Privacy Concerns in Research Involving Third Parties PRIM&R May 4 Hyatt Harborside Hotel Boston, MA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TISSUE BANKING Challenging to Say the Least
Advertisements

Identifiability: A Useful or Decrepit Concept in Research Ethics? Sara C. Hull, PhD Faculty, Clinical Center Department of Bioethics Director, NHGRI Bioethics.
Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH University of Utah.
Top Ten Investigator Responsibilities When Conducting Human Subjects Research Thanks to Ada Sue Selwitz, Univ. of Kentucky and PRIM&R (Public Responsibility.
Human Specimen Repositories: Requirements of 45 CFR part 46 PRIM&R May 5, 2004 Julie Kaneshiro DHHS Office for Human Research Protections Phone:
Subcommittee on Harmonization Mark Barnes David Forster.
COOL THINGS ABOUT THE GENOME Humans have fewer genes than expected Human genes make more proteins than those of other critters Humans have adopted 200.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
RESEARCH COMPLIANCE: Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Who’s the Boss? Faculty Advisor or Principal Investigator Supervision versus Student Investigator or Study Coordinator Responsibilities Gwenn Snow, MS,
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
Common Rule and FDA Regulation Comparison David Forster Jeff Cooper Gary Chadwick.
East Tennessee State University. Full Accreditation Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP)
The Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections (SACHRP): Recommendations Regarding the Newborn Screening Reauthorization Act of 2014.
Research PHE 498. Define Research Research can be considered as systematic inquiry: A process that needs to be followed systematically to derive conclusions.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
Human Subjects Issues Surrounding Ethanol Administration in Humans ARTSS Summer Program June 6, 2011.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review.
Getting Your Research Through IRB (UCHS) Review Elaine Wethington, Chair Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects (Ithaca)
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.
When Do I Need Ethics Board Approval? George Schmid, M.D., M.Sc. World Health Organization/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Privacy/Confidentiality – Principles and Regulations in the Social Sciences and Behavioral Research Moira Keane, MA, CIP University of Minnesota May 4,
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Second Annual Medical Research Summit March 25, 2002 Washington, D.C.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Medical Research in Times of Bioterrorism - OHRP’s Perspective Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
IRB – Investigator/Research Coordinators Monthly Meeting Gerald D. Fischbach, M.D. Executive Vice President for Health and Biomedical Sciences and Dean.
SoTL Research and the IRB Process Kathleen McKinney, Cross Chair in SoTL Nancy Latham, Campus IRB Executive Committee Phyllis McCluskey-Titus, SoTL Scholar.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Scientific and Scholarly Validity
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Common Rule 2018 Exemption Changes
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Appendix 2 of New Application
Overview of Changes to Human Subjects Research Regulations
What are the Major Changes to the IRB under the Final Common Rule?
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Common Rule 2018 Exemption Changes
Common Rule 2018 Exemption Changes
Does my Research need IRB Review?
Presentation transcript:

Privacy Concerns in Research Involving Third Parties PRIM&R May 4 Hyatt Harborside Hotel Boston, MA

The Wanton Indiscretion Mark Seigler, "Confidentiality in Medicine A Decrepit Concept." New England Journal of Medicine (December 9, 1982, p. 1582

Reeve in recovery.

The Wanton Indiscretion Mark Seigler, "Confidentiality in Medicine A Decrepit Concept." New England Journal of Medicine (December 9, 1982, p. 1582

Richard Curtin with his twins, Allison and Kevin, objected to having his medical history become part of a research project Allison was involved in.

04/08/2001 Whose medical history is it, anyway? By Rita Rubin, USA TODAY At a meeting this afternoon, members of the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee, established by former Health and Human Services secretary Donna Shalala, will enter the fray.

USA Today "I hope Monday will be a big step forward," says Francis Collins, director of human genome research at the National Institutes of Health. Collins will moderate a panel about relatives in research at the meeting, being held near the NIH campus in Bethesda, Md.

IRB Processs Investigator’s Perspective

NHRPAC REPORT ON THIRD PARTIES April 24, 2002 Clarification of the Status of Third Parties When Referenced by Human Subjects in Research

Genetics Workgroup Mary Kay Pelias, Chairperson Terri Seargent: Alpha 1 Association Margaret Borwhat: Women’s Cancer Advocacy Network Francis Collins

Risks and Protections: Commensurablity As the risk of harm incurred by disclosure increases, so should the level of protection from such harm.

What Protections Allow Minimize subject’s concerns over use/misuse of data Subjects provide more accurate information to investigators thus improve quality of research

What Protections Allow Researchers are able to conduct difficult research on important social problems such as substance abuse, violence, high risk sexual behaviors, and genetic predispositions

Assessing Risk Some studies are inaccurately perceived as conveying minimal risk Disclosure of identifiable data may present significant risk to the subject Sensitive nature of the topic Protecting data is the key element in minimizing risk

Third Parties Report Issues specifically dealing with information provided by a human subject about someone else NOT: information about a research subject gathered through indirect means (chart review) = existing regulation

Interested Parties Investigators or their agents Human subjects who interact personally with investigators Third parties about whom researchers obtain information from human subjects but who themselves have no interaction with investigators or their agents

Who Decides? The determination of who is and is not a human subject rests with the IRB The requirement of informed consent, or waiver of consent, pertains only to those deemed to be human subjects by IRBs

Who Decides? Whether through interaction, intervention, or identifiable private information, persons are human subjects when they provide personal or contextual information about their own lives, circumstances, perceptions, or histories even when they make reference to others

Reference to a Third Party? Neither reference to a third party in a research design, nor the recording of information about a third party in research records suggests that a third party must be regarded as a research subject

Other Persons Investigators, in designing and proposing research projects and IRBs, in considering and reviewing research projects and in conducting continuing review, should consider how the research design might focus not only on the identified human subjects, but on other persons.

Factors in Research Design and Review Factors to consider in determining whether information is private and whether the third party is identifiable (and thus, by definition, a human subject)

Factors to Consider 1. The quantity of information collected about the third party 2. The nature of the information collected, including the sensitivity of the information and the possibility that it might cause harm to the third party

Factors to Consider 3. The ability of investigators to record information on third parties in a manner that protects the identity of those parties

Factors to Consider The possibility that classification of a third party as a human subject may have an impact on the rights or welfare of the originally designated human subject

Factors to Consider This requires the IRB to protect the interests of both the original human subject and the third party

Confidentiality and Data Protections Recommendations on Confidentiality and Research Data Protections July 30-31, 2002

Recommendations Host research institutions should recognize and fulfill their obligations to actively support the investigator in protecting all confidential information from compelled disclosure or as otherwise agreed to in the data protection plan

Recommendations OHRP should issue guidance to IRBs and the research community indicating that the degree of confidentiality protection required in research protocols be commensurate with the degree of risk of harm associated with the type of data collected

Recommendations This guidance should emphasize that a good DATA PROTECTION PLAN can reduce or ameliorate the degree of risk of harm

Recommendations To this end, OHRP should require this institutional responsibility as a term and condition of the assurance, and any future accrediting bodies should establish requirements in this area

Rudolph Virchow The physicians are the natural attorneys for the poor, and social problems should largely be solved by them Medical education does not exist to provide students with a way of making a living, but to ensure the health of the community

Rudolf Virchow The task of science is to stake out the limits of the knowable, and to center consciousness within them.