April 2006 Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process April 25, 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

1 INAC First Nation Education Policy Framework Regional Dialogues Coordinated by AFN and INAC Education Policy Framework - Joint Steering Committee (EPF-JSC)
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Improvements to Project Development and Program Management of New Starts Projects FY 2008 Proposed Effective April 30, 2006.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
40 CFR REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS OF NEPA Legislative vs. Discretionary Timelines - Agency Requirements for Implementing.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
Scoping in the EIA process Proposal Identification Screening
MSRA Environmental Review Requirement. Section 107 Requirements Revise and Update Procedures Consult with CEQ and Councils, involve public Sole environmental.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 6,
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Eric J. Tomasi – Project Manager Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Northeast Energy.
FERC & Hydrokinetic Projects Ocean Energy for New England Conference Hosted by the Marine Renewable Energy Center at the Advanced Technology and Manufacturing.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Agenda Item 14 Consideration of Streamlining Grant Processes to Enhance Program Efficiency January 17, 2006.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Page 1 Internal Audit Outsourcing The Moss Adams Approach to Internal Audit Outsourcing Proposed SOX 404 Changes.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
Marine Spatial Planning for Wave Energy Development in Oregon Kate Sherman, M.S. Candidate Marine Resource Management College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
0 Technical Study Implementation Potential Disagreements Content of Progress Report Request for Modification to Approved Studies Request for New Study.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 8, 2010.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
GKRSE law offices of GKRSE 1 Federal Regulatory Issues Affecting the Development of Hydro in the Northeast Nancy J. Skancke Law Offices of GKRSE Washington,
FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Hydroelectric Licensing Regulations Final Rule July 23, 2003 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
1.What is the standard relicensing process in the U.S. and what is the ALP (Alternative Licensing Process) ? 2.How did we convince FERC to agree to an.
MIG 2 - Water Quality and Quantity Study Plan Review April 2, 2008.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Shasta County Board of Supervisors March 4, 2008.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Richard Hoffmann, Director Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Policies Affecting.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 4, 2010 Handout #3.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Middle Fork Project Existing Resource Information Reports July 18, 2006.
Regulatory Streamlining Task Force Update Discussion Item December 6, 2011 Board of County Commissioners.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
LNG Permitting: You Want it When? Lauren H. O’Donnell Deputy Director, DG2E Office of Energy Projects.
Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration Meeting February 4-5, 2010 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
System Planning To Programming
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

April 2006 Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process April 25,

1 April 2006 Environmental Review Process Under FERC Jurisdiction Environmental Review Process Under FERC Jurisdiction Requires Specific Consultation Activities Requires Specific Consultation Activities Evaluates Effects of On-Going Operations and Maintenance of the Project Evaluates Effects of On-Going Operations and Maintenance of the Project Establishes New License Term and Conditions Establishes New License Term and Conditions Relicensing Process

2 April 2006 Relicensing Process - History Integrated Licensing Process (ILP) Alternative Licensing Process (ALP) Hybrid/Enhanced Traditional Process Traditional Licensing Process (TLP)

3 April 2006 USFS 4(e) Conditions License Application SWRCB 401 Certification USFWS Biological Opinion FERC Section 106 Agreement Document FERC EA/EIS USFWS/ CDFG 10(j) New License Conditions Proposed PM&E Measures Relicensing Related Processes

4 April 2006 Developed to Streamline the Licensing Process by Providing a Predictable, Efficient and Timely Process Developed to Streamline the Licensing Process by Providing a Predictable, Efficient and Timely Process Default Process as of July 23, 2005 Default Process as of July 23, 2005 Integrated Licensing Process (ILP)

5 April 2006 Process Efficiencies Achieved by: Early Issue Identification and Resolution of Studies (Minimizes Post-Filing Studies) Early Issue Identification and Resolution of Studies (Minimizes Post-Filing Studies) Integration of Agency and Tribal Permitting Process Integration of Agency and Tribal Permitting Process Established Timeframe to Complete Process Steps for all Parties Established Timeframe to Complete Process Steps for all Parties Integrated Licensing Process (ILP)

6 April 2006 Key Activities: Filing of Notice of Intent (NOI) and Pre-Application Document (PAD) Filing of Notice of Intent (NOI) and Pre-Application Document (PAD) Development of Study Plans Development of Study Plans Implementation of Study Plans Implementation of Study Plans Development of Preliminary Licensing Proposal (PLP) Development of Preliminary Licensing Proposal (PLP) Submittal of Final Application Submittal of Final Application Integrated Licensing Process Pre-Filing Activities

7 April 2006 Key Activities: Notice of FERC Ready for Environmental Analysis (REA) Notice of FERC Ready for Environmental Analysis (REA) Submittal of Recommendations and Preliminary Terms and Conditions Submittal of Recommendations and Preliminary Terms and Conditions Distribution of FERC Draft NEPA Document Distribution of FERC Draft NEPA Document Submittal of Modified Term and Conditions Submittal of Modified Term and Conditions Distribution of FERC Final NEPA Document Distribution of FERC Final NEPA Document Issuance of New License Order Issuance of New License Order Integrated Licensing Process Post-Filing Activities

8 April 2006 Early Steps Pre-Application Document (PAD) Development Pre-Application Document (PAD) Development Study Plan Development Study Plan Development FERC Scoping FERC Scoping Integrated Licensing Process Pre-Filing Activities

9 April 2006 Project Description Project Description River Basin Description River Basin Description Description of Existing Environment and any Known Resource Impacts Description of Existing Environment and any Known Resource Impacts Preliminary List of Issues and Proposed Studies Preliminary List of Issues and Proposed Studies List of Relevant Comprehensive Plans List of Relevant Comprehensive Plans Process Plan and Schedule Process Plan and Schedule Summary of Contacts Summary of Contacts Integrated Licensing Process Content of PAD

10 April 2006 Cornerstone of the ILP Cornerstone of the ILP  Provides Basis for Identifying Issues, Data Gaps and Study Needs  Forms Foundation of Future Documents  Outlines Schedule for Developing the License Application Integrated Licensing Process Purpose of PAD Integrated Licensing Process Purpose of PAD

11 April 2006 Integrated Licensing Process Early Stakeholder Consultation

12 April 2006 Critical Element of ILP Critical Element of ILP Important to Ensure Timely and Informed Decisions Important to Ensure Timely and Informed Decisions Challenging and Time Consuming Challenging and Time Consuming FERC-Defined Study Criteria FERC-Defined Study Criteria Based on Information Provided in the PAD and During Scoping Based on Information Provided in the PAD and During Scoping Integrated Licensing Process Study Plan Development

13 April 2006 Applicant Includes List of Proposed Studies in PAD Participants File Study Request in Response to FERC’s Scoping Notice Applicant Files Proposed Study Plan Parties Meet to Resolve any Study Disputes Applicant Files Revised Study Plan OEP Director Issues Study Plan Determination Integrated Licensing Process Study Plan Development Process Formal Dispute Process

14 April 2006 Early Collaboration on Study Plan Development Early Collaboration on Study Plan Development  Approved Study Plan in PAD (Sept 2007) Early Implementation of Approved Studies Early Implementation of Approved Studies  Field Studies Initiated (2007)  Majority of Studies Completed ( ) Integrated Licensing Process PCWA’s Proposed Approach

15 April 2006 Early Collaboration on Select License Conditions Early Collaboration on Select License Conditions  Initiate Once Sufficient Information is Available  Tentative Agreement Integrated Licensing Process PCWA’s Proposed Approach

16 April 2006 Sufficient Time to Evaluate Project Impact and Collaborate on New License Conditions Sufficient Time to Evaluate Project Impact and Collaborate on New License Conditions  Initiate Discussion (Early 2009)  Incorporate Tentative Agreements into Preliminary Licensing Proposal (Sept 2010)  Resolution of New License Condition (Feb 2011) Integrated Licensing Process PCWA’s Proposed Approach

17 April 2006 Integrated Licensing Process PCWA’s Proposed Approach