Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information Management Objectives, Structure, and Operation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Regional Performance and Innovative Consortia(RPIC) Georgia Community Action Association Annual Conference Author: Lorraine Daniels, Executive Director.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Coordinating Center Overview November 16, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Diabetes Prevention Program Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Michele Dupuis, Senior Officer Knowledge Integration SSHRC Knowledge Mobilization: An Overview of SSHRC’s policies and practices March 31, 2014.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Thomas Hacker Barb Fossum Matthew Lawrence Open Science Grid May 19, 2011.
Establishing Research and Evaluation Network on Child Issues in Indonesia Nuning Akhmadi Indonesia Research and Evaluation Network Manila, 7 – 8 November.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
IEEE Power Electronics Society Long Range Planning Report Tom Habetler Chair, Long Range Planning Committee PELS Meeting Series – APEC 2013, Long Beach.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Governance & Leadership Structure Influence Build Connect.
Strategic Directions at BC, Committee Presentations, Spring 2015 Kate Pluta, lead Liz Rozell, Academic Affairs Grace Commiso, Student Affairs.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
General Capacity Building Components for Non Profit and Faith Based Agencies Lakewood Resource and Referral Center nd Street, suite 204 Lakewood,
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.
+ Chapter 9: Management of Business Intelligence © Sabherwal & Becerra-Fernandez.
Mapping New Strategies: National Science Foundation J. HicksNew York Academy of Sciences4 April 2006 Examples from our daily life at NSF Vision Opportunities.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
1 NSF/TeraGrid Science Advisory Board Meeting July 19-20, San Diego, CA Brief TeraGrid Overview and Expectations of Science Advisory Board John Towns TeraGrid.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
1 25 STRONG WORKFORCE RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW #strongworkforce DoingWhatMATTERS.cccco.edu.
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
COLLEGE PARTNERSHIP COMMITTEE HANDBOOK COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN SERVICES WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY.
June 23, 2016 Organizational Overview. 2 Automation Federation Background A fragmented community of automation professional associations and societies.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
1 GOAL: Provide students with a quality educational experience that enables them to complete their educational goals in a timely fashion. Review and restructure.
TeraGrid’s Process for Meeting User Needs. Jay Boisseau, Texas Advanced Computing Center Dennis Gannon, Indiana University Ralph Roskies, University of.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Building Community through Inclusive Excellence
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
University Career Services Committee
Emerging Frontiers of Science Information
Jeff Marr, PMP Nikki Van Ingen, MSA, MT (ASCP)
Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information
Office of Secretary of Defense
Diversity & Inclusion at UCONN
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information Management Objectives, Structure, and Operation

Management Objectives “To provide mechanisms for synergistic research and development of foundational principles, methods, and applications of post-Shannon information theory. To educate and train the next generation of information sciences practitioners To deeply engage students, researchers, and affiliated personnel from underrepresented groups in all aspects of the project. To facilitate seamless transfer of knowledge to the broader academic and commercial world.”

Management Goals: Research and Development Coordinate all projects to leverage research efforts across the Center Constitute mechanisms for rewarding synergistic development, identifying promising research directions,and terminating stagnant projects in a timely manner, and allocate resources accordingly. Engage the broader scientific community to evolve our shared vision of information sciences Involve the applications community to build up novel methods, formalisms, and products of the research and development plan Develop an industrial outreach plan focused on timely dissemination of results to industry and enabling them to influence research and development efforts

Management Goals: Education and Training Engage students from K-12 to post-doctoral researchers in the emerging concepts associated with information science Develop a coherent educational and diversity plan across various project sites focused on research involvement at all level Develop a novel curriculum across project sites, integrating theory and applications of information science Constitute mechanisms for initiating/ evaluating educational programs and their impact, as well as providing guidance and appropriate resources. Train educators to maximize impact Develop widely accessible instructional resources

Management Goals: Diversity and Outreach Leverage tremendous interdisciplinary opportunities in engaging underrepresented groups in all aspects of research and education. Develop processes for effectively engaging our partners to leverage their talent pool and train the next generation of researchers. Develop programs for outreach to untapped resources, including schools, community colleges, and industry.

Management Goals: Knowledge Transfer Constitute processes for timely and broad dissemination of project outcomes Assimilate promising research avenues and applications from the broader community (industry, labs, as well as academia). Enable the broader community to influence Center activities and to engage with the Center in mutually beneficial ways.

Vice President for Research Purdue University Executive Committee External Advisory Board Technical Director Szpankowski Managing Director Kotterman* Technical Thrusts Education and Human Resources Development Knowledge TransferDiversity and Outreach Management Structure Internal Management Committee Structural goal: coordinate center activities, ensure availability of resources, maintain accountability, and ensure achievement of all project goals

Vice President for Research Purdue University Executive Committee External Advisory Board Technical Director Szpankowski Managing Director Kotterman* Technical Thrusts Education and Human Resources Development Knowledge TransferDiversity and Outreach Management Structure Internal Management Committee Vice President for Research Purdue University Responsible for administrative oversight of the project Provides timely access to university facilities and resources Provides a liaison to student programs and academic units Ensures accountability to the National Science Foundation

Vice President for Research Purdue University Executive Committee External Advisory Board Technical Director Szpankowski Managing Director Kotterman* Technical Thrusts Education and Human Resources Development Knowledge TransferDiversity and Outreach Management Structure Internal Management Committee Technical Director: Establishes high-level goals and strategic directions; manages all center activities; coordinates and executes management decisions and advice from executive and advisory committees; point of contact with NSF Managing Director: Coordinates day-to-day center activities (100% effort) Technical Director Szpankowski Managing Director Kotterman*

Vice President for Research Purdue University Executive Committee External Advisory Board Technical Director Szpankowski Managing Director Kotterman* Technical Thrusts Education and Human Resources Development Knowledge TransferDiversity and Outreach Management Structure Internal Management Committee Executive Committee: Guides progress and vision; evaluates projects; coordinates efforts of different groups; strategizes to maximize Center’s impact. Executive Committee

Vice President for Research Purdue University Executive Committee External Advisory Board Technical Director Szpankowski Managing Director Kotterman* Technical Thrusts Education and Human Resources Development Knowledge TransferDiversity and Outreach Management Structure Internal Management Committee Internal Management Committee: Responsible for day-to-day administration of the center. Monitors and facilities progress, communication, and coordination. Internal Management Committee

Vice President for Research Purdue University Executive Committee External Advisory Board Technical Director Szpankowski Managing Director Kotterman* Technical Thrusts Education and Human Resources Development Knowledge TransferDiversity and Outreach Management Structure Internal Management Committee External Advisory Committee: Annually reviews projects; provides high-level guidance on strategic issues; provides a channel for open dialogue with the wider community External Advisory Board

Vice President for Research Purdue University Executive Committee External Advisory BoardInstitutional Advisory Committee Technical Director Szpankowski Managing Director Kotterman* Technical Thrusts Education and Human Resources Development Knowledge TransferDiversity and Outreach Coordinating Thrusts Research, education, outreach, and knowledge transfer activities must be tightly integrated. Thrust leads will have monthly meetings (either in person, or over video conference) to develop integrated initiatives. These meetings will include the Technical and Managing Directors. Industry representatives from partner companies will be invited as needed. Executive committee will minor coordination (and associated outcomes), assess coordination risks, and propose mitigation strategies

Executive Committee Composition: – Center leadership – Chair of the Executive Committee will not be the Director of the Center. Coordination – Monthly meetings conducted through telephone and/or video conference – Senior personnel from projects and managing director will attend by invitation as needed. – Meetings will manage new and ongoing projects; deal with issues that have arisen, and discuss possible future directions (fiscal and intellectual) – Action items from meeting will be distributed within 24 hours.

Project Management Projects within the Center will be managed by the Executive Committee via application management, solicitation, and assessment Managing Applications: – Track progress of each application – Ensure progress on towards foundational aspects – Terminate projects no longer relevant or demonstrating insufficient progress – Evaluate the success of collaborative investigations. Metrics for managing applications – Publication of quality peer-reviewed papers, software tools, and infrastructure, vis-à-vis information measures – Collaborations between investigators exemplified by joint publications and grants – Development of educational material that illustrate fundamental developments in the domain – Assessment of progress reports by the peers within the Center

Risk Assessment and Mitigation Monthly meetings of executive committee will include dedicated discussion to risk assessment and mitigation strategys Risk will be assessed on project progress, synergistic development, thrusts coordination, outreach and diversity, and knowledge transfer – Risk assessment will be based on concrete metrics – Mitigation strategies for at-risk areas will be developed, implemented, and monitored – An EC member will be assigned to any at-risk area, with responsibility for monitoring mitigation, reporting progress, and making recommendations Quarterly meetings will be held jointly between the EC and the IMC to discuss risk on all aspects of the project

Internal Management Committee Reports to the Managing Director Monitors internal progress and communication across the Center Committee mission: – Resolve day-to-day issues of the center without engaging executive committee – Raise issues that are of concern among projects, and to the user community – Provides a forum for coordinating the many ongoing efforts, thus minimizing redundancy, and sharing success strategies – Informs Technical Director, Executive, and Advisory Committees of larger issues that may prove problematic to the success of the project. Research ManagingDirector InternalManagementCommittee OutreachDissemination Education ImplementationApplications Projects Projects User Students Training User Community

External Advisory Board Composition: reflects diversity of scientific domains within the Center. – A renowned Computer Scientist who is expert in – A renowned Information Theorist who is expert in – Domain scientists in XXX, YYY, ZZZ. Coordination – External Advisory Board will receive quarterly progress reports from the Managing Director – Will meet with the Center Director and the NSF Project Officer each year – In-person meeting at the annual “all hands” meeting of the Center. This meeting will provide a forum for a high quality, detailed appraisal of the Center’s progress

External Advisory Board: Progress Assessment EAC will generate an annual report on the center’s progress for the Center Director and the NSF – Will summarize assessment of the Center’s initiatives and make recommendations Assessment and Metrics Include – The adequacy of the synergistic development (metrics may include new collaborations, student exchanges, and interdisciplinary publications.) – Infrastructure creation and its potential impact – The reliability, robustness, and usability of tools and methods (metrics may user surveys, publication citations, and metrics on tool usage) – The quality of the education and outreach component (metrics may include student surveys, diversity of program participants, statistics on outreach). – The effectiveness of dissemination activities (metrics may include citation indices and plenary/invited talks of participants) – Directions for Computer Science research related to Information Theory – Recommendations for strategic recruitments – Selection of new applications and termination of existing ones

Planning for Growth Identifying Novel Directions, Selecting and Integrating New Applications: – Recruiting: An open invitation to the entire information sciences and related applications communities – Evaluation: By Director and Executive committee at the “All Hands” meeting, Metrics for selection will include significance/scope of the proposed application (25%), likelihood of impact (50%), and likelihood of success (25%). – Integration: The Technical Director in consultation with the External Advisory Committee and NSF will collaborate with the PI of the new application to plan for transfer of resources to the new project.