ISE4 Alternate Demo Scenario Incorporates suggestions B. Kassel, S. Gordon, & B. Gischner with input from: T. Briggs and S. Moore May 23, 2005

ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal2 Revised Arrangements Demo Scenario Initial ASSET Arrangement + Requirements (LEAPS) Build Yards Design Agent AP 216 Hull Initial Arrangement Complete Arrangement + Equipment Vulnerability Analysis (LEAPS) Vulnerability Report Engineering Analysis Steel Processing

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal3 ISE4 Revised Future Ship Acquisition Demo Scenario Mission Requirements and Initial Arrangements provided by the Navy via ASSET –TWR 841 will be used as input TWR 841 Model Captured in FORAN to be treated as Concept Design –Send AP216 file to Navy (ASSET) for Analysis ASSET will pose new mission requirements and generates an initial Arrangement (AP215 Model) –List of Compartments with Requirements plus possibly some minimal Geometry Arrangement returned to Design Agent (FORAN) which sets up compartmentation and generates updated AP215 file (Part 21) Demonstrate Initial Electrical System design (KSSI) –Electronic System in Pilot House Navy selects Diesel Engine which fulfills base requirements and incorporates into ship contract

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal4 ISE4 Revised Future Ship Acquisition Demo Scenario cont’d. Two build yards (CAD Systems: ISDP and TRIBON) will be doing a collaborative design and are awarded a preliminary/detailed design contract –TRIBON will design Topside –ISDP will design below Decks Shipyards add Diesel to CPC Catalog and receive AP203 file Arrangements Model is transferred to TRIBON (P28) via AP215 exchange –Transfer requires Mediators between Part 28 and Part 21 files Designs are created in ISDP, and TRIBON –Arrangements transferred via AP218 to LEAPS and COMMANDS for Analysis –COMMANDS creates mesh and sends to Analysis tools (e.g. PATRAN, ABACUS) –FEM Analysis performed on revised model of Engine Room –Analysis report generated Design Agent sends Arrangements Model to LEAPS for Vulnerability Analysis

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal5 ISE4 Revised Future Ship Acquisition Demo Scenario cont’d. Extract Structure for Manufacturing (Intergraph) Develop neutral structural manufacturing model (ISPE) Generate yard-specific manufacturing data (EB, Avondale) –Compare EB and Avondale manufacturing outputs Ship check existing TWR design –Provide scanned shots of Engine Room from Ship Check Data Capture Project –Emphasize synergy between these NSRP funded projects, even though Demo is separate and not part of Ship Check Data Capture

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal6 Concept Design (ASSET/LEAPS) Preliminary Design (FORAN) Collaborative Detailed Design (ISDP) (TRIBON) (Electrical – KSSI) Production (Steel Processing) Operations & Maintenance (Ship Check Results) Navy Analysis (LEAPS) Engineering Analysis (COMMANDS) Flowchart of Revised New Design Demo Scenario

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal7 ISE4 Alternate Demo Proposal Initial Arrangement FORAN LEAPS Below Decks Arrangement ISDP – Des. 1 Topside Arrangement TRIBON – Des. 2 Analysis Tools PATRAN ABACUS etc. COMMANDS Results Des. 1 Results Des. 2 NAVSEA Proposes Concept Design Alternative Proposals Analyzed STEP Description of Selected Model Transferred for Steel Processing See EAD S

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal8 Engineering Analysis Demo Scenario AP 203 P21 Shipyard (Add to CPC, CAD) Vendor Equip arrangement Ship Product Model (ISDP) AP 227 P28 Equip arrangement AP 215 P28 Compartmentation AP 216 P21 AP 218 P28 AP 209 P28 CPC CAD Parts Analysis (COG, weight, location) AP 209 /218 P28 GUID, doc URL Feedback AP 209 P28 EADS Note: Feedback loop only for winner (ISDP) Equipment exchange precedes competition

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal9 Mediators Required / PLM ARM AIM P28 P21 P28 P21 P28 P21 Processing Capability Currently Available P28 Higher Priority (Needed as Soon as Possible) P28 Lower Priority (Possibly Optional)

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal10 Backup Slides

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal11 TWR Propulsion Engine (Caterpillar 3512) Model

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal12 TWR Reduction Gear Model

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal13 Demo Scenario Issues Scenario has analysis software used to discriminate among three proposed designs –More realistic than usual Demo Scenarios Must find way to work Electrical and ISPE (Steel Processing) more smoothly into Demo Steel Processing should be easily integrated with the Arrangements and Analysis scenarios, but we must determine what can be exchanged from this task

May 23, 2005ISE4 Future Ship Acquisition Demo Proposal14 Notional Mediators Required APARM -> AIMAIM-ARMARM-> 209 AIM P21 216Eng Analysis 215Arrangements 218Eng Analysis 227Eng Analysis 209Eng Analysis??