BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10 Are there Rival Causes?.
Advertisements

Value conflicts and assumptions - 1 While an author usually offers explicit reasons why he comes to a certain conclusion, he also makes (implicit) assumptions.
Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Evaluating Arguments Jason M. Chang Critical Thinking.
Statistics.  Statistically significant– When the P-value falls below the alpha level, we say that the tests is “statistically significant” at the alpha.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking Value Conflicts & Assumptions
The Scientific Method.
NOTES TO ANDERSON, CHAPTERS 3 PROFESSIONAL WRITING.
+ Argument Writing Moving from persuasive to argumentative essays.
Fallacies - Weak Induction. Homework Review: Fallacies » pp , §4.1 “Fallacies in General” » pp , §4.3 “Fallacies of Weak Induction” Inductive.
An approach to teaching it. Jacqueline is purchasing her first car and feels torn as she balances conflicting desires and messages. She yearns to be seated.
Do you suffer from judgement creep? A group moderation session will soon put you right!
Definitions – John Dewey
Argumentation - 1 We often encounter situations in which someone is trying to persuade us of a point of view by presenting reasons for it. We often encounter.
Short Paper By Anselmus Sudirman Th Laksmi Widyarini STIKES Jenderal Ahmad Yani Yogyakarta.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing 9.1 The Language of Hypothesis Testing.
Grammar Practice.  Language Standard 3: Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different contexts, to make effective choices.
Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 5 Causality.
Testing Hypotheses Tuesday, October 28. Objectives: Understand the logic of hypothesis testing and following related concepts Sidedness of a test (left-,
Steps of the Scientific Method.
1 How to Analyze A Case STEP 1 – READ THE CASE STEP 2 – READ THE CASE AGAIN Having said that, case analysis is not about merely reading the case, but about.
--- Hephizibah Roskelly and David A. Jolliffee, Everyday Use
Logical Fallacies.
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
1 Lesson 11: Criteria of a good argument SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
How to write a reader response paper SUMMARIZING, ANALYZING, AND SYNTHESIZING.
MAKING GOOD ARGUMENTS 5 Key Ters. The Logic of Everyday Life Conversation A: I hear last semester was difficult. How do you think this term will go? B:
The Expository Essay An Overview
NOTES TO ANDERSON, CHAPTERS 6 & 7 PROFESSIONAL WRITING.
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
Hypotheses tests for means
Unit 1 What is Physics? Science- comes from Latin meaning ‘to know’ Understanding facts- TRUTHS about nature Pure vs. Applied Science Pure- wanting.
Terms Propositions Fallacies Miscellaneous.
AN INTRODUCTION Managing Change in Healthcare IT Implementations Sherrilynne Fuller, Center for Public Health Informatics School of Public Health, University.
& The Scientific Method. Forming an idea of an expected outcome based on observations and experiences.
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Statistical Analysis. Null hypothesis: observed differences are due to chance (no causal relationship) Ex. If light intensity increases, then the rate.
Chapter 10 Lecture Notes Causal Inductive Arguments.
Tuesday 08/12 Grab DOK handouts and put them in your “Units” tab. Warm-up: Look over the Academic Integrity Policy that you researched for homework. Respond.
Text Table of Contents #10: How Good is the Evidence?
Reliability performance on language tests is also affected by factors other than communicative language ability. (1) test method facets They are systematic.
BLHC4032 CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING SIX STEPS OF CRITICAL THINKING.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Writing an analysis of a text: Read the text carefully. Take notes. Look for similarities, patterns, or groups of ideas. Rearrange the notes into groups.
Section 10.2: Tests of Significance Hypothesis Testing Null and Alternative Hypothesis P-value Statistically Significant.
IB Business & Management Exam Basics. What is meant by these words? Assessment Objectives Command terms.
T. Trimpe Science Scramble Science Experiments T. Trimpe
Reason Pt. 2. Inductive Reasoning Induction moves from the particular to the general. As a result, it involves generalizing: moving from observable facts.
Toulmin Argument A process of discovering how argumentation works.
Text Table of Contents #5: Evaluating the Argument.
Evaluate Inductive Reasoning and Spot Inductive Fallacies
Scientific Method. OVERVIEW What is the Scientific Method? It’s a way to solve/explain a problem or natural phenomenon, while removing human bias and.
Writing a Classical Argument
.  Evaluators are not only faced with methodological challenges but also ethical challenges on a daily basis.
The Toulmin Method. Why Toulmin…  Based on the work of philosopher Stephen Toulmin.  A way to analyze the effectiveness of an argument.  A way to respond.
Scientific Method Vocabulary Observation Hypothesis Prediction Experiment Variable Experimental group Control group Data Correlation Statistics Mean Distribution.
Unit Four Seminar. Fallacies A.What is a fallacy? 1. A fallacy is a defect in an argument that consists in something other than false premises alone.
Academic Writing Fatima AlShaikh. A duty that you are assigned to perform or a task that is assigned or undertaken. For example: Research papers (most.
MKT 421 guide / mkt421guidedotcom.  MKT 421 Entire Course And Final Guide  1. Blending the firm's promotion efforts to convey a complete and consistent.
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
Chapter 9: Critical Thinking
Is Education a Good Investment?
Logical Fallacies.
Thinking Skills Paper 2.
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Logical Fallacies
Chapter 9: Critical Thinking
Faulty Reasoning What’s wrong with this statement?
FCAT Science Standard Arianna Medina.
Presentation transcript:

BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers Text Table of Contents #11: How Good is the Evidence? Rival Causes

Some Comments Faithfulness and Charity in analyzing an argument. Ambiguities Why is identifying them important? Faithfulness and Charity in analyzing an argument. Context is important in interpreting what the author is communicating. Evaluating the argument / reasons: use caution Usually will NOT “Fail” a reason outright. Usually we will decide on a level of “confidence” in the reason – a degree of probability / acceptance.

Testing Arguments and Reasons Truth – is it true (by common knowledge) or at least probably true? For example, as we have to assume more things to accept a reason as true – the likelihood of the reason being acceptable decreases. Logical strength – if the reason is true could we conclude otherwise? Could these reasons lead to a different conclusion? Relevance – do we need the reason for the conclusion to be true? Could different reasons lead to this conclusion? Circularity – does the conclusion assume or include the reason(s)?

Evaluating the Argument ConcL: I have earned an A in this class. R1: I have attended every class and completed every assignment and exam. R2: I have put in more effort than in any other class this semester. R3: I have an A average for all criteria on the syllabus including assignments and exams.

Testing Arguments and Reasons I like all democrats Obama is a democrat Therefore I like Obama What is the relative degree of relevance of the reasons to the conclusion? If there was only one other reason I could like Obama – for example I might like him because he takes the same position as I do on something important? If there were 10 other reasons I might like Obama like his youth, his integrity, his voting record, etc.? Circularity?

How Good is the Evidence: Rival Causes A plausible alternative explanation for why an outcome occurred. Applies to: Reasons related to the conclusion Evidence / supporting reasons related to main reason. Ex: muffler problem concluded vibration caused by broken baffles but could have been caused by loose bracket, etc.

How Good is the Evidence: Rival Causes Oversimplification: in many situations there are complicated causal relationships. Research – difficult to account for all differences between the groups studied. Causation vs. correlation. When you identify possible alternative causes test them for logical strength and probability. Ex: Researchers identify alternates in order to support their own conclusions.

How Good is the Evidence? Form groups of 4-5, take out paper and write down all members’ names. Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.

Analogy as Evidence Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars. Gun control as typically discussed makes owning some weapons impossible (like assault rifles) for all people all weapons hard or impossible for some people (like crazy people or felons). Does affect non-criminals - for some weapons.

I was recently hired to find the best cherry pie recipe in the state of Virginia. I found it in the kitchen of Evelyn Smith. My search began by requesting all interested cherry pie tasters to answer my newspaper ad. All respondents in the state met in a central location and tasted cherry pies. Each of 68 persons tasted the five cherry pies that were judged superior at the recent Virginia State Fair. To assure fairness, each "taste" was made on a different day so that the taste buds would not be confused. The winner? Ms. Smith’s pie! She received over 40 percent of the votes. Her closest competitor received 22 percent. Apparently, Ms. Smith has something special when it comes to cherry pies.

According to a recent study, one of the major causes of violence in schools is listening to aggressive heavy metal music. Researchers studied more than 100 cases of “serious” violence within schools and found that 68% of the children involved in the violence listened to heavy metal music. These children would frequently come to school with headphones, listening to this music, as well as wearing clothing from heavy metal bands. Frequently, these heavy metal songs discuss violence, and therefore are a direct cause of school violence.