Presenter: Wan-Ning Chen Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: November 11, 2009 Ramaswamy, S., Harris, I., & Tschirner, U. (2001). Student peer teaching: An.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flexible Grouping Practices
Advertisements

Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
CCE GUIDELINES FOR CLASSES 6 TO 8
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
Chapter 10 Teaching and Learning Strategies
Structured Learning Assistance (SLA) and Training for Success Jim Valkenburg Delta College.
From Numbers To Learning. Vision Of FEN We believe in providing a holistic educational system, encompassing all learning fields that emphasize achievement.
C H A P T E R 10 Social Constructivist Approaches
Teaching Methods Chapters 7 and 8 Instructors and Their Jobs and additional resources.
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Dr. Pratibha Gupta Associate professor Deptt. of Community Medicine ELMC & H, Lucknow.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
STEP: Teaching Pedagogy 1 David J. Shook, Ph.D. Coordinator, TA Development Programs, CETL Associate Professor of Spanish.
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
Basics of Lesson Planning
ICT TEACHERS` COMPETENCIES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
1 Evaluation. 2 Evaluating The Organization Effective evaluation begins at the organizational level. It starts with a strategic plan that has been carefully.
Principles of Assessment
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Problem Based Learning (PBL) David W. Dillard Arcadia Valley CTC.
1 Self-regulated Learning Strategies and Achievement in an Introduction to Information Systems Course Catherine, S. C. (2002). Self- regulated learning.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Applying creativity in CS high school education - criteria, teaching example and evaluation Romeike, R. (2007). Applying creativity in CS high school education.
Creating Web-based Learning Activities to Support the Needs of Diverse K-12 Learners.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 15: Capacity development and training on Maternity.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Elements of successful lesson and some classroom management tips Lecturing.
Prepared and presented by Reda Saad El-Mahdy Ahmed Bin Hanbal Independent Secondary School for Boys And “SEC Curriculum Standards”
Blue Springs Elementary School Standards Based Report Card Parent Meeting.
As a Teaching Strategy Ellen Plummer, RN Melissa Lewis, RN.
NESCent Postdoc Professional Development Series on Effective Teaching and Learning Session 5 – Student Involvement: Cooperative Learning, Learning Communities.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
Review of Course Approach and Assignment on Class Discussions These slides from session 1 of the class and can be found on the class website.
Course and Syllabus Development Presented by Claire Major Assistant Professor, Higher Education Administration.
A free-to-share educational resource designed and presented by Stephen Nalder.
Project Based Learning What, Why & How. Objectives for Today Have you experience the beginning of a project (= Making your own project) Analyze your experience,
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Cooperative Learning Better learning through teamwork.
Formative Peer Review at Ocean County College. Guiding Principle “Ideally, the peer review of teaching is a critically reflective and collaborative process.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
Designing a Training Program RATIONALE OF THE TRAINING Background or introduction of what the training is all about –Developments in the field/discipline/area.
Teaching Philosophy and Teaching Portfolio
Peer Evaluation and the College of Business Effective 3/15/93.
Critical Thinking By: Nakendra Jones Tyrone Salmon-Jarrett Nikia Johnson Peta-ann Rowe Tiffany Brown.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
Using Journals to Build Information Literacy Skills Violet H. Harada University of Hawaii ACEI Annual International Conference April.
Problem-based Learning Cherdsak Iramaneerat Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital 1PBL.
Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: April 12, 2008 Liaw, S., Huang, H.,
Identifying Assessments
Project Based Learning “If I can learn the way you teach, why can’t you teach the way I learn”
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
1 Using team based learning (TBL) to maximise the effectiveness of flipped learning School of Law Zoe Swan Sally Gill Kristian P Humble.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
이화여자대학교 Combining Cooperative Learning And Peer Instruction In Introductory Computer Science (SIGCSE 2000 Proceedings) 002OFE03 비서교육전공 4 학기 황 정 희 J. D.
Rank the following know-how levels from the lowest level to the highest remember (memorize and repeat facts as they are given in various sources) understand.
How do Sudanese's educators approach cultural diversity within the Turkish Universities settings? Dr. Amani A. Elfaki Department of Anatomy/ Faculty of.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Module 5: Questioning, Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Introduction and Module Overview Standards Knowledge and skills Assignments.
JIGSAW METHOD OF TEACHING. The purpose of Jigsaw is to develop teamwork and cooperative learning skills within all students. In addition it helps.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
Flexible Grouping Practices
Understanding assessment in the MYP
Cooperative Learning Concepts
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
Presentation transcript:

Presenter: Wan-Ning Chen Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: November 11, 2009 Ramaswamy, S., Harris, I., & Tschirner, U. (2001). Student peer teaching: An innovative approach to instruction in science and engineering education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), Student Peer Teaching: An Innovative Approach to Instruction in Science and Engineering Education

INTRODUCTION In applied science and engineering higher education, the most important purposes are for students to learn fundamental concepts, principles and application. Traditional method of lecturing and note-taking –not encourage students to actively participate in in-depth learning of the content. –not foster student learning of essential problem-solving skills in a collective team or group environment. The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a pilot- study in a senior paper science and engineering class, of an innovative instructional method designed to foster student problem-solving and in-depth learning of material, namely, student peer teaching.

PERSPECTIVES FROM LITERATURE The goals of education for the professions include –Specialized knowledge –Skills in applying knowledge in the complex situations of practice Smith (1998) suggests four strategies for development of engineering expertise: –problem-based learning –cognitive apprenticeship –reflective practicums –cooperative learning Problem-based learning, which has been well developed in health profession education (Barrow and Tamblyn, 1980) has been increasingly used in other professional education.

Peer teaching has been found to benefit the student-teachers, because preparing to teach involves in-depth study of material, analysis, and selection of key concepts into one’s own words. Cooperative learning is the use of small student groups as teams to accomplish a common goal, emphasizing positive interdependence, individual and group accountability, face-to- face interaction, team skills, and group processing(Smith, 1996). PERSPECTIVES FROM LITERATURE

METHODS OF PEER TEACHING Students in a senior level course in the field of paper science and engineering were required to teach a small portion of the subject matter to their fellow classmates. 4 weeks - instructor covering the basic principles and concepts in the course. Students in the class selected topics of individual interest from among subject matter units. 2 hours - Professor provided mentoring for each student: –individual discussions of the subject matter –relative importance of various topics –sources of additional information –strategies for teaching 1 month - student prepare for his or her teaching session.

One important goal of this instructional strategy was to encourage active learning and participation of all students in the class. Professor participated in the class in a dual role: –Sat among the class as a student, making comments and asking questions. –Facilitate class discussion by asking questions of the students and generally encouraging active participation of all students. Total grade –50% : The teaching performance of students was evaluated by classmates and the professor, using a performance rating form. –50% : Students’ performance on the final examination at the end of the quarter. METHODS OF PEER TEACHING

EVALUATION OF PEER TEACHING - Evaluation of Students’ Instruction Two methods (1) evaluation of students’ instruction by their peers and the Professor. (2) evaluation by all students of the effectiveness of this teaching method. For each student teaching session, a total of 11–13 students and the Professor participated in evaluation of the session, using a 5-point scale for each of the evaluation criteria.

It is noteworthy that the overall means, for each criterion, and for the overall performance and total points, for student- evaluators only and the Professor only, were not significantly different. Using the Professor’s ratings as the “gold standard” for performance assessment, this finding suggests that students serve as accurate evaluators of their peers. The quality of visual aids received the highest mean rating, and the highest rating for all student-instructors, –university students’ general proficiency in developing computer-aided graphics. EVALUATION OF PEER TEACHING - Evaluation of Students’ Instruction

Students received the lowest mean rating on the criterion of stimulating student active participation. –while focusing on development of in-depth content knowledge, and translating their knowledge into a succinct presentation format, student- teachers gave less attention to planning teaching strategies to stimulate class participation and student problem solving. It is noteworthy that students in the class, on the average, gave the lowest mean rating to their own level of preparation for participation in the class (m = 3.16). –students not completing recommended reading assignments in preparation for class. EVALUATION OF PEER TEACHING - Evaluation of Students’ Instruction

EVALUATION OF PEER TEACHING - Student Viewpoints Students’ viewpoints were obtained at the end of the quarter: (1) Structured questions: the overall value of the teaching method for student learning, the value of the lecture preparation sessions with the instructor, and the effectiveness of students evaluating each other. (2) Open-ended questions: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations for change in using this instructional method. Students were most positive about the value of the mentoring sessions with the Professor (m = 3.43) and the teaching session for their own learning (m = 3.07). Students were generally negative about students evaluating each other, particularly if these evaluations comprise a significant percentage of the grade (m = 2.5). 53% of students rating this experience as “4 = Fair.”

Benefits: –Students’ developing substantial in-depth understanding and expertise in the subject area of their teaching session. –Developing teaching and presentation skills. Weaknesses –While each student develops an in-depth understanding of the subject of their teaching session, the class may not learn as well from the students as from their Professor. –Students may focus on the content of their teaching session at the expense of other content. –Students perceive that only the Professor has the requisite expertise and objectivity to grade them fairly. EVALUATION OF PEER TEACHING - Student Viewpoints

Suggestions –The teaching time should be equally divided between the student- instructor and the Professor, with the Professor discussing details left out, “driving home” the most important details, and providing insights from experience. –Having periodic quizzes to make sure that they are keeping current with all course content, and reassure them that they are making appropriate progress. –Student-instructors be mandated to include in their sessions teaching strategies designed to stimulate class participation, such as use of cases. EVALUATION OF PEER TEACHING - Student Viewpoints

DISCUSSION A modified structure for student peer teaching: –Cooperative learning methods. –Increased Professor involvement in class sessions, in the role of mentor. –Modifications in performance evaluation methods.