CIFOR Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response CIFOR Guidelines and CIFOR Toolkit Donald J. Sharp, MD, DTM&H Food Safety Office National Center for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Health Essential Service #2
Advertisements

2010 Food Safety Epidemiology Capacity Assessment CSTE Annual Conference June 13, 2011 Lauren Rosenberg, MPA Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.
Rethinking Public Health Surveillance for the Future Perry F. Smith CSTE Annual Conference Pittsburgh, PA June 13, 2011.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
Local Health Department Perspective Electronic Medical Record Software and Health Information Exchanges Kathleen Cook Information & Fiscal Manager, Lincoln-Lancaster.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 5—Fatality Management What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Christa-Marie Singleton, MD, MPH Associate Director for Science
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
1 Antivirals in the Draft CDC Pandemic Plan David K. Shay Influenza Branch National Center for Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
North Carolina’s Role in Preparedness. Objectives How you fit into the LRN Describe critical aspects of lab preparedness, surveillance and reporting,
Overview of Outbreak Investigations. Goals The goals of this presentation are to: Provide a general overview of the basic steps of disease outbreak investigations.
Investigating Foodborne Disease Outbreaks: The CDC Perspective Ian Williams, PhD, MS Chief, Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch Division of Foodborne,
OREGON PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Office of Environmental Public Health Radiation Emergency Preparedness and Response Capabilities in State Health Departments.
1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.
Pandemic Influenza Response Planning on College Campuses Felix Sarubbi, MD Division of Infectious Diseases James H. Quillen College of Medicine.
The Quality Management System
Presented DATE to GROUP NAME The Great Lakes Border Health Initiative.
WHO guidelines for investigation and control of Foodborne Diseases outbreak Dr. Christina Rundi Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Kirk Smith MN, Carina Blackmore FL, John Dunn TN, Alicia Cronquist CO, Bill Keene OR Dale Morse & Don Sharp CDC CSTE Annual Meeting June 12, 2013 National.
Introduction to US Health Care
Toolkit to Promote the Use of the CIFOR Guidelines Jeanette Stehr-Green, MD CSTE Consultant June 13, 2011.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
NumericNoExplosionAnswer.
1 Workforce Development: The Role of a Board of Health National Association of Local Boards of Health, 10th Annual Conference July 11, 2002 J. Fred Agel,
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
1 Draft for discussion only. This document is not for general distribution and has not been approved by any agency or entity. No further / external distribution.
August 11, 2014 Opportunities for Technical Assistance through ASTHO.
Chapter 2 CRITICAL RESOURCE VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS [ENTER FACILITATOR’S NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION] Developed by Troutman Sanders LLP Developed for the.
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control June 14, 2011 : The Food Safety Modernization Act: Implications.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS Foodborne Illness Investigations: Current Thinking Scott A. Seys, MPH Chief,
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
State trainings to improve outbreak response using the CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response CSTE Annual Conference June 5, 2012 Lauren.
Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
1 Developed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) January 2014 Setting up a Sustainable National GHG Inventory Management System.
U.S. Department of Education Safeguarding Student Privacy Melanie Muenzer U.S. Department of Education Chief of Staff Office of Planning, Evaluation, and.
TM Coordinating the Functions, Uses and Activities of Systems and Organizations Involved in Public Health Surveillance John W. Loonsk, M.D. Director Information.
1 National Association of Environmental Health Annual Educational Conference & Exhibition Orlando, FL July 14, 2015 Presented By: David Dekevich, MPH –
HIV/STD Partner Services Recommendations Cindy Getty & Rheta Barnes Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention & STD Prevention National Centers for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Analysis. Answers. Action. Data Acceptance Workgroup Encouraging acceptance and use of laboratory data by end users Robyn Pyle, MS Specialist,
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
Dobrin / Weisser / Keller: Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century. © 2010 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All Rights Reserved.
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Preparedness for Biological Emergencies 27 April 2004 Jeffrey S. Duchin, M.D. Chief, Communicable Disease.
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview New York Integrated Center of Food Safety Center of Excellence.
Overview of Environmental Management Systems Using ISO John Rupe Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region.
APHL Workforce Development Programs and Resources
Daniel Pollock Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 7: Epidemiology Investigation New York Integrated Center of.
CMS Policy & Procedures
Roles and Responsibilities of VDH Epidemiologists
Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (CIFOR) Update
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 5: Pathogen-Specific Surveillance New York Integrated Center.
CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview of Focus Area 2 – Necessary Resources
1. Structure and training objectives for this course & key references
North Carolina’s Role in Preparedness
CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview of Focus Area 2 – Necessary Resources
Council for Outbreak Response: Healthcare-Associated Infections
Response Teams – Planning and Preparation
Foodborne Illness Response Strategies
North Carolina’s Role in Preparedness A Brief Overview
CIFOR Toolkit Focus Area 11: Food Recall
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 6: Initial Steps of an Investigation New York Integrated Center.
Presentation transcript:

CIFOR Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response CIFOR Guidelines and CIFOR Toolkit Donald J. Sharp, MD, DTM&H Food Safety Office National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta

CIFOR: History and Structure 2005 – Organizational discussions 2006 – First full meeting and first projects identified Structure –Council (AFDO, APHL, ASTHO, CSTE, NACCHO, NASDA, NEHA, FSIS, FDA and CDC) –Workgroups for identified projects Co-Chaired by CSTE/NACCHO

CIFOR: Purpose To improve detection, investigation, control, reporting, and prevention of outbreaks of foodborne illnesses at the local, state, and federal levels

CIFOR: Process Systems approach used to identify and prioritize barriers in the foodborne outbreak detection, investigation, control, prevention system Workgroups are formed to develop projects that address the barriers Funding identified (CDC: projects, FDA: workgroup meetings)

CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response Released July, 2009

Guidelines Development Experts from local, state and federal agencies Epidemiology, environmental health, laboratory science and communications Workgroup wrote major chapters Coordinated by technical advisors and lead author Key informant interviews, technical experts, external reviewers and a public comment

Guidelines Purpose Provides model recommendations Target local and state agencies, high or low capacity Cover preparation, detection, investigation, control and follow-up Provide all agencies a common foundation Describe the roles of all key organizations

Guidelines Chapters Overview Fundamental Concepts of Public Health Surveillance and Foodborne Disease Planning and Preparation Foodborne Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Detection Investigation of Clusters and Outbreaks Control Measures Special Considerations for Multijurisdictional Outbreaks Performance Indicators Legal Preparedness for Surveillance and Control

Chapter 4: “Foodborne Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Detection” Introduction Overview Pathogen-specific surveillance Notification/complaint systems Syndromic surveillance 20 pages in length

Guidelines Intended Usage Reference document that complements existing procedures to: –Fill gaps –Update agency-specific procedures –Create missing procedures –Target training of program staff Not intended to replace current procedure manuals. Released in electronic and in hard-copy formats Distributed to state and local health departments.

Guidelines Implementation Barriers A multitude of recommendations—198 pages Recommendations require different resources and have different levels of impact Recommendations include well-accepted activities seen as effective in most settings and “cutting edge” activities, evaluated only in limited settings. Implementation of any recommendation depends on careful consideration and a host of factors.

CIFOR Guidelines Toolkit Released Feb 4, 2011 TOOLKIT

CIFOR Toolkit Purpose Better understand their current foodborne disease outbreak response activities Assess their needs for improvement Identify appropriate recommendations from the CIFOR Guidelines Make plans to implement recommendations. A process (and supporting materials) to help agencies and jurisdictions:

CIFOR Toolkit - Target Audience Interdisciplinary groups that work together to respond to outbreaks Agency staff focused on specific elements of outbreak response Professional groups providing guidance or training to their members Individuals (“champions”) who can get the process started for an agency or jurisdiction.

CIFOR Toolkit - Components Instructions for toolkit process Worksheets to record findings and decisions Sample worksheet pages completed for a fictitious local health department Tips for facilitators A participant evaluation form

Response Activities Categorized “Tracks” and “Focus Areas” Smaller, bite-sized pieces of outbreak response Cover most critical aspects of outbreak investigation common to most jurisdictions and outbreaks Allow systematic examination of activities Focus on most important areas

Planning and preparation Surveillance and Outbreak Detection Investigation of Clusters and Outbreaks Control Measures Plus: Making changes Relationships Necessary resources Communication Notification/ complaint systems Pathogen-specific surveillance Initial steps Epidemiological investigation Environmental investigation Laboratory investigation Control of source Food recall Control of secondary spread Tracks and Focus Areas

Toolkit “Keys to Success” Help explain what is in each Focus Area Consist of critical activities, relationships, resources for each Focus Area If few Keys to Success are in place, should consider prioritizing that Focus Area

For each Focus Area: 1.Describe your current activities and procedures compared to the Keys to Success 2.Prioritize CIFOR recommendations to address needed improvements 3.Make plans to implement selected CIFOR recommendations Toolkit Steps and Worksheets

TRACK: SURVEILLANCE AND OUTBREAK DETECTION FOCUS AREA 5: PATHOGEN-SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE FOCUS AREA GOAL: Agency receives reports from health-care providers and laboratories on all cases of disease when certain foodborne pathogens are identified and obtains case information in a way that allows for timely follow-up of patients and quick detection and investigation of possible outbreaks. Step 1: Describe your current activities and procedures in this focus area: Considering the keys to success on the previous page, describe your agency’s current activities and procedures in this focus area. Indicate which might need work to improve your agency’s response to foodborne disease outbreaks.

Step 2. Prioritize CIFOR recommendations to address needed improvements Having identified activities and procedures in need of improvement, review the CIFOR recommendations related to this Focus Area. Rate the priority for implementing each recommendation based on its likely impact on foodborne outbreak response at your agency and available resources. TRACK: SURVEILLANCE AND OUTBREAK DETECTION FOCUS AREA 5: PATHOGEN-SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE

Step 3. Make plans to implement selected CIFOR recommendations For each CIFOR recommendation selected in the previous step, identify who might take the lead in implementing the recommendation and the timeframe for implementation. Consider other factors that might influence the implementation of a recommendation. TRACK: SURVEILLANCE AND OUTBREAK DETECTION FOCUS AREA 5: PATHOGEN-SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE

Download hardcopies from the CIFOR website ( Users can pick and choose which documents to download Best to use online version with your team On line forms are “fill-able” Evaluation planned for next year Thank you!! CIFOR Guidelines and Toolkit