Developing an On-Line Training Program in Research Administration Stacy Miller Sr. Grant and Contract Officer NCURA Regional 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Advertisements

Broadening Participation… The Role of Underrepresented and Underserved Students and Faculty Roosevelt Y. Johnson, Ph.D. Program Director Division of Research.
Insert local logo here. Insert name Contact information.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Research Administration Capacity Building in an Established Institution Presenter: M.M.Aboud, MD Director of Research and Publications, MUHAS.
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
NCURA Region VI & VII 2009 Spring Meeting Re-launching a Sponsored Research Office John Carfora, Executive Director Joseph McNicholas, Director of Pre-
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Office of Grants and Sponsored Programs Faculty Orientation.
NCETM AIM - to facilitate, enhance and provide leadership for all aspects of mathematics CPD for teachers in schools (primary and secondary) and colleges.
Leading to excellence Comprehensive Equity at Ohio State: What have we learned? Joan M. Herbers Principal Investigator ceos.osu.edu 1.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
Expanding the role of the DRA: Moving from and Island culture to a global community Leadership Project NCURA Region VI & VII 2010 Spring Meeting April.
MTIP: Michigan Technology Implementation Project: Western Michigan Technology Conference April 19, 2002.
Staff Compensation Program Update
Glenda McAlister Kimberly Long
External Quality Assessments
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Connecting Community College Students to Completion: Engagement, Commitment & Institutional Planning Presented in Partnership by: Phi Theta Kappa & The.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Welcome to LC W University Parkway. Our Staff Director Summer Valente Academic Service- Learning Director Jonathan Westover Program Coordinator.
ULR COORDINATORS: TIA COUTROUPIS MONIQUE DEBI DAWN EDWARDS Union Learning Representative 1 Draft 1.
Options for researching the library’s impact on early literacy skill development Research designs for investigating cause and effect relationships: Experimental.
Southern Oregon Educational Service District Supporting School Leadership Oregon Leadership Network April 9, 2008 Kathy McCollum Barry Vitcov.
Engage and Excel! Strengthening Your FRYSC Advisory Council to Enhance Center Success.
University Development Office. Questions What is the mission of a University development office? What are the prerequisites for a successful development.
About ACTE ACTE provides leadership and resources for developing an educated, prepared and competitive workforce  Largest national education association.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Quality Improvement Project March Now Future.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
Department of Grants and District Initiatives 1 San Antonio Independent School District Department of Grants and District Initiatives The purpose of the.
Who are we? And what is it that we do? LCC--Business Department Advisory Committee.
Staff Development Entitlement Subcommittee Final Report FY11 Mobile County Public School System.
PARTNERSHIP FOR STUDENT SUCCESS AT SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE Overview and Two Models.
Source: McKinsey Report Improvement Journey Poor to FairFair to GoodGood to GreatGreat to Excellent ThemeAchieving the basics of literacy and numeracy.
CSBS Faculty Workshop: The Proposal Process CSBS: FRANCES SOLANO ORSP: STEFANIE FRIESEN 9/16/15 1.
Billy Gellepis Administrative Services Associate NCURA Region VI Meeting Waikoloa, HI – April 2012 Developing an OPEN HOUSE Collaboration Between Principal.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Introduction to The Grant Center Fitchburg State University.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Renovating the Sponsored Research and Funds Administration Website “Stepping Into Our Tomorrow” Lesa DeVance-Mitchell Sr. Grant & Contract Officer Cedars-Sinai.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
FMDG FMDG at Virginia Tech: A Synergestic Approach Virginia Tech Facilities Managers' Development Group : A Synergistic Approach Dawn Maxey, Facilities.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.
Building an Institutional Capacity for Federal Contracting Activity Matthew Kirk, MS, CRA Sr. Grant & Contract Officer Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Spring,
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
The Ins and Outs of PI Transfers A departmental administration perspective on faculty moves between institutions Jennifer Cory & Tim Reuter.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF BUSINESS AFFAIRS Approved by the Vice President for Business Affairs: December 2,  Provide students.
REBECCA COYLE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION CONFERENCE MARCH 31, 2011 AMERICAN IMMUNIZATION REGISTRY ASSOCIATION.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
HR Research Mary O’Regan. HR Research Mary O’Regan Laura McSweeney Tracy Eagles.
Organizational Structure Why is this important? Where do we fit in? Who is responsible for what?
“Are We Ready? ” Research Administration Day 2016 Research Services Office Together we make it happen Research Administration Day June 1, 2016 “Are we.
Making Cross-campus, Inter-institutional Collaborations Work
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development
Online Teaching Conference
Cross Training Pre/Post Award Shared Service Model
Research Development Office
Managing Your Electronic World in Research Administration
Topics Introduction to Research Development
Research Administration Taskforce: Improving Relations and Procedures
Faculty and Staff Research Support
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
Presentation transcript:

Developing an On-Line Training Program in Research Administration Stacy Miller Sr. Grant and Contract Officer NCURA Regional 2011

Personal Observation T here is a historical belief that formal training in research administration is not necessary for researchers and/or research administrators. The organization hires experienced researchers, research administrators and central office grant officers. The culture of the organization dictates that education should not be required which gave rise to periodic confusion, researchers and administrators alike attempt to process proposals based upon prior experience from previous organizations. Change has occurred…CSMC is launching a self paced on-line training program is based upon staff and management input along with new leadership, resulting in identifying this educational opportunity. Spring 2011

LEAD ME Personal Best Project Journal Educational project was identified “Lost in the minutia” Institutional awareness - need for educational tools Parallel request for a volunteer to develop an institutional on-line training Process includes:  Ongoing regular meetings with the Operations Manager on developing a training program  Continual collaboration with Grants and Contracts Manager, SRFA Director and colleagues  Review of external training materials and resources  Collaborate with and visit Stanford University Process continues…..

Educational GAPS : RESEARCHERS/PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Increased number of new investigators joining Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Increased number of investigators independently completing proposal applications RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS Existing Research Administrators with varied skill set Increase in the number of new Department Research Administrators Frequent miscommunication between central office and the departments CENTRAL OFFICE Central office experiencing an increase in assistance to the department Increase in proposal errors caused by departmental administrators not familiar with their role Frequent miscommunication between central office and the departments

Opportunities/Challenges: Expand Medical Center vision to include “Excellence in Research” Efficiency and improvement in Research Administration Personal responsibility for future education Individual opportunity for advancement Develop a “homegrown” program

Plan of Action: 1. Evaluate the ROG survey results 2. Identify subjects for immediate development 3. Review other intranet-based self paced training programs 4. Investigate program developers and compare providers 5. Guidance from Stanford University 6. Develop a series of self paced Research Administration Training modules that are knowledge-based 7. Introduction to the research community “quest for a logo” 8. Finalize top three modules 9. Test modules, test process, test the quizzes 10. Develop the certification system 11. Evaluation prior to launch

The Stakeholders:  Sponsored Research and Fund Administration Director, Management and Professional Staff  Vice President for Research  Vice President for Academic Affairs  Research Institute  Principal Investigators  All Department Research Administrators  Colleagues and Partners

Wrap-up Any Questions?