Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effectiveness of Irradiation in Controlling Pathogenic and Spoilage Microorganisms in Meats Catherine N. Cutter Department of Food Science Pennsylvania.
Advertisements

Food Storage and Preservation. Storage and Preservation  Principles of Preservation  Methods of Preservation  Drying, curing & smoking  Fermentation.
1 Food Safety in Child Care. 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Estimates  76 million cases of foodborne illness per year  325,000 hospitalizations.
Lesson 9: Food Safety Mr. Taylor Reading from: Modern Livestock and Poultry Production, 8 th Edition, pg
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS NOTICE CLARIFYING AND EXPANSION OF SAMPLING ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA.
HACCP Validation The FSIS Perspective Charles Gioglio FSIS/OPPD Director, Meat and Poultry Advisory Committee Staff.
Lesson 1.5 The Usual Suspects Definitions and templates for: Case Notes 1.5 Investigation Activity 1.5.
Green Family Sonia H, Nicole S, Karly B, Josh C Block 2.
Food Borne Illnesses What are Food Borne Illnesses? An illness that comes from the ingestion of contaminated food Often called food poisoning Two types:
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03G Fully Cooked Not Shelf Stable Tool Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through.
ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR TREATMENT OF TRICHINA (TRICHINELLA SPIRALIS) Amelia K. Sharar, Ph.D. United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety.
Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) and ambient foods
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
FOOD SAFETY.
Food Microbiology 08/11/11.
FOOD SAFETY.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Role of Economics in Pathogen Control Regulations Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
Microbiological Considerations Related to Poultry Products For the FSIS “How to” Workshops Spring 2009 Presented by Dr. Patricia Curtis and Ms. Jessica.
Food Safety and Inspection Service 1.  In 1993, a small team was tasked to identify information that would be included in a safe handling instruction.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Pasteurisation, sterilisation and irradiation Extension DRAFT ONLY.
Listeria Summit - Washington, DC November RISK MANAGEMENT Current FSIS Activities Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI) Public Meeting.
Good Hygiene Practices Managing Hygiene through Temperature Control Sub-Module 5.3, Section 2.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
IAFP’s 11 th European Symposium on Food Safety Cardiff, Wales April 2015 IAFP’s 11 th European Symposium on Food Safety Cardiff, Wales April.
Food Industry Perspective on Non-O157 STEC Jenny Scott Vice President, Food Safety Programs Grocery Manufacturers/Food Products Association.
Providing Safe Food. Foodborne Illness Illness carried or transmitted to people by food Foodborne-Illness Outbreak Incident in which two or more people.
Interventions to improve microbial safety –Compounds, Ingredients, Processes 1. Carcass washing - remove, reduce beginning numbers –remove bacteria before.
Review of the Federal Food Safety System
A Bacterial Analysis of Irradiated and Non-Irradiated Meat Megan Markland Department of Biological Sciences York College, PA Introduction Hypotheses H.
FOOD SAFETY. Cross-contamination : letting micro-organisms from one food get into another. –Example 1 : cutting meat on a cutting board, then cutting.
1 Use of Oriental Mustard and Allyl Isothiocyanate to Control Salmonella, Campylobacter and L. monocytogenes in Poultry Meat Products Amin Naser Olaimat.
Review of the Compliance Guide HACCP Systems Validation Public Meeting June 25, 2013 Washington, DC Dr. William Shaw Risk, Innovations & Management Staff.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Salmonella Initiative Program Isabel Arrington, PhD, DVM Sci. Advisor, RIMD.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat.
United States Department of Agriculture Office of Food Safety Protecting Public Health through Food Safety Brian Ronholm Deputy Under Secretary for Food.
1 Judi Lee/Janice Attrill, MPI J MPI Update for NZFMA – Mar 2014 Salmonella Strategy & Animal Feeds Review.
Factors affecting survival and growth FS
Regulatory Update National Turkey Federation 2012 Annual Convention February 15 – 18, 2012 Brett T. Schwemer.
Lessons Learned from the Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein Incident Jenny Scott FDA CFSAN Office of Food Safety.
1 Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 7, 2001 National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods _________________ Blade Tenderized, Non-Intact.
FSIS Policy Update: Turkey Product Presented by DANIEL ENGELJOHN, PhD Assistant Administrator Office of Policy and Program Development Food Safety and.
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 HACCP Impacts on Contamination Levels in Meat and Poultry Products: FSIS Perspective Delila R. Parham, DVM Office of.
Overview of Post-Harvest Food Safety in ARS
Proposed Rule: Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
Food Microbiology and Chemistry. Summarize the chemical and microbiological factors that affect food safety. Objectives هدف.
1 Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001 Processed Meat and Poultry Proposed Rule _________________ Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp.
Risk Assessment Technical Meeting Washington, DC -- February Current Listeria Policy And Risk Management Questions Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
Blood sausageLiver pate Corned beef in can Fig: Basic canning process flow Selection of raw materials Preparation (eg cutting, dicing) Cooking of raw.
Compliance and Investigations Division (CID). Proposed Rules  Official establishments, and retail stores that grind raw beef products, will keep records.
Understanding Bacteria Bacteria Everywhere. Food Safety and the Battle with Bacteria  The United States has one of the most safest food supplies in world.
Food Microbiology 1 Unit 4 Microbial Growth. Bacteria are single-celled organisms Bacteria multiply in a process called binary fission in which two cells.
Thermally Processed, Commercially Sterile Products Paul M. Uhler United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Office of Policy,
1 FAC Charge and Questions Mickey Parish, Ph.D. Senior Advisor for Microbiology FDA/CFSAN, Office of Food Safety JIFSAN Advisory Board November 6, 2015.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Public Health-Related Performance Standards Currently Under Consideration for.
1 Food Safety in Child Care. 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Estimates  76 million cases of foodborne illness per year  325,000 hospitalizations.
Food Safety HFA4M & HFN20. Food Safety Practices that help prevent foodborne illness.
Food Safety Challenges and Benefits of New Technology Randall Huffman, Ph.D. Vice President, Scientific Affairs American Meat Institute Foundation USDA-
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 11 ISSUES FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION: E. coli O157:H7 DANIEL ENGELJOHN, Ph.D. Deputy.
Labeling Issues for Raw Beef Pathogen Control and Regulatory Compliance in Beef Processing September 9-10, 2015.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
Thermal and Non-Thermal Preservation
Chapter 25:4 Handling Food and Food-borne Illness
FOOD HYGIENE.
Microbiological Sampling of Dairy Products
Catherine N. Cutter Department of Food Science
Presentation transcript:

Processed Meat and Poultry Performance Standards _________________ Lethality and Stabilization Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001 All current FSIS policy documents, including proposed and final regulations, are available at the FSIS website at: www.fsis.usda.gov/oppde/rdad/publications.htm The FSIS docket room is open to the public Monday through Friday, 8:30am to 4:30pm. The docket room contains copies of current proposed and final regulations and associated public comments. The location is: 300 12th Street, S.W., Room 102, Washington, DC 20250-3700 Questions regarding FSIS proposed and final regulations should be directed to the Regulations and Directives Development Staff at: 300 12th Street, S.W., Room 112, Washington, DC 20250-3700 Phone: 202-720-5627 Fax: 202-690-0486 E-Mail: FSIS.regulations@usda.gov

Comment closing date extended; now due June 28, 2001 Docket Information Docket #97-013P Performance Standards for the Production of Processed Meat and Poultry Products; Proposed Rule 66 FR 12589, February 27, 2001 Comment closing date extended; now due June 28, 2001 Extension of comment period closing date: Originally closed on May 29,2001 Extended to June 28, 2001( 66 FR 19102, April 13, 2001)

Proposed Definitions Relative to Lethality 9 CFR 430.1 Fermented product Made ready-to-eat by bacterial enzymes acting to lower pH and microbial inhibition Ready-to-eat product Safe to consume without cooking or application of some other lethality treatment to destroy pathogens Worst case product Defined for lethality requirements in 9 CFR 430.2(a)(1) for meat and poultry, and in 9 CFR 430.2(b)(1) for beef Worst Case: For purposes of the lethality requirements contained in 430.2(a)(1) worst case raw poultry contains 6.7-log10 of Salmonella in any 143 gram sample worst case raw meat contains 6.2-log10 of Salmonella in any 143 gram sample For purposes of the lethality requirements contained in 430.2(b)(1) worst case raw beef contains 4.4-log10 of E. coli O157:H7 in any 143 gram sample Other definitions included in proposed 430.1 but not discussed in today’s lethality/stabilization session. See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--A. Lethality) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12592-12601).

Proposed Text for Lethality: Salmonella 9 CFR 430.2(a) Either a probability of survival No greater than the specified Salmonella organisms in any 100 grams of finished product, assuming incoming product is worst case Or a log reduction 6.5-log10 reduction for meat 7.0-log10 reduction for poultry Detectable viable Salmonella adulterate ready-to-eat product 430.2(a)(1) Processing of any meat or poultry product, except a thermally-processed, commercially sterile product, for the purpose of rendering that product ready-to-eat, must be validated to achieve probabilities no greater than the following that Salmonella organisms would remain in any 100 gram sample of finished product, assuming that incoming raw product is worse case product. >0 surviving = 39.4%; >1=9.06%; >2=1.45%; >3=0.177%; >4=0.0174% Any detectable level of viable Salmonella organisms adulterates ready-to-eat meat and poultry products. 430.2(a)(2) Official establishments that do not wish to demonstrate that their processing results in probabilities no greater than the probabilities in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may instead employ processing validated to achieve either a 6.5-log10 reduction of Salmonella throughout a finished ready-to-eat product, or, a 7.0-log10 reduction of Salmonella throughout a finished ready-to-eat product that contains any amount of poultry. See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--A. Lethality) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12592-12601).

Proposed Text for Lethality: E. coli O157:H7 9 CFR 430.2(b) Either a probability of survival No greater than the specified E. coli O157:H7 organisms in any 100 grams of finished (fermented beef) product, assuming incoming product is worse case Or a log reduction 5.0-log10 reduction for fermented meat or poultry product containing beef Detectable viable E. coli O157:H7 adulterate ready-to-eat product 430.2(b)(1) In addition to meeting the standards in paragraph (a), of this section, processing of any fermented meat or poultry product that contains any amount of beef, except a thermally-processed, commercially sterile product, for the purpose of rendering that product ready-to-eat, must be validated to achieve probabilities no greater than the following that E. coli O157:H7 organisms would remain in any 100 gram sample of finished product, assuming that incoming raw product is worse case product. >0 surviving = 22.2%; >1=2.67% Any detectable level of viable E. coli O157:H7 organisms adulterates ready-to-eat meat and poultry products. 430.2(b)(2) Official establishments that do not wish to demonstrate that their processing results in probabilities no greater than the probabilities in paragraph (b)(1) of this section may instead employ processing validated to achieve either a 5.0-log10 reduction of E. coli O157:H7 throughout a finished ready-to-eat product that contains any amount of beef. See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--A. Lethality) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12592-12601).

Proposed Text for Lethality 9 CFR 430.2(c) Reduction of other pathogens and their toxins or toxic metabolites: Validated to prevent product adulteration 9 CFR 430.2(d) Maintain the lethality performance standards throughout product shelf-life Validated under the conditions in which the food is stored, distributed, and held See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--A. Lethality) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12592-12601).

Determination of worst case levels: Lethality Used highest Most-Probable-Number (MPN) results from FSIS national microbiology baseline surveys MPN samples were frozen; samples were companion with those that tested Salmonella positive on a qualitative test Conservative assumptions were made in determining worst case levels Assumptions: MPN values adjusted for recovery Upper 97.5% confidence bounds used for statistical measured values Levels assumed to be uniformly distributed throughout 143 grams of product ( = 100 grams/0.7; assuming a 70% yield) See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--A. Lethality) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12592-12601).

For whole poultry carcasses, the high value reported was 66 MPN/cm2 For poultry products, 2300 MPN/g is used (results seen for ground product) Poultry carcasses, the measured MPN/ml of rinse was converted to MPN/cm2 using the relationship between the weight of the bird and its surface area (i.e., SA = 0.87 weight(grams) + 635). A 1500 gram carcass would have approximately 1940 cm2 For whole poultry carcasses, the high value reported was 66 MPN/cm2 For red meat products 720 MPN/g is used: The samples from the carcass baseline survey were taken from 3 sections of the carcass, so, multiply the highest MPN value (=240 MPN/cm2) by 3. Assume cut of meat is 0.8 cm and specific density of beef is about 1.1 grams/cm3, then MPN/cm2 are assumed to estimate MPN/g. For the ground red meat product, the highest level cannot be determined from >110 MPN/g result. Upper confidence bound of level in sample: Assume  is the probability that a single cell is not detected, so that if there are n cells in a sample the probability of no detection is n. The value of  was determined by assuming that 13 cells would be detected (in a 25 gram sample) with 99% probability, so that 1- n = 0.99;  = 0.70, so that the recovery is assumed to be 30%. See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--A. Lethality) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12592-12601).

Salmonella Lethality Performance Standard Safety margin: 0.3-log10 added to worst case level resulting in the performance standard: Poultry = 7.0-log10 Meat = 6.5-log10 Implies that after application of the lethality treatment on raw product containing worst case level of cells, probability of any viable cell is 39.4% Poultry products Upper 97.5% confidence bound  37,500 cells/g Multiplied by 143 grams, = 5.36 x 106 cells Approximately 6.7-log10. Red Meat products Upper 97.5% confidence bound  12,300cells/g Multiplied by 143 grams, = 1.76 x 106 cells Approximately 6.2-log10 See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--A. Lethality) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12592-12601).

E. coli O157:H7 Lethality Performance Standard for Fermented Beef Safety margin: 0.6-log10 added to worst case level resulting in the performance standard: Fermented beef = 5.0-log10 Implies that after application of the lethality treatment on fermented beef containing worst case level of cells, probability of any viable cell is 22.2% The Agency found no reason to change present practice which is based on a 5.0-log10 lethality. In about 4000 samples analyzed for the USDA microbiology baseline studies for beef carcasses, only 2 positive MPN values, with highest value of 0.93/cm2. Recovery: Eight of nine 25-gram samples of ground beef inoculated with 0.7 E. coli O157:H7 cells/g were detected as positive, so that 97.5% lower confidence bound for recovery is 6.2%. Assuming a 6.2% recovery, the upper 97.5% confidence bound for the level is about 59.5 cells/cm2; the 59.5 cells/cm2 is multiplied by 3, and then multiplied by 143 grams to derive an approximate 4.4 log10 cells for the worst case level. Foodborne illness associated with E. coli O157:H7 might be more severe than that associated with Salmonella; researchers believe that low numbers of ingested E. coli O157:H7 cells are sufficient to cause foodborne illness; there is only a small amount of data from the Agency’s microbiological baseline survey: only two MPN samples were positive. If lethality requirement were 5.5-log10 then the probability of surviving E. coli O157:H7 for the worst case product would be: 7.6%; if lethality requirement were 6.0-log10 then the probability of surviving E. coli O157:H7 for the “worst case” product would be: 2.5%. See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--A. Lethality) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12592-12601).

Proposed Text for Stabilization 9 CFR 430.3(a) Processing of all ready-to-eat meat and poultry products must prevent multiplication of toxigenic microorganisms: Clostridium botulinum Allow no more than 1.0-log10 multiplication of Clostridium perfringens 9 CFR 430.3(b) Processing of all heat treated, not ready-to-eat meat and poultry products must meet same criteria as in (a) above Clostridium botulinum: Able to form deadly toxins when multiplying Spores of these bacteria, initially present on the raw meat, can withstand heating during cooking, become heat shocked, germinate, and after a lag period, multiply as vegetative cells during cooling Clostridium perfringens: Growth rate is high Viable counts of 105 /g or greater have been recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1996) for incriminating C. perfringens as a possible causative agent of foodborne illness Viable counts of 106 /g or greater are usually found in foods implicated in outbreaks (National Research Council, 1985) Estimating the possible amount of vegetative cell multiplication is paramount in assessing the safety of the final product See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--B. Stabilization) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12601-12602).

Proposed Text for Stabilization 9 CFR 430.3(c) Processing of products applicable to 9 CFR 430.3(a) or (b) must be validated: to maintain stabilization performance standards throughout product shelf-life under conditions in which the food is stored, distributed, and held See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--B. Stabilization) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12601-12602).

See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--B See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--B. Stabilization) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12601-12602).

Determination of worst case level: C. perfringens Used results from FSIS national microbiological baseline survey No finding greater than 105/g Worst case is assumed to be 104 C. perfringens per gram that become heat shocked, germinate, and after a lag period, multiply as vegetative cells during cooling In ground beef survey, out of 1687 samples, only one sample result was >104 /g In chicken, at 11,000/g For raw meat carcasses, out of 6313 samples analyzed, there were 10 (0.16%) results that were greater than 104 but less than 105 CFU/cm2 Distribution of C. perfringens may be highly skewed within lot; sampling may be like looking for a needle in a haystack See the preamble (section IV. The Proposed Performance Standards--B. Stabilization) for a more complete discussion (66 FR 12601-12602).

Draft Compliance Guidelines Available now: Constituent Update, May 4 FSIS Website at: www.fsis.usda.gov/OPPDE/rdad/FRPubs/RTEGuide.pdf FSIS requests comment on these Including suggestions for expansion to cover all types of ready-to-eat and partially heat-treated meat and poultry products Draft guidelines Not to be used for regulatory enforcement or compliance purposes Developed by FSIS to assist establishments in understanding the requirements of the proposed rule on performance standards for processed meat and poultry. Guidance is based on previous Agency regulations; published scientific challenge studies; and other procedures validated to achieve the performance standards. Covered ready-to-eat products include cooked, fermented, salt-cured, and dried meat and poultry products. The compliance guidelines in Appendix A and Appendix B (with the final roast beef and cooked poultry rules) are reproduced here. Of note: FSIS and ARS co-authored an article entitled “Modeling non-linear survival curves to calculate thermal inactivation of Salmonella in poultry of different fat levels” soon to be published in a scientific journal. The times within the new time/temperature combinations are significantly higher than those assumed to be effective and published in our current compliance guide (e.g., 160 degrees instantly). FSIS requests comment on these new time/temperature combinations for ready-to-eat poultry.