Workshop on piloting the Payment for Ecosystems Services tool in Kyrgyzstan – Pilot project in the Chon-Aksuu watershed 18th-19th of July 2011 Cholpon-Ata.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Advertisements

Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
FRPA Data Collection, Management and Reporting Defining the Business Requirements RSM Pilot Review Workshop February 2005.
Towards More Sustainable and Market-based Payment for Ecosystem Services A Pilot Project in Lijiang, China Lu Zhi.
Pilot PES scheme in the Chon-Aksuu watershed, Kyrgyzstan Simon Charré The Regional Environmental Center for Central Asia - CAREC December 2011.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
1 Madhya Pradesh Decentralized Planning Experience in Madhya Pradesh M.P. STATE PLANNING COMMISSION.
Directorate for Climate Change, Desertification and Water Resources Ministry of the Environment - PERU ADAPTATION KNOWLEDGE DAY IV Session 3: Lessons Learned.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
Regional highlights of R-PINs Africa Region FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008 By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel Forest Carbon Partnership.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
1 Module BASICS OF PLANNING. 2 Content Overview Planning principles Gantt charts.
ATO/ITTO PCI for the sustainable management of African natural forests.
Valuing Nature Campaigns. Communicating the benefits of Mexico’s protected areas Studied the goods and services provided by the country’s protected areas.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
9/10/2015A GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE AND PROSPEROUS KENYA Challenges on Climate Change Adaptation in Kenya.
Europe’s Living Countryside All photos © WWF / Ola Jennersten Rural Development Programming Guidelines A manual based on the findings of the Europe’s.
Integrated Catchment Management Key Elements - Julie Burke.
Low Flow Analysis & Water Use Plan Science & Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Forum June 10, 2004 Barry Ortman Diversified Technical Services Dawson.
1 Input by South Africa Five-year work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change SBSTA May 2005, Bonn.
Africa Adaptation Programme Republic of Mauritius Informed decision-making for Climate Change adaptation Activities and lessons learned in Mauritius 15.
MANTADIA- ZAHAMENA. Deforestation across elevation  Between 1974 and 1994: around 90% of forest
An Integrated Water Resources Planning (IWRP) perspective Information needs for Water Resources Management to be addressed by WRIM Information Systems.
ENPI/FLEG Georgia – Program Update. ENPI/FLEG Georgia Implementing Organizations: in partnership with the NPAC and other key stakeholders World Bank IUCN.
 Summarize results from:  USFS-CAREC technical cooperation  USFS-CAREC workshop on PES  Identify challenges and recommendations for developing PES.
Mali Work Packages. Crop Fields Gardens Livestock People Trees Farm 1 Farm 2 Farm 3 Fallow Pasture/forest Market Water sources Policy Landscape/Watershed.
Pilot PES scheme in the Chon-Aksuu watershed, Kyrgyzstan Mariya Genina, The Regional Environmental Centre for Central Asia (CAREC) 13 March, 2012.
Country Summary for Ukraine (part 1) status for Roman Volosyanchuk, IUCN CPC.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
Ecosystem Services & their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Suynik Province, Armenia Armenia.
Dr. Benjamin Khoo New York Institute of Technology School of Management.
7-8 October, 2010 Workshop-seminar Payment for Ecosystems Services in Kazakhstan: Best Practices and Lessons- learned in Watershed Management in the U.S.
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
INYO NATIONAL FOREST - TRAVEL ANALYSIS PROCESS Public Meeting – April 21, 2015.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
Green Recovery And Reconstruction: Training Toolkit For Humanitarian Aid 1 Disaster Risk Reduction Session 2: Environment-based DRR Activities and Assessments.
Potential and Pitfalls of Experimental Impact Evaluation: Reflections on the design and implementation of an experimental Payments for Environmental Services.
Phare 2003 Sector: Economic and Social Cohesion Title: Water Supply and sewerage in tourism and resort settlements.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Black Sea Basin Directorate – presentation of the scope, responsibilities and project interests Mrs. TANYA.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Basin management plan Case Sibalom watershed, Philippines Marion Hermus Cornelia Rudolph Lennart Swinkels.
“Analytical Tools and Data Collection” April 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Session 1 Introduction to Role of Impacts Assessment in RIAs.
National and regional activities for environment observations Natalya Shulgina Uzhydromet World Environmental Day Round Table GEO CBC7 Meeting 5 June,
Economic, Social and Environmental Benefits Better Planning and Operational Decisions in Water Management Decision Making Capacity and Institutions; Stakeholder.
ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ICES cooperative research report.
Importance of local communities empowerment Lucia Madrid Ramirez
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
R-PLAN and REDD activities Review Lao PDR Flag of your country.
Vision, overview of objectives and expected results.
Ian Gray Natural Resources GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 How To Prepare Multi-Focal Area Projects SFM/REDD+ Projects.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 6 – 9, 2011 Dakar, Senegal.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Kyrgyzstan & UNFCCC. Adaptation to Climate Change: Strategies & Priorities Zukhra Abaikhanova, Center for Climate Change Workshop The 2 nd Meeting of Working.
Social impacts, integrity and MRV for REDD+ in Bangladesh Estelle Fach, UNDP Mariam Akhter, FAO Dhaka, Bangladesh, 7 April 2013.
Agroforestry – Implementation, Obstacles and Questions.
INTEGRATED LAND-USE ASSESSMENT (ILUA) PHASE II AN OVERVIEW Bwalya Chendauka National Coordinator 2011 REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA.
REDD+ AND FOREST GOVERNANCE PGA Kick off workshop Hà Nội, 6 tháng 3 năm 2012 Phạm Minh Thoa Tổng cục Lâm nghiệp - Bộ Nông nghiệp và PTNT.
Introduction to Malawi REDD+ Process and Outlook
DIABOLO has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Project duration:
Low-flows and livelihoods (R8171)
DG AGRI, Unit F6 Bioenergy, biomass, forestry and climatic changes
Guidance on Integrating Adaptation into Land Management
Natural water Retention Measures
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
Global Meeting of the DS-SLM Project
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on piloting the Payment for Ecosystems Services tool in Kyrgyzstan – Pilot project in the Chon-Aksuu watershed 18th-19th of July 2011 Cholpon-Ata EcoCentre

First assessments in 2009 – highlight problem with water quality Overgrazing and forest degradation/deforestation were pointed to have the main impact on water resources 2010 fundraising – ReSource Award 2011 May-July 2011 – scientific assessments (pastures, forests, landslides) meetings with stakeholders, discussions about the PES contract First assessments in 2009 – highlight problem with water quality Overgrazing and forest degradation/deforestation were pointed to have the main impact on water resources 2010 fundraising – ReSource Award 2011 May-July 2011 – scientific assessments (pastures, forests, landslides) meetings with stakeholders, discussions about the PES contract Background of the project

Activities achieved Researches –2009 – General pilot site assessment: General overview of the area, presentation of local economical and ecological characteristics, first –2011 – Researches on: Capacity of ecosystems to provide services Pasture use, pasture degradation and impact on water Forest use, degradation and impact on water Landslides, impact on water and possible management Researches –2009 – General pilot site assessment: General overview of the area, presentation of local economical and ecological characteristics, first –2011 – Researches on: Capacity of ecosystems to provide services Pasture use, pasture degradation and impact on water Forest use, degradation and impact on water Landslides, impact on water and possible management Discussions with stakeholders – 2010 – Workshop in Almaty on PES and recommendations from the United States Forestry Service – 2011 – Different individual or group meetings with local stakeholders ; meeting with the Governor of the Oblast Discussions with stakeholders – 2010 – Workshop in Almaty on PES and recommendations from the United States Forestry Service – 2011 – Different individual or group meetings with local stakeholders ; meeting with the Governor of the Oblast

Initial project planning Working mostly on pastures and forests degradation; Determining the Hydrological Services they provide thanks to the input of an international expert for very accurate scientific researches; Making recomendations for an improvment of the Hydrologival Services provision; Having a brief look to the landslides but without planning special activities or researches for them; Creating a PES system involving the water and pasture users association, and the Forestry Unit. Working mostly on pastures and forests degradation; Determining the Hydrological Services they provide thanks to the input of an international expert for very accurate scientific researches; Making recomendations for an improvment of the Hydrologival Services provision; Having a brief look to the landslides but without planning special activities or researches for them; Creating a PES system involving the water and pasture users association, and the Forestry Unit.

A plan is a plan… Discussions with locals and first scientific researches showed that: –Pastures are indeed degraded, but the impact of this degradation on water was probably overestimated; –The impact on landslides is probably important than what we thought. Discussions with locals and first scientific researches showed that: –Pastures are indeed degraded, but the impact of this degradation on water was probably overestimated; –The impact on landslides is probably important than what we thought. Modification of the plan: –Cancellation of the trip for international expert; –Reallocation of funds to landslides assessment and possibly for water quality tests; –Integration of tourists and mushroom collecters in the PES mechanism

Field trip: objectives and schedule Pastures: 7-days fieldtrip to research about degradation and to make recommendations for a more sustainable use of pastures; Forests: 2-days fieldtrip to identify the areas degraded, the type and reasons of the degradation and to make recommendatons for a better protection of the forest; Landslides: 4-days field trip to analyze their possible impact on water resources. Pastures: 7-days fieldtrip to research about degradation and to make recommendations for a more sustainable use of pastures; Forests: 2-days fieldtrip to identify the areas degraded, the type and reasons of the degradation and to make recommendatons for a better protection of the forest; Landslides: 4-days field trip to analyze their possible impact on water resources. Recommendations are the main scientific input for discussions in this workshop, they will be the base of the working group sessions.

Researches conducted (1) Pastures: –Places degraded; –Nature and reasons of the degradation; –Potential impact on water resources; –Mapping; –Technical and institutional recommendations to improve the situation; –Inclusion of these recommendations in the PES Scheme; –Proposition for a Monitoring and Evaluation plan. Pastures: –Places degraded; –Nature and reasons of the degradation; –Potential impact on water resources; –Mapping; –Technical and institutional recommendations to improve the situation; –Inclusion of these recommendations in the PES Scheme; –Proposition for a Monitoring and Evaluation plan. Forest: –Places degraded; –Places where the regeneration is limited; –Nature and reason of the degradations (grazing, illegal logging); –Proposition for a Monitoring and Evaluation plan; –Inclusion of these recommendations in the PES Scheme; Forest: –Places degraded; –Places where the regeneration is limited; –Nature and reason of the degradations (grazing, illegal logging); –Proposition for a Monitoring and Evaluation plan; –Inclusion of these recommendations in the PES Scheme;

Researches conducted (2) Landsildes: –Identification of the different landslides in the watershed; –Granulometric and geologic analysis of the ground; – Technical recommendations for decreasing their impact on water quality; –Proposition for a Monitoring and Evaluation plan; –Inclusion of these recommendations in the PES Scheme; Landsildes: –Identification of the different landslides in the watershed; –Granulometric and geologic analysis of the ground; – Technical recommendations for decreasing their impact on water quality; –Proposition for a Monitoring and Evaluation plan; –Inclusion of these recommendations in the PES Scheme;