1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations. 2 W hat’s new in Safe Fill Definition? Definition is short as a result of: – Due diligence procedures moved to existing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Robert A. Tardif, P.E., Administrator Subsurface Systems Bureau New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services.
Advertisements

Department of Environmental Protection CLEAN FILL POLICY
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
SW101 The NPDES Industrial Storm Water Program. What Does the Industrial Program Cover? F Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity l.
A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE NAS FINAL REPORT ON CCB PLACEMENT AT COAL MINES KIMERY C VORIES OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING.
Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,
Chapter F.A.C. Updates F. Thomas Lubozynski, P.E. Waste Program Administrator.
Your logo here WasteMINZ Mid-Year Roundup Wellington.
The Proposed Part 115 Rules and Waste Utilization East and West Michigan Chapters of the Air and Waste Management Association & The Environmental Law Section.
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
S-1925 Subsection t Stakeholder Meeting November 9, :30-2:30pm NJDEP Public Hearing Room 1 st Floor, 401 East State Street Trenton, NJ.
BCC PUBLIC HEARING Concrete & Asphalt Plants Ordinance Adoption Hearing ZONING DIVISION January 27, 2015.
CCDD Rules and Regulations Salvaging Chad Broege – Thelen Sand & Gravel.
BCC Public Hearing Concrete & Asphalt Plants Ordinance ZONING DIVISION December 2, 2014.
New Leachate Sampling and Analysis Rules for C&DD Facilities Barry Chapman and Schuyler Schmidt OAC Effective January 1, 2013 Ohio’s Solid Waste.
Exemption Categories Category 1 – Industrial, farm and residential Category 2 – Storage and processing Category 3 – Permits by Rule Category 4 – Recycling,
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Looking Ahead.
Status More on gardening pathway & historic fill proposals – situations addressed under the “Permanent Solutions with Conditions (No AULs)” MCP Public.
Mid-Florida Materials (MFM) (Division of Hubbard Construction) C&D Debris Disposal Facility Renewal of C&D Permit.
Recycled Asphalt Shingles in Texas Dale Rand, P.E.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.
Detect Limits as Representation for a Standard VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi Risk Assessor, DERR, Central Office VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi.
Connecticut Department of Public Works -- Rebecca Cutler – Environmental Analyst.
Appendix 8.1 – Waste Management Plan Oil Spill Contingency Plan – Land Document Number: KOC.SA.020 Incident Name: Incident Date/Time: Incident Location:
Chapter F.A.C. Updates Solid Waste Program.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Waste Management Overview & Land Disposal Restrictions.
TRB: Waste Management and Resource Efficiency Workshop July 2011 Tom Roick, Senior Policy Analyst Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Oregon DEQ’s.
Department of Public Works Non-Exclusive Solid Waste Collection Franchise System – Review September 29, 2014.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
David Dippel, P.G. Frank Zeng, P.E. Waste Permits Division Municipal Solid Waste Permits Section 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
Draft Policy for Assessing & Managing Contaminants in soil: a progress report WMINZ Conference, 15 October 2009 James Court and Howard Ellis Ministry for.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
South Australia’s Environment Protection Authority Articulating aesthetics Monday 24 August 2015 Andrew Pruszinski.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
1 Permit Implementation Regulations Defines the phrase “significant change in the design or operation of a solid waste facility that is not authorized.
Denise Imbler, Program Administrator Florida Hazardous Materials Planning and Prevention Program
Presented by: “Name, Title” “Date” For “Client Name” Universal Waste Don Gansert Managing Consultant October 16, 2008.
State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Office of Waste Management Policy Memo Guidelines for the Management of Historically.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations Major Changes/Revisions Presented to the CSSAB November 8, 2002.
Community Development Department Special Exception Vehicle Rental and Leasing St. Joe Plaza.
Division of Water Quality Coal Ash Storage, Use, & Disposal: Update Ted L. Bush, Chief Aquifer Protection Section Division of Water Quality “To protect.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCE DEPT. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (DERM) “THE PERMITTING PROCESS TO DISPOSE OF STORMWATER.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
Asphalt Paving Technical Committee (APT) Proposed revisions to the Asphalt Concrete Sections of the MAG Specifications.
30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 210, Subchapter E Presented by Kara Denney September 23, 2015.
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Solid Waste Handling Standards
Timothy Veatch, Section Chief
What to Do With Contaminated Fill
Ohio EPA Beneficial Use Program
FAQs for Evaluating the Soil-to-Groundwater Pathway
Institutional Controls At Voluntary Cleanup Sites
the path less traveled Termination of Post Closure Care
Presentation transcript:

1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations

2 W hat’s new in Safe Fill Definition? Definition is short as a result of: – Due diligence procedures moved to existing §287.11(a) – Exceptions to safe fill moved to a new section, § (Determination that a material is safe fill – Placement along waterways moved to another new section, §287.13

3 Safe Fill Process Material is:  Safe fill by Definition – Unrestricted use  Safe fill by Determination – Restricted uses  Otherwise waste – PBR, General Permit or individual permit for beneficial uses – Disposal

4 Safe Fill Definition Limited to the following uncontaminated materials: – Soil including rock and stone – Dredged material – Used asphalt – Brick, block, concrete or mixtures of brick, block, concrete generated from C/D activities must be separate from other c/d wastes Recognizable as brick, block or concrete Examples of other c/d wastes that may contaminate: wood waste, metal, plaster, gypsum, paper, lead painted materials, wiring, etc.

5 Safe Fill Definition (continued) Materials are uncontaminated safe fill based on the following: – Not affected by a spill or release (determined by appropriate level of due diligence) – No visible staining, odor or sensory nuisance from chemical contaminants associated with the material does not include staining from normal vehicular use or dripping lubricant – Meet numeric standards of §287.11(b) --- lower of: residential generic value or the lowest residential direct contact numeric value(risk-based Statewide health standards) – Sampled and analyzed based on procedures in §287.11(c-f)

6 Safe Fill Definition (continued) Safe Fill Definition (continued) Material may be safe fill under (Determination that a material is safe fill) Burden of proof on user to demonstrate material is safe fill Placement in Waters require Department approval and comply with § (Relationship of safe fill to surface waters) Safe fill not regulated as waste with one exception : – Materials determined to be safe fill under § are regulated as waste until used as safe fill

7 Due Diligence and Safe fill Numeric Standards – § (continued) Due diligence requirements moved to (a) – 2 options instead of proposed three options – Possible to screen by field or laboratory testing to verify spill or release or confirm due diligence results Numeric standards moved to §287.11(b) – No changes to proposed safe fill numeric standards – No changes to proposed composite and discrete sampling procedures in §287.11, moved to subsections (c), (d) & (e)

8 Due Diligence and Safe fill Numeric Standards – § – PQL (practical quantitation limitation) added to demonstrate compliance with safe fill numeric standards if lower than PQL – Statistical analysis provisions for large sites or piles added, to a new subsection, (f). Overall, draft final regulations allow for field and laboratory screening of material including composite, discrete or statistical sampling and analyses for safe fill by definition or determination and for the permits by rule provisions.

9 New § Determination that a material is safe fill Two options under safe fill determination: (a)(1) and (a)(2) §287.12(a)(1) – requirements for determination are: – Material exceeds SF numeric std. but is not affected by a spill or release – Soil or drained dredged material only qualify – No visible staining, no odor or nuisance does not include staining due to normal vehicular use and dripping lubricant – Numeric standards may be > safe fill but may not be > the cap (cap = lower of nonresidential direct contact or nonresidential generic value of SHS)

10 §287.12(a)(1) (continued) Determination that a material is safe fill Use of material limited to: – Within a right-of-way – Offsite of residential property – Within a property For drained dredged material, additional uses limited to: – Beach nourishment on land adjacent to dredging (consisting mainly of sand and gravel) – Soil additive/soil substitute for commercial or industrial purposes or, – blended with clean soil/dredge to use as fill for residential purposes. Blend must meet safe fill numeric standards

11 §287.12(a)(2) (continued) §287.12(a)(2) - Requirements for determination are: – Material affected by a spill or release – Soil, drained dredged material, historic fill, and recognizable brick, block, concrete or their mixtures (no waste) qualify – Visible staining acceptable but no odor or nuisance – Num. standard may be above SF but < cap Use of material limited to: – Within a right-of-way – Historic fill can be moved offsite in amounts < 500 cy/excavation location; used as fill or as construction material – Within a property

12 §287.12(b) (continued) Determination that a material is safe fill Numeric standards capped under determination – The cap is lower of : lowest nonresidential direct contact or nonresidential generic value from soil-to-groundwater pathway numeric values

13 §287.12(c) (continued) Determination that a material is safe fill Safe fill determination under (a)(1) & (a)(2) require: – Appropriate level of due diligence for material not subject to a spill or release under (a)(1) – Sampling /analysis for material subject to a spill or release under (a)(2) – Sampling/analysis based on (c - f) – user maintains documentation to support determination

14 §287.12(c) (continued) Determination that a material is safe fill – User submits proof of recorded deed notice to Department that includes following: exact location by latitude and longitude of the fill placement list contaminants and their concentrations – Location and contaminant description part of the deed for all future conveyances or transfers of subject property

15 §287.12(c)(7) (continued) Determination that a material is safe fill Deed notice not required if: – Material is not affected by a spill or release in accordance with § (a)(1) and exceeds SF but is equal to or below the cap, or – Material is affected by a spill or release in accordance with § (a)(2), is below the cap but also at or below the background level at the property

16 §287.12(d) to (g) (continued) Determination that a material is safe fill Placement in Waters prohibited Not regulated as waste when used as fill Storage/transportation requirements of Chapter 299 apply Zoning restrictions when sf num. Std. exceed – Offsite movement when allowed only to zoned commercial/industrial properties – Unzoned commercial/industrial use only where background contaminants > those in the material Burden of proof on user

17 New § (continued) Relationship of Safe Fill to surface Waters For placement of safe fill into or along surface waters: – If approved under Chapter 105, material may not produce leachate in excess of residential GWMSC for used aquifer and TDS<2500 mg/L by SPLP analysis – Comply with water quality standards in Chapters 16 & 93 For placement into waters as part of an active or abandoned mine or abandoned quarry reclamation: – 10% of safe fill numeric standards for contaminants – Approved sampling/analysis plan required – Comply with water quality standards in Chs.93 & 16

18 § Relationship of Safe Fill to surface Waters – For metals, in lieu of 10%, SPLP analysis to show material does not produce a leachate in excess of residential GWMSC for used aquifer/TDS<2500 mg/L. SPLP only if GW monitoring is conducted where material is to be placed Material determined safe fill under §287.12, may not be placed into waters of the Commonwealth

19 Changes to Permits by Rule § (i) & § (j) (continued) § (i): PBR for beneficial use of contaminated brick, block or concrete or mixtures of brick, block or concrete from C/D activities that do not meet SF definition – Clarification that it should not be mixed with other c/d wastes and brick, block or concrete should be recognizable, as such. Three proposed PBRs -(j), (k) & (l)- in § are consolidated into one PBR, now subsection (j)

20 Changes to Permits by Rule § (i) & § (j) (continued) PBR § (j) for beneficial use of contaminated soils, dredged material, used asphalt and historic fill (j) can be used also for material that is not subject to a spill or release but exceeds safe fill numeric standards and proposed for uses not authorized under §287.12(a) Numeric standards based on nonresidential SHS instead of proposed residential SHS – Lower of the nonresidential generic value or the lowest nonresidential direct contact value SHS (Tables 3 & 4) – For drained dredged material TCLP or SPLP required

21 Permits by Rule (continued) § (i) & § (j) Material may be beneficially used: – To bring an area to grade – As construction material – In reclamation of active/abandoned mines or abandoned quarries if approved by the Department or under Department contract – For control of fire and subsidence events

22 Permits by Rule (continued) § (i) & § (j) All conditions proposed for the two PBR are retained and following new ones added: – Document longitude and latitude of location where material is placed for beneficial use – Eliminate direct contact pathways promptly & permanently by using engineering controls – User to maintain records of analytical evaluations that include: a recorded, amended deed that shows the exact location where material is placed at the property including description of contaminants from sampling and analysis deed to be part of all future conveyances or transfers of subject property

23 Permits by Rule § (i) & § (j) – User submits a copy of recorded deed notice to Department with latitude/longitude of placement, contaminants detected including concentrations Placement into or on waters prohibited Except for reclamation, when used to bring an area to grade, material not to be used in a way to create a landfill or a valley fill

24 Permit by Rule - § (k) Proposed PBR (m) for placement of contaminated soil at a site undergoing remediation is now subsection (k) with following minor changes: – Sampling and analysis based on § (c – f) – PQL to demonstrate compliance with the applicable SHS used as remediation standards

25 Other Changes (continued) Historic fill definition amended by deleting 287.1(ii) due to: – Moved volume exemption to §287.12(a)(2)(ii) – Spill or release requirement from exempted volume deleted §287.2 (relating to Scope) expanded to include following activities as not regulated under the residual waste regulations: – §287.2(e)(3): noncoal materials from noncoal surface mining activities as defined §77.1, and in compliance with Noncoal Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act

26 Other Changes – §287.2 (e)(4): Commercial dredging operations where mainly sand and gravel are dredged in compliance with Department-issued Chapter 105 permit, 401 certification, and consistency determination under the Coastal Zone Management Program

27 Changes to Appendix A (continued) Proposed Tables 3 (short list under safe fill), 4, 5 and 6 (under PBR) are deleted due to: – Two options for due diligence instead of proposed three options – testing is based on substances suspected or identified by knowledge, due diligence or both – Consolidation of 3 PBRs into one PBR in (j)

28 Changes to Appendix A Changes to Appendix A Tables 1 and 2 (safe fill numeric standards) are updated to include numeric standards applying under § and listed as a range (>safe fill <cap) New Table 3 – lists numeric standards for organics under the PBR provisions in (i) & (j) New Table 4 – lists numeric stds. for metals and inorganics under the PBR, (i) & (j) Numeric values in all 4 Tables are corrected to be in compliance with the SHS in amended Act 2 regulations

29