Working Proposals Working Proposals 2015 - 2016 Rosário D. Laureano D2.03.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 A proposed approach to developing indicators Use the Strategic Targets document as the basis –Recent; explicitly addresses outcomes; relatively concise.
Advertisements

GIS APPLICATIONS IN SELECTION OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITES
Chapter 12 Analyzing Semistructured Decision Support Systems Systems Analysis and Design Kendall and Kendall Fifth Edition.
Multi‑Criteria Decision Making
Suitability and Optimality in the Asset Allocation Process Conflict and Resolution Paul Bolster, Northeastern University Sandy Warrick, S&S Software.
Hydrogen Production Decisions: Decision Making in View of Differing Stakeholder Preferences Elvin Yuzugullu Doctoral Candidate The George Washington University.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Multiple-criteria decision-making Real world decision problems –multiple, diverse criteria –qualitative as well as quantitative.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Multiple-criteria decision-making Real world decision problems –multiple, diverse criteria –qualitative as well as quantitative.
Ecological Economics Lecture 13 Ricardo da Silva Vieira Researcher/Consultant Tiago Domingos Assistant Professor Environment and Energy Section Department.
An Introductory Overview to Multi Criteria Evaluation GEOG 5161: Research Design Professor Kenneth E. Foote Petra Norlund 2010.
1. Introduction 2 In this study, fuzzy logic (FL), multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) and maintenance management (MM) are integrated into one subject.
Decision-Making Understand the main steps involved in rational decision-making Discuss the major reasons for poor decisions, and describe what managers.
Planning and Decision Making
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc Course Arrangement !!! Nov. 22,Tuesday Last Class Nov. 23,WednesdayQuiz 5 Nov. 25, FridayTutorial 5.
The Rational Decision-Making Process
Multi Criteria Decision Modeling Preference Ranking The Analytical Hierarchy Process.
Executive Manager Decision Making and Policy Planning, typically with many goals Sometimes even > 1 decision maker (Game Theory, Group Decisions) Linear.
Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies
1 Multi-Criteria Decision Making MCDM Approaches.
Decision Based Design Some Questions David Kazmer University of Massachusetts Amherst.
1 Enviromatics Decision support systems Decision support systems Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
Strategic Project Alignment With Team Expert Choice
Project Detailed Business Case
Computerized Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Projects Planning and Implementation By Ali Reda Al-Jaroudi Presented by: Jihad Farhat.
«Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process» DAGKINIS IOANNIS, Dr. NIKITAKOS NIKITAS University of.
Presented by Johanna Lind and Anna Schurba Facility Location Planning using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Specialisation Seminar „Facility Location Planning“
Comparing Rankings from using TODIM and a Fuzzy Expert System Valério A. P. Salomon Luís A. D. Rangel Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Fluminense Federal.
State Smart Transportation Initiative October 9, 2014 Matthew Garrett Oregon DOT Director Erik Havig Oregon DOT Planning Section Manager.
MULTICRITERIAL REASONING of PRIORITIES1 THE PRINCIPLES OF MULTICRITERIAL REASONING OF THE DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Buracas & Zvirblis
Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis, 3e, by Cliff Ragsdale. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning Multicriteria Decision Making u Decision.
Chiara Mocenni Roma, June 4-5, 2009 Dept. Information Engineering – Centre for the Study of Complex Systems – Univ. of Siena The “DITTY” DSS In the DITTY.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making by: Mehrdad ghafoori Saber seyyed ali
Dr Fionn Rogan Climate Change Research workshop Presentation, 29 th May 2013.
Decision Support System for the Long-Term City Metabolism Planning Problem Work Package 54 Mark Morley, Diogo Vitorino, Kourosh Behzadian, Rita Ugarelli,
Tanja Magoč, François Modave, Xiaojing Wang, and Martine Ceberio Computer Science Department The University of Texas at El Paso.
Finnish-Russian Doctoral Seminar on Multicriteria Decision Aid and Optimization Iryna Yevseyeva Niilo Mäki Institute University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Analyzing the Problem (Outranking Methods) Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Multi-Criteria Analysis - preference weighting. Defining weights for criteria Purpose: to express the importance of each criterion relative to other criteria.
BALTPORTS-IT - IST ____________________________________________________ Non-Monetary Evaluation Methodology for Small and Medium Sized Ports.
Process modelling and optimization aid FONTEIX Christian Professor of Chemical Engineering Polytechnical National Institute of Lorraine Chemical Engineering.
Chapter 4 Decision Support System & Artificial Intelligence.
Proprietary & confidential. © Decision Lens 2010 Decision Lens Criteria Development Session PSU ITS Pilot Gina Patel, Senior Client Decision Manager
2nd Meeting of Young Researchers on MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION AIDING Iryna Yevseyeva Niilo Mäki Instituutti University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Nov 2004Joonas Hokkanen1 Dr. Joonas Hokkanen Consulting Engineers Paavo Ristola Ltd Finland Presentation of the EU study (1997) “THE USE OF DECISION-AID.
Maximizing value and Minimizing base on Fuzzy TOPSIS model
MCDM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
1. 2 Multicriteria analysis problems Multicriteria analysis problem may be described by a decision matrix A(n x k), which can be defined in two ways,
Introduction to IT investment decision-making Pertemuan 1-2 Matakuliah: A Strategi Investasi IT Tahun: 2009.
LECTURE 10. Course: “Design of Systems: Structural Approach” Dept. “Communication Networks &Systems”, Faculty of Radioengineering & Cybernetics Moscow.
S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology 1 Decision Analysis Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University.
Applied Mathematics 1 Applications of the Multi-Weighted Scoring Model and the Analytical Hierarchy Process for the Appraisal and Evaluation of Suppliers.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Effects-Based Operations as a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Problem Jouni Pousi, Kai.
Analytic Hierarchy Process Do your decision conferences turn out like this?
IE582 MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING Prof. Dr. Y. İlker TOPCU
AHP based group decision making using keypads Faculty of organization and informatics University of Zagreb Croatia doc.dr.sc. Nina Begičević, Ph.D. prof.dr.sc.
© 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Analysis of climate change mitigation tools in Ukraine
Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding with the Use of DECERNS WebSDSS
HSE, ICAD RAS, MERI RAS. Moscow
Alejandra Duenas ScHARR
بسم الله الحکيم بسم الله الحکيم.
رويكردهاي MCDM (مطالعه موردي در مهندسی عمران)
Chapter 8 Goal Programming.
MHY530E DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
Chapter 12 Analyzing Semistructured Decision Support Systems
An Actor, Game & Network Analysis of Decision Making in the English Regions Sarah Ayres (University of Bristol) & Ian Stafford (Cardiff University)
State University of Telecommunications
ANALYZING SUPPLIER SELECTION BY USING AN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) AT AJ CONFECTIONARY SDN. BHD. Che Syahada Bt Che Azeman, Bachelor Degree Industrial.
Presentation transcript:

Working Proposals Working Proposals Rosário D. Laureano D2.03

The following proposals of work are based on MULTI- CRITERIA Decision Analysis (MCDA) for STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, also known as Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)  Methodology MCDM is suitable for solving decision problems with some complexity:  we intend to evaluate the best alternative / option / action (for the evaluator / decision maker) against a relatively large number of decision criteria  but we have no way to satisfy all the criteria because they are conflicted / competitors. Working proposals 2015/16

 There are several multi-criteria methods (MACBETH, AHP, ANP, MAUT (and extensions as MUSA and UTA), TOPSIS, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, …) which:  have an high application potential  could be compared regarding relative effectiveness in decision making  (in general) have a specific decision-making software (DMS) to implement it [see andhttp:// ] MACBETH  M-MACBETH; MAUT  RightChoice; AHP  MakeItRational and ExpertChoice; ANP  Super Decisions; ELECTRE III-IV Software; PROMETHEE  The Smart Picker Pro Software; … Working proposals 2015/16

alguns métodos MCDM – alguns métodos  AHP – Analytic Hierarchy Process (MakeItRational, ExpertChoice)  Extensões do AHP  ANP – Analytic Network Process (Super Decisions)  MAUT – Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (RightChoice)  Extensões do MAUT (ex. Mét.UTA)  AHP – Analytic Hierarchy Process (MakeItRational, ExpertChoice)  Extensões do AHP  ANP – Analytic Network Process (Super Decisions)  MAUT – Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (RightChoice)  Extensões do MAUT (ex. Mét.UTA)  ELECTRE – ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (The Electre III-IV Software)  Extensões do ELECTRE  PROMETHEE – Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enriched Evaluation (The Smart Picker Pro Software)  Extensões do PROMETHEE  ELECTRE – ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (The Electre III-IV Software)  Extensões do ELECTRE  PROMETHEE – Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enriched Evaluation (The Smart Picker Pro Software)  Extensões do PROMETHEE FULL AGREGATION APPROACH (ESCOLA AMERICANA) OUTRANKING APPROACH (ESCOLA FRANCESA) Rosário Laureano 5ª aula – 04 Out  MACBETH - Measuring Attractiveness by a Category Based Evaluation TecHnique (M-MACBETH) inclui conceitos das 2 Escolas, embora + da Americana (M-MACBETH) inclui conceitos das 2 Escolas, embora + da Americana Working proposals 2015/16

-  All following proposals use the MACBETH method - Measuring Attractiveness by a Category Based Evaluation TecHnique, although they may involve other methods.  The special emphasis given to this method is due to:  It allows a quantitative analysis of the decision problem only based on qualitative judgments by the evaluator /decision maker  It is very intuitive and and challenging  There is the M-MACBETH decision-making software facilitating its application. Working proposals 2015/16

MACBETH - MACBETH - Measuring Attractiveness by a Category Based Evaluation Working proposals 2015/16

MACBETH - MACBETH - Measuring Attractiveness by a Category Based Evaluation Working proposals 2015/16

 1 st Proposal Assessment of the location of an hostel in Lisbon city based on the characteristics and goals of the investment by means of the MACBETH method.  2 nd Proposal Optimization of the fixed and mobile networks in a company given the recurring challenges of telecommunications and company characteristics by means of the MACBETH method.  3 rd Proposal To apply the MACBETH method together with the Geographic Information System (GIS) in the telecommunication network planning and design. Working proposals 2015/16

 4 th Proposal Programming language assessment based on the programmer goals through MACBETH method.  5 th Proposal To compare the use of M-MACBETH decision- making software with the use of another existing computerized multi-criteria decision support systems (that is, another existing DMS) and provide recommendations on implementing them. In this comparison we can turn to one of the problems solving indicated in previous proposals. Working proposals 2015/16