biology, Algebra I, English II and American Government Program data is presented from The Science MAP is administered in 5 th and 8 th Grades End-of-Course Exams are administered at the end of each course. Again, MAP Index points are used to illustrate performance.

Program Data: 5 th Grade Science (Different students each year )

Program Data: 8 th Grade Science (Different students each year)

Program Data EOC Biology (Different students each year)

Program Data: EOC Algebra I (Different students each year)

Program Data: EOC English II (Different students each year)

EOC American Government (Baseline year)

Data Reported By Building We are a total district team and depend on each other for total district results (APR). While some buildings showed significant improvement, others did not. All schools experienced improvement in at least one area. The focus is on improvement and progress no matter where scores begin.

Building: Elementary Grade Three 2009-Grade Four 2010 Communication Arts Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 6 points (723.3 – 729.4) Eastwood Hills: Down 1 point ( ) Fleetridge: Up 7 points ( ) Laurel Hills: Up 11 points ( ) Little Blue: Baseline year (735.7 and 703.3) Norfleet: Up 14 points ( ) Robinson: Down 3 points( ) Southwood: Same ( ) Spring Valley: Up 14 points ( ) Westridge: Up 17 points ( )

Building: Elementary Grade Four 2009-Grade Five 2010 Communication Arts Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 4 points ( ) Eastwood Hills: Down 14 points ( ) Fleetridge: Down 1 point ( ) Laurel Hills: Up 15 points ( ) Little Blue: Baseline year (Grade Five: ) Norfleet: Up 9 points ( ) Robinson: Up 32 points ( ) Southwood: Up 5 points ( ) Spring Valley: Down 11 points ( ) Westridge: Up 10 points ( )

Building: Middle School Grade Six 2009-Grade Seven 2010 Communication Arts Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Down 14 points ( ) Raytown South Middle: Up 10 points ( ) Raytown Central Middle: Up 15 points ( )

Building: Middle School Grade Seven 2009-Grade Eight 2010 Communication Arts Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Up 12 points ( ) Raytown South Middle: Up 14 points ( ) Raytown Central Middle: Up 5 points ( )

Building: Elementary Grade Three 2009-Grade Four 2010 Mathematics Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Down 36 points ( ) Eastwood Hills: Down 10 points ( ) Fleetridge: Up 13 points ( ) Laurel Hills: Up 17 points ( ) Little Blue: Baseline year (724.3 and 716.4) Norfleet: Up 21 points ( ) Robinson: Down 13 points ( ) Southwood: Up 2 points ( ) Spring Valley: Up 27 points ( ) Westridge: Down 5 points ( )

Building: Elementary Grade Four 2009-Grade Five 2010 Mathematics Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 3 points ( ) Eastwood Hills: Down 4 points ( ) Fleetridge: Up 5 points ( ) Laurel Hills: Up 22 points ( ) Little Blue: Baseline year (Grade Five: 765.7) Norfleet: Up 25 points ( ) Robinson: Up 29 points ( ) Southwood: Up 26 points ( ) Spring Valley: Up 22 points ( ) Westridge: Up 20 points ( )

Building: Middle School Grade Six 2009-Grade Seven 2010 Mathematics Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Down 17 points ( ) Raytown South Middle: Up 6 points ( ) Raytown Central Middle: Down 7 points ( )

Building: Middle School Grade Seven 2009-Grade Eight 2010 Mathematics Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Up 10 points ( ) Raytown South Middle: Down 7 points ( ) Raytown Central Middle: Up 6 points ( )

Building: Elementary Grade Five 2009-Grade Five 2010 Science Program Data Blue Ridge: Same ( ) Eastwood Hills: Up 17 points ( ) Fleetridge: Up 31 points ( ) Laurel Hills: Up 40 points ( ) Little Blue: Baseline year (744.3) Norfleet: Up 7 points ( ) Robinson: Up 35 points ( ) Southwood: Down 7 points ( ) Spring Valley: Up 7 points ( ) Westridge: Down 7 points ( )

Building: Middle School Grade Eight 2009-Grade Eight 2010 Science Program Data Raytown Middle: Up 2 points ( ) Raytown South Middle: Up 2 points ( ) Raytown Central Middle: Up 21 points ( )

Middle School EOC Algebra I Program Data Raytown Middle: Up 7 points ( ) Raytown South Middle: Up 2 points ( ) Raytown Central Middle: Up 15 points ( )

High School EOC Algebra I Program Data (Different students each year) Raytown High: Up 7 points ( ) Raytown South High: Up 9 points ( ) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

High School EOC Biology Program Data (Different students each year) Raytown High: Down 22 points ( ) Raytown South High: Up 2 points ( ) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

High School EOC English II Program Data (Different students each year) Raytown High: English II: Up 17 points ( ) Raytown South High: English II: Same ( ) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

High School EOC American Government Program Data 2010 Baseline Raytown High: Raytown South High: NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

2010 APR Score: 11 All areas MET with the exception of:  3-5 Mathematics (Missed by 4 status points)  ACT (Missed by one point)  Attendance (Missed by 6 tenths of a point)

What’s Next? District and Building Professional Development areas – PLC/Collaboration – Differentiation/Structure – Assessment/Data (Data Collection) District PD classes Evaluation/Collection of Work Samples eSource