Developing NAEP Frameworks: A Look Inside the Process Mary Crovo Deputy Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board November 17, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012 Quality Assurance in a Chaotic World An External Perspective.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for.
Program Evaluation in Gifted Education Rebecca Mann EDPS 540.
Qualifications are changing Curriculum Update Event – Stirling Management Centre Friday 9 December Mathematics and Numeracy.
1 SECONDARY EDUCATION CURRICULUM REFORM in TURKEY Emin Karip Assoc. Professor of Educ. Admin. Deputy Chair of the Turkey’s National Board of Education.
NEES Project Management Workshop June 16 June 18 1 Segment 2.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Standard Setting Inclusive Assessment Seminar Marianne.
SUNY GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT CONFERENCE November th 2003, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Albany, New York Creating a Comprehensive General Education Assessment.
Ricki Sabia, JD edCount, LLC Senior Associate and NCSC Technical Assistance and Parent Training Specialist Universal Design for Learning: Working to Create.
Guidance Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation September 13, 2012.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting January 11, 2008.
Building Evidence to Inform Education Policy and Practice: Managing a Balancing Act July13, 2012 Adriana Villavicencio Research Associate The Research.
Phase II Kick-off Introduction by Commissioner Virginia M. Barry, Ph.D.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Myanmar October 3, 2013.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Elementary Progress Report Proposal May Process 18 months of committee work. 3 representatives from each elementary school (at the start at least).
Benchmarking with National and International Assessments Larry V. Hedges Northwestern University This paper is intended to promote the exchange of ideas.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Short Term Economic Statistics Timeliness Framework Richard McKenzie OECD.
Census Quality: another dimension! Paper for Q2008 conference, Rome Louisa Blackwell Quality Assurance Manager, 2011 Census.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Common Core State Standards Initiative State Board of Education January 28, 2010.
1 Draft Content Standards for K-12 Science First Reading Helen Maguire, Cheryl Kleckner Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
EQAO Assessments and Rangefinding
Inside NAEP Developing NAEP Test Questions 1 Peggy G. Carr National Center for Education Statistics November 17, 2007.
Office Of Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner For Standards, Assessment and Reporting S/CDN September 23, 2004.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
OECD Water Programme Pillar 1, Output 1 “Pricing Water Resources and Water & Sanitation Services” World Water Week Stockholm, August 2008.
A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO STRATEGIC PLANNING Mitch Everton Saturday, November 23 4:15-5:30.
Qualifications are changing Curriculum Update Event – Dunblane Hydro Monday 12 December Science.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Evaluation and Assessment Mike Fleming. Assessment can be source of disagreement and tension implications for a Framework of reference for Languages of.
1 Draft Content Standards for High School Mathematics Helen Maguire for Paul Hibbard Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Social Studies (Business) Linda Allison, Qualification Development Manager Scottish Qualifications Authority.
 SHS REVIEW Duncan Gray, Senior Statistician, Housing Statistics, Scottish Executive.
Language Arts Standards Revision ESU #3 Writing Extravaganza September 16 th, 2008.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
So What is Going to be Happening with State Assessment for Students with Disabilities for 2007/2008? Peggy Dutcher Fall 2007 Assessment and Accountability.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Common Assessment Initiative (CAI) Presentation to CCCAA October 3, 2014 – North October 24, 2014 – South Jennifer Coleman, EdD Statewide Project Director.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March Keric Ashley,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March (Excerpted version.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
OVERVIEW Guiding Framework for the Design and Development of Future Kindergarten to Grade 12 Provincial Curriculum. Prepared for Tribal Chiefs Educational.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
SNOMED CT Education SIG: Strategic Plan Review
Assessment Framework and Test Blueprint
Next-Generation MCAS: Update and review of standard setting
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Reproductive Health and Safety Education: Making It Stick in NC
Oregon’s Content Standards Revision Process
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Curriculum Evaluation
Technology Bob Dohrer, Technology Working Group Chair
Presentation transcript:

Developing NAEP Frameworks: A Look Inside the Process Mary Crovo Deputy Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board November 17, 2007

NAEP Frameworks: Governing Board Responsibilities in Current NAEP Legislation  select the subject areas to be assessed  develop assessment objectives and test specifications that produce an assessment that is valid and reliable, and are based on relevant widely accepted professional standards  develop a process for review of the assessment which includes the active participation of teachers, curriculum specialists, local school administrators, parents, and concerned members of the public (P.L )

Governing Board Policy: Framework Development  WHAT - comprehensive, inclusive, and deliberative process to determine the content and format of NAEP subject area assessments  WHO - educators, testing experts, state and local policymakers, researchers, business representatives, military representatives, members of the public; key “users and consumers” in the subject area  HOW – Steering and Planning Committees; broad- based input and review from NAEP stakeholders; input and guidance from ADC and the Board

Procurement Contract Award Planning Document & Committee Composition Framework & Specifications Development Framework and Specifications Development Board Action Framework & Specs to NCES Board Input Overview of the NAEP Framework Process Framework Review Process Overview of the NAEP Framework Process

NAEP Framework Components WHAT  Content areas and objectives for each NAEP grade  Process or cognitive dimension HOW  Types of test questions  Distributions  by content area  by cognitive dimension  by item type  Administration procedures, delivery mode  Sample test questions HOW MUCH  Sample scoring rubrics  Preliminary achievement level descriptions

NAEP Specifications  Audience  NCES and NAEP assessment development contractors  Purpose  to provide a detailed blueprint for constructing the assessment  Framework and Specifications are both public documents

Developing the Framework & Specifications  Charge to the project Steering Committee  Issues Paper  Committee meetings  Consideration of research and key documents  Drafting of Framework and Specifications  Ongoing ADC and Board review, input, guidance

Framework Process Balances Consideration of: Research and Best Practice  Research on student learning, cognitive development and assessment  Current instructional and measurement issues  Curricular reform efforts Standards and Assessments  State standards and assessments  International standards and assessments (e.g., PIRLS, PISA, TIMSS)  Professional association standards (e.g., national content standards)

Framework Review Process  Framework reviews in diverse venues across the U.S.  External review panel  Board action on Framework and Specifications  Framework & Specifications sent to NCES for assessment development  Framework dissemination strategies

Framework Process Balances Consideration of (continued) Other considerations  Key documents having national or international significance  Preparedness reports and research (grade 12)  Previous NAEP Frameworks  Following vs. leading the field (given 5-6 year NAEP development cycle)  Assessment content  Assessment format/delivery  Resources

Lessons Learned Participants  Committee membership – cast a wide net  Framework review – use broad outreach with diverse venues and audiences  Often 1,000+ individuals involved per Framework Process  Project timeline – 18+ months  Scope of the project, focus on:  What NAEP can do well  What NAEP is not designed to do  Realities, constraints, and timing  Resolving difficult issues – trust the process  iterative, not linear

New Challenges in NAEP Framework Process  Assessing 12 th grade preparedness  Considering the role of technology  Maintaining trend lines  Increasing framework dissemination  Funding for new frameworks

NAEP Related Resources For further information regarding the Framework process, policies, and publications, visit these websites:    00_2001/framework.asp 00_2001/framework.asp  