IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESafety 8 July e-Safety Working Group Brussels 8 July 2002 Sub-group 1: Autonomous In-vehicle Technologies.
Advertisements

Date: 1 October2013 Meeting: Concertation meeting VRA Speaker and organisation: Maarten Oonk, TNO [ Roadmap Automation in Road Transport.
58 th Traffic Safety Conference Romell Cooks Regional Administrator Central Region May 10,
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2013 Overview of International Activities to Limit Distraction Document No. ITS (21st ITS,
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Concept of Driver Assistance The ASV Project of Japan Geneva November 2003 Informal Document No. 20 (131 st WP.29, agenda item 2.4.)
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
UNIT VI SCHOOL BUS CRITICAL SITUATIONS VI-2 Topics: Responses to critical situations Preventing and correcting:  traction loss  loss of brakes  steering.
Partial Lesson first 20 out 65 slides 4 Lane Strategies and Rules of the Road.
Human Factors Challenges for Automated Vehicles Peter Campbell Burns Chief, Ergonomics and Crash Avoidance Motor Vehicle Safety ​​​​​ ITU-UNECE Symposium.
Ian Fraser Highways Agency Co-operative Vehicle - Highway Systems Research.
1. NV DMV FollowupProprietary and Confidential 2 Peloton Technology Founded 2011, Menlo Park CA To dramatically improve highway safety and the efficiency.
Human Factor and Traffic Controls HERO UNIT Training Module.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
Summary of Activities up to Now March 16, th ITS Informal Group Meeting K. Hiramatsu and M. Sekine NTSEL: National Traffic Safety and Environmental.
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty Chief, Enterprise Planning & Performance California Department of Motor Vehicles July 22, 2015.
Guidelines for Safety Critical Warnings Peter Burns IHRA-ITS Transmitted by the representative of Canada Informal Document No. ITS th ITS informal.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Human Factors Concerns for Design & Performance of Warnings J.L.Harbluk & P.C. Burns Ergonomics & Crash Avoidance, Transport Canada Human Factors Forum.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Lane Departure Warning Human Machine Interface GRRF informal group on AEBS/LDWS 1 February 2010 AEBS-LDWS
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
Human Factors Challenges for Automated Vehicles Peter Campbell Burns Chief, Ergonomics and Crash Avoidance Motor Vehicle Safety ​​​​​ ITU-UNECE Symposium.
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
Driver-Vehicle Interface Design Principles Chris Monk September 24, 2013.
Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2009 Page 1 Improve Road Safety – Target the Main Cause Effectively UNECE Road Safety Seminar Minsk, 13 May.
Sample Workbook for Crash Avoidance Technologies Focus Groups.
Sample Workbook for Crash Avoidance Technologies Focus Groups.
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2007 Page 1 Improve Road Safety – Target the Right User “ Results of the European Truck Accident Causation study”
Loughborough University research areas
Autonomous Vehicles in California
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
On-board Technologies
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
The Importance of ADAS Technology
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Working Principle of Blind Spot Technology in Car
The Safety Technologies to Consider While Buying a New Car.
Monthly Training Topic NV Transport Inc. Safety & Loss Prevention
SAE J3016 Revisions & SAE Ads/adas Standards
Accelerating the Introduction of
TUGS Jason Higuchi && Julia Yefimenko && Raudel mayorga
Statement of Principles on the Design of High-Priority Warning Signals
NHTSA Research Overview: Automation, ADAS, and Human Factors
2018 Summit of the National Association of State Motorcycle Safety
Sergio Buonomo Counselor ITU-R Study Group 5
On-board Technologies
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
How technology and data can bring needed improvements to air quality and the environment Dr Dave Williams 8th November 2018.
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
New Zealand Transport Agency
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
New Hampshire Department of Motor Vehicles
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted by chairman of IHRA/ITS Informal document No. ITS ( 19th ITS, 11March 2011, Agenda item 5)

 Trends in driver assistance technology  Safety concerns  Design principles for control  Summary Outline March International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS)

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems  Collision warning and automatic braking  Adaptive front headlights  Lane departure warning  Lane keeping assistance  Blind spot  Driver monitoring  Speed alert  Assisted parking  Overtaking assistance  Signal violation warning  …. Cooperative systems  V2V, V2I, V2X EU Project - Prevent March International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS)

March 20114

International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS) 5 Human Factors Needs  Awareness and understanding of current system status  Understanding of system functions and limitations  Proper instructions, supporting materials and accurate marketing  Optimal driver workload and task engagement  Consistent ‘look and feel’ to limit interoperability issues  Identify factors that affect appropriate trust and system reliance  Design in fail-safe modes  Identify potential unsafe side effects of behavioural adaptation and design for any reasonably foreseeable misuse.

March 2011 International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS) 6 In-the-Loop  the driver is involved in the driving task and is aware of the vehicle status and road traffic situation.  driver plays an active role in the driver-vehicle system. Out-of-the-Loop (potential negative consequence of automation)  Reduced situational awareness - driver is not immediately aware of the vehicle and the current or developing road traffic situation.  not actively monitoring, making decisions or providing input to the driving task.  diminished ability to detect system errors and manually respond. In-the-Loop Performance

7March 2011 International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS)  The International Harmonized Research Activities (IHRA) working group on Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) has been providing support to the UN- ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group.  The following draft control principles were prepared for WP.29.  These basic principles are intended to identify automation issues and help to avoid drivers being out-of-the-loop and unprepared to manage safety-critical situations.  The principles are structured in relation to Control, Operation and Display under Normal and Critical driving situations.  Based on research evidence, international standards and best practices. Overview of Control Principles

March 2011 International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS) 8  These principles cover the basic driver interface and intervention capabilities for active vehicle control systems.  These principles may also be relevant to automation that provides information and warnings to drivers.  These principles apply to systems that support elements of the driver’s task.  These principles also apply to systems that can actively change vehicle speed and direction. Scope of Control Principles

March 2011 International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS) 9 1. Normal Driving Situations  The driver should be able to easily and quickly override system actions at any time under normal driving situations and when crashes are avoidable. 2. Critical Driving Situations  When the crash is determined to be unavoidable, the system can take actions to try to mitigate the crash severity.  When a loss of control is determined to be unavoidable, the system can take actions to try to regain stability and control.  When it determines that driver performance is impaired, the system can take actions to avoid or mitigate collisions. Principles: Control Elements

March 2011 International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS) 10 Principles: Operation Elements  For systems that control the vehicle under normal driving situations, the driver should have a means to turn it OFF manually and to keep the system in the OFF state.  Drivers should be informed of the conditions that result in system activation and deactivation.  Drivers should be informed of the conditions when system operation is different or is not guaranteed.

March 2011 International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS) 11  It should be clear to the driver what assistance systems are installed on the vehicle.  For systems that can be turned OFF, the driver should be able to easily determine the system state.  The driver should be provided with clear feedback informing them when the system is actively controlling the vehicle.  Drivers should be notified of any transfer of control between the driver and vehicle.  If action is not available due to a failure, the driver should be informed.  If symbols are used to notify the driver, a standard symbol should be used when available. Principles: Display Elements

March 2011 International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS) 12 Summary  Automation should provide users with safe, comfortable, convenient and efficient mobility.  This document describes some of the human factors issues and needs associated with driving task automation.  It sets out some basic principles that will help to optimize system performance and avoid drivers being out-of-the-loop and unprepared to manage safety-critical situations when they are needed.  When the advanced driver assistance systems control or support elements of the driving task, drivers should be fully aware of the performance and limitations of those functions.  These basic principles were prepared by the IHRA working group on Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) to support the activities of the UNECE WP.29 ITS informal group.

13 Thank you March 2011 International Harmonized Research Activities Working Group on ITS (IHRA-ITS)