PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 PH 8.01/99 – Seminar on “Dissemination of PHARE projects description and results” Overview of BG PHARE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Energy Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2009/71/EURATOM establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations.
Nuclear power plant siting International Nuclear Power Conference October 23, 2009, Tallinn.
EGYPT NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAME INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION “General Information on the Status of the Egyptian Nuclear.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Human Resources Development for Nuclear Safety J. Bastos NSNI/RAS.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
Challenges of a Harmonized Global Safety Regime Jacques Repussard Director General IRSN IAEA 2007 Scientific Forum.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Regulatory Approach to the Lifetime Management of the Nuclear Power Plants in Korea June 30, 2004 Choi, Kyung Woo Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety International.
Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard CWA 15793:2008
Thailand NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION: Regulatory Body Prof. Dr. Chaivat TOSKULKAO Secretary General Office of Atoms.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Tom MAZOUR IAEA, Division of Nuclear Power
Bulatom Annual Forum, Bulgaria, Varna - Riviera, 2-4 June 2011 LICENSING PROCESS FOR BELENE NPP: CURRENT STATUS AND NEXT STEPS Tinko Ganchev Head of Department.
IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency LICENSING OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES Luc Baekelandt Safety of radioactive.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “National legislation and licensing” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Bulgaria.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 EU Requirements Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Key outcomes of IRRS Mission in Finland Kirsi Alm-Lytz.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
TACIS Project: R8.01/98 – TRANSLATION, EDITING AND DIFFUSION OF DOCUMENTS (Result Dissemination) Probabilistic Safety Analysis Technology (PSA) TACIS R3.1/91.
Maria J Moracho Ramirez Regulatory Activities Section
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.10 Documents to be Submitted to the Regulatory Body.
IAEA - 4 th Steering Committee Meeting on Competence of Human Resources for RBs and SARCoN seminar EUROPEAN UNION COOPERATION TO STRENGTHEN REGULATORY.
LEGAL and REGULATORY FRAMEWORK for NUCLEAR and RADIATION SAFETY in BULGARIA General overview Dr. M. Mateeva – Chief Inspector R. Markova-Mihaylova – Chief.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
International Atomic Energy Agency Irina Sanda Education and Training in the Area of Safety Assessment Irina Sanda Safety Assessment Section Division of.
4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.
Current Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure and Human Resources Development in the Republic of Belarus TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Safety Assessment Process. Plant Modification.
Oversight of Licensees Human & Organizational Factors in Bulgaria Oversight of Licensees’ Human & Organizational Factors in Bulgaria Technical Meeting.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE The role of EIA and decision-making.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
IAEA TSO-Conference, April 2007, Aix en Provence 1 Independent technical and scientific advice for regulatory decision making L. Hahn, GRS International.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
June 2016, Brussels Vladyslava Levakina
THAILAND Training and Tutoring Feedback
Radioactive waste repositories
Status and Development of Regulatory Infrastructure in Iraq
Brazil - Training and Tutoring Feedback Second Coordination Meeting
WENRA Current activities of WENRA 4th GNSSN Steering Committee Meeting
facilities and activities at Armenian NPP –
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.
Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop
Regulatory Cooperation Forum (RCF) - Plenary 2018
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Introduction to the training
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
Regulatory system in Hungary
Presentation transcript:

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 PH 8.01/99 – Seminar on “Dissemination of PHARE projects description and results” Overview of BG PHARE nuclear safety assistance projects and summary on project BG Enhancement of safety assessment capabilities available to Bulgarian Nuclear Safety Authority N. Vlahov, BNRA Executive Secretary

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 Content Scope of PHARE assistance to BNRA PHARE projects implemented PHARE projects started PHARE projects - under tendering and drafting phase Proposed project for PHARE’2005 Regulatory decision making as a result of implementation of BG (BG/TS/17) Conclusion

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 Scope of PHARE assistance Transfer of Western regulatory methodologies and practices to the Bulgarian Nuclear Safety Authority Support to BNRA in the licensing process –Modifications –Decommissioning –Safety assessments –Radioactive waste management Emergency preparedness

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 PHARE projects implemented BG/RA/03 - Transfer of Western European regulatory methodology and practices to the nuclear safety authority of Bulgaria (3 years) –STRATEGY & MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES - internal QA programme and emergency preparedness manual –INSPECTION PRACTICES –ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Successfully completed in December 1999

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 PHARE projects implemented BG Institutional Building of BNRA – Support on Licensing Activity Related to Decommissioning of NPP Kozloduy Units 1 & 2 Successfully completed in October 2003 ZZ (BG/TS/15) - Enhancement of safety assessment capabilities of BNRA –Support in the review and assesment of the modernisation programs of units 3-6 Successfully completed in September 2005

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 PHARE projects implemented BG (BG/TS/17) - Enhancement of safety assessment capabilities available to BNRA –Continuation of BG/TS/15, including SAR review of Kozloduy 3&4, RPV integrity and improvement of QM system Successfully has been completed in September /000/ Assistance to BNRA in improving management of high activity sealed radioactive sources (SRS) Successfully has been completed in October 2005

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 Ongoing PHARE projects 2003/ Assistance to BNRA in the development of requirements and procedures for decommissioning of Kozloduy units 1 and 2, follow-up –support to NRA in reviewing of Kozloduy NPP submittals on decommissioning issues –improving NRA and TSO’s competence in assessing of decommissioning/dismantling activities –developing guidelines in decommissioning related areas Project started in September / Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs) review and assessment in compliance with international requirements –Review of SAMGs of Kozloduy 3-6, developed under a PHARE project –Improvement of BNRA capacity through training and transfer of knowledge and know-how Project started in October 2005

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 PHARE projects coming 2004/ Safety Analysis Report of Kozloduy NPP Units 5 and 6. Review and assessment in compliance with international requirements ToR is approved. Thendering phase. Project is planed to start in April / Improvement of the Off-site Emergency Preparedness (OSEP) in Central and Eastern Europe: Installation of the RODOS System in Bulgaria Project is planed to start in 2006

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 PHARE projects coming 2004/ Assistance to the Bulgarian Nuclear Regulatory Agency in capacity building in the areas of regulatory guides, assessment capabilities, staff training and quality management; –development and enforcement of regulatory safety guides –performing safety assessments and review of licensee safety documentation –drawing and implementing regulatory training programs –Further improvement of the QMS Project is planed to start in 2006

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 Regulatory decision making as a result of implementation of BG (1) BG/TS/17 project “Enhancement of safety assessment capabilities available to BNRA” Purpose –Support to Bulgarian Nuclear Safety Authority and its TSOs in the review of the safety cases for Kozloduy NPP – 3, 4, 5 and 6, including regulatory reviews and approval of plant-specific, in-depth analysis reports in compliance with widely applied practices within the EU; –Develop a modern well-documented quality management system and implementation of this system at the BNRA; –Assist BNRA and its TSOs with the regulatory review and assessment of the measures to ensure reactor pressure vessel integrity for Kozloduy NPP 3, 4, 5 and 6; –Transfer of know-how to BNRA and its TSOs for long term perspective, enhancing their competence and capabilities.

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 Scope of the project T echnical assistance to review and assess: –nearly 21 technical measures from the Modernisation Programs of units 5-6 of Kozloduy NPP; –Safety Analysis Reports for units 3, 4; –Reactor pressure vessels integrity surveillance programs; –BNRA Quality Management System. Project implementation period: Regulatory decision making as a result of implementation of BG (1)

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 BG project management - carried out by RISKAUDIT, supported by IRSN, GRS, STUK, VTT, AVN, HSE, Serco Assurance, REZ and BG TSOs - Energy Institute, EAE Engineering, Institute of Metal Science to the BAS; - The consortium of Western and Bulgarian experts - an essential contribution to the BNRA decision making Methodology Following the two-phase approach, RISKAUDIT (RA) have submitted for each project topic: –Interim reports - on the comprehensiveness and completeness of the reviewed documents and on a preliminary assessment of selected key safety issues; –Technical reports - on the results of a detailed review of the documents and, if necessary, independent analyses and calculations. Regulatory decision making as a result of implementation of BG (1)

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 BNRA decision making process based on: –BNRA own complete review and assessment –RA Final Technical reports recomendations, which incorporate harmonised recommendations of Western and Bulgarian experts –RA recommendations review by BNRA experts Review of following documentation: –Safety related studies and analyses –Applications on plant modifications Regulatory decision making as a result of implementation of BG (1)

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 Safety related studies and analyses –part of the overall plant safety substantiation (SARs); –issuing of specific permit is not required; –regulatory decisions for acceptance or not are made depending on the significance of comments and recommendations: >Significant BNRA comments and RA recommendations (Final technical reports) are sent to the licensee for consideration in the next revisions of the document or SAR. >Specific examples: The Final technical reports for several topics of BG Regulatory decision making as a result of implementation of BG (1)

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 Applications for plant modifications –Permit is required by the legislation; –Technical dossier (basic design, detailed design, etc.) submitted together with the application for review; –Over 30 modification permits issued within project scope: >In cases of adequate safety justification and minor RA and BNRA comments - specific conditions and additional regulatory requirements are set in the individual permits Insufficient justification –Permit is not issued; RA and BNRA comments are sent to the applicant for consideration in the design documentation. Regulatory decision making as a result of implementation of BG (1)

PH 8.01/99 - Seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2005 Conclusions 21 technical measures from the large modernisation programs, safety analysis reports and safety substations of units 3-6 of Kozloduy NPP have been reviewed during project implementation Assistance of Western TSOs played essential role for enhancement of the safety assessment capabilities by: –directly contributing to the BNRA decision making –transfer of knowledge and experience to Bulgarian TSOs and BNRA experts All tasks successfully managed and completed to meet the BNRA demands - high level of flexibility applied All RA recommendations appropriately considered Project objectives are met