WP4: “ ” Meeting Marcelo Cintra do Amaral WP4: “ Transferability guidelines and Evaluation ” Meeting Marcelo Cintra do Amaral Grant agreement no.: Coordination and support actions (Coordinating) Activity code:SST : Urban freight delivery systems

2 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Outline  WP4 general overwiew  Description of tasks  Expected contributions from partners  Action Plan - Description of actions, responsibles and dates: [ADJUSTED DATES] o First actions o Next actions

3 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Focus: Latin America: Brazil and Peru WP4 general overview WP4 - Transferability guidelines and Evaluation WP3 - Selected case studies WP2 - Business concepts WP5 - Urban logistics guidelines Bestufs

4 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | WP4 general overview October, 2010 May, 2011

5 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | WP4 general overview Participant number Participant short name TIS.PTNEAUnivLEEDSBHTRANSPTL-UNITIS.BR Person- months per participant: 21,533,521,5

6 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | WP4 general overview Objectives This WP is fully devoted to the assessment of a transferability methodology between EU and other continents with a particular focus on the Latin America cases. More specifically this refers to: Collection and analysis of transferability methodologies; (4.1) Barriers and Drivers to transferability applied to Urban logistic initiatives; (4.2) Practical feasibility and expected results; (4.2) Potential of transferability beyond TURBLOG_WW (4.2 and 4.3) Recommendations on Transferability in particular for Latin America countries (4.2 and 4.4).

7 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Description of tasks Task 4.1. – Methodological framework for transferability (lea by TIS.PT, NEA, UNIVLEEDS) Transferability process contemplates the following main stages a “search phase” where a best practice/ business concept on urban logistics is identified in the originator city; a “appraisal phase” where the compatibility of the best practice in the receptor city is appraised; an “refinement phase” where specific barriers amenable to change and factors of success are identified in the receptor city; finally, an “implementation phase” where the good practice is implemented in the receptor city This task is fully dedicated to the establishment of a framework to assess the potential for transferability of urban logistics concepts, practices and models.

8 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Possible questions: There is another metodologie of transferability to use or to compare? No, this one is general enough and for urban mobility. There is another metodologie to select a “business model” practice? Yes, but in another context: benchmarking. Can we change the order of the steps or indicate adaptations? Yes, it’ll be a possible product of 4.2 and 4.3.

9 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Preliminar questions: The steps 1 to 6 can change of order? The city can first look around, and find good solutions and after that, analyse if there is similar problems in the city. Or a spiral approach.

10 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands |

11 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Description of tasks Task 4.2. – Assessment of transferability options and barriers (led by BHTRANS, TIS.PT, NEA, UNIVLEEDS, PTL-UNI) The exercise of transferability is most of all about looking properly at the enablers (success drivers) and the conditioning barriers affecting adoption of mobility management measures that selected before as candidates. Therefore, it is necessary to systematise what barriers to policy implementation exist and when are they likely to occur in each target case. The aim is thus to undertake an assessment of transferability and finally propose a framework supporting the adoption of urban logistic processes in new settings, in particular Latin America (in particular to Brazil and Peru). It will assess whether urban logistic measures adopted in the reviewed stock of experiences (both in case studies and as synthesised at the EU level in previous projects) are actually transferable and under what specific conditions.

12 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Step9 best practices - WP2 (or all practices) Business example – WP3 (?) Cities context Latin America (focus on Brazil and Peru) Final product (recomendations or adaptation) Hypotetical cases 1 The 10 steps metodologie For each step, general recomendations or adaptations Lima/Gamarra and Cuzco (Cesar) Fortaleza (Tis.Br) Cariacica, Br (Paul Timms) Belo Horizonte (Marcelo) Task 4.2. – Table of Assessment of transferability options and barriers

13 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Latin America context: Brazil and Peru Task 4.2 general overview Aplication of measures WP3 – Best practices (or all practices?) WP2 – business examples (?) “hypothetical cases” - aplication of the steps anda recommendations in a example (measure X from city Y on city Z) Turblog measures

14 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Description of tasks Task Potential for transferability beyond TURBLOG_WW (led TIS.PT, UNIVLEEDS, NEA) The harmonisation of a transferability process will provide decision makers and practitioners a common and structured language facilitating wide-scale engagement in urban logistics innovative initiatives from a world wide perspective. This will provide recipients of the “TURBLOG_WW message” with valuable information of the topic by bringing to the dissemination activities a digest on the state-of-the-art in transferability along with aspects on practical feasibility and expected results of mobility management initiatives. As a transferability process does not simply imply individual technical or operational features of instruments, it should also focus on how a required policy instrument to support urban logistics may fit within the context of the receptor city, The need to transfer not only the policy instrument but also some of the relations between institutions and territories

15 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Rest of the word context Task 4.3 general overview Aplication of measures “hypothetical cases” - aplication of the steps anda recommendations in a example (measure X from city Y on city Z) Bestufs measures Proposition: NEA developpment with contribution all partners

16 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Description of tasks Task 4.4. – Reporting (led by BHTRANS, TIS.PT, UNIVLEEDS, PTL-UNI) This task is dedicated to the consolidation of transferability findings and respective evaluation. More emphasis will be put on the Brazilian and Peruvian opportunities however considerations on the potential for other contexts and beyond the project will also be made.

17 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Expected contributions from partners TASK TIS.PTNEAUnivLEEDSINOVA+BHTRANSPTL-UNITIS.BRTOT Task 4.1. – Methodological framework for transferability 0,5 1,5 Task 4.2. – Assessment of transferability options and barriers 0,5 1 2,51,517 Task Potential for transferability beyond TURBLOG_WW 10,51 2,5 Task 4.4. – Reporting 0,5 1 2,5 TOTAL 21,5303,521,513,5

18 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Action Plan - WP4 first actions 1.Coordination meeting (actions planning) and Task 4.1 discussion (metodologie adopted) BHTRANS (Marcelo and Geraldo) with Univ. Leeds (Paul Timms) meeting BHTRANS (Marcelo and Geraldo) with Univ. Leeds (Paul Timms) meeting 14/10/2010, in Belo Horizonte. 14/10/2010, in Belo Horizonte. 2.Turblog dissemination, success factors and barriers collecteds in Brazilian urban logistic stakeholders workshop Paul Timms, Marcelo and Geraldo Paul Timms, Marcelo and Geraldo Workshop participators: BHTRANS (President, Directors, technicals); Universities (UFMG, CEFET-MG, Fund. Dom Cabral); Logistic agents. Workshop participators: BHTRANS (President, Directors, technicals); Universities (UFMG, CEFET-MG, Fund. Dom Cabral); Logistic agents. 15/10/2010, in Belo Horizonte. 15/10/2010, in Belo Horizonte.

19 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Action Plan - WP4 first actions 3.Success factors and barriers collecteds in Peru stakeholders workshop Paul Timms, Marcelo and Geraldo ( with collaboration of other partners) Paul Timms, Marcelo and Geraldo ( with collaboration of other partners) 20/10/2010, in Lima. 20/10/2010, in Lima. 4.WP4 Action Plan discussion All partners All partners 18/10/2010, in Lima 18/10/2010, in Lima

20 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Action Plan - WP4 first actions 5.Good practices in the Case Studies and Cities context AND Exercise proposition: 03/12/2010BHTRANS – 03/12/ WP4 Exercise discussion All partners – 9/12/2010 All partners – 9/12/2010

21 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Action Plan - WP4 next actions 7.Task 4.1 (led 7.Task 4.1 (led by TIS.PT, NEA, UNIVLEEDS) led by 12/11/2010 NEW DATE? – draft version by Tis.Pt with Univ. LEEDS collaboration 30/11/2010 NEW DATE? – final version with sugestions by partners. 8.Milestone 8.Milestone M13 Guidance for transferability established Document with key issues for transferability produced Expected date: 30/11/2010 NEW DATE? By Tis.Pt with BHTRANS and UnivLeeds collaboration

22 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Action Plan - WP4 next actions 9.Task 4.2 (led by BHTRANS, TIS.PT, NEA, UNIVLEEDS, PTL-UNI) Inputs: WP2, WP3 best practices and success factors and barriers collecteds in Brazil and Peru meetings. 19/11/ /01/ Table of Assessment of transferability options and barriers: first version by BHTRANS and UnivLEEDS 15/12/ /01/2011 – suggestions others partners 31/01/2011 ? IT’S POSSIBLE? - Hypothetical cases - 31/01/2011 ? IT’S POSSIBLE? - Hypothetical cases - PTL- UNI, UnivLeeds, BHTRANS and Tis.Br 15/02/ draft report 15/02/ draft report 31/03/2011 – final report 31/03/2011 – final report

23 | 23 Marcelo Cintra do Amaral| BHTRANS | Zoetermeer, Netherlands | Action Plan - WP4 next actions 10.Task 4.3 ( led TIS.PT, UNIVLEEDS, NEA) Inputs: Bestufs measures and 4.2 Draft report Hypothetical cases from bestufs by NEA 31/03/ Hypothetical cases from bestufs by NEA 15/04/2011 – Draft report b 15/04/2011 – Draft report by Tis.Pt with BHTRANS and UnivLeeds collaboration 30/04/2011 – Final version 30/04/2011 – Final version 11.Task 4.4 ( led by BHTRANS, TIS.PT, UNIVLEEDS, PTL-UNI) 15/01/2011 – Report Structure proposition by BHTRANS, UnivLeeds and Tis.Pt 15/02/2011 – Final Report Structure (with partners contributions) 31/03/ First version with Task 4.1 and Task /04/2011 – Complete Draft Report D4 – Report on transferability guidelines and evaluation applied to urban logistics – 31/05/2011