July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 SLAC BaBar Program-Overview Blair Ratcliff SLAC BaBar Department Head.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resources for the ATLAS Offline Computing Basis for the Estimates ATLAS Distributed Computing Model Cost Estimates Present Status Sharing of Resources.
Advertisements

Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Radiative B Decays (an Experimental Overview) E.H. Thorndike University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration FPCP May 18, 2002.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
This is the last message in this gathering of North American PI’s with an interest in the INFN hosted SuperB project. I will try to deal with issues on.
1 SLAC BaBar Program Blair Ratcliff SLAC BaBar Program Manager June 2004.
Nick Hadley Maryland DØ Effort Maryland DOE Review August 30, 2005.
Jochen Dingfelder, SLAC Semileptonic Decay Studies with B A B AR Annual DOE HEP Program Review, June 5-8, 2006, SLAC B D   X c,X u.
The Caltech Alumni Fund Alumni Fund Conference September 13, 2003 Jim Cutts, MS’67, PhD’71 Former Alumni Fund Chair.
June 2000Status of BELLE1 Beyond e + e - Workshop The Homestead Glen Arbor, MI Daniel Marlow BELLE Princeton University June 17, 2000.
July 2000Results from BELLE1 IV th Rencontres du Vietnam Hanoi, Vietnam Daniel Marlow BELLE Princeton University July 22, 2000.
DOE Program Review, SLAC, June SLAC BaBar Program-Overview Blair Ratcliff SLAC BaBar Program Manager June 2006 Blair Gregory Jochen Matt Jon Denis.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 New Charmonium-like States Arafat Gabareen Mokhtar SLAC Group-EC (B A B AR ) DOE Review Meeting July 8 th,
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
Hall D Online Data Acquisition CEBAF provides us with a tremendous scientific opportunity for understanding one of the fundamental forces of nature. 75.
12 Dec 2005 J. Schukraft1 ALICE USA ALICE position towards US participation EU participation in emcal Requirements Formal steps & schedule.
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
Rare Charm Decays Adrian Bevan IHEP, Beijing, 22 nd October 2011
LHCb computing in Russia Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) Russia-CERN JWGC, October 2005.
Fermilab User Facility US-CMS User Facility and Regional Center at Fermilab Matthias Kasemann FNAL.
Your life with CLEO + BTEV The bottom line: a We are a small, friendly, well supported group of particle physicists. a We work on a variety.
Antiproton Physics Experiments Keith Gollwitzer -- Fermilab Antiproton Sources Accumulator Antiproton Physics Experiments –Precision measurements Method.
The LHC Computing Grid – February 2008 The Worldwide LHC Computing Grid Dr Ian Bird LCG Project Leader 25 th April 2012.
DOE Program Review, SLAC, June SLAC BaBar Program-Overview Blair Ratcliff SLAC BaBar Program Manager June 2007 Blair Gregory Matt MarkRainer Veronique.
28 Feb – 3 Mar, 2006 Discoveries in Flavour Physics Frascati, Italy 1 Why do we need a super tau/charm factory? David Asner Carleton University.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
The BTeV Project at Fermilab Talk to DOE/Fermi Group Jan. 11, 2001 Introduction – Joel Butler Tracking detectors – David Christian Particle Identification.
Robert Klanner - DESY 1 DESY, HERA and the US contribution HERA and DESY HERA status ZEUS and the US groups HERA and particle physics.
Recommendations on the scientific programme The PAC endorsed the main lines of the proposed long-term programme. The draft document is expected.
Physical Program of Tau-charm Factory V.P.Druzhinin, Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Top threshold Monte Carlo generator Stewart Boogert John Adams Institute Royal Holloway, University of London Filimon Gournaris (Ph.D student and majority.
The LHC Computing Grid – February 2008 The Challenges of LHC Computing Dr Ian Bird LCG Project Leader 6 th October 2009 Telecom 2009 Youth Forum.
The LHCb CERN R. Graciani (U. de Barcelona, Spain) for the LHCb Collaboration International ICFA Workshop on Digital Divide Mexico City, October.
Strategic Planning Workshop  Presented by: Jason P Aubee.
Particle Physics Research - Birmingham group HEFCE academic staff 7 Research staff 13, Engineers 2, Technicians 2 PhD students 12.
Penn CDF B Physics Overview Joseph Kroll – Penn DOE Site Visit – 8 August 2005.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
CERN as a World Laboratory: From a European Organization to a global facility CERN openlab Board of Sponsors July 2, 2010 Rüdiger Voss CERN Physics Department.
ATLAS B-Physics Reach M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK
Recent B A B AR Measurements of Hadronic B Branching Fractions David N. Brown University of Louisville For the B A B AR Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
Sep/19/2008 Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation: Accelerator based Particle Physics1 Accelerator Based Particle Physics Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
The ATLAS Computing Model and USATLAS Tier-2/Tier-3 Meeting Shawn McKee University of Michigan Joint Techs, FNAL July 16 th, 2007.
Computing Division FY03 Budget and budget outlook for FY04 + CDF International Finance Committee April 4, 2003 Vicky White Head, Computing Division.
Glion Colloquium / June Accelerating Science and Innovation R.-D. Heuer, CERN HL-LHC, Aix-les-Bains, 1 Oct ECFA HL-LHC Experiments Workshop.
Physics Results from CDF and Prospects for a FY 2011 Run Kevin Pitts / University of Illinois DOE S&T Review of Scientific User Facilities June 30 – July.
Americas comments on Linear Collider organization after 2012 P. Grannis, for LCSGA – Aug. 24, 2011 ILCSC GDE.
RECFA September Kenneth Österberg, University of Helsinki Experimental e + e - physics – LEP&LC DELPHI Major finnish LEP contribution analysis.
Beauty Baryon LHCb Steven Blusk Beauty 2014, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 14-18, 2014 On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Syracuse University.
First results from CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 collider Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia September 2011 E.Solodov (for.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Baryon Spectroscopy and Decays using the Belle Detector John Yelton University of Florida I review recent results on charmed baryon decay,
B-factories Legacy Book 11st Meeting, SLAC, Oct 2009 Section Editors BaBar: Stephen Sekula Belle: Roberto Mussa Bottomonium Sketch B-factories Legacy Book.
Extending the PHENIX physics reach Physics beyond the baseline accessible at RHIC II Capabilities needed to address the new physics Detector upgrades to.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Nuclear Physics Data Management Needs Bruce G. Gibbard
Charmless B-decays at BaBar
SLAC B-Factory BaBar Experiment WAN Requirements
Λb and heavy states at Tevatron
Λb and heavy states at Tevatron
BaBar Physics Results and UCSD Contributions
New Spectroscopy with Charm quarks at B factories.
LHC Computing, RRB; H F Hoffmann
Presentation transcript:

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 SLAC BaBar Program-Overview Blair Ratcliff SLAC BaBar Department Head

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 2 Core Elements of SLAC’s BaBar Contributions Detector: Provide infrastructure, support, engineering, technical support, and management (see talk of H. Jawahery) now moving to D&D (see D&D Session-Wisniewski& Krebs) Computing: Provide infrastructure, support, and management (G. Dubois-Felsmann) Physicist Collaborators (SLAC BaBar) –Overview-Structure and Leadership (Blair) –Physics Sketches: Studies of Upsilon SpectroscopyP. Grenier New Charmonium-like StatesA. Gabareen-Mokhtar Studies of Charm MixingJ. Coleman Charmless B DecaysM. Graham

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 3 Status of the Collaboration-H. Jawahery 74 Institutions in 10 countries Although fewer BaBarians than last year, with more than 200 students and postdocs the collaboration continues to be on a very strong foundation. FacultyPhD StaffPostdocGradNon-PhDTotals Canada France Germany Italy Netherlands112 Norway213 Russia Spain3238 United Kingdom United States Totals

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 4 Overview of SLAC BaBar Manpower – FY2008&2010

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 5 SLAC BaBar Physics Manpower by Year (FTE)

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 6 SLAC Physics Program Support *Detector Operations & “Service” until the shutdown –(~0.6 of Active Physicist FTEs, ~2x nominal collaboration average) –Significant role in most detector systems, computing, etc. –Moving to minimal maintenance and D&D phases *Computing Support is evolving rapidly. –Online personnel moving to other roles in BaBar or positions in SLAC –Substantial offline support remains essential, but evolving. *Physics Analysis (more later) *Leadership – Snapshot as of May 2008 –Collaboration Management Technical Coordinator Computing Coordinator Council Chair –Operations and Technical Operations Manager System Leadership & Technical Board (Transition to Maintenance and onto D&D) –DCH –DIRC –EMC –IFR/LST –Trigger –MDI –Physics and Tools Convenors (7/42-May 08 Snapshot) Quarkonia Hadronic Spectra 2 body Charmless 3 body Charmless Semileptonic Charm Neutral Particles Reconstruction and ID –Standing and Ad-hoc Committees Exec board; Speakers Bureau; Pub Board; Membership Committee; etc.

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 7 Shift in data taking goals for run 7 Challenges in many areas, especially accelerator, trigger & DAQ, online, and computing  Successful  S),  S), and above  S) scans. The end of an era- last run completed April 7. BaBar now in a transition period to the Minimum Maintenance State (~Sept 1).  Completing the development of appropriate monitoring system Ownership of detector in transition  SLAC responsibility Minimum Maintenance State  D&D. BaBar Detector

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 8 BaBar Computing Expect delivery of the final data set about the end Need to support ~2 more years of full-scale analysis with extensive central computing activities Includes analysis, 2-3 skim cycles per year, and substantial simulation production. Can do if we retain infrastructure in place now, including at SLAC, Tier-A sites and the network of simulation hosts. Assumes retention of resources at Tier-A sites, network of simulation hosts *“Ramp-down” period begins in 2010….remaining analysis should converge at SLAC Total need should be similar to current SLAC-only capacity in 2011, then decline fairly rapidly Continued (diminishing) support is needed for several more years For the long term need a system for archiving datasets and providing accessibility for analysis; will begin real engineering once reprocessing started

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 9 Physics Well into the  (4S) intense analysis period (9 months ahead of schedule). Have a rich new dataset in the broader Upsilon region in addition to the  (4S). Top priority now is to publish the “core” analyses with the full dataset. It will take substantial effort, and long term commitment to tap the full potential of the data.

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 10 Analysis SLAC BaBar Physics Analysis *Fully collaborative physics analysis model….. across institutions and groups. *Broad program. Many different “key” results. *SLAC is full participant in all phases of the physics. E.g., there were 198 BaBar Analysis Notes in the last 3 months. A SLAC physicist was the lead editor on 24. *Some examples of SLAC BaBar’s interests: –CP Violation in B   0  0 &, more generally, B  mm’ where m and m’ are charmless mesons. –Inclusive semi-leptonic B decays and the extraction of |V ub | & |V cb | –CP Violation and search for new physics in B   K s ; B  K + K - K s ; B  K L K s K s –Search for Exotic Baryons (Pentaquarks) –Search for narrow mesonic resonances (D s, X(3872), etc.) –Inclusive Hadronic Spectra;  K,p, ,  c,…………….. –Radiative Penguin decays; Inclusive b  s  Inclusive b  d    K*  ; B   ; B   ; etc. –ISR; Exclusive hadronic final states; Inclusive and exclusive measurements of R. –Exclusive VV production in e+e- collisions. –Leptonic b & c decays; (e.g., B   e  D   D s   –Exclusive B decays; B  p+p-      ’K* –CP violation in  +  - B decays –Determination of Hyperon Spins.

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 11 SLAC BaBar Physics Leadership History AWG/Tools/Task Force Conveners Charmless 2 Body Cristianziani, Roodman Charmless 3 Body Dujmic, Graham CharmColeman SemileptonicLuth, Dingfelder Radiative PenquinsLibby, Jessop, Convery Leptonic DecaysRobinson, Schindler, Nelson PentaquarkHalyo Inclusive SpectraMuller, Ratcliff Particle IDAston Neutral Particles/Reco and IDRoodman QuarkoniaGrenier  Presently comprise 6/24 Physics AWG conveners

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 12 Physics Program Support-Education  10 Stanford Ph.D. Graduate Students (5/08).  Research Associates –10 –How many do we turnover? 20 in last five years.

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 13 BaBar SLAC Ph.D. Students Graduated Students and Thesis Topics Hiro Tanaka, Radiative Decays of the B Meson (8/02). Aron Soha, Branching Fraction and TDCPA in B 0 Decays to Psi and a   (5/03). Amanda Weinstein, Study of Exclusive Charmless Semileptonic Decays of the B Meson (12/04). Erkcan Ozcan, Measurement of Inclusive Radiative B Meson Decay B  X s  (1/06) Tetiana Hryn’ova, Study of B Meson Decays to p anti-p h Final States (3/06) Joerg Stelzer, A Precise Measurement of Ds   (4/06). Nicolas Berger, Inclusive Measurement of RHAD with ISR events (4/06). Mark Allen, Measurement of Alpha in B  p0 p0, p+p0, and K+p0 (2007) Current Students and Thesis Topics, if known. Kevin Yarritu, Radiative Penguin Decays Mark Allen, Measurement of Alpha in B           and      Joshua Thompson, Measurement of Beta in the Dalitz Analysis of B0  K + K - K s Andrew Wagner, Dalitz Analysis of B0  K +     Brian Lindquist, Asymmetries in Three Body Decays Manuel Franco Sevilla B to D*  Decays Wells Wulsin, B   l  Steve Sun, e + e -  V V Chris West, Search for eta-b in inclusive upsilon(3S) decays Jose Benitez, A study of D*npi final states and a search for new excited charm states

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 14 Future Challenges For SLAC BABAR Collaboration Manpower Base is slowly decreasing, with…. –An intense “Intense Analysis” period underway. –Uniquely large data sets for Physics Analyses on > 100 different topics. –Need to exploit the full data sets with methodological improvements for final archival analyses and publications. –Need to retain flexibility to include new physics channels and classes of events not previously envisioned. –Need to retain simulation capability and data accessibility for the long term –Increasing pressure on total manpower as LHC begins, now that experimental data taking has ended.  Continued need for substantial computing support during Intense Analysis phase (FY ).  Support for Maintenance and Detector D&D  (Fy ?) Retain simulation, data accessibility, and analysis capability to fully exploit the unique data set for physics.

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 15 Summary SLAC BaBar: –Has provided infrastructure, management, and technical support for detector and computing for the life of the experiment. Moving to Minimal Maintenance Phase for Detector and on toward D&D. Significant support required for computing during intense analysis phase, decreasing thereafter, but becoming centered at SLAC. –SLAC BaBar Physicists partner with the Collaboration on physics analysis, & computing. Substantial computing and analysis efforts will be needed to mine and publish results from the very rich data set for both the intermediate and longer terms.