Ahlam A. Saleh Research Librarian Arizona Health Sciences Library University of Arizona.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

"How's our impact?: Developing a survey toolkit to assess how health library services impact on patient care" Alison Weightman July 2008.

Advertisements

Evidence-Based Medicine

Protocol Development.

What do I do with the literature when I’ve found it? Alison Brettle, Lecturer (Information Specialist) School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Salford.

Systematic Reviews Dr Sharon Mickan Centre for Evidence-based Medicine

Introduction to the Joanna Briggs Institute.

A Proposal for Certification of Librarians as Partners in Systematic Reviews Pamela C. Sieving¹, Kay Dickersin², Roberta Scherer 2, & Ann-Margaret Ervin.

Teaching/Learning Strategies to Support Evidence-Based Practice Asoc. prof. Vida Staniuliene Klaipeda State College Dean of Faculty of Health Sciences.

Reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA

An Introduction to Evidence Based Searching Kerry Sullivan, MLIS Health Sciences Librarian November 2010.

Introduction to meta-analysis in Review Manager (RevMan).

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Joan Pollner, RN, BSN, CHPN October 18, 2006.

1 Teaching Cultural Competency: A Review of the Literature Sunita Mutha MD 1,2, Carol Allen MA 1, Cynthia Salinas MD 3, Arnab Mukherjea MPH 4 1 The Network.

Evidenced Based Practice; Systematic Reviews; Critiquing Research

1 Meta-analysis issues Carolyn Mair and Martin Shepperd Brunel University, UK.

Cheryl Miller Ferris State University 2010  Provide physicians an overview of the Nursing Administrator role in relation to patient care services, present.

Critical appraisal Systematic Review กิตติพันธุ์ ฤกษ์เกษม ภาควิชาศัลยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่

Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.

Meta Analysis MAE Course Meta-analysis The statistical combination and analysis of data from separate and independent studies to determine if there.

Systematic Review of the Literature: A Novel Research Approach.

Systematic Reviews Professor Kate O’Donnell. Reviews Reviews (or overviews) are a drawing together of material to make a case. These may, or may not,

Environmental/behavioural interventions aimed at preventing falls in older people with visual impairment: Effectiveness and experiences Fiona Neil Claire.

Systematic Reviews.

Learning Outcomes of the SCPHN Programme & How they Link to Practice.

Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 2 Evidence-Based Nursing: Translating Research Evidence Into Practice.

1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 13 Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice.

Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.

Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 2 Translating Research Evidence Into Nursing Practice: Evidence-Based Nursing.

Finding Relevant Evidence

Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.

Meta-analysis and “statistical aggregation” Dave Thompson Dept. of Biostatistics and Epidemiology College of Public Health, OUHSC Learning to Practice.

Conducting and Interpreting Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses July 12, 2007.

BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.

Background Information Audience Response Systems (ARS) are a technology used in classrooms that consist of an input device controlled by the learner, a.

The Joanna Briggs Institute: A world of evidence at the bedside

Introduction to Systematic Reviews of Disability and Rehabilitation Interventions 3.0.

Christopher Manacci, MSN, ACNP, CCRN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Critical Care Transport Services The Cleveland Clinic Director, ACNP Flight Nursing.

Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.

Review Characteristics This review protocol was prospectively registered with BEME (see flow diagram). Total number of participants involved in the included.

Midday at the Oasis November 19, 2014 Pacific Southwest Region.

Doing a Systematic Review Jo Hunter Linda Atkinson Oxford University Health Care Libraries 1 March 2006 Workshops in Information Skills and Electronic.

Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when and how to do them Andrew Smith Royal Lancaster Infirmary 18 May 2015.

Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.

All health care professionals must understand and use the EBP approach to practice Incorporates expertise of clinician and patient’s values and preferences.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 27 Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-Analysis, Metasynthesis,

Using Research in Evidence-Based Nursing Practice

Evidence-Based Public Health Practice: Using Research and Data to Improve Your Programs Week 2, Part 1: Step 3 of 6--Use the research literature to guide.

` ASystematic review of the effectiveness of nurse coordinated transitioning of care on readmission rates for patients with heart failure Jason T. Slyer.

Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-based Healthcare resources Roger Tritton: Senior Publisher, ProQuest.

Systematic Reviews of Evidence Introduction & Applications AEA 2014 Claire Morgan Senior Research Associate, WestEd.

Week Seven.  The systematic and rigorous integration and synthesis of evidence is a cornerstone of EBP  Impossible to develop “best practice” guidelines,

Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice

JBI MODEL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE

Evidence Synthesis/Systematic Reviews of Eyewitness Accuracy

Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist

Development of Critical Thinking among Health Professions Students: a

A Systematic review of the effectiveness of structured interdisciplinary collaboration for adult home hospice/palliative care patients on patient satisfaction.

Evidence-based Practice What Does it Mean for Nursing?

February 24, 2014 Thomas McGeough Regional Sales Manager

H676 Meta-Analysis Brian Flay WEEK 1 Fall 2016 Thursdays 4-6:50

Evidence-Based Practice

Systematic Review (Advanced_Course_Module_6_Appendix)

Critical Care I hope to continue my career as a nurse in the critical care setting. The Quality and Safety Education in Nursing (QSEN) practice standards.

Interprofessional learning and teaching in evidence-based practice

Systematic Review (Advanced Course: Module 6 Appendix)

Evidence-Based Public Health

Presentation transcript:

Ahlam A. Saleh Research Librarian Arizona Health Sciences Library University of Arizona

Who: Nursing professionals, nursing students, information professionals What: Joanna Briggs Institute Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Programme Where: Various locations When: Annual Duration: 5 days Instructors: 2 (Nursing Faculty)

70 globally 1.USA Dallas (ESG) 2.USA Indiana (JBC) 3.USA Louisiana (JBC) 4.USA Oklahoma (JBC) 5.USA Texas (JBC) 6.USA San Francisco (JBC) 7.UCSF Medical Center (EIG) 3

Established in 1996 International not-for-profit based at the University of Adelaide, South Australia “promote and support the synthesis, transfer and utilization of evidence through identifying feasible, appropriate, meaningful and effective healthcare practices to assist in the improvement of healthcare outcomes globally” Retrieved from: 4

JBI Process Quantitative and qualitative synthesis Lecture & hands-on activities ◦ Develop and present protocol ◦ Learn to use JBI specific software 5

Day 1 ◦ Intro to JBI & SRs; question, search strategy, CReMS software Day 2 ◦ Quantitative reviews; critical appraisal Day 3 ◦ Meta-analysis; forest plots; data extraction, MAStARI software Day 4 ◦ Qualitative reviews; critical appraisal, meta-synthesis, QARI trial software Day 5 ◦ More qualitative evidence; protocol presentations & feedback 6

Two librarian attendees Shared expertise with nursing attendees ◦ Database selection and search strategy consultation ◦ Feedback during protocol presentations 7

8

Protocol draft JBI reviewer certification Established new collaborations Librarian expertise awareness 9

Who: Personnel in healthcare decision-making, industry, academic research, graduate training What: Training Program in Meta-Analysis Where: University of Arizona, Center for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ When: Annual Duration: 3 days Instructors: 5 (Pharmacy, Nursing, and Library Science Faculty)

Meta-analysis (MA) Overall process: protocol development, literature search, study selection, data extraction, performing and interpreting meta-analysis Lecture & hands-on activities 11

12

Day 1 ◦ Protocol outline, question, criteria, screening and extraction forms, literature search Day 2 ◦ Study selection, data extraction, estimates of effect and variability, fixed and random effects models, heterogeneity Day 3 ◦ Evaluating meta-analyses, assessing risk of bias, examining bias, MA of diagnostic accuracy, subgroup analysis, meta- regression, conceptual and methodological issues in MA 13

14

15

16

Enhanced understanding meta-analysis methods Enriched team relationship Established new collaborations

Arizona Health Sciences Library JBI Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Programme, 2014, Indiana Center for Evidence Based Nursing Practice Training Program in Meta-analysis, 2014, Center for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona