Extraction of the x- dependence of the non- perturbative QCD b-quark fragmentation distribution component Eli Ben-Haim LAL OrsayLPNHE Paris HEP2003 Europhysics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zijin Guo University of Hawaii (Representing BES Collaboration) Quarkonium Working Group ’04, IHEP Beijing October 13, 2004 Study of  c Decays at BES.
Advertisements

Report from the LEP QCD Working Group Roger Jones Lancaster CERN Switzerland.
Maria Jose Costa, CERN DIS 2004 April 14 th -18 th 2004, Slovakia b -mass effects in 3 and 4 jets events with the DELPHI detector at LEP b u,d,s.
QCD N06 - Monte Porzio Catone - 15/06/ SIDIS Cross Sections and Spin Asymmetries Predictions for Ongoing and Future Experiments M.Elena Boglione.
Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.
Electroweak b physics at LEP V. Ciulli INFN Firenze.
Constraining the polarized gluon PDF in polarized pp collisions at RHIC Frank Ellinghaus University of Colorado (for the PHENIX and STAR Collaborations)
1 Inclusive B Decays - Spectra, Moments and CKM Matrix Elements Presented by Daniel Cronin-Hennessy University of Rochester (CLEO Collaboration) ICHEP.
Forward Jet Production at HERA, Patrick Ryan, Univ. of Wisconsin EPS2005, July 21, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin On Behalf of the H1 and.
FRAGMENTAION UNCERTAINTIES IN THE EXTRACTION OF FROM THE SEMI-INCLUSIVE MEASUREMENT OF B  X d  Tim Beck, Bruce Schumm Radiative Penguin Meeting April.
Resummation of Large Logs in DIS at x->1 Xiangdong Ji University of Maryland SCET workshop, University of Arizona, March 2-4, 2006.
1 Bose-Einstein Correlations in hadronic W decays at LEP Nick van Remortel University of Antwerpen Belgium.
Multijets in e+e- annihilations Hasko Stenzel FRIF workshop e+e- multi-jets H.Stenzel 2 Outline  Jet rates and algorithms  energy evolution.
M. Djordjevic 1 Effect of dynamical QCD medium on radiative heavy quark energy loss Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University.
 s determination at LEP Thorsten Wengler University of Manchester DIS’06, Tsukuba, Japan.
QCD Resummations for Hadronic Collisions Werner Vogelsang RBRC and BNL Nuclear Theory RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting 2005.
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
Measurement of α s at NNLO in e+e- annihilation Hasko Stenzel, JLU Giessen, DIS2008.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
Hints for Low Supersymmetry Scale from Analysis of Running Couplings Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida DPF06 + JPS06, October 31, 2006, Waikiki,
Cambridge Workshop July 18, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Sources of b-Quarks at the Tevatron  Important to have good leading (or leading-log)
May 18-20, 2005 SIR05 JLab 1 P ? Dependence of SSA -- from nonpert. to pert. Feng Yuan, RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory References: Ji, Ma, Yuan,
Zhongbo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory QCD structure of the nucleon and spin physics Lecture 5 & 6: TMD factorization and phenomenology HUGS 2015,
Vcb and Vub Determinations Changhao Jin University of Melbourne BEACH 2002, Vancouver.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Twist-3 distribution amplitudes of scalar mesons from QCD sum rules Y.M Wang In collaboration with C.D Lu and H. Zou Institute of High Energy Physics,
Latest Physics Results from ALEPH Paolo Azzurri CERN - July 15, 2003.
V. Chiochia DIS 2003 Workshop Production of beauty quarks in deep inelastic scattering at HERA XI International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering St.
Precise α s from  Decays(*) M. Davier, S. Descotes-Genon, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang Tau08 Workshop Novosibirsk, Sept (*) arxiv: ;
22 nd Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics “Can STAR p+p data help constrain fragmentation functions for strange hadrons” Mark Heinz (for the STAR collaboration)
K.K. Gan The Ohio State University New Results on  Lepton July 17, 2003.
LISHEP Rio de Janeiro1 Factorization in diffraction Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague On behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaborations.
W Mass and Width at LEP2 Jeremy Nowell ALEPH / Imperial College London On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
July 16th-19th, 2007 McGill University AM 1 July 16th-19th, 2007 McGill University, Montréal, Canada July 2007 Early Time Dynamics Montreal AM for the.
Event Shapes, Alexander Savin University of WisconsinDIS 2006, April 21, Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS Alexander A. Savin University of Wisconsin.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
The Importance of Higher Twist Corrections in Polarized DIS E. Leader, A. Sidorov, D. Stamenov, LSS 11th International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering.
Measurement of b-quark mass effects for multi-jet events at LEP Juan A. Fuster Verdú EPS-2003 Aachen, July 2003.
1 Forward Jet/  0 Production in DIS at HERA On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations ICHEP August 2004, Beijing Didar Dobur, University of Freiburg.
Moriond QCD March 24, 2003Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D01 b-production cross-section at the TeVatron Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D0 for the CDF and D0 collaborations.
HEP2003 Photon Structure Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Measurements of the Photon Structure Function at LEP Albert De Roeck / CERN Representing the LEP Collaborations.
Color Reconnection in W Pair Events Guillaume Leibenguth Université Catholique de Louvain Belgium DIS 2003, St. Petersburg On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
F Don Lincoln f La Thuile 2002 Don Lincoln Fermilab Tevatron Run I QCD Results Don Lincoln f.
Tools08 1 st July1 PDF issues for Monte Carlo generators Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University.
Hadron production and QCD coherence at LEP Marco Cuffiani University of Bologna and INFN (Italy) on behalf of the OPAL Collaboration QCD coherence and.
ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Marta Calvi - Study of Spectral Moments… 1 Study of Spectral Moments in Semileptonic b Decays with the DELPHI Detector at LEP Marta.
A T : novel variable to study low transverse momentum vector boson production at hadron colliders. Rosa María Durán Delgado The University of Manchester.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
University of Antwerpen, Belgium On behalf of the LEP experiments
seminar at Academia Sinica
Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS
Color Reconnection in Hadronic WW Events at LEP
Sílvia Bravo i Gallart IFAE, Barcelona Moriond-QCD, 18 March 2002
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Open Heavy Flavour Production at HERA
Charmed Hadrons from Fragmentation and B Decays
Edgar Dominguez Rosas Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Event Shape Variables in DIS Update
Event Shape Variables in Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA
ATLAS 2.76 TeV inclusive jet measurement and its PDF impact A M Cooper-Sarkar PDF4LHC Durham Sep 26th 2012 In 2011, 0.20 pb-1 of data were taken at √s.
Improved alpha_s from Tau Decays(*)
in the Rein-Sehgal Model
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Hints for Low Supersymmetry Scale from Analysis of Running Couplings
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
b-Quark Production at the Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

Extraction of the x- dependence of the non- perturbative QCD b-quark fragmentation distribution component Eli Ben-Haim LAL OrsayLPNHE Paris HEP2003 Europhysics Conference, Aachen, July 2003 Sponsored by EEC RTN HPRN-CT

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen2 Contents Measured b-fragmentation function: summary. Perturbative and non-perturbative QCD components of the fragmentation function. New Method for extraction of the x-dependence of the non-perturbative QCD component. Results of the method. A remark concerning fitting the x-distribution and its moments.

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen3 Measured Fragmentation Function Recent results from ALEPH (May 2001), SLD (May 2002), OPAL (October 2002, not published) and DELPHI (not published). Average < 1995 (still used):  Mean values: ALEPH:   DELPHI:   OPAL:   SLD:    0.002(model) New average (preliminary)  Definition: Bin contents are correlated Systematics dominate

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen4 Perturbative and non-perturbative components perturbativenon-perturbative Typically: gluon radiation. Calculable. Different approaches: Monte Carlo. Theoretical QCD. Typically: hadronisation. Non calculable. Contains all the contributions that are not included in the perturbative component. Usually taken as a model.

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen5 = =  folding perturbative non-perturbative NO MODEL Mellin transform: X-Distributions moments Non-perturbative Part: New Approach. hep-ph/ perturbative (theoretical QCD, Monte Carlo) non-perturbative (usually models) Inverse Mellin- transform Non perturbative function: directly extracted, not model dependent     

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen6 Results of the New Method: General This Non perturbative functions are expected to be valid in a different environment than e + e -, only in the framework where similar perturbative assumptions are used for its extraction. Extraction point by point. 3 perturbative Approches: Monte Carlo (JETSET 7.3). NLL QCD, Cacciari and Catani. NLL+DGE QCD, Cacciari and Gardi, hep-ph/ non-perturbative = F (perturbative) Low x region indicates gluon radiation is well accounted in the perturbative components. Higher order QCD  the non perturbative part starts at larger x. The non-perturbative functions for JETSET and NLL QCD have similar shapes, translated. D NP (x) Extracted non- perturbative distributions

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen7 Results of the New Method: JETSET Model parameters from fit to ALEPH’s data. Comparison: folding the x- distributions, by: Lund and Bowler models favoured (as observed by OPAL and SLD). D pert (x) D NP (x) Perturbative & non-perturbative components Comparison ALEPH-OPAL D NP (x) Comparison to hadronisation models: Extracted non-perturbative distribution: D NP (x)

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen8 Results of the New Method: NLL QCD Folding a physical model with the unphysical NLL QCD  not meaningful. Our extracted non-pert. QCD distribution solves this problem. Solves this Not 0 for x>1 NLL Break down Cacciari and Catani Nucl.Phys. B617 (2001) Comparison to hadronisation models: Extracted non-perturbative distribution: D NP (x) D predicted (x) D pert (x) D NP (x) new Don’t fold NLL QCD with models !

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen9 Fitting the x-distribution and moments Fitting the x-distribution and moments Typically large x large N. Each moment contains a weighted information from the bins. The information measured in x- space is distributed among moments (not necessarily low order ones). Moments are highly correlated. Example for ALEPH (19 bins): Fitting x-space data is different from fitting moments. fraction of contribution from each bin to the moments moment order fraction ALEPH

Eli Ben-Haim b-fragmentation HEP2003, Aachen10 Summary and conclusions A model independent extraction of the x-dependence of the non-perturbative QCD component of the b-quark fragmentation function has been performed. It depends closely on the perturbative approach. The result differs markedly from some hadronisation models. Perturbative=Monte-Carlo: Lund and Bowler models are favoured. Perturbative = NLL QCD: The extracted function goes beyond x=1. Don’t use it with hadronisation models! The non perturbative function is 0 at low x: gluon radiation is well accounted by perturbative QCD. This Non perturbative function is expected to be valid in a different environment than e + e -, if similar perturbative assumptions are used.