LOGO 1 Credit Ranking System Supervisor: Mr. QuangLT Credit Ranking System

2 Contents Introduction 1 Development process 3 Q&A 5 Credit Ranking System Project Plan 1 Demo Product 3

3 GROUP INTRODUCTION Project name: Credit Ranking System Supervisor: Mr. Quang LT Students: - Đào Mai Ly - Trần Thị Hương Giang - Phạm Thị Phương Thảo - Phan Lê Quang Chính - Nguyễn Thanh Long Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Result Quality Assurance Project management Credit Ranking System

4 PRESENTATION VIEW-POINT Follow process groups: Requirements => Integration Testing Each process contains 2 two parts: group working method and result Quality assurance follows all the processes Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

5 FPT University Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT Business customer Individual customer Credit Ranking Banking Financial Index Non Financial Index Business Scale Basic Index Collateral Index Finance Deposit Others AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC CC C D Evaluation Ranks Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

6 Banking Credit System FPT University Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT Ranking Customer Info Customer Rank InputProcessOutput Business Process conclusion Clustering Classifying Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System Rules of Banking & Government

7 FPT University Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT THE TWO APPROACH OF RANKING CREDIT AAA CC BBB Customer OLD SOLUTIONNEW SOLUTION Fixed! Flexible Data Clustering techniqueSimple technique Credit Ranking System

8 Role Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Result Quality Assurance Project management Credit Ranking System

9 Project Plan Result Quality Assurance Project management Credit Ranking System

10 Time table Result Quality Assurance Project management Deploy Integration test Implement Create TC DD Review Quality Assurance Project management DB & AD Require ment Feasibil ity study Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan DecJanFebMarAprNovOct Credit Ranking System

11 Process model – Waterfall model Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Result Quality Assurance Project management Reason: Simple and familiar model Short-term project Due to Report submissions Credit Ranking System

12 Result Quality Assurance Project management Working process Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

13 Cross-Review method Result Quality Assurance Project management SRS & DD review: cross-review between 2 teams Code review: Person who designed the module will review code for this module -> form a review circle. LongGiangThảoLyChính Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Advantages: Review from different view-point All member can understand what others is doing All members can understand the whole system Credit Ranking System

14 Result Quality Assurance Project management Working process – Issue management Credit Ranking System

15 Working process – Task management Result Quality Assurance Project management Credit Ranking System

16 Result Quality Assurance Project management Working process – Bug management Credit Ranking System

17 Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Elicitation Validation Analysis & Negotiation Documenting BSN | FI NFI | INV | SYS |RNK |RPT Credit Ranking System

18 Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT CREDIT RANKING PROCESS FOR BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Receive request ranking Collect customer information Identify customer’s industry operation Marking for Financial Indexes Marking for Non-Financial Indexes Calculate total score Summary Evaluation Credit staff Credit dept manager Risk managing staff Risk dept manager Branch Director Request for updating Committing Result Validation Evaluation Verified Accepted 18 Credit Ranking System

19 Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT CREDIT RANKING PROCESS FOR INDIVIDUAL CUSTOMERS Receive request ranking Collect customer information Marking for Basic information Marking for Other information Calculate total score Summary Evaluation Credit staff Credit dept manager Risk managing staff Risk dept manager Branch Director Request for updating Committing Result Validation Evaluation Verified Accepted 19 Credit Ranking System

20 Result Quality Assurance Project management SRS Template Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

21 Review action: Review within sub-team. Cross-review of two sub-team Customers clarification. Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

22 -Result: -FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT -Use cases: -22 BSN use cases -33 INV use cases -14 NFI use cases -9 FI use cases -24 SYS use cases -17 RNK Use cases -2 RPT use cases Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System SYSTEM GENERAL USE CASES

23 -NON FUNCTIONAL -Reliability Result Quality Assurance Project management IDMetricRequirement REL001 POFOD (Probability of failure on demand) In 500 of service requests may result 1 failure on demand REL002 ROCOF (Rate of failure occurrence) In 1000 operational time units, there are 5 failures likely to occur REL003 MTTF (Mean time to failure) 720(h) Mean time between two successive failures is 720h REL004 AVAIL (Availability) In 1000 hours of operation, the system must be available for at least 950h REL005 MTTR (Mean time to repair) 24(h) The system is allowed 24h to be out of operation after it has failed REL006 DR Defect rate 1 bug / KLOG (thousand lines of code) Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

24 -NON FUNCTIONAL -Security Result Quality Assurance Project management IDType SEC001Identification SEC002Authentication SEC003Authorization SEC004Privacy SEC005Immunity SEC006Integrity Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

25 -NON FUNCTIONAL -Portability Result Quality Assurance Project management IDTypeRequirement POR001Program portability The system must be deployed as an Extranet Website and required to be run successfully on Internet Explorer 7 or upper and other popular browsers such as Firefox and Google Chrome POR002Data portability The data of the system must be stored using SQL Server Express 2005 or Oracle database POR003End-user portabilityThe system is required to have the same look and feel across different browsers. All are displayed according to the standard of Website user interface design: The form of index pages will list all the record, and there is a link to the add, edit and remove page. All the button of saving changes or adding will be put at the bottom of the textboxes. When there are some errors occurred, display red message to the users and require them to do again (if possible). After successfully changing the data, display notification to users. All pages of the application will have the same menu and users can access to functionalities of the system from here. Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System Result Quality Assurance Project management

26 -NON FUNCTIONAL -Performance Result Quality Assurance Project management IDTypeRequirement PER001Response time The average time to response for a transaction when managing parameters is 2s and the maximum is 5s. The average time to response for a transaction when ranking for customers is 3s and the maximum is 8s PER002CapacityThe system can accommodate for a maximum number of 1000 users at different locations Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System Result Quality Assurance Project management

27 I. DB design Goal: Solve business requirement. Try following 3 Normal Form. Inherit customer data Approach: Bottom up Design and edit, review, merge in Visio then create DB Result: Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

28 DB design Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

29 II. System Design -Base on non-Functional requirement: -Need a lot of user using common DB Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

30 MVC architecture Framework : Using MVC( Microsoft MVC.Net 2.0) -Advance : beside common advance, it save our time Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

31 MVC architecture Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

32 Result Quality Assurance Project management Component Diagram: Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

33 Detail design Goal: - Describe all class, function in this program Approach: - Bottom up: each person design a function - Using our excel template and MS Visio. Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

34 Result Quality Assurance Project management Implemented modules Administration Parameters Customer Clustering Ranking Report Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

35 Result Quality Assurance Project management K-means algorithm for Customer Clustering Definite : k-means clustering is a method of cluster analysis which aims to partition n observations into k clusters in which each observation belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean. Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

36 Result Quality Assurance Project management K-means algorithm flow chart Credit Ranking System

37 Result Quality Assurance Project management Testing activities Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

38 Result Quality Assurance Project management AcceptanceSystemIntegrationUnitRequirementsHigh-level designDetailed designCoding DevelopingTesting Plan for Test strategy follows V-model Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

39 Testing process Result Quality Assurance Project management Create TC template Write TC (based on SRS) Review TC Create test data IT Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

40 Testing process Result Quality Assurance Project management Test case Test data Integration test Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

41 Result Test case Quality Assurance Project management Test case Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

42 Test data Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

43 Test report Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

LOGO 44

LOGO 45

LOGO 46