1 Interactive Introduction Cost Effectiveness and Psychotherapy Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Psychotherapeutic Centrum ‘De Viersprong’, Halsteren

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparing different treatments How can we decide?.
Advertisements

Measuring outcomes Emma Frew October Measuring outcomes Learning objectives By the end of the session students should be able to – Explain how different.
Quality of life in relation to costs
Quality of life (Utility) Measurements In Relation to Health Economics
1 Could there be a single European EQ tariff? Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D. Former address: –iMTA, Erasmus university Present address: –Medical Psychology.
COCOM Kwaliteit van leven in maat en getal Jan van Busschbach.
Justice and Economic Evaluation Prof. Dr. Jan Busschbach
1 The Future of Quality of Life Assessment in Cost-Effectiveness Research Prof. Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Erasmus MC Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
1 The QALYs debate  Prof. dr. Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D.  Erasmus MC  Institute for Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
1 Does it make a difference for the patient? Survival & Quality of life  Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D.  Erasmus MC Institute for Medical Psychology and.
1 A Health Economic View on Borderline Personality Disorder Prof. dr. Jan Busschbach Viersprong Institute for studies on Personality Disorders Medical.
Big Q and Little Q revisited Christopher McCabe PhD Capital Health Endowed Research Chair in Emergency Medicine Research.
(Cost-)Effectiveness of Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders Jan van Busschbach Prof. Dr. J. van Busschbach Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
(Cost-)Effectiveness of Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders Prof. dr. Jan van Busschbach Department of Medical Psychology & Psychotherapy Erasmus MC.
1 Interactive Introduction cost effectiveness Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Psychotherapeutic Centrum ‘De Viersprong’, Halsteren
1 Cost-Effectiveness in Medicine An Interactive Introduction  Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D.  Erasmus MC Institute for Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
Health Economics II –2010 Health Economic Evaluations Part III Lecture 2 Cost-effectiveness analysis QALYs and cost-utility analysis Nils-Olov Stålhammar.
Quality of life Assessment introduction
1 Dyslexia and Cost Effectiveness Prof. dr. Jan van Busschbach De Viersprong Erasmus MC.
1 EuroQol EQ-5D Jan J. V. Busschbach, Ph.D Psychotherapeutic Centrum ‘De Viersprong’, Halsteren Department of Medical.
1 EQ-5D, HUI and SF-36 Of the shelf instruments…..
1 Health Economics  Comparing different allocations  Should we spent our money on Wheel chairs Screening for cancer  Comparing costs  Comparing outcome.
Measuring the “Q” in QALYs for cost- effectiveness analysis: the EuroQol Group’s approach Valuing health outcomes for healthcare decision making using.
Overview of the EQ-5D Purpose and origins of the descriptive system.
1 The valuation of disease-specific questionnaires for QALY analysis  To rescue data in absence of an utility measure  Growth hormone deficiency in adults.
Is healthcare any good for patients? Measuring health outcomes using EQ-5D Professor Paul Kind Principal Investigator Outcomes Research Group Centre for.
Rescuing Clinical Trial Data For Economic Evaluation
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 11: Cost-utility analysis – Part 4.
Why use the EQ-5D? What are the alternatives?. What are the alternatives for Direct valuation? Other VAS Time Trade-Off Standard Gamble Willingness to.
EQ-5D AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF OSTEOPOROSIS AT-RISK PATIENTS IN A SWEDISH OSTEOPOROSIS PATIENT REGISTRY Arun Krishna 1, Dan Mellström 2, Zhiyi Li 3, Chun-Po.
BACKGROUND Cost-effectiveness of Psychotherapy for Cluster C Personality Disorders and the Value of Information and Implementation Djøra I. Soeteman 1,2,
1 Reconciliation of Economic Arguments and Clinical Practice Monday November 4, 2002 ISPOR, Rotterdam Jan Busschbach PhD, –Department of Medical Psychology.
1 Patient values or values from the general public.
1 QALY, Burden of Disease and Budget Impact  Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D.  Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands  
1 The valuation of disease-specific health states to facilitate economic evaluation E. Kok, E. Stolk, Jan J. v. Busschbach Address: –Jan v. Busschbach.
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY)
Interactive Introduction cost effectiveness Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D Viersprong Institute for studies on Personality Disorders (VISPD)
1 Cost effectiveness as argument for reimbursement in prevention Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Erasmus MC –Institute for Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
1 Interactive introduction in Quality of life Assessment Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC
1 EQ-5D, HUI and SF-36 Of the shelf instruments…..
The experience of Denmark with Summary Measures of Population Health 7 th Meeting of the Task Force on Health Expectancies Luxembourg, 2 December 2008.
Patsi Sinnott, PT, PhD, MPH HERC Economics Course April 7, 2010 Introduction to Effectiveness, Patient Preferences and Utilities.
Governance and Public Policy: a NICE example John Brazier Professor of Health Economics, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK With thanks to Matt Stevenson.
Economic evaluation of psychotherapy for personality disorders: burden of disease and cost-effectiveness Djøra Soeteman Viersprong Institute for Studies.
Quality of life and Cost-Effectiveness An Interactive Introduction Prof. Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Erasmus MC Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy Viersprong.
1 The Cost Effectiveness of Treatment of Personality Disorder  Dr. Jan J.V. Busschbach  PTC De Viersprong, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, 
Cost-Effectiveness of Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders Soeteman, Busschbach, Verheul.
Cost-effectiveness in the quest to convince the outside world Dr. Jan Busschbach De Viersprong Erasmus MC
1 Cost Effectiveness  Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D.  Viersprong Institute for studies on Personality Disorders VISPD  Erasmus.
1 The Economics of Health Care and New Technologies Friday October 18, 2002 Between Technology and Humanity, Brussels Jan Busschbach PhD, –Department of.
Hermann P. G. Schneider, Alastair H. MacLennan and David Feeny
“Introduction to Patient Preference Methods used for QALYs” Presented by: Jan Busschbach, PhD, Chair Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department.
Cost-Effectiveness of Psychotherapy (for Personality Disorders) Prof. dr. Jan van Busschbach.
Values Lower Than Death Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. –Erasmus University Rotterdam institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) PO box DR.
How to weight cost effectiveness in appraisal NVTAG / CVZ course: The appraisal process, work in progress 22th of April 2009 Jan van Busschbach.
(Cost-)Effectiveness of Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders Jan van Busschbach Prof. Dr. J. van Busschbach Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
Effect of framing of death on health state values obtained from DCEs Dr. Esther W. de Bekker-Grob by Jonker, de.
1 Quality of life and Cost-Effectiveness An Interactive Introduction Prof. Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Erasmus MC Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
Who is involved in making NICE guidance recommendations and what evidence do they look at? Heidi Livingstone, Senior Public Involvement Adviser.
1 Are values cultural determined…..  Many believe that QoL is cultural determined  One of the starting points of the EuroQol group.
1 Cost-Effectiveness in Medicine An Interactive Introduction  Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D.  Erasmus MC Institute for Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
1 VAS, SG, TTO and PTO An Interactive Introduction.
1 Utilization of Quality of Life Research in Decision-Making and Policy  Prof. Dr. Jan J.V. Busschbach  Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands  Section.
The burden of disease in patients with personality disorder indicated for psychotherapy: Arguments for necessity of care Djøra Soeteman, MSc
Prof. Dr. Jan J.V. Busschbach
The valuation of disease-specific questionnaires for QALY analysis
Is healthcare any good for patients
Student Champions Learning about NICE
Measuring outcomes Emma Frew October 2012.
How to Measure Quality of Life
Presentation transcript:

1 Interactive Introduction Cost Effectiveness and Psychotherapy Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Psychotherapeutic Centrum ‘De Viersprong’, Halsteren – Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC –

2 Psychotherapy or cancer treatment Symptoms of illnessPsycho Chemo Additional Survival0 years0.5 year Quality of life0.5   0.5 Days benefit / patient10 year0.5 year Costs of treatment € € Savings (medical)5.000 €0 € Savings (productivity)5.000 €0 €

3 Issues –Quality of life measurement –Rule of rescue »Equity »Burden of disease –Productivity costs –Discounting Non issues –Determination of effects –Direct medical costs –Survival / days of benefit Issues in health economics

4 Standardise Quality of Life EuroQol EQ-5D Recommend by the Dutch Health Council (CvZ) Also 5 questions: MOBILITY –I have no problems in walking about –I have some problems in walking about –I am confined to bed SELF-CARE –I have no problems with self-care –I have some problems washing or dressing myself –I am unable to wash or dress myself USUAL ACTIVITIES (e.g. work, study, housework family or leisure activities) –I have no problems with performing my usual activities –I have some problems with performing my usual activities –I am unable to perform my usual activities PAIN/DISCOMFORT –I have no pain or discomfort –I have moderate pain or discomfort –I have extreme pain or discomfort ANXIETY/DEPRESSION –I am not anxious or depressed –I am moderately anxious or depressed –I am extremely anxious or depressed

5 Value a health state Wheelchair –Some problems in walking about –Some problems washing or dressing –Some problems with performing usual activities –Some pain or discomfort –No psychosocial problems

6 Time Trade-Off TTO Wheelchair –With a life expectancy: 50 years How many years would you trade-off for a cure? –Max. trade-off is 10 years QALY(wheel) = QALY(healthy) –Y * V(wheel) = Y * V(healthy) –50 V(wheel) = 40 * 1 V(wheel) =.8

7 EuroQol EQ-5D MOBILITY –I have no problems in walking about –I have some problems in walking about –I am confined to bed SELF-CARE –I have no problems with self-care –I have some problems washing or dressing myself –I am unable to wash or dress myself USUAL ACTIVITIES (e.g. work, study, housework family or leisure activities) –I have no problems with performing my usual activities –I have some problems with performing my usual activities –I am unable to perform my usual activities PAIN/DISCOMFORT –I have no pain or discomfort –I have moderate pain or discomfort –I have extreme pain or discomfort ANXIETY/DEPRESSION –I am not anxious or depressed –I am moderately anxious or depressed –I am extremely anxious or depressed

8 Direct measurement

9 Indirect measurement MOBILITY –I have no problems in walking about –I have some problems in walking about –I am confined to bed SELF-CARE –I have no problems with self-care –I have some problems washing or dressing myself –I am unable to wash or dress myself USUAL ACTIVITIES (e.g. work, study, housework family or leisure activities) –I have no problems with performing my usual activities –I have some problems with performing my usual activities –I am unable to perform my usual activities PAIN/DISCOMFORT –I have no pain or discomfort –I have moderate pain or discomfort –I have extreme pain or discomfort ANXIETY/DEPRESSION –I am not anxious or depressed –I am moderately anxious or depressed –I am extremely anxious or depressed

10 Indirect measurement

11 Validated Questionnaires Describe health states Have values from the general public –Rosser –QWB –15D –HUI Mark 2 –HUI Mark 3 –EuroQol EQ-5D

12 Effect psychotherapy

13 QALY Count life years Value (V) quality of life (Q) –V(Q) = [0..1] »1 = Healthy »0 = Dead –One dimension Adjusted life years (Y) for value quality of life –QALY = Y * V(Q) »Y: numbers of life years »Q: health state »V(Q): the value of health state Q Also called “utility analysis”

14 Which health care program is the most cost-effective? A new wheelchair for elderly –Increases quality of life = 0.1 –10 years benefit –Extra costs: $ 3,000 per life year –QALY = Y x V(Q) = 10 x 0.1 = 1 QALY –Costs are 10 x $3,000 = $30,000 –Cost/QALY = 30,000/QALY Special post natal care –Quality of life = 0.8 –35 year –Costs are $250,000 –QALY = 35 x 0.8 = 28 QALY –Cost/QALY = 8,929/QALY

15 Example STIP STIP –Short-Term Inpatient Psychotherapy Cost price –Per patient day: € –3 mouths = 91.3 day –91.3 x 210 = 19, € Effect –Assume quality of life increase of 0.25 –Over 10 year Cost / QALY –19, / (10 x 0.25) = 7, € Although gold standard… Cost per QALY of psychotherapy have never been published

16 QALY league table

17 Car economics Should we spend our money on a –Suzuki Alto 1.0 –BMW 316 –Comparing costs –Comparing outcome Relate costs to outcome –Cost per outcome –Cost per kilometer »Suzuki Alto 1.0 »BMW 316

18 Car league table

ABC Utility of Health Egalitarian Concerns

20 Implications shifting threshold QALY are weighted Weighted QALYs are maximized –Health is no longer the only thing maximized Health status population will drop Differences in health will drop –Egalitarian consideration are incorporated Burden of disease becomes a criteria –Equity

21 CE-ratio by equity

22 Burden of disease based on STEP-data (N = 641)

23 Are health economic results used? Must we be afraid of the uncontrolled use of QALY? QALY league table are difficult to make –Largest at Harvard School of Public Health – »a comprehensive league table »a catalogue of preference scores QALY league tables are not used –At least not in The Netherlands –There used to be a mysterious list in UK….

24 Health economic are used next to other criteria Burden of disease Ethical constrains Financial constrains

25 Reimbursement arguments Dunning’s Funnel –1990 –Government declaration 2002 –Necessary care »Need »Equity elements –Efficacy –Cost effectiveness –Own account and responsibility

26 Reimbursement arguments Impact on QoL Effect on QoL Cost effectiveness ? QALYs