Quantum noise observation and control A. HeidmannM. PinardJ.-M. Courty P.-F. CohadonT. Briant O. Arcizet T. CaniardJ. Le Bars Laboratoire Kastler Brossel,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

ILIAS 5-6/11/2004 WG T2 Task T2 (WG 11) AIM: exact definition (theoretical and experimental) of photo-thermal noise PARTICIPANTS INFN (AURIGA group; also.
Albert-Einstein-Institute Hannover ET filter cavities for third generation detectors ET filter cavities for third generation detectors Keiko Kokeyama Andre.
Space-time positioning at the quantum limit with optical frequency combs Workshop OHP September 2013 Valérian THIEL, Pu JIAN, Jonathan ROSLUND, Roman SCHMEISSNER,
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Various ways to beat the Standard Quantum Limit Yanbei Chen California Institute of Technology.
An optomechanical transducer for the AURIGA “bar” gw detector cryogenic optics towards the quantum limit: high finesse cavities, fibers, piezo actuators,
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
Several Fun Research Projects at NAOJ for the Future GW Detectors
Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.
Interferometer Topologies and Prepared States of Light – Quantum Noise and Squeezing Convenor: Roman Schnabel.
CNRS LKB – Task T1 Current status of the experiment on optomechanical coupling Sensitivity: 5.10  20 m.Hz  1/2   New high-finesse, high-power cavity.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Experimental Characterization of Frequency Dependent Squeezed Light R. Schnabel, S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, and K. Danzmann.
Optomechanical Devices for Improving the Sensitivity of Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunnong Zhao for Australian International Gravitational wave Research.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
Eighth Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves Sheon Chua, Michael Stefszky, Conor Mow-Lowry, Daniel Shaddock, Ben Buchler, Kirk McKenzie, Sheila.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
RSE Experiment in Japan Feb. 20 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting LIGO-G Z K.Somiya, O.Miyakawa, P.Beyersdorf, and S.Kawamura.
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1WG1 Meeting, Birmingham 07/2008.
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
Ponderomotive amplifier to reduce shot noise Kyoto May Kentaro Somiya 1 and Yanbei Chen 2 Waseda Inst. for Adv. Study 1 and Caltech 2.
Einstein gravitational wave Telescope Which optical topologies are suitable for ET? Andreas Freise for the ET WG3 working group MG12 Paris.
Experimental investigation of dynamic Photothermal Effect
Opto-mechanics with a 50 ng membrane Henning Kaufer, A. Sawadsky, R. Moghadas Nia, D.Friedrich, T. Westphal, K. Yamamoto and R. Schnabel GWADW 2012,
The interests to join LCGT Xiang-Hua Zhai 翟向华 Shanghai United Center for Astrophysics(SUCA), Shanghai Normal University
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
PONDEROMOTIVE ROTATOR: REQUIREMENTS Zach Korth (Caltech) – GWADW ‘12 – Waikoloa, HI.
Task T2 – Measurement of photo-elastic noise Goals: - observation of photo-elastic effects - dependence with temperature down to a few K - dependence with.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
QND, LSC / Virgo Collaboration Meeting, 2007, HannoverH. Müller-Ebhardt Entanglement between test masses Helge Müller-Ebhardt, Henning Rehbein, Kentaro.
Optomechanics Experiments
The cancelation of displacement- and frequency- noise using four mach-zehnder interferometer Keiko Kokeyama Ochanomizu University / NAOJ.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Detuned Twin-Signal-Recycling
Wide Bandwidth Dual Acoustic GW Detectors
Overview of quantum noise suppression techniques
Interferometric speed meter as a low-frequency gravitational-wave detector Helge Müller-Ebhardt Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (AEI) and Leibniz.
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
MIT Corbitt, Goda, Innerhofer, Mikhailov, Ottaway, Pelc, Wipf Caltech
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
A. Bramati M. Romanelli E. Giacobino
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen February 2004
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005
Quantum Optics and Macroscopic Quantum Measurement
Squeezed states in GW interferometers
New Results on Photothermal Effect: Size and Coating Effect
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
LIGO Quantum Schemes NSF Review, Oct
“Traditional” treatment of quantum noise
3rd generation ITF sensitivity curve
A. Heidmann M. Pinard J.-M. Courty P.-F. Cohadon
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
Presentation transcript:

Quantum noise observation and control A. HeidmannM. PinardJ.-M. Courty P.-F. CohadonT. Briant O. Arcizet T. CaniardJ. Le Bars Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Paris

1980 – 90: Radiation pressure effects limit the sensitivity Studies on ideal systems Study of quantum noise in interferometers 1990 – 2000: Reduction of noise by quantum optics techniques (squeezing, QND)

Experimental injection of squeezing in an interferometer Study of quantum noise in interferometers McKenzie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, (2002) Since 2000:Application to GW interferometers

Study of quantum noise in interferometers Adaptation of squeezing Constraints on the interferometer (losses, …) Needs for: New (simpler ?) schemes Experimental tests of quantum noise Theoretical studies Kimble et al., Phys. Rev. D 65, (2002)

Output phase-shift: Quantum noises in interferometers Mirror motion:

Noise reduction by squeezing Squeezing of a specific combination of   in and  I in   Frequency dependent squeezing

  Frequency dependent quadrature Noise reduction by QND measurement Measurement of a specific combination of   out and  I out Quantum correlations in the interferometer

Insensitive to quantum properties of the interferometer New scheme: quantum locking of mirrors Local measurement and active control of mirror motion Courty et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, (2003)

Interferometer: Finesse = 600 Input = 20 W Interferometer sensitivity

Control cavity: Finesse = Input = 5 mW Measurement of   x m limited by   in and   x r Measurement of mirror motion

Optimal gain: large at low freq. small at high freq. Control with an optimal gain Mirror is locked to the reference mirror Reduction of radiation pressure noise

Locking with QND measurement Control cavity: QND measurement 1% loss Noise reduction below SQL No effect of interferometer losses

Signal amplification by cavity detuning Noise reduction in signal recycled interferometers Similar effect expected by cavity detuning Modification of mirror dynamics Amplification of signal Buonnano, Chen, Phys. Rev. D 64, (2001)

Sensitivity improvement by cavity detuning Signal amplification by the mirror dynamics Possible implementation in GW interferometers Test with our experiment

Measurement of small displacements Optomechanical sensor based on a high-finesse cavity (30 000) Quantum limited sensitivity:

Current improvements of the experiment New cavity with a finesse Improvement of the laser frequency locking Cryogenic setup Sensitivity improved by a factor 10

Comprehensive study of quantum noise with real systems Interferometer constraints, active controls, detection,... Search for innovative and simpler quantum optics methods Quantum locking of mirrors, … Experimental observation and tests of quantum noise Up to now, no observation of radiation pressure effects Tests of quantum noise reduction schemes Development of efficient squeezing sources Conclusion – Main issues