River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results End State and Final Closure Jeff A Lerch Manager, Long Term Stewardship June 1 and 2, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Advertisements

E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
The decision box represents key management decisions and serve as the GATES which delineate phases. The decision can be to proceed, exit, or recycle. More.
REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF POST-CLOSURE CARE INNOVATION Mr. Charles G. Johnson Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Hazardous Material and.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF DOE POLICY -- USE OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS COLLEEN OSTROWSKI (202)
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
1 DOE Annual Review -June 15,2005 An Overview of Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) U. S. ILC Civil studies and cost issues for Snowmass Fred.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Hanford Site: Long-term Stewardship Boyd Hathaway Realty Officer Department of Energy – Richland Operations Office Hanford Long-Term Stewardship (LTS)
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
Framework for the Service Acquisition Process Conduct Historical Analysis Define Stakeholder & Customer Needs 2. Review Current Strategy 3. Market Research.
ToR of GEOSAF2 WG on Operational Safety Review of WG2.
Volker Michelfelder Planning Section Head. Outline Geographical Area What are management plans for protected area? Framework for management plans Planning.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
Manage Project Procurement Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit Code BSBPMG509A.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
1 International Working Forum on Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Technical Meeting Amel MELLOUK – ASN / DRC Jérémie VALLET – MEDDE/MSNR Regulatory.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
The Evolution of Long-Term Stewardship at Hanford Rick Moren MSA Director of Long-Term Stewardship Mission Support Alliance.
Segment SCD 4.3 Module SCD 4: Safety Case Segment SCD 4.3 Documentation and use of the safety case.
1 PROJECT EVALUATION IT’S ALL ABOUT STUDENTS. 2 In partnership, we help America’s students stay in school and graduate by: Reducing gaps in college access.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ESTABLISHING THE SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IAEA WORKSHOP ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT.
Michael Webster (Cameco Corporation) Tamara Yankovich (IAEA, Formerly Saskatchewan Research Council) Martin Klukas (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited) IAEA.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
Project Management Processes for a Project
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Medication, Treatment, Evaluation, and Management MedTEAM An Evidence-Based Practice.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Integrating EM QA Performance Metrics with Performance Analysis Processes August 26, 2009 Robert Hinds, Manager, Quality Assurance Engineering & Greg Peterson,
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results End State and Final Closure Jeff A Lerch Manager, Long Term Stewardship June 1 and 2, 2006.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Nuclear Research and consultancy Group European Radiation Survey Site Execution Manual Leo van Velzen ENVIRONET Kick-off meeting Vienna 23 – 26 November.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Working Group 3 Murmansk. SC structure – Assessment context has to be more elaborate and detailed – Optimization. Provide justification based on the document.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Program and Quality.
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
River Corridor Closure Project 1 Safety Teamwork Disciplined Operations Integrity River Corridor Closure Project Safety Teamwork Disciplined Operations.
February 26 – March 1, 2012 ♦ Phoenix, Arizona Session # 90 Long–Term Stewardship at DOE’s Hanford Site Abstract #12575 Authors & Affiliation : Rick Moren:
Module 4 Presented by Strumpf Associates on Behalf of the WDB February 19, 2016.
Strategy Framework & Work Plan Strategy Framework Updated document.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Successfully Managing Customer Expectations Change is expected to occur during the life of any project, but this change must be controlled and managed.
Long-Term Stewardship: Institutional Controls on Department of Energy Sites Steve Schiesswohl, Senior Realty Officer November 2006.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
An Overview on Risk Management
How To Apply Quality Management
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Surveillance. Public Health Approach Surveillance What is the Problem ? Problem Risk Factor Identification : What Is the Cause ? Intervention Evaluation.
Raytheon Parts Management
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
PSS verification and validation
HSE Requirements for Pipeline Operations GROUP HSE GROUPE (CR-GR-HSE-414) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule defines the minimum HSE requirements related to the.
Presentation transcript:

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results End State and Final Closure Jeff A Lerch Manager, Long Term Stewardship June 1 and 2, 2006

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _2 Major Scope Elements Orphan Site Evaluations Remedial Action Reports Long Term Stewardship Plan Independent Closure Reviews Data Management Systems

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _3 Orphan Sites Evaluations Orphan Site: Manmade features, items, or activity areas within the River Corridor that 1) meet the TPA MP- 14 criteria for waste site identification, 2) are not identified for characterization or cleanup within the regulatory framework (e.g., RODs and work plans) Orphan Site Evaluation: A systematic approach involving historical review and field walkdown activities to identify new source unit waste sites within the River Corridor that are not identified for characterization or cleanup within the regulatory framework (e.g., RODs and work plans). Results of each orphan site evaluation are presented in a summary report (contract deliverable C.2.10) including a description of the process and a listing of identified orphan sites.

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _4 Orphan Sites Evaluations (continued) Evaluations conducted for each Reactor/Operational Area and Inter Areas –Historical review –Field walkdown –Gap analysis –Historical/Field integration –Summary report Upland Inter Areas includes flight survey subtask

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _5 Orphan Sites Evaluations (continued) Reactor/Operational area evaluations sequenced based on anticipated field remediation schedule –100-D, 100-IU, 100-H, 100-K, 100-N, 300-FF-2, 400 Area Upland Inter areas scheduled to begin 2008 Evaluations complete for 100-B/C, 300-FF-1, 100-F

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _6 Remedial Action Reports Documents completion of remedial actions established in ROD –Chronology –Construction (remedial action) summary –Performance Standards –O&M/Institutional controls –Cost summary Does not include “No Further Action” determination Required for each OU – 14 total (deliverable C ) Sequenced based on anticipated field remediation schedule Report enhancement planned to support final cleanup decision strategy

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _7 Long-Term Stewardship Plans Criteria to be met for long-term stewardship and a proposed Finding of Suitability to Transfer in accordance with CERCLA Section 120(h) Identifies criteria to ensure land use consistent with exposure scenarios following remedial action –Record keeping and information management –Monitoring and surveillance –Access control and postings Does not establish cleanup objectives or exposure scenarios

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _8 Long-Term Stewardship Plans Draft Plan – October 2007 (deliverable C ) Final Plan – 90 days before completion of contract requirements (deliverable C ) –DOE approval is a condition precedent to completion of contract requirements

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _9 Independent Closure Review Conduct closure review with independent experts to assure implemented remedies meet ROD requirements and that No Further Action Is Needed to Protect Human Health and the Environment Separate reviews for 100 Area & 300 Area Scheduled near anticipated contract end (~2012) Pilot Closure review planned in mid-2007 –100-B/C likely choice

River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results E _10 Data Management Systems Overlies all WCH field projects Supports internal and external database tools –GIS, SDT, ENRE, risk assessment –HEIS, WIDS Key long-term stewardship deliverable elements