Who Does What Susan Handy TTP282 October 2009. Players Government Industry Citizens/ Consumers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Discrimination Environmental Justice Limited English Proficiency Fiscal Year
Advertisements

Danville Area Transportation Study. Fundamentals of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Adam Aull Danville Area Transportation Study MPO ASCE Presentation.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Proposed Transportation Funding Policy Changes Fairfax County Department of Transportation March.
Title VI and Fares March 18, 2013 Jonathan Ocana Equal Opportunity Specialist.
Overview of Title VI and Environmental Justice. n Title VI Legislation and Regulations n Current Transportation Laws n Environmental Justice Executive.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
FINANCIAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT FOR FTIPS AND FSTIP FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 17, 2012 Wade Hobbs,
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY(CMAQ) 1.  FY2013 = $9.8 million for NE  New CMAQ Guidance, November 12, 2013  Purpose of the CMAQ Program is to.
The Metropolitan Transportation System – Who’s Responsible for What TTP282 Orientation Seminar S. Handy 10/10/08.
Environmental Justice: Principles, Policies, Guidance, and Effective Practices FTA Region VI Civil Rights Colloquium March 29, 2006.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
11/24/08ESPP-781 How should environmental risks and benefits be distributed? From questions of which nature to for whose benefit (or harm) Two kinds of.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
Doug Brown October 23, Budget Overview A Budget Planning Process (Overland Park’s) Financial Management.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
Highway Program Financing July Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment.
High Performing Communities. Goal To develop a program or legislation to assist communities across America in a transformation into – low-carbon producing.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
TRENDS AND HIGHWAY CLASSIFICATIONS Spring Examples of highway design problems
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Environmental Justice Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Title VI and Environmental Justice: The Planning Process Responds Broward MPO Fort Lauderdale, FL March 20, 2012.
UNDERSTANDING TITLE VI RESPONSIBILITIES AND PITFALLS November 16, 2005.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
A MBER O NTIVEROS (O NTIVEROS & A SSOCIATES ) E THAN C ONNER -R OSS (E CONSULT S OLUTIONS ) July 13, 2015 Title VI Implications of State of Good Repair.
INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Steve Baumann Financial Specialist (503) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer) Mike.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Title VI Program Overview Benjamin Limmer Valley Metro Corridor & Facility Development Manager Phoenix, AZ.
Civil Rights and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) GAMPO Georgia Association of MPO’s November 30, 2010 Presented by Michael G. Cooper, Director.
May 21, 2008 Bringing Transit Planning to the MPO Planning Table Bringing Transit Planning To The MPO Planning Table Daniel Rudge.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
©2011 Cengage Learning. Chapter 15 ©2011 Cengage Learning REQUIRED GOVERNMENT REPORTS.
AASHTO ANNUAL MEETING STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANNING BILOXI, MS OCTOBER 30, 2010 Potential Changes to STAA Planning Process and Performance Measurement.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
EJ in Canada. Different histories produce different patterns of environmental inequality and injustice.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
Transportation Project Process: From Concept to Completion Kate Daniel, TPO Staff October 8, 2015.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
ACEC-ODOT Conference Monday, March 6, Project Funding Federal Funds State Funds Summary.
House Transportation Policy and Finance April 13, 2016 Tracy Hatch Deputy Commissioner Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Fiscal Year Draft Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Final Phase Public Hearing June 18, 2007.
Role of Environmental Justice in Land Use Planning Shankar B. Prasad, M.B.B.S. Community Health Advisor California Air Resources Board May 11, 2001 Statewide.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Environmental Justice Presented to the Government-wide Transportation Policy Council Lisa D. Quiveors Chair, Federal Environmental Justice Interagency.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Financial Planning and Fiscal Constraint Requirement MAG Regional Council February 24, 2010.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Title VI Program Overview
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
An Overview Title VI Applicability Public Outreach Fare Policy
HRTPO Draft Public Participation Plan & Title VI & LEP Plan Update
Presentation transcript:

Who Does What Susan Handy TTP282 October 2009

Players Government Industry Citizens/ Consumers

Players Government Industry Citizens/ Consumers Highways Transit Ports Airports etc. Railroads Vehicles Trucking Taxis/shuttles etc.

Government Levels Federal State Local, i.e. City, County And… special agencies –MPOs –Transit agencies –Port authorities –etc. Mechanisms Regulate Tax Build Operate Allocate

LevelAgenciesPrimary concern Roles FederalFHWA FTA National Highway System Policies – planning process Funding – highways, transit, other Programs – e.g. bikes and peds, livable communities, etc. StateDOTHighways outside metro areas Policies – State Transportation Plan, TIP Funding – federal match, state programs Implementation – construction, maintenance RegionalMPO Transit Highways, transit within metro areas Policies – Regional Transportation Plan, TIP Funding – local sales tax Implementation – transit system and operations LocalPlanning Public Works Local streets Policies – General Plan, capital improvements Funding – general revenues, special taxes Implementation – construction, maintenance collects & distributes $$$; regulates

SAFETEA-LU: Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act – a Legacy for Users Multi-year authorization bill that sets: –Funding by category –Planning requirements Bill does NOT select actual projects… –With exception of “earmarks”

TitleProgramSAFETEA-LU Title IInterstate Maintenance 25,201,5959.9% National Highway System 30,541, % Bridge Program 21,607,4418.5% Surface Transpn Program 32,599, % CMAQ 8,609,1003.4% High Priority Projects 14,832,0005.8% MG/Bonus Equity 40,895, % Other Highway Programs 25,203,2009.9% Title IIHighway Safety 3,131,5921.2% Title IIIFormula Grants 34,476, % Capital Grants 9,890,3643.9% Other Transit Programs 946,5540.4% Titles IV-XMisc. Programs 7,595,0353.0% Total 255,530,104

Other Federal Legislation Clean Air Act Energy Policy Conservation Act National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Justice

Primary Air Quality Standards for Transportation-related Pollutant PollutantType of AverageConcentration CO 8-hour 1-hour 9 ppm (10mg/m 3 ) 35 ppm (40 mg/m 3 ) O3O3 8-hour 1-hour 0.08 ppm (157 mg/m 3 ) 0.12 ppm (235mg/m 3 ) PM 2.5 Annual 24-hour 15 ug/m 3 65 ug/m 3 PM 10 Annual 24-hour 50 ug/m ug/m 3 ppm = parts per million mg/m 3 = milligrams per meter cubed ug/m 3 = micrograms per meter cubed Source:

Classified 1-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Areas Source:

Percentage of Change in Motor Vehicle Emissions Related to Demographics and Transportation ( ) Source:

Source:

NEPA Requires federal agencies to integrate environmental values into their decision making processes by considering the environmental impacts of their proposed actions and reasonable alternatives to those actions. To meet requirements, federal agencies prepare a detailed statement known as an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

Grand Prairie example… “By careful attention to design and detail, the facility would blend into the urban backdrop against which it is viewed…” – SH161 EIS

Source: "No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." - Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 "Each Federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations." - Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 1994

WHAT IS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE? There are three fundamental environmental justice principles: To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority populations and low-income populations. To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process. To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations. Source:

LevelAgenciesPrimary concern Roles FederalFHWA FTA National Highway System Policies – planning process Funding – highways, transit, other Programs – e.g. bikes and peds, livable communities, etc. StateDOTHighways, outside metro areas Policies – State Transportation Plan, TIP Funding – federal match, state programs Implementation – construction, maintenance RegionalMPO Transit Highways, transit within metro areas Policies – Regional Transportation Plan, TIP Funding – local sales tax Implementation – transit system and operations LocalPlanning Public Works Local streets Policies – General Plan, capital improvements Funding – general revenues, special taxes Implementation – construction, maintenance Builds & operates highways

LevelAgenciesPrimary concern Roles FederalFHWA FTA National Highway System Policies – planning process Funding – highways, transit, other Programs – e.g. bikes and peds, livable communities, etc. StateDOTHighways outside metro areas Policies – State Transportation Plan, TIP Funding – federal match, state programs Implementation – construction, maintenance RegionalMPO Transit Highways, transit within metro areas Policies – Regional Transportation Plan, TIP Funding – local sales tax Implementation – transit system and operations LocalPlanning Public Works Local streets Policies – General Plan, capital improvements Funding – general revenues, special taxes Implementation – construction, maintenance Planning & programming

Long-Range Plans Scope: 20 years or more Timing: updated every 4 years (or 5) Planning factors Public involvement Fiscal realism Coordination with other plans Certification of planning activities

Source:

Baseline…

“No Build”…

“Build”…

LevelAgenciesPrimary concern Roles FederalFHWA FTA National Highway System Policies – planning process Funding – highways, transit, other Programs – e.g. bikes and peds, livable communities, etc. StateDOTHighways outside metro areas Policies – State Transportation Plan, TIP Funding – federal match, state programs Implementation – construction, maintenance RegionalMPO Transit Highways, transit within metro areas Policies – Regional Transportation Plan, TIP Funding – local sales tax Implementation – transit system and operations LocalPlanning Public Works Local streets Policies – General Plan, capital improvements Funding – general revenues, special taxes Implementation – construction, maintenance Build & maintain local streets

National Committee on Urban Transportation, 1958

Source:

LevelTransportation Agencies Land Use Agencies FederalFHWA FTA none StateDOTnone RegionalMPO Transit none LocalPlanning Public Works (City and County) Planning (City and County) Transportation vs. Land Use Planning

Next up: Michael Zhang on Traffic Control