Streamflow Information in Texas David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin USGS Workshop, Fort Worth,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Ernie Wells Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather Service May.
Advertisements

Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
Hydrologic Measurement Precipitation Evaporation Streamflow Channel Properties Topography GIS datasets Reading: Applied Hydrology Chapter 6.
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
Hydrologic Measurement
Mel Kunkel & Jen Pierce Boise State University Climatic Indices: Predictors of Idaho's Precipitation and Streamflow.
GIS Modeling Venkatesh Merwade, University of Texas at Austin Interdisciplinary aquatic modeling workshop, July 21, 2005.
Improving Estimates of Hydrologic Extremes: Applications to the Olympic National Forest Ingrid Tohver PNW Climate Science Conference September 14, 2011.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Colorado River Compact Administration Program Steve Wolff Colorado River Coordinator Interstate Streams Division Wyoming State Engineer’s Office.
Environmental Flows Under Texas Senate Bill 3: Did We Leave Enough Water for the Fishes? Kirk Winemiller, Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Sustainability of Ground-Water Use in the San Pedro River Basin, Cochise County, Arizona James Leenhouts,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Alabama Water Science Center StreamStats: By Kernell Ries and J.
OVERVIEW: USGS Streamgage Network Design. USGS Streamgage Network effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements.
National Flood Conference April 22, 2009 Victor Hom Hydrologic Services Division Office of Climate, Water and Weather NOAA’s National Weather Service National.
Water Web Services David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Open Waters Symposium Delft, the Netherlands.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
Water in Colorado: Climate, Hydrology and Uses Dr. Gigi Richard Faculty Director, Water Center at CMU Professor, Geosciences River Cañon - Nestler Water.
The Texas Instream Flow Program Barney Austin Surface Water Resources Division Texas Water Development Board Halloween 2005.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey StreamStats: A Web-Based Tool for Estimating Streamflow Statistics by Alan Rea Idaho Water Science.
FLASH FLOOD PREDICTION James McDonald 4/29/08. Introduction - Relevance  90% of all national disasters are weather and flood related  Central Texas.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING for the SULPHUR RIVER BASIN Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Austin, Texas Consultant: R. J. Brandes Company.
DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning.
Presenter: Eric S. Hersh, University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources TRRMS Annual Symposium May 18, 2006 New Tools to Assess.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
Combining CMORPH with Gauge Analysis over
Modes of Sustainability Definition  In text  In aquifer-storage terms  In water-budget terms  In physical changes at the river (natural side)
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
Role of the Texas Water Development Board in Environmental Flow studies Barney Austin Surface Water Resources Division Texas Water Development Board May.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Streamgage Network: Implication of Budget Cuts Michael Lewis USGS ID Water Science Center.
CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Lecture 1 – Introduction to the course Readings for today –Applied Hydrology, Chapter 1 –“Integrated Observatories to.
July 31, 2012 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Tim Bardsley Western Water Assessment 1 Future Colorado Basin Observing System.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Streamgaging Task Force Summary Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia September 10, 2003.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Sensors: Making Monitoring More Useful Charles S. Spooner US EPA May 20, 2008.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Montana StreamStats An overview of Montana StreamStats and methods for obtaining streamflow characteristics.
Water Quality Assessment Cypress Creek Adrian L. Vogl Aquatic Resources Texas State University Jason Pinchback River System Institute Texas State University.
Design of meteorological data networks Dr. Anil Kumar Lohani National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee India Hydro-Met Network Design Workshop, April 6-11,
Streamflow Information for the Next Century A Plan for the National Streamflow Information Program December 2, 1999.
By Pete Steeves Rainy River and Lake of the Woods (RRLOW) StreamStats Demonstration for the International Joint Commission October 2, 2014 U.S. Geological.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Overview and Evaluation of the Current Hydrologic Data Network Scott Morlock USGS Indiana Water.
Building Hydrologic Information Systems David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Modeling.
Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers!
Submitted by: Stephanie L. Johnson
Lauren Schneider CE394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Dr. Maidment 4/28/05
National Hydro Data Programs
Arc Hydro for EPA Basins
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Improvements from Senate Bill 2: Instream Flow requirements
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Hydrology.
Model Calibration and Forecast Error for NFIE-Hydro
Assessing Environmental Streamflow Characteristics in Texas
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Situational Awareness for Flash Flooding
ESRI User Conference Water Resources User Group, July 15, 2010
Presentation transcript:

Streamflow Information in Texas David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin USGS Workshop, Fort Worth, Tx, 9 February 2005

Streamflow Information in Texas Texas as part of the National Streamflow Information Program Gage network analysis in Texas Streamflow information system

Streamflow Information in Texas Texas as part of the National Streamflow Information Program Gage network analysis in Texas Streamflow information system

Current Stream Gaging Network (~ 7000 gages)

Water Watch – Real Time Data (~ 5000 gages)

National Streamflow Information Program What gages need to be federally supported? Five goals with associated GIS metrics Recent National Academy report National Academy Press

NSIP Goals 1.Interstate and International Waters (Borders and Compacts) 2.Flood Forecasts (NWS sites) 3.River Basin Outflows (Water Budgets) 4.Sentinel Watersheds (Regionalization and Long Term Trends of “natural flows”) 5.Water Quality (NAQWA, NASQAN,…

1.Interstate and International Waters (515 gage sites) Metric: Operate a discharge station at rivers: on or near crossings of state and international borders where the drainage area of the river reach is greater than 500 square miles, or where the location is mandated by a treaty, compact or decree

2. NWS Forecast Points (3244 Gage sites) Metric: Operate a streamgaging station at each NWS and NRCS forecast point that is not located on a reservoir

3. River Basin Outflows (450 gage sites) Metric: Operate streamgaging stations near the terminus of each of the 352 Hydrologic Accounting Units (6-digit HUC’s) for water budgeting purposes

4. Sentinel Watersheds (874 Gage sites) Regionalization and Long Term Trends in Streamflow (stations measuring natural flow in undisturbed lands) Ecoregion

5. Water Quality (210 gage sites) Metric: Locate a stream gage on the same river reach as a permanent water quality monitoring site

All NSIP Stations (4424 gage sites)

Source of NSIP Gage Sites Active USGS gages 2796 (63%) Other agency gages 307 (7%) Inactive gages 837 (19%) New gages 484 (11%) 3103 existing gages (70%) 1221 inactive or new gages (30%)

Number of NSIP Gage Sites Texas (416) California (201) Colorado (171) Kansas (166) Rhode Island (2) Delaware (4)

Streamflow Information in Texas Texas as part of the National Streamflow Information Program Gage network analysis in Texas Streamflow information system

Stream Gages in Texas Daily Mean Flows Peak Flows

Existing: 312 daily stations, 17 annual peak stations Back to 1962

Existing: 312 daily stations, 17 annual peak stations NSIP Goal: 416 daily stations NSIP Goals vs Existing Stations

Texas Stream Gaging Network Active Stations Discontinued Stations

Texas Gage Network Assessment Carried out by USGS and Texas Water Development Board (principal local cooperator) Goals –Regionalization – estimate flows or flow characteristics at ungaged sites in 11 hydrologically similar regions –Major Flow – obtain flow rates and volumes in large streams –Outflow from the State – account for streamflow leaving the State –Streamflow conditions assessment – assess current conditions with regard to long-term data and define temporal trends in flow

River Basins and Hydrologic Regions

Regional Optimization Model Based on Generalized Least Squares Regression – separates model error from error due to finite sample size Estimating mean annual flow and 25 year peak flow using basin characteristics with equations for each hydrologic region Three planning horizons (5yr, 10yr, 20yr) Active or discontinued stations in natural watersheds considered Start with all stations then step backwards, eliminating least informative station at each step

As number of stations increases, sampling error decreases until a minimum is reached As planning horizon increases, sampling error decreases 5yr 10yr 20yr Estimating the 25-year Peak Streamflow Mean Sampling Error Number of Stations

Results of Regional Optimization Stations on steepest part of the curve offer the most valuable regional hydrologic information relative to basin characteristics Sampling error increases as you go west and climate gets drier –Mean annual flow 6.6% to 114.3% –25yr peak flow 9.9% to 28.5% Much less error in regression equations for 25yr peak flow than mean annual flow in arid regions Greater variability in error between regions than by adding stations within a region

Flow Correlations Strong correlation in flows for upstream and downstream stations on the same river –61 of 81 station pairs analyzed for mean annual flow have correlation coefficient > 0.9 –43 of 129 station pairs analyzed for 25 year flow have correlation coefficient > 0.9 Select stations for core network that are not highly correlated with other selected stations

Interstation Correlation of Mean Annual Flow > – 0.95 < 0.9 Correlation Coefficient

Figure 12 > – 0.95 < 0.9 Correlation Coefficient Interstation Correlation of 25yr Peak Flow

Results of Texas Study Proposed core network of 263 stations for regional hydrology purposes in natural watersheds –205 active stations (78%) NSIP for Texas requires 416 stations –Border (10), NWS (345), Basin (36), Sentinel (87), Water Quality (16) (some gages serve multiple goals) Existing Gage Network of 312 stations Difficult to make comparisons between national and regional studies because criteria are different

Streamflow Information in Texas Texas as part of the National Streamflow Information Program Gage network analysis in Texas Streamflow information system

Streamflow Information System “The stream gaging activity is no longer considered a network of observation points, but rather an information system in which data are provided by both observation and synthesis” (Fontaine et al, 1984, “Cost Effectiveness of the Stream- Gaging Program in Maine”, USGS Water Supply Paper 2244)

Water Watch – Real Time Data (~ 5000 gages)

Streamstats

Space Historical daily mean discharge Streamflow statistics Real Time data Streamflow Information in Space and Time Time At Gages Anywhere on a Stream Future PossibilitiesCurrent Streamstats

Numerical Weather Prediction (North American Regional Reanalysis) PrecipitationEvaporation 3 hour time steps, 32 km grid,

Real-time bacteria estimation Kansas River at DeSoto, KS

Point Design Model Gage Domain Site gages so as to accurately measure the vertical flux (e.g. precipitation) over a domain

Coverage Design Model Take a space and subdivide it into subspaces with an area for each point e.g. service areas of fire stations (goal of 4 min response time to a call)

NWS forecast Watersheds (flooding) EPA TMDL Segments (water quality) TCEQ water availability points (water supply) Guadalupe HydroNetwork Coverages of the Guadalupe Basin

San Marcos basin as a coverage model

Instream Flows in Texas Senate Bill 2 in 2001 Texas Legislature authorizes legal protection of instream flow Study program on selected reaches underway Review by National Academy Report released Feb 8, 2005

Senate Bill 2 Implementation is joint responsibility of TWDB, TPWD, TCEQ SB2 says: “… conduct studies and analyses to determine appropriate…flow conditions [that]…support a sound ecological environment.” Achieving this goal is scientific and institutional challenge for Texas

Instream Flow Studies Requires TPWD, TWDB, TCEQ to develop procedures for defining instream flow requirements Implemented on priority study regions by 2010 Based on aquatic life analysis Priority Study Regions Guadalupe San Antonio Brazos Trinity Sabine

River Reach Studies

Combining Flows and Biology Instream Flow Decision Making Hydrodynamic Model Habitat Descriptions Habitat Model ArcGIS SMS/RMA2Data Collection and some statistics Depth & velocity Species groups Criterion

Biological Gage A representative reach associated with a stream gage Regular monitoring for aquatic life assessment Scientific program for relating flow and ecological integrity

Conclusions National: number of stream gages steady, real-time rising Texas: number of stream gages declining since peak of ~410 in 1972 Losing 6 gages per year to less than 290 currently Texas National

Texas Needs 416 gages to meet national needs Texas (416)

Statistical studies have been done to optimize existing gage network > – 0.95 < 0.9 Correlation Coefficient

We need flows to support lots of different watershed coverages TCEQ water availability points (water supply) NWS forecast Watersheds (flooding) EPA TMDL Segments (water quality) Guadalupe River Network

We face a major challenge to define instream flows