A Great L-EAP Forward: Successes and Challenges in Implementing FEMA’s Expanded Appeals Process Todd Steiner FEMA Maggie Mathis, CFM RAMPP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Two-Year Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) Eligibility Extension A National Flood Insurance Program Self-Study Learning Module for Community Officials.
Advertisements

Flood Map Modernization in North Dakota North Dakota State Water Commission FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION.
FEMA PROGRAMS II Session Name: FEMA Programs II Coastal Hazards Management Course Amends the Stafford Act Establishes a Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Springettsbury Township STORMWATER AND HOW IT AFFECTS YOU February 19, 2013.
Pierce County, WA DFIRM Update Fife City Hall rd Street East Fife, WA March 18, 2014.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Modernization Project City of Bryan City of College Station & Brazos County, Texas.
Health and Safety Executive What’s new in the 2014 Regulations? Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) Regulations 2014 Implements 2009/41/EC (GM.
Mapping On Demand Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map Modernization and the Post-Preliminary Process Escambia County, Florida PDCC Meeting November.
The New FIS Report: What Has Changed and What Does the Future Hold? May 17, 2011 Andy Bonner, PE, CFM – BakerAECOM Scott McAfee, CFM, GISP – FEMA Turgay.
Letter of Map Change Fundamentals
FEMA NFIP Community Rating System and Crediting Tsunami Mitigation Mike Mahoney, FEMA Mitigation.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Understanding Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) Understanding Advisory Information and the Implications for Your Home December 2012.
Flood Risk Mapping Project Editorial Board Meeting [COMMUNITY NAME]
What is a Flood Map? Flood maps are integral part of communities’ disaster and emergency management system. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Osceola County Floodplain Program
CHAPTER 3 MAPS AND MAP CHANGES
Homepage To learn about eLOMA click on the ‘Learn about eLOMA’ link under the Tools For Professionals.
1 Flood Insurance. 2 Flood - History History of the Law –National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Federally subsidized insurance became available Voluntary.
Flood Training by Brad Bullock CRCM, First National Bank of Midland This tool can be found in the Banker Tools section of BankersOnline.com.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 Proposed BSE Comprehensive Rule: A New Approach to BSE Rulemaking Dr. Christopher Robinson Assistant Director, NCIE BSE Comprehensive.
Using Digital Flood Hazard Data in the National Flood Insurance Program FGDC Coordination Working Group Scott McAfee Paul Rooney April 5 th, 2005.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Monday, May 2, 2011 W-10 Clarification of Rules and Regulations Presenters: Steve Van Dyke, Tyrone Gregory & Carleathea Greenhill Facilitator: Corise Morrison.
Community Coordination Meeting Hampden County, Massachusetts Review of Preliminary Flood Maps May 31, 2012.
The rFHL/NFHL: What’s In It For Me (WIIFM). 2 What is the NFHL?  National Flood Hazard Layer  FEMA’s most up-to-date flood hazard information  Database.
FLOOD STUDY Oswego County, NY FEMA REGION II February 7, 2011.
Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program
FEMA UPDATED FLOODPLAIN MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division August 5, 2008 FEMA UPDATED FLOODPLAIN MAPS Public Works Department.
FEMA’s Coastal Mapping and Management Process. 2 2 Welcome  Background and Coastal study methodologies  Technical Opportunities  Management Opportunities.
March 2010 Plenary Session Notes on IEEE 802 Governance Review IEEE 802 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: ec EC Date.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
Back Creek Floodplain SEPTEMBER 2, Why are we here Introductions Almost 300 parcels affected by revised flood study of Back Creek Outline ◦History.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Welcome to the Manage Revalidation module of the “MIP Release 3 Study Workflow Training” course! This module guides you through the revalidation process.
MIP Workbench: Revisions FEMA Learning Management System TASK LEAD ROLE MODULE.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Feedback on the New Datums 2015 Geospatial Summit April 13 to 14, 2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency Risk MAP Paul Rooney.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #4 January 16, 2001.
Implementing the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 2 Background The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612) requires Federal agencies to— –Consider the.
Mid-Course Adjustment Overview. Flood Map Modernization The Question “The committee understands that the 5-year, $1,000,000,000 program will not update.
Kevin Kesterson, Chair, Dane County Board of Supervisors Diann Danielsen, Manager, Dane County Land Information Office WLIA Annual Conference March 14,
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
North Carolina Pasquotank River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings May 17 and 18, 2001.
Passaic County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting FEMA Region II Mitigation Division October 6th, :00-11:00.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Moving To the Year 2000:Implementing 4010 Implementation Resolution Process Rich Emrich EDI Manager J.M. Schneider.
Polk County Preliminary Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps City of Windsor Heights Public Meeting Polk County Preliminary Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
FLOOD STUDY Burlington County, NJ FEMA REGION II November 29, 2010.
FEMA Terms (Last updated July 25, 2006) The Acronyms  NFIP – National Flood Insurance Program  FIRM – Flood Insurance Rate Map  SFHA – Special Flood.
Objectives At the end of this unit, you should be able to:
Changes to the National Flood Insurance Program – What to Expect Impact of changes to the NFIP under the Biggert- Waters Flood Insurance and Reform Act.
4.0 Unit 4: BFE Considerations. 4.1 Objectives At the end of this unit, you should be able to:  List potential data sources for determining BFEs in A.
National Flood Insurance Program Bureau and Statistical Agent Flood Insurance Two-Year Preferred Risk Policy Eligibility Extension Kristin Minich, Regional.
Oregon Statewide Flood Hazard Framework Geodatabase and Web Library, version 1.0 Seamless statewide GIS floodplain element that conforms to standards adopted.
Preliminary DFIRM Community Coordination (PDCC) Meeting Dixie County, FL February 10, 2016.
Polk County Preliminary Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps City of Clive Public Meeting Polk County Preliminary Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps November.
Preliminary DFIRM Community Coordination (PDCC) Meeting Hamilton & Suwannee Counties, FL February 8, 2016.
Prince George’s County Flood Forum March 23, 2017
2007 Flood Insurance Rate Maps
Flood Hazard Area, Flood Insurance and Stormwater Management
Technical Manuals 1002 & 1003 Updates
Major Changes Additional Updates
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
N. F. I. P. Provides federally subsidized flood insurance
North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan
Glynn County, GA Flood Remapping January 2018
Presentation transcript:

A Great L-EAP Forward: Successes and Challenges in Implementing FEMA’s Expanded Appeals Process Todd Steiner FEMA Maggie Mathis, CFM RAMPP

2 FEMA’s regulations call for public notification and a statutory appeal period when new or modified flood elevations are issued FEMA initiates due process through:  A Federal Register publication  Notifying the community CEO through a proposed flood hazard determination (90-day start) letter or Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) document  Publication of a newspaper notice twice following notification of the community CEO  Publication of a notice on FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping public website Background

3 Flood Hazard Determinations notice Appeal policy previously applied to Base Flood Elevation (BFE)/flood depth determinations only Excerpt from a old format notice

4 The Expanded Appeals Process (EAP)  Effective December 1, 2011  Same due process procedures previously only applied to BFE determinations now apply to:  The addition or modification of any Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundary or zone designation  Zones A, AO, AH, A1-A30, AE, A99, AR, AR/A1-A30, AR/AE, AR/AO, AR/AH, AR/A, VO, V1-V30, VE, and V  The addition or modification of any regulatory floodway  Applies to both studies and LOMRs

5 Why the Change?  FEMA’s Office of Chief Counsel recommended a broader interpretation of what can be appealed  More consistent approach - changes in SFHA, zone, and regulatory floodway boundaries can have the same impact as a BFE/flood depth change

6 Ancillary Benefits  Simplified Federal Register publications and online notices  No longer include flood source names or detailed BFE/flood depth listings  Less time consuming and costly to prepare  Less costly publication  Fewer delays due to corrections  All preliminary FIRMs and FIS reports and LOMR determination documents/attachments are now available online

7 EAP Notices

8 When Does the EAP Apply?  All studies for which preliminary FIRMs are issued on or after December 1, 2011  All studies for which a proposed flood hazard determination notice (formerly a proposed rule) is published in the Federal Register on or after December 1, 2011  LOMRs issued on or after December 1, 2011

9 When Does the EAP Apply? (cont.)  The EAP w ill apply to revised preliminary FIRMs that are the result of flood hazard changes unrelated to an appeal resolution  The appeal period will apply to all revised preliminary AND preliminary FIRM panels  Previously published FR proposed rule must be withdrawn (if applicable) and a new EAP notice published

10 When Does the EAP Apply? (cont.)  Any exceptions to the criteria must be presented to FEMA HQ for consideration  Consistency in our replies to requests from ineligible communities that they be afforded the EAP is needed – guidance and pat replies will be shared widely

11 Resources Resources:  FEMA Procedure Memorandum No. 57: Expanded Appeals Process  Criteria for Appeals of Flood Insurance Rate Maps  EAP Public Fact Sheets  Updated web content on FEMA.gov

12 Appeal Criteria  All appeals must be supported by scientific and technical data  ‘Criteria for Appeals of Flood Insurance Rate Maps’ developed to support PM 57  Establishes areas eligible for appeal  Identifies documentation needed to support an appeal of each flood hazard type (e.g. modeling, topography, etc)

13 Common Questions  Are we likely to receive more appeals and experience more study delays?  Have the data requirements for appeal submittals changed as a result of the EAP?  If only the SFHA boundary for a flooding source was adjusted based on new topographic data (i.e., no new hydrologic/hydraulic analyses have been performed and BFEs have not changed), does that mean that the BFEs along the flooding source can be appealed?

14 Common Questions  Is an appeal period required if an SFHA or portion of an SFHA is removed from the FIRM, rather than added?  If there was an error or omission on a Federal Register notice published prior to December 1, 2011, will the study now be processed under the EAP?

15 EAP: Status of Implementation Studies  46 Federal Register publications  90-day appeal periods have been initiated for 34 of those studies  Requests for the EAP to be applied to ineligible communities have not been received to date  Posting of the Preliminary Map Products has been received positively

16 EAP: Status of Implementation LOMRs  145 Federal Register publications and appeal periods initiated to date.  Concerns over the more lengthy process have not materialized  “Changes to FEMA’s Appeal Process” notice drawing processing questions

17 What’s Next Coming soon….Updates to:  Appeals, Revisions, and Amendments to National Flood Insurance Program Maps: A Guide for Community Officials  Adoption of Flood Insurance Rate Maps by Participating Communities (FEMA 495)  Guidelines and Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping (formerly G & S for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners)  Document Control Procedures Manual Long term ….  FEMA-based web solution for posting of Preliminary FIRMs and FIS reports, LOMRs

18 For Further Information Contacts: FEMA  Todd Steiner PTS Leads  Maggie Mathis  Paul Slonac  Mike Gilliam

Questions?