RPCs in CMS Supreet Pal Singh India-CMS Meeting, July 20-21, 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
Advertisements

General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
Glass Resistive plate chambers for muon Detection
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (1/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
The CMS Detector Paoti Chang National Taiwan University
Radiation Detectors / Particle Detectors
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #12.
CMS Outer Hadron Calorimeter (HO) Project Naba K Mondal Tata Institute, Mumbai, India.
1 Sep. 19, 2006Changguo Lu, Princeton University Induced signal in RPC, Configuration of the double gap RPC and Grouping of the strips Changguo Lu Princeton.
Resistive Plate Chambers for CMS (Pre-assembly Jobs done at BARC) Archana Sharma, Suman B.Beri P.U, Chandigarh & L.M.Pant BARC, Mumbai.
1 VCI, Werner Riegler RPCs and Wire Chambers for the LHCb Muon System  Overview  Principles  Performance Comparison: Timing, Efficiency,
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
Pascal PERRODO, ATLAS-LAPP
ARNAB BANERJEE Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, India.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Visualizing Data from the LHC with the Atlantis Event Display Program Joshua Auriemma Advisor: Andy Haas.
IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics1. IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics2 OUTLINES oLHC parametres oRPCs oOverview of muon trigger system oIdea of.
Proportional Counters
Detectors. Measuring Ions  A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. Particle energy E Chamber area A  An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
1 Geiger-Mueller Tube  Introduced in 1928 by Geiger and Mueller but still find application today Used in experiments that identified the He nucleus as.
LHeC : Muon Systems L. Pontecorvo.
RPC (Resistive Plate Chamber)
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
Drift Chambers Drift Chambers are MWPCs where the time it takes for the ions to reach the sense wire is recorded. This time info gives position info:
Recirculation Concept - Cyclotron Radio frequency alternating voltage Hollow metal drift tubes time t =0 time t =½ RF period D-shaped.
Experiences with RPC Detectors in Iran and their Potential Applications Tarbiat Modares University Ahmad Moshaii A. Moshaii, IPM international school and.
Approved Plots from CMS First Beam Runs 2-October-2008.
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG Introduction The Detector Choices Simulation The structure and detector design The Expected performance Schedule.
RPC Development in Beijing and Potential for NO A Tianchi Zhao University of Washington May 16, 2005.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
Electronics play a critical role in modern accelerator physics experiments. Events will be recorded at a rate of 200,000/second. Modular electronics such.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
RPC Upscope : An overview with Indian perspective L. M. Pant Nuclear Physics Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre L. M. Pant India-CMS Meeting, BARC.
Gamma background simulation for the RPC Endcap and Barrel regions of CMS/LHC using GEANT4 We present some results obtained by the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber.
RPCs of BESIII Muon Identifier  BESIII and muon identifier  R&D  Mass production  Installation Zhang Qingmin Advisor: Zhang Jiawen.
India CERN Meeting, BARC, 28/02/11
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
M. Bianco On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
Neutrinos are tiny, neutral, elementary particles which interact with matter via the “weak force”. The Sun produces over two hundred trillion trillion.
The Compact Muon Solenoid. What does CMS do? The Compact Muon Solenoid is a general purpose particle detector installed at point 5 of the Large Hadron.
Jessica Leonard, U. Wisconsin, December 19, 2006 Preliminary Exam - 1 H->  Jessica Leonard University of Wisconsin - Madison Preliminary Examination.
Slide 1Crispin Williams INFN BolognaALICE TOF The ALICE-TOF system 1. Quick overview of the TOF system that we are building 2. The Multigap Resistive Plate.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
ITEP participation to the CBM TOF project ITEP ALICE - TOF group CBM – Russia meeting at ITEP, Nov 5 th, 2004.
Test results of Multi-gap RPC Test Chambers for a Digital HCAL  Geometrical design  Test setup  Signal: avalanche mode and streamer mode  Comparison.
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
CMS History Compact Muon Solinoid Compact Relative to ATLAS, which is ~1.5x the diameter of CMS and 2x as long (but ATLAS is half the weight of CMS!).
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker End-cap Quality Control and the Characterization of Straw Deformations Michael Kagan University of Michigan Supervisor:
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
The CMS Muon System BAN Yong, Peking University 2006/12/12 IHEP, Beijing, China Outline: CMS-Muon system: introduction China’s contribution to CMS Muon.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
A. Parenti 1 RT 2007, Batavia IL The CMS Muon System and its Performance in the Cosmic Challenge RT2007 conference, Batavia IL, USA May 03, 2007 Andrea.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
The ALICE-TOF system 1. Quick overview of the TOF system that we are building 2. The Multigap Resistive Plate Chamber -what is it? 3. Difference in.
(University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”)
An extension of Ramo's theorem to include resistive elements
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Multigap Resistive Plate Chambers (MRPC)
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Experimental Particle Physics
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG 16 September 2002.
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
The CMS muon system performance
Experimental Particle Physics
Presentation transcript:

RPCs in CMS Supreet Pal Singh India-CMS Meeting, July 20-21, 2007 BARC, Mumbai Centre of Advanced Study in Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh RPCs in CMS Centre of Advanced Study in Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh S. Gautam, Panjab University, Chandigarh, July 20-21, 2007 S. Gautam, Panjab University, Chandigarh, July 20-21, 2007

CMS will use three types of gaseous particle detectors for muon identifica-tion: Drift Tubes (DT) in the central barrel region, Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC) in the endcap region and Resistive Parallel Plate Chambers (RPC) in both the barrel and endcaps. The DT and CSC detectors are used to obtain a precise measurement of the position and thus the momentum of the muons, whereas the RPC chambers are dedicated to providing fast informa-tion for the Level-1 trigger

RPC system at CMS detector RE1/2, RE1/3 of end-cap RPC (totally 144 detectors);

RPC(Resistive Plate Chambers) is in fact a special purpose detector providing fast information for the Level-1 trigger. Its geometry follows the muon detector geometry. As stated earlier in addition to RPC there are two other types of detectors used for muon identification: Drift Tubes (DT) chambers in the barrel and Cathode Strip Chambers(CSC) in the endcap region. These muon detectors consists of four stations interleaved with the iron return plates. They are arranged in concentric cylinders around the beam line in the barrel region, and in disks perpendicular to the beam line in the endcaps. So we have a barrel divided in 5 wheels ,12 wedges and 4 stations and two end- caps divided in 4 stations(disks) with rings of 36 or 18 wedges. Stations are numbered 1 to 4 starting from the one nearest to the beam line. In the barrel, we have RPC chambers below each Muon station. MS1 and MS2 will have also RPC chambers on the outer surface.

The total number of RPC barrel chambers are 480: all the chambers can be seen in this schematic view that clarifies also why there are 96 chambers for each helm . (The CMS reference system has the x axis pointing to LHC center, the y axis pointing up and the z axis along the beam )

All the end-cap RPC chambers have a trapezoidal shape with radial strips. Their number is 540. They are organized in rings and two or more rings form a disk. Each ring contains 36 or 18 chambers (i.e. each chamber sees a sector of 10 or 20 degrees). The first station has three rings of 36 chambers, the other three stations have an outer ring of 36 and an inner ring of 18.

Basics of Resistive Plate Chamber

Resistive Parallel Plate Chambers Resistive Parallel plate Chambers are fast gaseous detectors whose information is at the base of the triggering process. RPCs combine a good spatial re-solution with a time resolution of 1 ns, comparable to that of scintillators. The RPC is a parallel plate counter with the two electrodes made of very high resistivity plastic material. The high gain and thin gap result in a small but very precise delay for the time of passage of an ionizing particle. The high resistivity electrodes are transparent to the electric signals generated by the current of the avalanche: the signals are picked up by external metallic strips. The pattern of hit strips gives a measure of the muon momentum which is used by Trigger

Block diagram of an RPC Effective area: ~ 0.6X0.6 m2; Double gas gaps: 2 mm; Read-out strip plane between two gas-gaps; bakelite resistivity: ~ 10 12- 10 13 cm .

The electric field inside a RPC is uniform The electric field inside a RPC is uniform. Electrons made free by the ionizing particle near the cathode generate a larger number of secondary electrons (exponential multiplication). The detected signal is the cumulative effect of all the avalanches. A proper threshold setting allows the detection of a signal dominated by the electrons generated near the cathode. The threshold setting determines to a large extent the time delay of the pulse, the time resolution and also the efficiency. With a proper choice of the resistivity and plate thickness, the rate capability can reach several thousand Hertz per cm2.

The drawing shows the simplicity of an RPC detector: one of the two resistive plates holds a glued array of small 2mm thick spacers having a typical pitch of 10 cm. Also glued on the plate is the border that will guarantee the chamber tightness. The second plate is then placed on top and the detector is completed.

Basics of Resistive Plate Chamber The signal is induced on the read-out electrodes.

Basics of Resistive Plate Chamber: working mode Avalanche: The electric field is such that the electron energy is larger than the ionising potential Streamer: The electric field is intense enough to initiate a spark breakdown CMS-RPC will work at avalanche mode, to ensure the proper operation at very high rate.

Good timing performance comparable to that of scintillator (~ 1-2 ns) Why RPC? Good timing performance comparable to that of scintillator (~ 1-2 ns) Space resolution sufficient for CMS muon trigger purpose (~ cm ) Simple design & low cost Arbitrary readout geometry Good rate capability (~ several kHz/cm2) RPC has been used in L3, BaBar, Belle experiments. All 4 LHC experiments will use RPC for muon system. STAR used MRPC as TOF

Assembly procedure of RE1/2 RPC

Brief outline of work done at BARC The wires were cut for RE*/2 and RE*/3 RPCs. Total no. of wires cut - 1300 wires. 1000 wires for 10 RE*/2 and 300 wires for 3 RE*/3.

Some interesting facts about CMS detector

Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL): General: The total mass of CMS is approximately 12500 tonnes - double that of ATLAS (even though ATLAS is ~8x the volume of CMS). Silicon Tracker: The CMS tracker comprises ~250 square metres of silicon detectors - about the area of 25m- long swimming pool. The silicon Pixel detector comprises (in its basic form) more than 23 million detector elements in an area of just over 0.5 square metres. Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL): The lead tungstate crystals forming the ECAL are 98% metal (by mass) but are completely transparent. The 80000 crystals in the ECAL have a total mass equivalent to that of ~24 adult African elephants - and are supported by 0.4mm thick structures made from carbon-fibre (in the endcaps) and glass fibre (in the barrel) to a precision of a fraction of a millimetre. Hadronic Calorimeter (HCAL) : The brass used for the endcap HCAL comes from recuperated artillery shells from Russian warships

Solenoid Magnet : Data Acquisition: The CMS magnet will be the largest solenoid ever built. The maximum magnetic field supplied by the solenoid is 4 Tesla - 100000 times the strength of the magnetic field of the earth. The amount of iron used as the magnet return yoke is roughly equivalent to that used to build the Eiffel Tower in Paris. The energy stored in the CMS magnet when running at 4 Tesla could be used to melt 18 tonnes of solid gold. Data Acquisition: The "slow control" data rate of an LHC experiment (readout of temperatures, voltages, status etc.) is comparable to the total LEP data rate. During one second of CMS running, a data volume equivalent to 10,000 Encyclopaedia Britannica is recorded . The data rate handled by the CMS event builder (~500 Gbit/s) is equivalent to the amount of data currently exchanged by the world's Telecom networks Computing: The total number of processors in the CMS event filter equals the number of workstations at CERN today (~4000 - how many failures per day?!)

Thanks