1 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved DX University Sponsored by the Utah DX Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roofing Filters, Transmitted BW and Receiver Performance
Advertisements

1 Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Advanced Licence Course Anthony Martin M1FDE Slide Set 9: v1.0, 24-Aug-2004 (4) Receivers-1 - Parameters Chelmsford.
HF Receiver Principles Noise and Dynamic Range Jamie Hall WB4YDL Reelfoot Amateur Radio Club April 26, 2012.
Roofing Filters, Transmitted IMD and Receiver Performance
Chapter 3 – Radio Phenomena
Technician Licensing Class Supplement T4, Questions Only Amateur Radio Practices 2 Exam Questions, 2 Groups.
HOW DOES MY SIGNAL GET FROM HERE TO THERE? By Forest Cummings, W5LQU And Dave Russell, W2DMR.
Chapter 5 Radio Signals & Equipment (Part 2)
Rob Sherwood NCØB 2013 / 2014 Rig Contest Results + Test Data Means What? How to optimize rig performance Sherwood Engineering.
Rob Sherwood NCØB 2013 / 2014 Rig Contest Results + Test Data Means What? How to optimize rig performance Sherwood Engineering.
Inside the K3 High Performance Rig Design Dynamic Range is your friend! Dynamic Range is your friend! Hands on Ham Radio. © 2009 Elecraft, Inc.
IMD and BPSK Quality Clint Hurd – kk7uq. Presentation on the Web A printable copy of this presentation is available at
Lab 3 Antennas.
New Offerings 2013 Since Dayton 2012 Rob Sherwood NCØB New strides plus some disappointments Sherwood Engineering.
Choosing a Transceiver Far From Simple
Radios Used in a Contest Environment Rob Sherwood NC Ø B Have Radios Gotten Better in the Last 5 or even 25 Years? Sherwood Engineering.
1 SCHOOL OF COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING EKT 341/4 ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION Lecturer: En. Rosmizi bin Abd Rahim Dr. Mohd Faizal Bin Jamlos PLV:
Transceiver Performance & Evolution of lab testing
18 October 2003By NNN0JQH1 Wide Band Folded Dipoles A comparison between Wide Band Folded Dipole (WBFD) and an Open Wire Fed Dipole (OWFD)
What makes a DX receiver great? Understanding receiver specs John Eisenberg K6YP.
Quiz Draw a block diagram of a quadrature (I/Q) demodulator. Carrier Recovery cos(  o t) Splitter  /2) LPF Recovered Q Data: Q R (kT) Recovered I Data:
Spectrum analyser basics Spectrum analyser basics 1.
08/16/01.
General Licensing Class Your HF Transmitter Your organization and dates here.
HF Transceiver Notes (July 2015)
Electromagnetic Wave Theory
Transceiver Performance What’s new in the last year? Rob Sherwood NC Ø B Lots of options for your dollars. Sherwood Engineering.
Lecture Notes #5 Antennas and Propagation
DX University – Visalia Station & Antenna Considerations Ned Sterns AA7A.
Technician License Course Chapter 2 Radio and Electronics Fundamentals
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
Receiver Performance Transmitted BW Contest Fatigue Rob Sherwood NC Ø B Limitations to a better contest score may not always be obvious. Sherwood Engineering.
DX University Visalia California – DX University – Visalia 2014DX University – Visalia 201 Station & Antenna Considerations Ned Sterns AA7A.
Transceiver Performance What’s new in 2011?
9/21/2015© 2009 Raymond P. Jefferis III Lect Geographic Information Processing Radio Wave Propagation Line-of-Sight Propagation in cross-section.
Antennas for Emergency Communications
Antenna Heights for 6m Sporadic-E
CSE5807 Wireless and Personal Area Networks Lecture 2 Radio Communications Principles Chapters 2,5 and 11 Stallings.
Copyright 1999, S.D. Personick. All Rights Reserved. Telecommunications Networking I Lectures 14 & 15 Wireless Transmission Systems.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
Choosing a Transciever Far From Simple Rob Sherwood NC Ø B The “Numbers Game” is no longer a level playing field. Sherwood Engineering.
24/03/2003Jacques MdM / REF France1 HF Receivers desensitisation from wideband noise spurious in HF bands (1.8 to 30 MHZ) Impact of spurious radiations.
Receiver Performance Transmitted BW Contest Fatigue Rob Sherwood NC Ø B Limitations to a better contest score may not always be obvious. Sherwood Engineering.
Radio links Seminary 7. Problem 7.1 Free space (one way / line-of-site) propagation a) Calculate the section attenuation of a 10 km long radio link operating.
Electromagnetic Spectrum
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (5marks)
General Frequency Ranges Microwave frequency range –1 GHz to 40 GHz –Directional beams possible –Suitable for point-to-point transmission –Used for satellite.
Selecting an HF Transceiver
1 Antennas for Emergency Communications. Emergency Antennas VHF / UHF - FM HF – Voice, CW, or Digital 2.
1 A TECHNICAL BRIEFING FOR AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS “HOW FAR CAN YOU TALK ON A 2 METER HANDHELD RADIO” PRESENTED TO: ARASWF Naples, FL MARCH 2015.
TRANSMITTER FUNDAMENTALS P-117. Audio Frequency Definition Acoustic, mechanical, or electrical frequencies corresponding to normally audible sound waves.
NVIS June What is NVIS? Near Vertical Incident Skywave ◦A radio propagation mode ◦An alternate method to obtain reliable communication at distances.
Antenna Basics.
Radio Equipment. Review: On the Transmitter Side The purpose of radio communications is to transfer information from one point to another. The information.
How to optimize what you currently own
CTU Presents Techniques to Optimize 6 Meter Contest Performance Joel Harrison, W5ZN.
Numericals.
Digital Mode by Dr. Joe Taylor K1JT Astrophysicist
Transceiver Performance for the 6m - UHF operator
Antennas 10/18/2017.
Understanding Receiver Specifications
S Meters.
High Performance IF and Transverter Design
Technician Licensing Class
Ham ANTENNAS: A practical introduction to The THEORY AND operation
Communication Systems.
Inside the K3 High Performance Rig Design
Amateur Extra Q & A Study Pool
Multi Mode Same Band Contesting and Prep for Field Day Use
10 GHz … Northwest Style Pacific Northwest VHF Society 2005 Conference, Seaside Oregon Mike Reed KD7TS and Bob Larkin W7PUA 10 GHz...NW Style KD7TS &
Presentation transcript:

1 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved DX University Sponsored by the Utah DX Association

2 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Station Equipment Considerations

3 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Choosing a Transceiver for DX High close-in dynamic range (copy S1 in crowded band) Low noise floor (copy very weak signals) Low phase noise (low noise on the Local Oscillator) Low in-band spurious on both receive and transmit Low IMD on SSB transmit, and low key clicks on CW transmit Effective SSB speech processor (more talk power) Good receive and transmit audio quality (intelligibility) Smooth AGC for low fatigue (noise doesn’t fill in spaces) AGC that doesn’t exaggerate impulse noise (hangs up AGC) Good ergonomics of controls and menus (easy adjustments) Good display that also shows important settings

4 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Dynamic Range The range in dB of very strong signals to very weak signals that the receiver can handle At The Same Time What is Close-in Dynamic Range vs. Wide-Spaced Dynamic Range? Why is Close-in Dynamic so important for CW ops? Why is it less important for SSB operators?

5 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Dynamic Range Wide & Close Dynamic Range

6 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Dynamic Range If you know the close-in dynamic range of a radio, at what signal level will IMD start to be a problem? S Meter standard is S9 = 50 μV, which is –73 dBm Assume a typical radio: 500 Hz CW filter Noise Floor of -128 dBm Preamp OFF Dynamic Range Signal Level Causing IMD = Noise Floor 55 dB S9 FT dB S9 + 5 dB FT-101E 65 dB S dB KWM dB S dBTS dB S dB 756 Pro II / III 80 dB S dB Omni-VII 85 dB S dB R dB S dB Orion I (93 dB) 95 dB S dB Orion II & Flex 5000A 100 dB S dBK3, FTdx5000

7 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Dynamic Range The dynamic range of a radio is the same with an attenuator ON or OFF. If on a noisy band, attenuate the noise and all signals to make better use of the dynamic range, and reduce the chance of overload. If band noise goes from S6 to S2 by turning on the attenuator, you have lost nothing, yet your radio is being stressed much less.

8 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA IP3 (3rd Order Intercept) It is a theoretical number. It has more meaning for a block amplifier or mixer. Almost meaningless if the AGC of a receiver is involved October 2007 QST Product Review FT-2000D DR3 Spacing Level IP3 98 dB 20 kHz Noise Floor +25 dBm 69 dB 2 kHz Noise Floor -19 dBm 29 dB 2 kHz 0 dBm = S9+73 dB +15 dBm

9 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Blocking & Phase Noise Blocking is the onset of gain compression. This can be an issue with another ham within “line-of-site”. It is an issue on Field Day and multi-multi contest stations. Low phase noise is desirable, but a very good low phase noise receiver has to contend with transmitted phase noise. Dealing with transmitted phase noise is like dealing with transmitted IMD products and splatter. We cannot do much about it.

10 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Noise Floor? Sensitivity is a familiar number, normally applies to SSB. Sensitivity = 10 dB Signal + Noise / Noise (10 dB S+N/N) Noise Floor = 3 dB Signal + Noise / Noise (3 dB S+N/N) Noise floor can be measured at any filter bandwidth, CW or SSB, for example, and is bandwidth dependent. ARRL normally only publishes noise floor for a CW bandwidth, typically 500 Hz CW filter.

11 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Transmitter Third Order IMD

12 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Transmitted IMD Collins 32S dB

13 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA FT db

14 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA FT-1000 Mk V in Class A -42 dB

15 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Mk V Class A Linear Amplifier -40db

16 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Close-in Signals and Splatter IF Filter vs. Adjacent Signal and IMD Splatter 5 KHz -45 dB, 7 th Order

17 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Close-in Signals and Splatter Reduce your power -30 dB -42 dB

18 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Close-in Signals and Splatter Some transceivers, in addition to normal IMD products, produce additional ALC-Induced splatter. On CW the ALC can cause leading-edge key clicks. Some modern rigs splatter more if the ALC is more than “tickled”, or induce clicks on CW.

19 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Conclusions DX’ers need a good receiver for SSB and even better for CW High Dynamic Range Receiver Good Speech Processor on SSB But Your Brain Can Get “Fried” due to operator fatigue. Bad audio can be a factor in that fatigue.

20 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Antenna Considerations

21 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Antenna Considerations "All I'm totally certain of is that any antenna is better than no antenna and the antenna should preferably erected as high and be as long as is possible or desirable".

22 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA The Hard Stuff where: h ant is the height at the receiving antenna, a e is the earth’s radius, the distances G and G b are functions of the angle T between the local horizon and the direction to the wave source point at height h i in the ionosphere. Matching a Antenna to the propagation path

23 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Arrival Angles

24 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA How High? Horizontal polarization (PHV = 20), earth ground, T = 5°, roughness is 3 m

25 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Optimum Height Height gain for horizontal polarization in the 20 m band

26 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Multiband Considerations Optimum antenna heights over even terrain for various frequencies

27 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Signal?

28 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Reflection Loss Reflection coefficient with surface roughness, 20 m band

29 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Arrival Angles vs. Distance Hop distances, with the 3, 4, and 5 hop points marked for a 10,000 km path

30 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Path Loss vs. Arrival Angle

31 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Practical antennas SMALL SIZE (in terms of wavelength) HIGH EFFICIENCY BROADBAND Choose only 2

32 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Radiation Angles 1/4 ʎ

33 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Radiation Angles 3/8 ʎ 1/2 ʎ

34 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Radiation Angles 5/8 ʎ 3/4 ʎ

35 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Radiation Angles 7/8 ʎ 1 ʎ

36 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Radiation Angles 1½ ʎ 2 ʎ

37 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Radiation Angles 2½ ʎ 3 ʎ

38 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA Discussion

39 © 2011, Utah DX Association, All rights reserved UDXA