Learning Object Metadata Application Profiles: Lithuanian Approach E. Kurilovas S. Kubilinskienė Centre for IT in Education, MoE Lithuania.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some impressions from the school visits and the conference -No systematic report 1 st Some general wisdom 2 nd Key analysis questions of the project Conference.
Advertisements

Elearning Quality for Learning Repositories in Secondary Education Elearning Quality for Learning Repositories in Secondary Education e-Learning Quality:
E-learning and Libraries WSIS Forum, Geneva,11 May 2010 Tullio Basaglia, CERN Scientific Information Service, Geneva.
Group of teachers and PhD Students who teach Research Methods in Education using ICT and study them. At this moment, we have different research projects.
A Standard and an eLearning Platform for LEMAIA: SCORM and Moodle Antonio De Nicola.
University of Piraeus Department of Technology Education and Digital Systems Centre for Research and Technology - Hellas(C.E.R.T.H.) Informatics and Telematics.
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT FORMS OF ASSESSMENT.
1 Archiving Workflow between a Local Repository and the National Library Archive Experiences from the DiVA Project Eva Müller, Peter Hansson, Uwe Klosa,
MINERVA Cluster meeting – 5 March The importance of standards and interoperability for OER Frans Van Assche Senior Manager Standards.
EDEN 2007 Naples, Italy LIFELONG LEARNING TEACHERS’ NEEDS IN VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Josep Maria Boneu 1, Maria Galofré 2, Julià Minguillón 2 1 Centre.
Knowledge Experts – Knowledge Management and E-Learning Skills for Digital Librarians Aban Budin & Gerhard Budin University of Vienna.
Technology Integration C. Candace Chou University of St. Thomas This presentation is modified from Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology. Learning.
Modeling Units of Assessment for Sharing Assessment Process Information: towards an Assessment Process Specification Yongwu Miao, Peter Sloep, and Rob.
ER-0317/2/99 G R U P O S G A E Intellectual Property Rights in digitisation of education Part 1. Current problems in the face of digitisation. Massive.
Technologie dell’informazione e Profili e Curricula le biblioteche Parma Ottobre 2005 IT Competences and Curricula Issues: A University Perspective.
University of Jyväskylä – Department of Mathematical Information Technology Computer Science Teacher Education ICNEE 2004 Topic Case Driven Approach for.
TELEStraining Inc. The eTrainerCB: Using Instructional Templates To Create Training SCO’s Lucio Teles, Ph.D., President, TELEStraining Inc. Fuchun Xiao,
Improving access to digital resources: a mandate for order mandate: managing digital assets in tertiary education craig green,
ELearning Frameworks: What, Why and Who, Where & When Daniel Rehak, Learning Systems Architecture Lab, USA Kerry Blinco, Dept. Education Science and Training,
Recommendations Adopting Standards and Specifications for Educational Content.
ICT TEACHERS` COMPETENCIES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
Agricultural Biotechnology Network for Regional Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations An Overview.
Magdi Latif Regional Knowledge and Information Management Officer FAO Partnership, Advocacy and Capacity Development Division FAORNE Jordan Plant Genetic.
Technology Support on a University Campus Contingency Theory and Collaboration.
Malaysian Grid for Learning October DC 2004, Shanghai, China. © 2004 MIMOS Berhad. All Rights Reserved Metadata Management System DC2004: International.
Interuniversity Center for Educational Research and Advanced Training Paolo Tosato, Juliana Raffaghelli European Distance and E-Learning Network Teachers’
Dr David Massart, EUN AgLRs – Budapest, Hungary Nov. 2, 2009 Reusable Learning Content Discovery and Exchange.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Pedagogical templates approach - the base of EPSS design in B- Learn project Lehti Pilt Blended learning workshop in Porto 13rd of November, 2006.
Evaluation of Quality of Learning Scenarios and Their Suitability to Particular Learners’ Profiles Assoc. Prof. Dr. Eugenijus Kurilovas, Vilnius University,
Project EIFL Direct in Lithuania By Ausra Vaskeviciene Martynas Mazvydas National Library of Lithuania, Lithuanian Research Library Consortium.
SOLSTICE Conference th & 5 th June 2015 Transactional Distance and Flexible learning Dr John Bostock Edge Hill University.
Interoperability ERRA System.
ICT at Oerestad Gymnasium, Denmark Presentation at the closing conference of ELFE2, Bled 13 September 2009.
South African Education Portal
KMEP, Bratislava 2002 E- dilemma E-learning: fashion, necessity or reality? Jaroslava Mikulecká University of Hradec Králové Peter Závodný University of.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Niall Sclater, and Lorna M. Campbell,
1 Chapter 9 Database Design. 2 2 In this chapter, you will learn: That successful database design must reflect the information system of which the database.
Eloenet European Learning Object Network The Search Portal for Learning Objects Sergey Chernov L3S and University of Hannover, Germany
Connecting Teachers Can there be models of effective practice for teachers with ICT? Chair: Christine Vincent, Becta Presenter: Margaret Cox King’s College.
E-Learning standards and meta-data: Case study ดร. น้ำทิพย์ วิภาวิน Sripatum University Library.
New teaching and learning methods through virtual environment Vlasta Rabe University of Hradec Králové Faculty of Education.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
LADL2007 Workshop, 20 Sep 2007, Budapest, HU Polyxeni Arapi Nektarios Moumoutzis Manolis Mylonakis George Stylianakis George Theodorakis {xenia, nektar,
2007 © Giunti Labs – No reproduction without written permission Visualizing IMS Learning Design for easier editing Marco Luccini, Giunti Labs R&D Project.
Educational Software for Mathematics; A Greek Reality Kyriakos Mamoukaris & Anastasios Economides UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA THESSALONIKI, GREECE.
The Pedagogical ICT Licence ICT in initial teacher training Professional development of teachers in ICT Denmark.
TECHNO PEDAGOGY.
The Evolution of ICT-Based Learning Environments: Which Perspectives for School of the Future? Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Bottino, R.
Celine DONDEYNAZ, Joint Research Centre- Italy A. Leone, C. Carmona, P. Mainardi, M.Giacomassi and Prof. Daoyi Chen A Web knowledge Management Platform.
Group #1 GroupWork of Making National Standards Competency for ICT Teacher.
Content and Tools Standards Will Ellis, Head of Digital Learning Resources “We need better digital resources more widely available and more flexible learning.
ICT in primary education. Introduction The evolution towards an information society marks a new step in the history of civilization and it always brings.
CASE (Computer-Aided Software Engineering) Tools Software that is used to support software process activities. Provides software process support by:- –
EQNet Implementation Experience in Lithuania Dr. Eugenijus Kurilovas, Virginija Bireniene, ITC MoE Lithuania EdRene / eQNet, Lisbon,
Software Engineering Chapter: Computer Aided Software Engineering 1 Chapter : Computer Aided Software Engineering.
1 Educational Technology Electronic Teaching Portfolio Based on the ISTE/NCATE Foundation Standards for all educators. All candidates in teacher preparation.
Title THE CREATION AND SHARING OF LEARNING OBJECTS THROUGH OPEN SOURCE PLATFORMS BEAT FOR RESINT PROJECT Olivastri Silvio
1 eLearning: a Technological and Scientific Perspective Michele Missikoff IASI-CNR LEMAIA, Closing Conference Rome, 11 april 2008.
Quality Assurance in Done by :Salim Mohammed\ Muslim\ Mahmoud \Tariq E-learning.
E-Learning: components of e-learning Mohammed Hassan 1.
SAS Curriculum Mapping Trainer (SAS CMT) October 2011.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Breeda Herlihy, IR Manager, UCC Library. UCC selected DSpace in 2008 Software selection group Staff from Library IT, Computer Centre, Special Collections,
Creating and sharing OER in primary and secondary education: challenges and strategies Francesc Busquets Educational Network of Catalonia.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.
ICT22 – 2016: Technologies for Learning and Skills ICT24 – 2016: Gaming and gamification Francesca Borrelli DG CONNECT, European Commission BRUXELLES.
Integration of ICT in teaching and learning
Institute for the Improvement of Education
BUILDING A DIGITAL REPOSITORY FOR LEARNING RESOURCES
Presentation transcript:

Learning Object Metadata Application Profiles: Lithuanian Approach E. Kurilovas S. Kubilinskienė Centre for IT in Education, MoE Lithuania

Digital Library of Educational Resources and Services (DLE) – the aggregate of knowledge repositories, and services, organized as complex information system Learning Object (LO) – any digital resource that can be reused to support learning Learning Asset (LA) – small pedagogically decontextualised part(s) (piece(s)) LOs can be combined of Unit of Learning (UoL) – Unit of Learning itself and all its components are considered here as embedded LOs, including learning objectives, prerequisites, learners’ or trainers’ roles, activity assignment, information objects, communication objects, tools and questionnaire objects Main Notions (1)

Learning Object Repository (LOR) – any collection of resources (learning objects) that are accessible via a network without prior knowledge of the structure of the collection LOM – IEEE LTSC Learning Object Metadata Standard Reusability – the extent to which LO can operate effectively for a variety of users in a variety of digital environments and a variety of educational contexts over time. LO reusability is affected by technical, pedagogic and social factors Interoperability – the capability to communicate, execute programs, or transfer data among various functional units in a manner that requires the user to have little or no knowledge of the unique characteristics of those units Main Notions (2)

The vision: To create qualitative new and flexible students and teachers learning environments which would provide them personalized (customized) learning possibilities in electronic space and stimulate creation and implementation of modern ICT-based teaching and learning methods Lithuanian ICT in Education Strategy (1)

Lithuanian ICT in Education Strategy (2)

Lithuanian ICT in Education Strategy (3)

The need for reusability of LOs has at least three elements: Interoperability: LO is interoperable and can be used in different platforms. Flexibility in terms of pedagogic situations: LO can fit into a variety of pedagogic situations. Modifiability to suit a particular teacher’s or student’s needs: LO can be made more appropriate to a pedagogic situation by modifying it to suit a particular teacher’s or student’s needs. DLE Components Interoperability (1)

Recommendations prepared: 1.To create Learning Objects Metadata strategies: To integrate curriculum with Learning Objects. To prepare Lithuanian LOM AP. 2. For all DLE components interoperability. DLE Components Interoperability (2)

Interoperability literature and experience analysis (conclusions): The majority of standards and specifications are not adopted and do not conform with educational practice. There exists a problem of complex solutions for application of standards and specifications in education. Standards and specifications often do not cooperate. DLE Components Interoperability (3)

Curriculum Integration with Learning Objects

Recommendations for LOM AP

DLE Components Scheme

DLE Components Interoperability (4)

Learning objects technical evaluation literature and experience analysis (conclusions) Well-known LOs evaluation tools have a number of limitations: LORI, Paulsson & Naeve and MELT do not examine different LOs life cycle stages. Q4R insufficiently examines technical evaluation criteria before LOs inclusion in the repository. Learning Objects Technical Evaluation Criteria (1)

Approved Lithuanian Computer Teaching Aids evaluation tool analysis (conclusions) The tool has a number of limitations: All LOs and services (e.g., LAs, UoLs, LORs, VLEs) have to be evaluated against the same criteria. No metadata-related criteria are included. Approved technical evaluation criteria for e-content, activities, services and tools do not reflect their reusability aspects overall. Learning Objects Technical Evaluation Criteria (2)

Learning Objects Technical Evaluation Criteria (3)

Experimental Lithuanian DLE Implementation (1) Creation of Central Learning Object Metadata repository: EUN LOM AP 2.0 was localised to Lithuanian by the Institute of Mathematics and Informatics More than 1200 Lithuanian LRs were described in conformity with this AP by specially trained LOs indexers Centralised LO metadata (LOM) repository based on MySQL database management system, PHP software package (internet programs handling environment) and Java technology was created. ITC Apache web server and Linux operating system were used for creation of LOM repository. User–friendly interface to aggregate LOs metadata into LOM repository was created. All evaluated and approved LOs metadata was created and filled into LOM repository on ITC server. All approved distance learning courses were disaggregated to smaller courses and even to LOs level and were described in conformity with LOM. Disaggregated smaller courses were introduced as SCORM 2004 packages to reuse in different VLEs. All these LOs are available in centralised LOM repository.

Experimental Lithuanian DLE Implementation (2)

Experimental Lithuanian DLE Implementation (3)

Central Learning Object Metadata repository. All Learning Objects repositories and metadata services available: Information services (open for users): Administrator’s services: ex2.php ex2.php Experimental Lithuanian DLE Implementation (4)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!