Doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 1 Proposal for Higher Spatial Reuse Date: 2005-03-16 Authors: Notice: This document.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0300r1 Submission May 2007 Guenael Strutt, MotorolaSlide 1 LB93 Unresolved RFI Comments Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0916r0 Submission September 2005 Slide 1 Adjacent channel interference and its impact on the Mesh MAC Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0247r1 Submission March 2005 Atsushi FujiwaraSlide 1 Advantages of multiple channel usage in 11s WLAN Mesh network Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0787r2 Submission July 2008 Ruijun Feng, China Mobile Table of Neighbor APs Adopting the Same Channel Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0072r0 SubmissionS. Filin H. Harada, NICTSlide 1 Coexistence algorithms Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission January 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Definitions and Terminology Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1528r0 Submission 22 September 2006 Naveen Kakani, Nokia, IncSlide 1 TGn PSMP adhoc Group September Closing Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0197r0 Submission March 2005 Nancy Cam-Winget et alSlide 1 TAP & JIT Merge Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Proposal for Higher Spatial Reuse
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
IEEE WG Opening Report – March 2007
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Beam Ad Hoc Agenda Date: Authors: March 2007 March 2007
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Beam Ad Hoc Agenda Date: Authors: March 2007 March 2007
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions for LB 84 Comment Resolutions
IEEE White Space Radio First Call for Contributions
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 1 Proposal for Higher Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at.

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 2 Issues IEEE802.11s will be based on AP’s using existing standards (IEEE802.11a/b/g) When IEEE802.11s becomes a standard (in 2 years?) the dominant AP’s will most likely use n and/or other smart antenna techniques –Many AP vendors already have products with MIMO –A primary application of IEEE802.11s is residential systems which may include multimedia distribution, a main area of application of n

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 3 Issues (cont.) IEEE802.11s may not work well with n AP’s or AP’s with smart antennas: –Addition of smart antenna AP’s into mesh networks designed without smart antenna considerations can actually degrade performance (Even though the link performance is higher, the network performance can be worse).

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 4 Issues (cont.) The ability to have higher spatial reuse greatly increases the capacity of a mesh network: –Smart antennas can suppress co-channel interference (up to M-1 co-channel interferers with M antennas), allowing for spatial reuse in the adjacent cell –Spatial multiplexing (as proposed for IEEE802.11n) with MIMO permits multiple channels in the same frequency band

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 5 Issues (cont.) The ability to have spatial reuse greatly increases the capacity of a mesh network (cont.): –These techniques can increase the link capacity by a factor of M or more (2, 4, or even 8 times capacity of networks without smart antennas – with 2 or 4 antennas at the AP) –These gains can dwarf the variation of performance of various routing techniques/protocols, but these gains can be lost if IEEE802.11s techniques do not accommodate smart antenna capabilities

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 6 Concerns The functional requirements state that "out of scope" are: – Specification of BSS measurements (e.g., k AP-STA measurements) TGs may use relevant measurements defined in TGk or other groups that are relevant for a WLAN Mesh, but the group does not intend to modify BSS-specific measurements –MAC extension to support the use of dynamic directional antenna. Likely requires high complexity, e.g. TDMA scheduling to know when a neighbor’s antenna is pointed at a node. – Algorithms to steer directional antennas.

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 7 Concerns (Cont.) Specification of BSS measurements (e.g., k AP-STA measurements): –IEEE802.11k (draft) is currently not “antenna aware” –We are working to modify IEEE802.11k to add this feature, not just for mesh networks, as this feature is essential for effective use of smart antennas in any network/system –Smart antennas can be used in current (standard-based) systems. Algorithms to steer directional antennas: –This does not (and should not) be an issue for consideration of smart antennas in IEEE802.11s (and we aren’t proposing this)

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 8 Smart Antenna Types SIGNAL OUTPUT BEAM SELECT SIGNAL BEAMFORMER SIGNAL INTERFERENCE BEAMFORMER WEIGHTS Directional Antenna Adaptive Array

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 9 Concerns (Cont.) Concern: “MAC extension to support the use of dynamic directional antenna - Likely requires high complexity”: –Consideration of smart antennas can be done without significant increase in complexity (particularly, the consideration of adaptive antenna arrays, rather than dynamic directional antennas – adaptive arrays are the main type of smart antenna to be considered for products by AP vendors) –Since interference suppression/spatial reuse can increase capacity so substantially, consideration of these capabilities can permit an IEEE802.11s standard to use less complex routing algorithms/protocols, yet have performance higher than more complex techniques that don’t consider higher frequency reuse with smart antenna capabilities

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 10 Implementation Capabilities that need to be included in a proposal: –Modify frequency assignment techniques to include reusing a frequency (up to M-1 times) if AP’s have M antennas –Modify the inclusion of multiple radio capability to include multiple radios in the same channel

doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission Jack Winters March 2005 Slide 11 Summary Smart antenna techniques need to be considered in IEEE802.11s Smart antenna capabilities can be included in IEEE802.11s without increasing the complexity of the standard