Measuring Policy Commitment to Community Management of Protected Areas L ooking at East African Forests Liz Alden Wily NRM Political Economist
The Background Forests a critical landscape for more than trees Global wave of change in how forests protected and managed Africa: 40+ of 56 states have new guiding forest policies &/or laws
Laws as Source for Assessment Precise Binding Refine new policy development But – No indicator of implementation
Supporting current legal change since 1990 Constitutions (c.20) Land rights (c. 25) Local government (c. 14) Environmental management (c. 10)
The East African Case … Large forest/woodland area (47 million ha) Diverse forest types: mainly multi- functional woodland (50-96%) Longstanding government protection strategies (15-48% as Reserves)
New National Forest Policies Ethiopia- Tanzania- Kenya- Uganda- draft 1998 2000 2001
New Forest Laws Ethiopia Tanzania Uganda Kenya revisions 2002 2003 Bill 2003
CBFM &/Or PFM underway Estimated Number of Communities Involved? ========== TZ. 2,000 UG. 30+ KE: 20+ ETH: 200+ Estimated Number of Forests Involved? ============ TZ: 1,500+ UG: c.10 KE: c.10 ETH: c.20
All four states claim they support community based forest management - But do they? Looking at the laws …
Indicator #1: Does law assure subsistence use of Govt. FR? UGANDA:YES TANZANIA:YES KENYA:YES ETHIOPIA:YES
Indicator #2: Does the law commit to benefit sharing of Govt. FR products/benefits? UGANDA:YES TANZANIA:YES KENYA:YES ETHIOPIA:YES
Indicator #3: Are natural trees on farm now the private property of farmer? UGANDA:YES TANZANIA:YES KENYA:YES ETHIOPIA:YES
Indicator #4: Is community participation promoted in the law? UGANDA:YES TANZANIA:YES KENYA:YES ETHIOPIA:YES
Indicator #5: Does law require that communities help write forest management plans? UGANDA:CONSULTED ONLY TANZANIA:OBLIGATORY & views to be accounted for KENYA:CONSULTED ONLY ETHIOPIA:NO
Indicator #6: If community asks, must Govt. permit community management/co- management? UGANDA:NO TANZANIA:YES KENYA:NO ETHIOPIA:NO
Indicator #7: Are all protected area classes open to community management? UGANDA:NO TANZANIA:YES KENYA:NO ETHIOPIA:NO
Indicator #8: May a community manage a national Forest Reserve? UGANDA:Co-manager only TANZANIA:YES: autonomously or as co-manager KENYA:YES, by contract ETHIOPIA:Co-manager only
Indicator #9: May communities create, own & manage their own protected forest areas? UGANDA:YES TANZANIA:YES KENYA:NOT PROVIDED FOR ETHIOPIA:NOT PROVIDED FOR
Indicator #10: Do community managers have the power to control who uses the Community Forest? UGANDA:NO TANZANIA:YES KENYA:NOT PROVIDED ETHIOPIA:NO
Indicator #11: Do community managers have right to issue licences & collect fees? UGANDA:ONLY CF TANZANIA:YES, using own bylaws KENYA:NO ETHIOPIA:NO
Indicator #12: Does the law enable a Government PA to be reclassified as a Community Forest? UGANDA:NO TANZANIA:YES KENYA:NO ETHIOPIA:NO
Indicator #13: Are all community members to be considered in management arrangements? UGANDA:USER GROUPS only TANZANIA:YES, legally obliged KENYA:USER GROUPS only ETHIOPIA:UNCLEAR
Indicator #14: Have limitations been placed upon the state taking more customary lands for Forest Reserves? UGANDA:only under Land Act TANZANIA:YES KENYA:NO ETHIOPIA:NO
Indicator #15: Are institutions for CBFM easily put in place? UGANDA: NO (must form new legal TANZANIA: YES (existing Village Councils) KENYA: NO (must form legal body) ETHIOPIA: YES (potentially)