LQCD Computing Review Bakul Banerjee Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory May 24, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 7 Managing Risk.
Advertisements

Project Management Concepts
Acquisition Planning and Adequate Market Research National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Acquisition and Grants Office Oversight and Compliance.
PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
Software Quality Assurance Plan
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
Getting The Theory Down to Earth Project Plan Dubai September 2007.
Chapter 7: Managing Risk
Project Cost Management Estimation Budget Cost Control
Cost, Schedule & Funding Closeout Jan Joint DOE/NSF CD2/3a Review 1 DOE/NSF Review of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Project SC 6/7 Cost, Schedule.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Introduction to Project Management Avneet Mathur
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Chapter 5 IT Processes Presented by Dr. Mohamed Sammouda.
Managing the Information Technology Resource Jerry N. Luftman
Project Process Discussion Adam D. Martinez Mgr, Market Ops Divisional Projects Organization ERCOT RMS Meeting May 10, 2006.
© 2008 Prentice Hall11-1 Introduction to Project Management Chapter 11 Managing Project Execution Information Systems Project Management: A Process and.
Project Execution.
Software Engineering Institute Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
Chapter 9. Intro  What is Project Management?  Project Manager  Project Failures & Successes Managing Projects  PMBOK  SDLC Core Process 1 – Project.
18/21/20151 Instructor: Suprakash Datta (datta[at]cse.yorku.ca) ext Lectures: Tues (CB 122), 7–10 PM Office hours: Wed 3-5 pm (CSEB 3043), or by.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
SA Capstone Requirements and Design Week 10 SYST Winter 2013 Instructors: Jerry Kotuba & Joe Varrasso.
Module 8: Risk Management, Monitoring and Project Control We would like to acknowledge the support of the Project Management Institute and the International.
Project Management Process Overview
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
Server Virtualization: Navy Network Operations Centers
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
Software Configuration Management
BSBPMG503A Manage Project Time Manage Project Time Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit Code BSBPMG503A.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Rev. 0 CONFIDENTIAL Mod.19 02/00 Rev.2 Mobile Terminals S.p.A. Trieste Author: M.Fragiacomo, D.Protti, M.Torelli 31 Project Idea Feasibility.
Lecture 11 Managing Project Execution. Project Execution The phase of a project in which work towards direct achievement of the project’s objectives and.
Chapter 11. Intro  What is Project Management?  Project Manager  Project Failures & Successes Managing Projects  PMBOK  SDLC Core Process 1 – Project.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Barry Boehm, USC CS 510 Software Planning Guidelines.
Presentation to the Information Services Board March 6, 2008 Bill Kehoe, Chief Information Officer Bill Kehoe, Chief Information Officer.
1 1 Nunn-McCurdy Legislation/Program Impacts Della McPhail Chief Financial Officer 308 ARSW DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution.
Project Management Methodology
BSBPMG501A Manage Application of Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
What is project management?
Project Management Processes for a Project Chapter 3 PMBOK® Fourth Edition.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
1 Chapter 11 Planning. 2 Project Planning “establishing a predetermined course of action within a forecasted environment” “establishing a predetermined.
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
Project Management PTM721S
LQCD Computing Project Overview
Chapter 11 Project Management.
Project Management – Part I
Software Project Configuration Management
Managing the Project Lifecycle
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Software Configuration Management
12.2 Conduct Procurements The process of obtaining seller responses, selecting a seller and awarding the contract The team applies selection criteria.
Project Management – Part II
LQCD Computing Operations
Project Management.
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Department of Licensing HP 3000 Replatforming Project Closeout Report
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Project Management Chapter 11.
Managing Project Work, Scope, Schedules, and Cost
Second Avenue Subway Project Execution Strategy
Presentation transcript:

LQCD Computing Review Bakul Banerjee Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory May 24, 2005

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/20052 LQCD Computing Project zScope: The Office of Science has initiated an investment project titled “SC Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics (LQCD) Computing” to create a seamless multi-site computing system necessary for sustained computational capabilities to perform the calculations essential to support Lattice QCD scientists. The goal of the project is to deploy a system delivering a total (average) computing capacity of 17.4 teraflop/s by the end of FY 09. This figure includes the 4.2 teraflop/s expected from the US QCDOC computer. zDrivers: Need for computing capacity by LQCD scientists, and available funding

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/20053 Lattice QCD Computing zAn OMB300 IT Investment initial proposal for FY06 was submitted on May 18, The revised submission for FY07 is with the DOE now. zProposed Project initiation date – 10/1/05; end date – 9/30/2009 zProposed funding from HEP and NP to FNAL, BNL, & JLab zProposed level of funding: $2.5M for FY06 thru FY 08, and $1.7M for FY 09. zBefore the approval of RFPs for procurement at each site, a rigorous specification review will be held to evaluate the merit of the proposed systems against alternatives. zWBS items for specifications will not be considered complete before the closeout of specification reviews.

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/20054 FNAL Level 1 Milestones NameFinish Date Release 1.8 new Tflops to operation9/14/2006 Deliver 0.85 Tflops-yr at FNAL FY069/30/2006 Release 2.2 new Tflops to operation4/1/2007 Deliver 4.0 Tflops-yr at FNAL FY079/30/2007 Release 3.6 new Tflops to operation4/1/2008 Deliver 6.2 Tflops-yr at FNAL FY089/30/2008 Release 2.9 new Tflops to operation4/1/2009 Deliver 8.6 Tflops-yr at FNAL FY099/30/2009

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/20055 JLab Level 1 Milestones NameFinish Date Release 0.45 new Tflop/s to operation4/1/2006 Deliver 1.15 Tflops-yr at JLabFY069/30/2006 Release 0.6 new Tflop/s to operation4/1/2007 Deliver 1.3 Tflops-yr at JLab FY079/29/2007 Release 0.9 new Tflop/s to operation4/1/2008 Deliver 1.6 Tflops-yr at JLab FY089/30/2008 Release 0.7 new Tflop/s to operation4/1/2009 Deliver 2.2 Tflops-yr at JLab FY099/30/2009

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/20056 BNL Level 1 Milestones NameFinish Date Deliver 4.2 Tflops-yr at BNL FY069/30/2006 Deliver 4.2 Tflops-yr at BNL FY079/30/2007 Deliver 4.2 Tflops-yr at BNL FY089/30/2008 Deliver 4.2 Tflops-yr at BNL FY099/30/2009

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/20057 LQCD Phases and details zProject phases in OMB300 yPlanning – project management yAcquisition – all hardware purchases yOperations – FTE for installation/operations zProject management documents in progress: yProject Execution Plan (Preliminary) yWork Breakdown Structure yDetailed Budget Estimate zThis system is a based on the R&D work done with SCIDAC funding

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/20058 Fund Management zThroughout its duration, the project is jointly funded by DOE- HEP and DOE-NP yFunds will go to Laboratories directly yAn agreement between DOE-HEP and DOE-NP will be established to track the awards z Allocation to laboratories: yFNAL – only HEP yJLab – only NP yBNL – distributed funds: HEP and NP zLaboratories will contribute to the project in kind (base) zSCIDAC efforts and funds are excluded from the project.

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/20059 Project Management Strategies zDistributed WBS, but integrated cost/performance accounting (more later) zFinancial/operational risks and mitigation strategy yCost and release schedules of commodity HW: Built to optimized cost using competitive bidding, experienced buyers, rigorous vendor evaluation ySchedule of FNAL facility upgrade: Early start on upgrade process (already begun) zChange management of cost and schedule: change control board, memoranda of understanding, budget authorization process, annual statement of work, WBS status reporting zBaseline management of WBS and budget authority processes will be created

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Project Management Strategies (contd) zChange management of controlled documents including review documents will be maintained in the project office zCyber security: Laboratories are responsible for implementing cyber security procedures. Site mangers will provide annual assessment reports to the project office zESH compliance: Laboratories will obtain necessary permits and assure compliance. Site managers will provide reports to the project office. zQuality assurance: peer reviews, self-assessments, deployment of operational metrics, quality control of procured hardware

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Project Control zProject WBS control: Once baselined, primary controlled elements of the project are schedule and cost as defined in the WBS. ySite managers are responsible for reporting monthly status of the project WBS to APM. yFinancial officers from laboratories are responsible for reporting monthly actual project cost at each site in a predefined format yAPM is responsible for conducting monthly status reviews, preparation of the comprehensive status reports yPM leads quarterly overall cost, schedule and technical performance reviews and reports the results to the Federal Project Manager. zWorking with the project office, each Laboratory will establish unique accounting charge codes associated operating and equipment funds.

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Project Control (cntd.) zControlled items: yTechnical deliverables defined in milestones ySchedule defined by Level 1 and Level 2 milestones yCost specified in the WBS at the cost accounting level zChange management of controlled items using change control threshold table (later) and Change Control Request (CCR) process zReviews: yCritical system specifications associated with RFPs will undergo technical team reviews yDesign reviews and performance testing of the completed systems will be used to ensure that each system meets the system specifications yAll CCRs to be reviewed by LQCD Scientific Program Committee for potential impact to the scientific program

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Change Threshold Table LevelCostScheduleTechnical Scope/Performance DOE Federal Project Director (Level 1) 6 or more months increase (cumulative) in a Level 1 milestone date Changes to scope that affect mission need and requirements LQCD Change Control Board (Level 2) Change of > $100K in labor/equipment balance or movement of > $25K between laboratories 3-month or more delay of a Level 1 milestone date > 10% decrease from baseline of either the targeted computing capability increment (Tflop/s) or integrated delivery (Tflop/s- yrs) in a single project year. LQCD Contractor Project Manager (Level 3) Any increase of > $25K in equipment purchase price > 1-month delay of a Level 2 milestone date Any deviation from technical deliverables that negatively affects expected performance specifications by more than 3%

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Risk Identification Area of RiskProbability of Occurrence Description ScheduleLowVendors may take longer than anticipated to bring new cpu's, memory systems, and/or interconnect systems to market. PerformanceLowVendors may take longer than anticipated to bring new cpu's, memory systems, and/or interconnect systems to market, or the performance of these components does not meet predictions. PerformanceLowLow utilization of the computing systems due to inadequate user support or due to unreliable components. CostLowAlthough cost projections for current budget year appear to be reasonably reliable, projections for subsequent years become progressively uncertain. CostLowUnexpected increases in life costs arise after systems are acquired. PerformanceLow Systems are held too long and become ineffective, increasing cost and using facility space. DependenciesLowHost institutions will not provide space, network connectivity, and mass storage. SuretyLowNatural disaster and/or major electrical failure PerformanceLowA major system simply fails to work. PerformanceMediumChanges in funding, due to alteration in administration policy, or legislative directives. DataLowLoss of stored data.

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Risk Management zProcurement risk assessment will be an integral part of each specification review zBenchmark data will be collected for prototypes and delivered systems using LQCD specific formulations. The data will be analyzed and used to make decisions during the next procurement cycle zIf the outcome of risk assessment results in significant changes, they will be managed using CCR process described above. Risk management process will be integrated with the CCR process zIf the risk is minimal and does not exceed the threshold designed for CCB, risk assessments and their outcomes will be consolidated and reported to DOE as a part of quarterly reports.

LQCD Cost and Schedule

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Budget Allocation

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Highlights of WBS zStructure of the MS Project WBS yThe master WBS is composed of three subprojects for three laboratories. yControlled master file will be managed at Fermilab yOnce the implementation of the WBS is understood by all parties, the master WBS and its components will be baselined yEach laboratory will status the WBS file on a monthly basis and provide updated project file on a monthly basis zPerformance Based Management System (PBMS): yProject WBS from each site will be integrated with the WelcomCobra available at Fermilab yEach site will provide monthly reports on actual cost

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ LQCD Master WBS

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ LQCD-FNAL WBS

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ LQCD-BNL WBS

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ LQCD-JLAB WBS

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ FTE Profile

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ LQCD Fixed Costs

Management, Cost and Schedule LQCD DOE Review, 5/24/ Questions?