Northwest-AIRQUEST & AIRPACT-3 Regional Modeling Studies Joseph Vaughan, Farren Thorpe, Ying Xie, Serena Chung, Brian Lamb and George Mount Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

MOPITT CO Louisa Emmons, David Edwards Atmospheric Chemistry Division Earth & Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.
‘NASA OMI Project’ MOZART Ozone Tracer Tracking for AIRPACT-4 CMAQ Joseph Vaughan,George Mount, Serena Chung, Brian Lamb, Rui Zhang, Louisa Emmons and.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,
Smoke Modeling BlueSkyRains and SHRMC-4S Rick Gillam U.S. EPA Region 4 Air Modeler’s Workshop March 8-10, 2005.
1 st Chimere workshop March 2005Stortini,Bonafe,Deserti,Minguzzi,Jongen Operational implementation of NINFA in Northern Italy ARPA Servizio IdroMeteorologico.
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
Short-Term Air Quality Forecasts for the Pacific Northwest and Long-Range Global Change Predictions for the US Jack Chen Committee Members: Brian Lamb,
Current Research in Smoke Modeling Scott Goodrick U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station Athens, GA.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
The ClearSky Field-Burning Decision Support System Joe Vaughan, Charleston Ramos, Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research WSU-Pullman NW-AIRQUEST.
A Comparative Dynamic Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modeling Systems Steven Smyth a,b, Michael Moran c, Weimin Jiang a, Fuquan Yang a,
Objective: Work with the WRAP, CenSARA, CDPHE, BLM and EPA Region 8 to use satellite data to evaluate the Oil and Gas (O&G) modeled NOx emission inventories.
Regional Air Quality Modeling: Long Range Global Change Simulations.
1 Mass Flux in a Horizontally Homogeneous Atmosphere A useful tool for emissions and lifetimes. Assume an atmosphere well- mixed in latitude and longitude;
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Southeast Nexus (SENEX) Studying the Interactions Between Natural and Anthropogenic Emissions at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change A NOAA Field.
Photo Seattle Times, 9/2012 Use of Advanced Dispersion Modeling Examples for the Northwest Susan O’Neill, Research Scientist USDA Forest Service, AirFire.
333 A New Project – An Earth Systems Modeling Framework for Understanding Biogeochemical Cycling in the Context of Climate Variability A New Project –
Performance of the National Air Quality Forecast Capability, Urban vs. Rural and Other Comparisons Jerry Gorline and Jeff McQueen  Jerry Gorline, NWS/OST/MDL.
Modeling Aerosol Formation and Transport in the Pacific Northwest with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Susan M. O'Neill Fire.
A New Project -- An Earth Systems Modeling Framework for Understanding Biogeochemical Cycling in the Context of Climate Variability Joseph K. Vaughan,
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
O. Russell Bullock, Jr. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division (in partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Urban Air Pollution Public and Environmental Health Concerns –Elevated levels of toxic compounds Regional and Global Impacts –Background Chemistry and.
Terry J. Keating, Ph.D. Office of Air & Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency International Transport of Air Pollutants (ITAP)
U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement: Transboundary PM Science Assessment Report to the Air Quality Committee June, 2004.
AIRPACT-3 status and near- term objectives Joe Vaughan Brian Lamb Jeremy Avise Jack Chen Matt Porter Li Wang.
AIRPACT and ClearSky Activity Report Joe Vaughan, Farren Herron-Thorpe, Serena Chung and Brian Lamb NW-AIRQUEST Annual Meeting June 2, 2011 Pullman, WA.
The Role of Antecedent Soil Moisture on Variability of the North American Monsoon System Chunmei Zhu a, Yun Qian b, Ruby Leung b, David Gochis c, Tereza.
WRAP Experience: Investigation of Model Biases Uma Shankar, Rohit Mathur and Francis Binkowski MCNC–Environmental Modeling Center Research Triangle Park,
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Models-3 Adel Hanna Carolina Environmental Program University of North Carolina.
Air Quality Effects of Prescribed Fires Simulated with CMAQ Yongqiang Liu, Gary Achtemeier, and Scott Goodrick Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 320 Green.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
Steve Edburg Assistant Research Professor Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Washington State University
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Time-Resolved & In-Depth Evaluation of PM and PM Precursors using CMAQ Robin L. Dennis Atmospheric Modeling Division U.S. EPA/ORD:NOAA/ARL PM Model Performance.
Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data & Estimating fire emissions: satellite.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Modeling Regional Haze in Big Bend National Park with CMAQ Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto CMAQ.
Chemical Condition and Surface Ozone in Urban Cities of Texas During the Last Decade: Observational Evidence from OMI, CAMS, and Model Analysis Yunsoo.
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
Chemical Data Assimilation: Aerosols - Data Sources, availability and needs Raymond Hoff Physics Department/JCET UMBC.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
NW-AIRQUEST projects on Agricultural and Wildfire Smoke in the Inland Northwest: ClearSky and AIRPACT-3 presented by: Joe Vaughan WSU-LAR contributors:
The 2003 Wake-up Call: Predictable? “Normal” airmass flow Stagnant airmass flow Jul29-Jul31-Jul 2-Aug 4-Aug 6-Aug8-Aug.
Robin L. Dennis, Jesse O. Bash, Kristen M. Foley, Rob Gilliam, Robert W. Pinder U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory,
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC
The 96th AMS Annual Meeting
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Recent Improvements to FireWork: Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Operational Air Quality Forecast System with Near-real-time Wildfire Emissions.
Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D.
ClearSky: status and near-term objectives
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
AIRPACT-5 Fire Emissions Processing Methodology
Presented by: Brian Lamb, WSU-LAR Contributors:
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presentation transcript:

Northwest-AIRQUEST & AIRPACT-3 Regional Modeling Studies Joseph Vaughan, Farren Thorpe, Ying Xie, Serena Chung, Brian Lamb and George Mount Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Washington State University, Pullman, WA Jack Chen, NRC, Environment Canada WRAP Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling Studies Denver, CO July 30, 2008

Topics NW-AIRQUEST Consortium AIRPACT-3 Air Quality Forecast System Cartoon Domain Evaluation and Performance (w/ new online tool) (4) Integration of BlueSky wildfire emissions (2) NASA ROSES project for integration of satellite retrievals (6) NOx-VOC sensitivity (2) Deposition from AIRPACT-3 and EPA STAR Climate and AQ Atmospheric Policy Trajectory program

NW-AIRQUEST Northwest and International Air Quality, Environmental Science and Technology Consortium Grew out of Northwest Regional Modeling Consortium’s Air Quality interest group using UW MM5 results for regional modeling needs Committed to providing air-quality science and technology to address regions policy needs! Members: State agencies: ID DEQ, OR DEQ and WA Ecology US EPA and USDA Forest Service Universities Tribes Local Air Quality Agencies

AIRNow Obs Online charting

AIRPACT-3 DOMAIN PM 2.5 sites: Colville, WA Beacon Hill, Seattle, WA Cheeka Peak, WA

Overall Daily Max 8-hr O 3 Performance Obs.Avg.42.9 ppbv Mod. Avg.43.0 ppbv MB2.7 ppbv ME7.2 ppbv R0.55

Daily Max 8-hr O 3 Performance P/O vs Observed Timing errors (running 8-hr means)

Overall 24-hr PM 2.5 Performance EPA-AQS Stations Obs. Avg. 11 (  g/m 3 ) Mod. Avg. 13 (  g/m 3 ) MB 2.0 (  g/m 3 ) ME 8.0 (  g/m 3 ) R0.46 IMPROVE Stations Obs. Avg. 6.0 (  g/m 3 ) Mod. Avg. 8.0 (  g/m 3 ) MB 2.2 (  g/m 3 ) ME 5.5 (  g/m 3 ) R0.53

Using the on-line charting tool to compare AIRPACT-3 forecast PM 2.5 vs observed PM 2.5

Receiving from Forest Service BlueSky system: heat flux -- used for SMOKE plume rise; and wildfire emissions: PM 2.5, PM Coarse, CO, TOG, NO x, NH 3, SO 2 Fok-Yan Leung comparing MINX plume heights with Bluesky-AIRPACT-3 SMOKE plume rise. Wildfire

Bluesky wildfire emissions imported nightly; and working toward use of SMARTFIRE.

Applied Sciences Program Approach to Integrated System Solutions for A Comprehensive Regional Air-Quality Decision Support System for the Pacific Northwest NASA ROSES-funded integration of satellite data

AIRPACT-3 Tropospheric Column NO 2 vs. OMI Tropospheric Column NO 2 for March 2008

Seattle: AIRPACT-3 vs OMI NO 2, March 2008

PORTLAND: AIRPACT-3 vs OMI NO 2, March 2008

Vancouver, BC: AIRPACT-3 vs OMI NO 2, March 2008

To recap, we’re working on making accurate comparisons of OMI-retrieved NO 2 to AIRPACT-3 forecast NO 2 to guide improved emissions characterization. just beginning to work with O3 OMI results. use of CO retrievals from AIRS (and MOPPIT) with intent of setting boundary conditions for CO and other correlated species. use of AOD (aerosol) observations to reset AIRPACT-3 aerosol state for rerun to new IC.

O3 sensitivity analysis study of NO x -VOC indicators in the Pacific Northwest -- Ying Xie Objective –Investigate the behavior of photochemical indicators (O 3 /NO y ) –Evaluate model predicted sensitivity by comparing to observed indicator values –Evaluate EI using observed compound ratios in the morning urban profile Methods –Measurements from PNW2001 field campaign –Rob Elleman’s CMAQ simulation as the standard scenario –Sensitivity runs based upon the evaluation of EI Results –Substantial overestimation of CO emissions by 80% and overestimation of total VOC reactivity by 30% in the EI. –Model predicted O 3 /NO y ratios are closely related to VOC-NO x sensitive conditions. –The standard scenario over-predicted peak O 3 and O 3 /NO y slope, suggesting an overestimation of sensitivity to NO x, probably due to too much VOCs in the EI. –The reduced VOC scenario resulted in better agreement with measurements in terms of peak O 3 as well as O 3 /NO y correlations.

O 3 versus NO y from CMAQ compared with measured values (Aug 26, 2001) Reduced VOC scenarioStandard scenario

A First Look at Regional Deposition Patterns Regional Deposition Issues  Low pH, elevated N deposition measured in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area  Concern for N, S critical loads in high alpine lakes in the Cascade Mountains  Elevated Hg levels in southern Idaho reservoirs possibly related to high Hg emissions from Nevada gold mines Regional Modeling Approaches  CMAQ Climate Change Modeling Runs  CMAQ Daily Forecast Runs Negotiating CESU scope of work with NPS for AIRPACT deposition products Regional Deposition Issues  Low pH, elevated N deposition measured in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area  Concern for N, S critical loads in high alpine lakes in the Cascade Mountains  Elevated Hg levels in southern Idaho reservoirs possibly related to high Hg emissions from Nevada gold mines Regional Modeling Approaches  CMAQ Climate Change Modeling Runs  CMAQ Daily Forecast Runs Negotiating CESU scope of work with NPS for AIRPACT deposition products

Nitrogen Dry + Wet Deposition Annual Total Annual Maxima along I-5, urban centers (~8-12 kg/ha) Range: kg/ha Nitrogen Dry + Wet Deposition Monthly Totals Monthly Maxima along I-5, urban centers (~1.5 kg/ha) {N_WETDEP max during winter} ~ {N_DRYDEP max during summer}

Atmospheric Policy Trajectory (APT): Enhanced training option for Ph.D. in Engineering Science at LAR –to give each participating student a strong foundation in atmospheric science along with complementary training in environmental public policy. Modeling and policy course Policy seminars and case studies Internships with air & policy orientation –to graduate students with the necessary science skills and policy insights to become leaders in industry and government and to undertake the public policy challenges associated with future air quality and climate change. –Associated N-Cycle IGERT proposal going to NSF. –to give each participating student a strong foundation in atmospheric science along with complementary training in environmental public policy. Modeling and policy course Policy seminars and case studies Internships with air & policy orientation –to graduate students with the necessary science skills and policy insights to become leaders in industry and government and to undertake the public policy challenges associated with future air quality and climate change. –Associated N-Cycle IGERT proposal going to NSF.

Thank You lar.wsu.edu/AIRPACT-3