Joined up Thinking: Integrating eLearning with QA and Enhancement Emma Rose: Teaching and Learning Office Linda Irish: eLearning Team Cath Dyson : eLearning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Programme Overview Mark Novels 5 th December 2011 Quality Assurance in Technical and Vocational Education and Skills Study Tour (5 th -9 th December 2011)
Advertisements

Official BFUG Bologna Seminar ENHANCING EUROPEAN EMPLOYABILITY July 2006 University of Wales Swansea.
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Approaches To E-Learning: Developing An E-Learning Strategy Brian Kelly UKOLN University.
Margaret Masson Glasgow Caledonian University BMAF Annual Conference 2009 Workplace mentoring for student support and employer engagement.
Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Supporting, informing and integrating students in their first year. Daniel Ashall.
Integrating Children and Young Peoples Services Will Greenhow - Home Affairs David Killip - Health and Social Security John Cain - Department of Education.
Northern Convening Butte College April 26, 2013 College Team Facilitators’ Presentation Student Support (Re)defined.
Implementation of a Vertical Teaching Model Tom Randell, Steve Glautier, and Doug Bernstein University of Southampton.
Enhancing Academic Practice Nigeria Role of Newcastle University.
Barriers and Enablers to Technology- Enhanced Learning What can Universities do to encourage innovative teaching? Steve Williams - Newcastle University.
Public engagement and lifelong learning: old wine in a new bottle, or a blended malt? Paul Manners Director, National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
Customisable Online Academic Skills Self-Assessment: Development and Initial Feedback Steve Briggs Nick Collis Nigel Upton.
Dr Esyin Chew Senior Lecturer in Technology Enhanced Learning, Teaching and Assessment The TEL Story at Glamorgan - Implementing Institutional Enhancement.
IASCE Conference Athlone October 7 th & 8 th 2004 Responsive Evaluation. Working with Stakeholders: A review of the Open Training College Quality Assurance.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Customer Focus Module Preview
CMI Leadership & Management Expansion of eAuthoring services for all academic staff Gareth Compton.
Two questions: What do you know about this picture?
Learning Development and Innovation Overview and Updates Steve Wyn Williams March 2013.
Evidence Based Teaching Strategy: Applied to Student Orientation
Patricia Campbell and Jonathan Sly
EdTech 2009 – National College of Ireland May Sustainability through Staff Engagement: Applying a Community of Practice Model to Academic Staff.
1 Beyond the Library: i-Skills for University Administration © Netskills, Quality Internet Training, Newcastle University Partly.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Merging university departments, schools and faculties Piers Brissenden School of Health Sciences University of South Australia.
The Teacake Club Building a learning community of front line welfare to work staff Richard Scothorne, Rocket Science Faye Thomas, Cardinalis.
Programs of the Intel Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Building Change Capability ‘To put in place the processes and people to support change within STFC’ Draft Blueprint Design v0.1 Project Manager: Steve.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
Overview of the workout TimeContentMethod / Person 10 minutesWelcome & objectives Trainer led 20 minutes Coaching – what it is; why it’s so important;
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
HEA Conference June 22nd – 23rd 2010 Shaping the Future: Future Learning It’s all in the words: the impact of language on the design and development of.
Professor Norah Jones Dr. Esyin Chew Social Software for Learning – The Institutional Policy of the University of Glamorgan ICHL 2012, China
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
Dolina Dowling December 2010 Presentations 2, 3 1
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Is Your Blackboard Getting Its Five-a-Day? Planning & Controlling Your SIS Integration Nicola Randles, Rob Oakes & Gareth Hall Staffordshire University.
Using Blackboard for blended learning Delivering the Geography curriculum at Kingston College This talk will give an overview of the assessment features.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Onsite and Online: An Effective Blend for Teaching and Learning Harrisburg Area Community College Week Zero Campus Day Event, January 14, 2015 Presentation.
LIFE Brusselles Meeting 23rd, 24th September 2010.
Alan Seatwo Knowledge Management Specialist How information helps to promote diversities and social justice An overview of an information literacy project.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Drs Natalie Lloyd and Reva Ramiah Cementing the Discipline.
Blackboard 9.1 and the MLE Project Languages, Linguistics and Cultures 27 October 2010.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN
Open Educational Resources for Researcher Development Ian Fairweather, School of Social Sciences University of Manchester.
E VALUATING YOUR E - LEARNING COURSE LTU Workshop 11 March 2008.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Students as Partners: Developing and sustaining a partnership approach to enhancing learning and teaching University of Hertfordshire Karen Clark, Claire.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Warwick Network Day Research Exchange and Teaching Grid.
Making Assessment Feedback Manageable Professor Carol Evans
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education ‘Tutoring for the 21 st Century’ 28 January 2015 Harriet Barnes Natalja Sokorevica Standards, Quality.
Presenter: Mazinza Ndala Tel:
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Using Technology-Mediated Feedback to Support Student Success Dr. Rosemary Cleveland – GVSU Faculty College of Education
Final-placement Meeting 18 October Demonstrate the ability to identify and apply appropriate methods of intervention, describe their theoretical.
Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Learning Management Systems: Best Practice Presented by Geoffrey Hooke Senior Instructional Designer Faculty of Medicine,
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Expansion of eAuthoring services for all academic staff
Continuous improvement through collaborative development
Implementing the NHS KSF Action Planning and Surgery Session
Developing the Guided Learner Journey
Enhancing Effective Assessment and Feedback
Good afternoon! Help yourself to refreshments
OTLA Report Writing Training
Presentation transcript:

Joined up Thinking: Integrating eLearning with QA and Enhancement Emma Rose: Teaching and Learning Office Linda Irish: eLearning Team Cath Dyson : eLearning Team University of Manchester Faculty of Humanities

Overview and Introduction Teaching and Learning Function Teaching and Learning Office eLearning Team Embed eLearning in policy and procedure This presentation will: Give an overview of the periodic review process Outline in more detail how eLearning engagement and support was embedded Consider the impact and next steps

What is Periodic Review at UoM? Requirement of the Quality Assurance Agency ( Enhancement led Reviews of the School led by the Faculty External input

Embedding eLearning 60 minute review of each selected course unit 1:1 meetings with course convenor(s) for feedback and recommendations Each eLearning technologist focused on a discipline Outcomes: discipline specific reports with recommendations overall School report with recommendations follow up with discipline leads and T&L Directors all reports fed into Periodic Review process

Impacting QA Robust quality assurance processes Identify areas for discussion Strategy Implementation of policy and procedures Good practice/areas for improvement Periodic Review Report and action plan Considered by School, Faculty and University

Impact on eLearning engagement Academic staff and School Process viewed positively by academic staff Some change of practice reported, for individuals and across the School For the eLearning team: Helps us to foster positive relationships with individuals and disciplines We gain a greater knowledge and understanding of what eLearning practice exists across the Faculty Improves team working, motivation and course development skills Impact on workload needs to be considered – to be sustainable, adjust to fit resources

Impact on individuals How was the process received? “I was initially a bit sceptical but found the review supportive and encouraging on ways that I had used elearning so far.” “It was very simple things.. the reviewer pointed out things that were confusing, from a user's perspective, and helped us 'streamline' the presentation.” “Being visited in my office and with one to one advice was superb and opened my eyes to key aspects of BB9 as a communication medium. Although I'm sure it was labour intensive it was very efficient in the outcome achieved.” “The personal meeting meant we could discuss how to do things rather than require me to have specific questions. It also meant the reviewer could review the course page as a whole and tell me when I had done something well - we don't necessarily know, and many academics feel they're making it up as they go along.”

Conclusions Change of practice - individuals “I am now a lot more confident to use more features of BB9.” “I plan to reform the file structure, use Turnitin, and video files.” “Not large changes, but small things with big impact.” “I can now organize the files on the blackboard site much more effectively. I can embed video in the site, which is very important for my PG course” “Labelling, organisation of folders, had a go at interactive session.”

Conclusions Change of practice – discipline/School “The process certainly helped me and I have heard from others that they understand things better. I think the meetings should be compulsory to ensure best practice.” “I think it has helped staff in general to improve their bb9 sites and their awareness of its features.” “You can put up a lot more resources on the web, so the whole teaching (not only for my discipline) experience has changed” “We have become more productive.” “It has the potential- the problem is enabling uptake or providing support and feedback on how to redesign.” “We all share good practice informally and as a result of periodic review some of this will become more formalised.”

Next steps To build on the experience, review and evolve. School: School eLearning leads play a pivotal role in ensuring recommendations are followed up Recommendations from eLearning Review and Periodic Review feed into School strategic planning eLearning team: Use the process to identify projects for future development, including the use of reusable learning objects Develop a framework for an approach to course design – can target disciplines “I would like to have the same meeting again in another year's time. These skills are easily lost over time and a refresher would be helpful. We also have many new colleagues in the Discipline and they would benefit as well.”

Questions?

Examples of recommendations A review of feedback provision with a view to implementing consistent and effective feedback mechanisms at least across subject areas within the School. A review of the role of the Blackboard learning space with a view to creating a methodology for using Blackboard to support face-to-face teaching. This could be in the form of subject-based approaches, including a statement on what is expected. Encourage the exchange of ideas among tutors, perhaps facilitated by events similar to the eLearning “showcases”, to help in developing awareness and practice. Arrange a Link2List session with the library concentrating on journals, digitising content and copyright, and including a practical guide on working with Pdfs. Training in Blackboard’s communication tools, particularly discussion boards, journals and wikis. Training should include a discussion on how these tools can support student engagement, personal reflection and feedback to develop such practice within an articulated pedagogical framework. Discipline based introduction for new staff as to how they might use the learning environment, with academics staff demonstrating examples from their own sites, and eLearning staff giving guidance on the Standard Course Structure and the discipline specific elements. Each course convenor to spend minutes ‘tidying up’ by hiding or deleting unused tools and folders. A list of commonly unused tools and folders will be sent round all staff.

University of Manchester Faculty of Humanities FTE Academic Teaching StaffStudentsCourse Units Manchester Business School Languages Linguistics and Cultures Arts, Histories and Cultures Education Environment and Development Law Social Sciences Combined Studies11961 Faculty Totals