Today’s Agenda  Return and go over Ethics in Journalism exam from last week  Present 1st am. case posters from last week  Revisit Critical Engagement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freedom of Religion – Establishment Clause
Advertisements

Chapter Fifteen Order and Civil Liberties. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved The Bill of Rights The failure to include a.
FCC – Part 4 Law and Policy. Telephone Conversations Station must notify the outside party of its intention to air the conversation before broadcast.
Obscenity Obscenity Defamation Defamation Hate Speech Hate Speech Boundaries of Free Speech.
Freedom of Speech Chapter 37.
Obscenity – is anything that treats sex or nudity in an offensive or lewd manner, violates recognized standards of decency, and lacks serious literary,
Miller and Pacifica: From Obscenity to Indecency November 2, 2004 The beginning of the end or the end of the beginning?
Miller vs. California By tyler bundies. What freedom was uestioned? Is obscenity protected by the first amendment? Does the first amendment give you the.
Freedom of Speech. Purpose for Freedom of Speech: To guarantee to each person a right of Free expression, in the Spoken and the Written word, and by all.
Obscenity. Obscenity: An overview We know it is not protected, but… The problem comes in defining obscenity. What is it? Where is it found? Who should.
1:6 Speech that is not protected by the First Amendment.
Why Allow Dissent? “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and.
Regulating speech How the Net changes attitudes and assumptions, and creates new societal tensions 1 and unintended consequences March 10, 2011Harvard.
Chapter 8 Offenses Against Public Morality. Introduction Many people deal with sexual conduct – fornication and adultery, seduction, incest, bigamy, sodomy,
Freedom Of Speech Government Neutrality: No Free Lunch.
Law & Ethics in Journalism The Rights and Responsibilities of the American Media (the more expurgated version)
1 st Amendment. Freedom of Religion The Establishment Clause – “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion…” – Lemon v. Kurtzman.
Civil Liberties Freedom versus Order. Civil Liberties definition Those personal freedoms that are protected for all individuals and that generally deal.
Obscenity is not protected by the 1 st amendment.
Civil Liberties. The Politics of Civil Liberties Civil liberties: protections the Constitution provides against the abuse of government power State ratifying.
Unit 2 – Ethics & Law. Payola v Plugola - L Payola – Acceptance of money in return for playing songs Plugola – Free promotion of production or service.
Freedom of Expression Laura Lantrip Alina Mihelin.
First Amendment Rights to Free Speech and Press.  Democracy depends on a free exchange of ideas.  Volatile area of constitutional interpretation.
LIBS100 July 20, 2005 First Amendment Library Bill of Rights.
Early Definitions of Obscenity Roth v. United States (1957) - Does the average person, applying contemporary community standards, find the dominant theme.
MEDIA LAW Obscenity – Pornography and Censorship.
Civil Liberties Introduction and First Amendment Forensics September 3,
MILLER VS CALIFORNIA By Justin Lacks. THE ISSUE Marvin Miller worked for a company that dealt with "adult" material In an attempt to advertise their product,
Freedom of Speech. 1 st Amendment The essential, core purpose of the 1 st Amendment is self-governance. It enables people to obtain information from.
Summary of Part V Freedom of Expression Constitutional Law Mr. Morrison Spring 2006.
American Government Chapter 19 Section 3. Freedom of Speech 1 st and 14 th Amendments Guarantees spoken and written word liberty Ensures open discussion.
New York Times v. Sullivan (1963) By: Carmen Vaca.
Freedom of Speech and Press. The Big Idea While the 1st and 14th Amendments gives Americans the right to express ideas freely, the Constitution and the.
1. What are some freedoms that we have in our daily lives as US citizens? 2. Can your freedoms ever be taken away or limited? (explain!)
Roth Decision zThe Roth Decision: worthless and sexually lewd zHarlan dissent: OK to control, but let the states do it zDouglas and Black: 1) Constitution.
“A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what not just government should refuse,
Freedom of the Press Freedom of Assembly, Association, and Petition Unit 6: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, Lesson 2 How has the Supreme Court expanded.
Today’s Agenda  KYCE Presentation & Quiz [GRAHAM]
The first amendment What it is and how it affects American media today.
“Were it left for me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without government, I should not hesitate a moment.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Civil Liberties and Public Policy Chapter 4  1 st Amendment Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry.
CH FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PRESS ADVANCED AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
Constitutional Review The truth your founding fathers never told you!
Freedom of Expression Free Speech Free Press Assembly and Petition.
The First Amendment and Oregon Student Journalists Allison Marks, Adviser THE FOREST Forest Grove High School.
The first amendment What it is and how it affects American journalism.
Obscenity. Defining Obscenity Obscenity = Indecent, Lewd, or Licentious Licentious =Lewd, Lascivious Lascivious =Lewd or Lustful Lewd =Indecent or obscene.
What is Obscenity?. What is your Definition? Are These Obscene?
Chapter Five Civil Liberties. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.5 | 2 The Politics of Civil Liberties Civil liberties: protections.
Civil Liberties Introduction and First Amendment Forensics September 3,
1 ST AMENDMENT; FREE SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF THE PRESS ELIZABETH MANWILL MIA MAY RAMI KHALAF MATT MARTY.
Freedom of Speech and Press 1 st Amendment Forms of (Speech) Expression Spoken Written Symbolic.
1 st Amendment /Speech What are some limits on speech? What are some types/examples of speech that can be punished/made illegal?
iRAT 2iRAT 2  3. Traditional religious ethical systems have tended to be quite _____.  legalistic.
1 st AMENDMENT RIGHTS: SPEECH PRESS RELIGION ASSEMBLY.
LIBS100 March 23, 2005 First Amendment Library Bill of Rights.
Group Three: Lyli, Jerica, Jen, & Chris. → Petitioners: Two Atlanta, Georgia movie theaters. ― Those involved: The movie theaters owners and managers.
Freedom of Speech Press, Assembly, Petition
Intro to the First Amendment
What is Obscenity?.
What is pornography? How is it defined?
Unit 2 Civil Liberties & Civil Rights
What is Obscenity?.
Free Speech and Free Press
Nationalization of Power & Civil Liberties
Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda: DO NOW: Legal or Illegal?
Unit 2 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
Warm Up 1. In what ways does the 1st Amendment limit the government? 2. Which of these are illegal and are not protected by the 1st Amendment? A. Burning.
Freedom of Speech “Freedom of speech and expression is the heart of a democratic society.”
Presentation transcript:

Today’s Agenda  Return and go over Ethics in Journalism exam from last week  Present 1st am. case posters from last week  Revisit Critical Engagement Questions  Freedom of Religion Video: “Football Prayer”  HOMEWORK:  KYCE due Thursday (Alexa)  Any missing assignments? Jake Delhomme is not very good.

First Amendment Cases of Note  Schenck v. United States (1919)  Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)  Terminiello v. Chicago (1949)  New York Times v. United States (1971)  United States v. Eichman (1990)  Cantwell v. State of Connecticut (1940)  Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)  Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Comm. School Dist. (1969)  Roth v. United States (1957)  Stanley v. Georgia (1969)  Miller v. California (1973) *  Jenkins v. Georgia (1974)

Obscenity  One of the most perplexing of all speech-related problems has been the issue of obscenity and what to do about it.  A wide variety of tests have been employed by individual justices to determine what is constitutionally proscribable obscenity, and for long periods of time, no single approach commanded the support of a majority of the Court.  The difficulty of defining obscenity was memorably summarized by Justice Stewart in a concurring opinion when he said: "I know it when I see it."

First Amendment Cases of Note  Schenck v. United States (1919)  Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)  Terminiello v. Chicago (1949)  New York Times v. United States (1971)  United States v. Eichman (1990)  Cantwell v. State of Connecticut (1940)  Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)  Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Comm. School Dist. (1969)  Roth v. United States (1957)  Stanley v. Georgia (1969)  Miller v. California (1973) *  Jenkins v. Georgia (1974)

The "Miller Test" for Obscenity 1. The work in question must depict or describe sexual conduct. 2. The prohibited conduct must be specifically described in the law. 3. The work, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. (the "SLAPS" test) 4. The work, taken as a whole and applying contemporary community standards, must appeal to prurient interest in sex. 5. The work must portray sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, applying contemporary community standards.

Critical Engagement Questions  Are all forms of speech protected?  How is our society shaped by the First Amendment?  Do First Amendment "rules" change depending on the situation?  Have court interpretations of the First Amendment changed over time?  How will new technologies affect the First Amendment?