CaBIG Population Sciences SIG Ethan Basch, MD, MSc Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center PRO-CTCAE A system for patient self-reporting of adverse symptoms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
Advertisements

Strategies for Implementing Outcomes in Practice Carolyn Baum, PhD, OTR, FAOTA.
Including the Patient Voice in Safety Reporting Ethan Basch, MD, MSc Health Outcomes Group Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology/Biostatistics Memorial.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4: Updating a Cancer Research Standard Ann Setser 1, Ranjana Srivastava 2, Lawrence Wright 1,
Validation Study of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Amylou C. Dueck (Mayo Clinic)
PRO-CTCAE Face-To-Face Meeting #2 Advancing the Science of Adverse Symptom Monitoring in Cancer Treatment Trials Ethan Basch, M.D. Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
AHRQ Annual Conference Patient-Reported Outcomes for Adverse Event Monitoring in Clinical Research Ethan Basch, M.D., M.Sc. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer.
Methods used to assess and report pain-related endpoints in NDA Ethan Basch, MD, MSc Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Adverse Event Reporting: A Patient or a Clinician Report? Ethan Basch, M.D., M.Sc. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center October 26, 2009.
ART-RIM Workshop National Cancer institute Ethan Basch, MD, MSc Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) January 22, 2010.
Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program Process & Outcome Evaluation Amanda Greene, PhD, MPH, RN Paul Young, MBA, MPH Natalie Stultz, MS NOVA Research.
Quality Assurance: Manufacturer & Clinical Aspects  Alan Cohen, M.S. DABR  Paul Naine, MSc. MIPEM  Jim Schewe, PhD, DABMP Accuray Incorporated Elekta.
[Hospital Name | Presenter name and title | Date of presentation]
Ilana F. Gareen, Ph.D. Brown University Center for Statistical Sciences
PROactive Physical Activity as a Crucial Patient Reported Outcome in COPD
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
CALGB Informational Session June 22, 2007 David Hurd, MD Interim Chair Data Audit Committee.
CTEP Program Meeting Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Treatment Trials Ethan Basch, MD, MSc Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center PROs for Adverse.
NCI-sponsored treatment trials: CTCAE v4 790 individual items Standard Approach to AE Monitoring CATEGORYEXAMPLEDATA SOURCE LaboratoryNeutropeniaLaboratory.
PRO-CTCAE Task 8 Committee: Feasibility Research March 18 th 2011 (11am EST) Kickoff Telecon.
by Joint Commission International (JCI)
Stakeholders In Clinical Research Government and Regulatory Bodies Professor Phil Warner.
Validation Study of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Amylou C. Dueck (Mayo Clinic)
1 October, 2005 Activities and Activity Director Guidance Training (F248) §483.15(f)(l), and (F249) §483.15(f)(2)
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, RN, OCN, CCRP.
CTEP, NCI Adverse Event Reporting Programmatic & Workflow Processes Prepared by: Ann Setser May 24, 2010.
FDA Approach to Review of Outcome Measures for Drug Approval and Labeling: Content Validity Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in.
It Is Time for Self-Incident-Reporting for Patients and Their Families in Every Health Care Organization: A Literature Review Medinfo 2013, Paper Session:
Cancer Clinical Trial Suite (CCTS): An Introduction for Users A Tool Demonstration from caBIG™ Bill Dyer (NCI/Pyramed Research) June 2008.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
PRO-CTCAE Face-To-Face Meeting #2 Advancing the Science of Adverse Symptom Monitoring in Cancer Treatment Trials Amy P. Abernethy, MD Task 6: Usability.
The Practical Art of Endpoint Selection: Industry Perspectives A View from the Pharma Industry of the FDA Guidance on PROs Glenn A. Phillips, Ph.D. Director.
Measuring the Feasibility and Cost of PRO-CTCAE Implementation in Trials Presentation to NCI Stakeholders Based on work of the PRO-CTCAE Task 8 (Feasibility)
Rapid cycle PI Danielle Scheurer, MD, MSCR Chief Quality Officer Medical University of South Carolina.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
Building Clinical Infrastructure and Expert Support Michael Steinberg, MD, FACR ULAAC Disparity Project Centinela/Freeman Health System.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Cancer Centers In Clinical Trials Sandrine Marreaud Head of Medical Department.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Maine Prenatal Collaborative Susan Swartz, M.D. Judy Soper, RT(R), RDMS, BS Tim Cowan, MSPH Principal Investigator Project Director Data Analyst December.
Bringing the Patient Voice into Cancer Care and Research Ethan Basch, MD, MSc November 19, 2015.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
Sandra A. Mitchell, PhD, CRNP Outcomes Research Branch, DCCPS
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
Role of the Drug Project Team in Formulating the Initial Development Plan of NCI-IND agents Jeff Moscow, MD IDB, CTEP.
CTEP Visiting Physician Externship Coordinator: Igor Espinoza-Delgado, M.D. NCI CTEP Investigational Drug Branch
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP): Part I – Which Entities/Offices are Involved ? J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
Emerging SACHRP Issues K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Director, PRIDE Office of Research & Development Department of.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Site Visit Introduction Kathryn M. Carbone, M.D. Associate Director for Research.
No Conflicts of Interest Including the Patient Voice in Safety Reporting Ethan Basch, MD, MSc Health Outcomes Group Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology/Biostatistics.
Performing a Successful Supportive Care Clinical Trial Jennifer Temel, MD.
OVERVIEW OF THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DOMAIN TASK FORCE APRIL 16, 2015 Joan D. Nagel, M.D., M.P.H. Program Director, Division of Clinical Innovation National.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Title of the Change Project
Biopharma Breakout Goals
Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
The Essentia Institute of Rural Health (EIRH) is
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Development of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire to capture the impact of living with a vascular condition: ePAQ-VAS Patrick Phillips, Elizabeth.
Design, Testing, and Use of a Pre-Visit Questionnaire to Improve CF Care Brooke Moore, M.D., MPH Pediatric Pulmonologist.
REDCap Regulatory Binder
Friends of Cancer Research
BioMedBridges – Work Packages 2 & 12
Cindy Murray NP Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
11 iii. Define management and supervision roles and responsibilities
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Presentation transcript:

caBIG Population Sciences SIG Ethan Basch, MD, MSc Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center PRO-CTCAE A system for patient self-reporting of adverse symptoms in oncology trials May 7, 2009

Overview 1.Background – Adverse Event reporting in oncology 2.PRO-CTCAE contract overview 3.System/functionality requirements 4.Demonstration

Essential activity in clinical trials To ensure patient safety To provide data about drug effects – Trialists, regulators, clinicians, patients Core activity in routine cancer care To guide therapy and supportive care Adverse Event Monitoring

NCI-sponsored treatment trials: CTCAE v3 ~1000 individual items Standard Approach to AE Monitoring CATEGORYEXAMPLEDATA SOURCE LaboratoryAnemia (hemoglobin)Laboratory report “Objective”Blood PressureClinical staff “Subjective”NauseaClinical staff and patients

Patient Experiences Symptom Clinician Interprets Symptom Clinician interviews patient at visit Chart Representation of Symptom Clinician writes in chart Data Manager Interpretation of Symptom Data manager abstracts chart Research Database Manual data entry Current Model for Adverse Symptom Reporting in Oncology Trials

Patient Experiences Symptom Research Database Patient direct reporting of symptoms (1)

Patient Experiences Symptom Research Database Clinician Patient direct reporting of symptoms (2)

FDA DEFNITION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO): “Any report that comes directly from a patient about a health condition or its treatment without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else” Increasing Regulatory Interest in PROs

Rationales for Patient-Reported Outcomes Approach to Adverse Symptom Reporting Improve efficiency of data collection – Eliminating data collection steps, reducing errors Provide more direct account of patient experience – Eliminating filtering of patient reports by others Engage patients as active participants in trials Enable real-time data capture (ePROs) – Automated alerts, between-visit reporting Provide subsequent patients with AE information reported by their peers, not clinical staff Harmonize CTCAE with current standards for symptom measurement using PROs – Eg, FDA guidance Trotti, Colevas, Setser, Basch: JCO, 2007

Patients willing and able to report CTCAE symptoms via computer at clinic visits Patient reporting is discrepant from clinician reporting – Patients generally self-report worse severity – Patient reports better reflect day-to-day experience Clinicians will accept patient-reported AEs for treatment decisions and documentation Prior Research Findings

Currently no standard approach or technology platform for collecting patent-reported adverse symptoms in oncology trials

2-Year Contract – Started on 10/1/08 NCI Contract HHSN C

Overall Mission of Project Employ rigorous scientific methods to create a system for patient self-reporting of adverse symptoms in cancer trials (called the PRO-CTCAE), which is widely accepted and used; generates useful data for investigators, regulators, clinicians and patients; and is compatible with existing adverse event reporting systems

SOW Multiple Interrelated Tasks Generate White Paper identifying barriers, ideal conditions, and solutions to implement PRO-CTCAE Create PRO-CTCAE items Build/evaluate electronic PRO-CTCAE platform Evaluate measurement properties of items Develop training materials Design cooperative group study YEAR 1 YEAR 2

Task-Based Framework for Project

Expert Investigative Team and Subcontracts

Overview of Project Brief review of relevant non- technology tasks of project

Progress to Date (1) Task 1: Create White Paper Survey of 729 stakeholders RoleN* NCI Representative41 FDA Representative26 Cooperative Group Leadership52 Cooperative Group Member130 Lead PI84 Investigator103 CRA161 Research Nurse185 Patient Advocate121 Industry30 *Not mutually exclusive

Progress to Date (2) Task 1: Create White Paper Survey results QUESTIONAGREENEUTRALDISAGREE Systems to collect PROs in clinical trials should be developed89%5%6% In clinical trials, AEs should be reported by clinicians and patients88%8%4% Both patient and clinician reported AEs should be reported in clinical trial results and in drug labels 76%15%9%

Progress to Date (3) Task 1: Create White Paper Potential barriers to CTCAE PROs QUESTIONAGREENEUTRALDISAGREE Severe illness/debilitation of patients88%6% Caregiver/proxy reporting should be permitted70%12%18% Lack of computers69%15%16% Limited time58%19%23% Limited personnel57%18%25% Limited clinic space48%21%29%

Progress to Date (4) Task 1: Create White Paper Solutions: funds and new computers QUESTIONAGREENEUTRALDISAGREE These barriers could be overcome with adequate funding79%13%8% My site has clinic staff who could assist patients to self-report66%18%16% My site has clinic areas that could be used for patient reporting47%28%25% My site has computers that could be used for patient reporting24%25%51% My site would need new computers72%21%7% Wireless computers are feasible at my site58%12%19% Paper-based reporting is feasible at my site86%14%4%

Progress to Date (5) Task 2: Develop Items 77 CTCAE symptoms identified amendable to patient self-reporting PRO-CTCAE items created – Different in format from CTCAE – Can be viewed on Wiki

PRO-CTCAE Item List Abdominal painDepressionEdema – LimbHot flashesMyalgiaRashUrticaria Acne Dermatitis (Radiation) Ejaculatory dysfunction Hyper- pigmentation Nail changes Rash: Hand- Foot Vaginal discharge Alopecia/hair lossDiarrhea Epistaxis (Nosebleeds) HypohidrosisNauseaRigors/chillsVaginal dryness Amenorrhea Distension/ bloating, abdominal Erectile dysfunction Incontinence, anal Neuropathy- sensory Skin Breakdown Vision – blurred AnorexiaDizzinessFatigue Incontinence, urinary OdorStriaeVoice changes AnxietyDry mouth/ xerostomiaFlashing lights Injection site reaction/ extravasation Orgasmic dysfunction Sweating (diaphoresis) Vomiting Arthralgia (joint pain) Dry skinFlatulenceInsomniaPain Taste alteration Watery eye Bronchospasm, wheezingDyspareuniaFloatersIrregular menses Painful urination Tinnitus Decreased concentration ChelilitisDysphagiaGynecomastiaLibidoPalpitationsTremorDepression 2 ConstipationDyspnea Heartburn/ dyspepsia Memory impairment Photo- sensitivity Urinary frequency Nail changes 2 (color) CoughEasy bruisingHiccoughsMucositis/ stomatitis Pruritus/ ItchingUrine color change Nail changes 3 (shape)

Progress to Date Task 2: Develop Items For each symptom, evaluate multiple dimensions – Frequency, severity, interference with activities Developed structure of questionnaire items

Generic Structure of Items FREQUENCY: How OFTEN did you have XXXX: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Frequently, Almost Constantly SEVERITY: At its worst, what was SEVERITY of your XXXX: None / Mild / Moderate / Severe / Very severe INTERFERENCE: How much did XXXX INTERFERE with your (daily activities): Not at all / A little bit / Somewhat / Quite a bit / Very much

Task 5: Platform Development Envisioned a system to allow PIs to create forms for electronic administration of PRO- CTCAE items to patients at clinic visits

Platform Components/Functionality Components – Form builder – Study calendar – Patient interface – Study-level reports – Patient-level reports – Automated alerts/notifications Skip pattern rules User-level access/permissions Interoperability with caAERS

Publishing Tool and FormBuilder

Task 5: Approach Subcontract to SemanticBits LLC Weekly teleconferences since 10/08 – Committee: investigators, research study personnel, oncologists, patient representatives, psychometricians, FDA representatives, NCI representatives DEMONSTRATION: – Ram Chilukuri, SemanticBits LLC