Assessment Lifecycle 1 Dr. Michele Walker, Director Office of Student Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Advertisements

Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Computation Fluency A spectrum of learning over grades.
DC CAS Kickoff Tamara Reavis Director Standards, Assessment, and Accountability.
Year 5 Objectives: Number
Year 4 Objectives: Number 1
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
Indiana Assessments June 4, 2014
ELA and Writing Assessment: Impact on Transitioning to CCSS South Carolina Department of Education Office of Assessment.
Mathematics Grade Level Considerations for Grades 3–5.
Mathematics Grade Level Considerations for Grades 6-8.
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
Standards for Mathematical Content Critical Areas College and Career Readiness.
English Language Arts Grade Level Considerations for Grades 3–5.
The New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Alignment Study December 5, 2006.
Common Core State Standards Video-Common Core Overview.
1 Unit 4: One-Step Equations The Georgia Performance Standards Website.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Dates:Tuesdays, Jan 7 – Feb 11
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
SOL Changes and Preparation A parent presentation.
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
Designing Common Core Assessment Questions for Educators Creating Type II and Type III Assessments.
Quality Instruction The ♥ of the matter is the depth of knowledge.
HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER 1. Early Connections Planning Phase 2. District Strategic Plan.
An Overview of Virginia Standards of Learning Item and Test Development.
TASC Content Frameworks Reading/Writing – Common Core State Standards – College and Career Readiness Standards for Adult Education Mathematics – Traditional.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES: Review, practice, and secure concepts. Breakdown the barriers of vocabulary and format. Analyze data from the District and State.
Common Core State Standards Defining the core: A whole new way of learning Broward County Public Schools Elementary Math Contact Meeting August 15, 2012.
Assessing in the Cognitive Domain KNR 341 Chapter 8 Dr. Henninger.
Common Core Standards Implementation ELA/Literacy and Mathematics Understand the Change Be the Change How to Change.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Welcome to Curriculum Night I am so glad you are here. Feel free to ask questions. Remember our time is short. Welcome to Curriculum Night for Ms. Figurelli’s.
Round any whole number to a required degree of accuracy.
Number (multiply and divide) multiply and divide numbers mentally drawing upon known facts multiply and divide whole numbers and those involving decimals.
DOK and 4th Grade Mathematics Smarter Balanced Assessment Questions
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge as it Relates to Unpacking the WV CSOs Adapted from the Office of Instruction’s Presentations posted on Teach st.
With great power comes great responsibility.
SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
Results. Performance Level Descriptors (PLDs) Indicate what a typical student at each level should be able to demonstrate based on his/her command.
The Constructed Response Assessment The Journey Continues.
Mathematics Common Core Standards and Depth of Knowledge Presented February 8, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Mapping to the Core May 21, 2013.
Maths Methods for Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication and Division for Year 5 and 6.
Constructive Conversation Smart Start Lessons
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
How could you adapt these for your year group? What skills / knowledge does this activity help practice? How could you use this activity to teach a different.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
End of year expectations
Strategies Number – addition, subtraction, multiplication and division
Place Value and Mental Calculation
Maths Workshop for Year 4/5 Parents
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Assessing the Common Core Standards
Preplanning Presentation
Biker Model Lesson: Discussion
Multiply and Divide I can count equal groups of items saying how many groups and how many altogether. I can explain that multiplying is an easy way to.
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Lifecycle 1 Dr. Michele Walker, Director Office of Student Assessment

Collaborative Effort 2 IDOE VendorEducators

Item Specifications/ Test Blueprints Item Development Internal IDOE Item Reviews Revise/Select Items Bias/Sensitivity, Content Reviews Administer Pilot Items (Statistical sample) Create / Administer Operational Test Create / Administer Operationalized Field Test (Operational and Pilot combined ) The Journey—From Item Specifications to the Operational Test OR A 10- to 12-month process An 18- to 24-month process Blue font = educator involvement

Establishing Item Specifications: An Overview 4 START analyze standards to determine DOK analyze standards to determine “weight” assign item format (MC, GR, CR, ER, TE) develop “specifications” for standards develop “content limits” for standards

Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels Level 1: Recall – recall of a fact, information, or procedure Level 2: Skill/Concept – use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level 3: Strategic Thinking – requires reasoning, developing a plan or a sequence of steps, some complexity, more than one possible answer Level 4: Extended Thinking – requires making connections across content areas or within a content area; an investigation, time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem

Establishing Item Specifications… Assign DOKs at the standard level Reflect the complexity of the objective, rather than the difficulty Describes the thinking involved, not the likelihood that the task will be completed correctly Assign standards “weights” 3 = essential 2 = important 1 = introductory 0 = assessed in the classroom

Establishing Item Specs… (continued) Assign item formats Multiple-Choice (MC) Gridded-Response (GR) Constructed-Response (CR) Extended-Response (ER) Technology-Enhanced (TE) Develop specifications and limits Clarify intention of standard Describe appropriate ways to assess standard Identify appropriate language and vocabulary Establish any content limits Provide examples of appropriate content/contexts

What is a “specification”? 5.2 ComputationSpecification Computation- Students solve problems involving multiplication and division of whole numbers and solve problems involving addition, subtraction, and simple multiplication and division off fractions and decimals Solve problems involving multiplication and division of whole numbers. Use straight computation. May include remainders, but no remainders in context. IDOE Content Specialists and educators identify appropriate language and vocabulary for items. Additional information to inform item development

What is a “content limit”? 5.2 ComputationContent Limit Computation- Students solve problems involving multiplication and division of whole numbers and solve problems involving addition, subtraction, and simple multiplication and division off fractions and decimals Solve problems involving multiplication and division of whole numbers. Divide 4-digit by 2-digit (maximum). Multiply 2-digit by 3-digit (maximum). Item parameters

The Basic Test Blueprint PercentDerived Test Blueprint Summary Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Etc. 100% Total Test

Involving Indiana Educators: Item Specs/Limits/Blueprint Summary Analyzing standards to determine – DOK level (1, 2, 3, 4) – standard weight (3, 2, 1, 0) – appropriate item format (MC, GR, CR, ER, TE) – specifications – content limits – blueprint percentages

Content Review Indiana educators in grade/content committees verify that each item is… matched to an Indiana Academic Standard accurate and appropriate for grade level and difficulty range clearly stated and unambiguous appropriate for the assigned DOK

Bias/Sensitivity Review Test items must be accessible to a diverse student population with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, geographic region, disability, socioeconomic status, and other factors. Test items must not contain: Offensive, disturbing, or inappropriate language or content Stereotyping Insensitivity to historical representation of groups

Final Steps in the Process…. Revise items as a result of Content and Bias/Sensitivity Reviews Select items for Pilot and Operational test