Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Squelch Tests for Streamer Noise Attenuation Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geophysical Data Systems Ltd. S E I S W I N O N B A S I S O F WINDOWS ® SOFTWARE PACKAGE Geophysical Data Systems Ltd. Address:117198, RUSSIA, Moscow,
Advertisements

Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Attributes UH Energy Numerical Modeling Numerical Modeling Prestack Data Analysis Prestack Data Analysis Data Processing Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Reflection Seismic Processing
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Improvement of Audio Capture in Handheld Devices through Digital Filtering Problem Microphones in handheld devices are of low quality to reduce cost. This.
Amplitude correction Important methods:
Signal Estimation Technology Inc. Maher S. Maklad A Brief Overview of Optimal Seismic Resolution.
GeoCenter LP SeisUP ® Marine Processing.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Seismic Reflection: Processing and Interpretation Katie Wooddell UW Madison.
Parallel Geoscience Corporation
Reflection GPH492 By: Jonathan Payne Peter Bernhard Eve Marie Hirt.
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Reflection Field Methods
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Quality Factor Inversion from Prestack CMP data using EPIF Matching Jing Zhao, Jinghuai Gao Institute of Wave and Information,
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Stacking  Statics  Residual statics in combination with the velocity analysis  Muting  Approximated zero offset section.
Beach Energy Ltd Haselgrove 3D Seismic Data Re-processing, 2014 Quash X – Crosspread Adaptive Linear Noise Attenuation Sept 3, 2014.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Attribute- Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation 3D CONSTRAINED LEAST-SQUARES KIRCHHOFF PRESTACK TIME MIGRATION Alejandro.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Motivation To characterize the shallow subsurface at Wadi Qudaid for its water storage and reuse potential.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2015 Matching Filter to match Transition Zone Airgun Source Wavelet.
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Reflection seismograms
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Testing the Match between Vibroseis and Dynamite Data Reflection.
Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging References: J.M. Reynolds, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons,
FIELD GEOMETRY FOR MULTICHANNEL SEISMIC (MCS) PROFILES Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging: Pt 2.
1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
A cross-equalization processing flow for off-the-shelf 4-D seismic data James Rickett Stanford University David E. Lumley Chevron Petroleum Technology.
. Lakeside Drive and Manzanita Lane to the north corner of Jasper Lane and Manzanita Lane.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Source Designature Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67 Jan. 25, 2014.
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
ADVANCED MARINE TUTORIAL
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Super-virtual interferometry
CLARITAS SWELL NOISE ATTENUATION PROCESS
SEISMIC DATA ANALYSIS AND FIELD QC SYSTEM
New ProMAX modules for reflectivity calibration and noise attenuation
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Paul Ogwari University of Memphis Center for Earthquake Research and Information 2nd year MSc Research on: Effects of Type of Faulting on Earthquake.
The Relationship between Uncertainty and Quality in Seismic Data
Typical Vertical Resolution
3D Seismic Processing Eric Verschuur AES 1530.
Uses of filters To remove unwanted components in a signal
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Presentation transcript:

Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Squelch Tests for Streamer Noise Attenuation Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67 Jan. 21, 2014

➢ Low frequency additive noise, generated along the streamer at Digibird locations was recorded on the marine 2D shot records in the field. A proprietary noise reduction method named Squelch can be employed to remove this noise. Other spurious noise segments are removed using an algorithm that compares RMS amplitude levels in a moving window against neighboring seismic traces. ➢ Using Squelch, the noises are separated from the signal by frequency bands and their amplitudes are reduced. Then the frequency bands are combined back together to create the noise-attenuated dataset. ➢ For testing, shot records and stacks were viewed before and after the application of Squelch and Spurious Noise Attenuation. Line BST14B24 was used as an example of data from a shallow water area and Line BST14B67 was used as an example of data from a deep water area. ➢ The effects of Squelch noise attenuation are much more pronounced on the pre-stack data than on the stack data, because the stack is also a very good noise filter. ➢ Squelch will enhance the reliability of pre-stack data analysis such as AVO Analysis and the improvements can also be clearly seen on the stack data. ➢ The application of Squelch and Spurious Noise Attenuation is recommended

Noise Attenuation Parameters Squelch Bandwidth: Hz Noise Reduction: approx. 50% Spurious Noise Attenuation Running ave. window length: 200 msec Mute taper: 30 msec Amplitude threshold : 2

Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Location of Test Lines

Shot Records

Shot Gathers, Line B24 (shallow water), spherical divergence correction applied Before Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Line B24 (shallow water), spherical divergence correction applied After Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Line B24 (shallow water), spherical divergence correction applied Difference After Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Deep Zone, Line B24(shallow water), spherical divergence correction applied Before Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Deep Zone, Line B24(shallow water), spherical divergence correction applied After Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Deep Zone, Line B24(shallow water), spherical divergence correction applied Difference After Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Line B67 (deep water), spherical divergence correction applied Before Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Line B67 (deep water), spherical divergence correction applied After Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Line B67 (deep water), spherical divergence correction applied Difference After Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Deep Zone, Line B67(deep water), spherical divergence correction applied Before Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Deep Zone, Line B67(deep water), spherical divergence correction applied After Squelch Applied

Shot Gathers, Deep Zone, Line B67(deep water), spherical divergence correction applied Difference After Squelch Applied

Stacks

Brute Stack, Line B24 (shallow water), prelim. NMO velocities applied No Squelch Applied

Brute Stack, Line B24 (shallow water), prelim. NMO velocities applied Squelch Applied

Brute Stack, Deep Zone, Line B24 (shallow water), prelim. NMO velocities applied No Squelch Applied

Brute Stack, Deep Zone, Line B24 (shallow water), prelim. NMO velocities applied Squelch Applied

Brute Stack, Line B24 (shallow water), prelim. NMO velocities applied No Squelch Applied

Brute Stack, Line B67 (shallow water), prelim. NMO velocities applied Squelch Applied

Brute Stack, Deep Zone, Line B67 (shallow water), prelim. NMO velocities applied No Squelch Applied

Brute Stack, Deep Zone, Line B67 (shallow water), prelim. NMO velocities applied Squelch Applied