1 HR-SMC and HR-SPS – 7 January 2010 1 MARS 2010 REFRESHER PRESENTATION HR presentations to staff members: 7 January 2010 – AT Auditorium 11 January 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HUMAN RESOURCES ADVISORS Conseillers en Ressources Humaines Clémentine Lehtinen HRA for BE.
Advertisements

Welcome !
Performance Development
Developing a Public Health Skills Passport Claire Cotter and Lauren King December 2014.
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
EvalS Application User Guide version September 17, 2011.
UNMJobs Updates Michael Brown, Sr. HR Consultant.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
EVULATION OF RESULTS OF WORK OF CIVIL SERVANTS Yuriy Pizhuk, Director of the Department of the Personnel of Government Bodies and Local Self-Government.
Genius online Appraisal Management System 1. Appraiser Configuration Getting Started Appraisal Management let the user to effectively conduct a users.
NEW MATHS CURRICULUM NEW CURRICULUM 2014 In September 2014 the primary school curriculum including maths was radically changed. The main aim is.
Human Resources Update (January 24, 2011) Chuck Risley, Managing Director Employee Relations and Development.
January 2007 What changes, What implications for your careers? DECODING from MAPS I to MAPS II:
Performance Appraisal Process November 2011 – Human Resources.
Developing an accessibility strategy. In this talk we will discuss an accessibility strategy an accessibility policy getting started - steps to consultation.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Granting Process Slide Show ANU COLLEGE OF ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES.
SuccessFactors: Phase 2 Annual Review Process Presented by: Patricia Kelly / VeLonda Dantzler Human Resources Management.
HR Induction. P ROBATION P ERIOD M ILESTONES Induction day I Induction interview Inductio n day II Mid probation review End of probation review Reference.
Users’ Office News Doris Chromek-Burckhart Head of Users Office New Users’ Office Web Pages Release of Pre-Registration Tool in July 2014 Insurance for.
Learning and Development at CERN Sudeshna Datta-Cockerill.
A few personal remarks/clarifications on the new MARS system How does the new system compare with the old one ? Transition measures A look at the changes.
National House of Social Insurance Performance Appraisal of Civil Servants in National House of Social Insurance Angela BOTNARIUC Head, HR Section Performance.
CERN openlab Communication ICE-DIP students and supervisors F2F meeting Mélissa Gaillard CERN openlab Communications Officer > 06/12/2013.
E-MAPS Presentation to IT-CS. Request & Scope Initiated by CERN‘s management (CFO) Initiated by CERN‘s management (CFO) Aim = replace current paper form.
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
MARS Merit Appraisal & Recognition Scheme. 2 CERN HR Department Strategy, Management and Development Overview Aim of the Scheme Main characteristics of.
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
1 HR-SMD and HR-SPS – 23 January MARS 2009 REFRESHER PRESENTATION HR presentation STAFF MEMBERS 26 January 2009 – Prévessin 28 January 2009 – AT.
Final Year Project 1 (FYP 1)
TAA1 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA1 Process TAA 1 Action.
Presented by: Theresa Elliot-Cheslek AVP & CHRO Terry Ryan Asst. Attorney General, AGO Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues Revised October 2015.
Applying for Specialist Registration through the CESR Route
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TAA2 TEACHER WORKSHOP Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Career Development Professional Recognition with the Society of Biology HEaTED – Regional Network Event 23rd April 2013 Debbie Brunt Society of Biology.
Merit Appraisal & Recognition Scheme. 2 CERN HR Department Strategy, Management and Development Overview Aim of the New System Main changes to the salary.
Status and role of International Department (Slovak experience) MGSC Meeting Luxembourg 23 – 24 March 2012 SOSR.
1 HR-SMC and HR-SPS – 10 January MARS 2011 REFRESHER PRESENTATION HR presentations to staff members: 10 January 2011 – BE Auditorium Prévessin 11.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda February 16, 2011 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update Group Exercise.
Start the slide show by clicking on the "Slide Show" option in the below menu or – hit the F5 Key.
Peter Berry – Induction – December 2013 HR Frontline.
The Human Resources Advisors
Induction Day, 30 March 2006 P. Gildemyn 1 CERN HR Department Personnel Management and Development MAPS ANNUAL INTERVIEW & ADVANCEMENT.
1 HR-SMC 1 MARS M ERIT A PPRAISAL R ECOGNITION S CHEME HR Induction December 2011.
Dubai Statistics Center practices in Human Resources Management - What is DSC? - Planning - Performing - Measuring and Evaluating - Supporting Factors.
Academic Staff Performance Review This package will introduce you to the Academic Staff Performance Review process undertaken here at Griffith University.
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training Agreements Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
FISCO2 – Financial and Scientific Coordination Work Package dedicated to ENSAR2 management WP leader: Ketel Turzó WP deputy: Sandrine Dubromel ENSAR2 Management.
Non-Tenure Track (NTT) Appointment Process (Preparer Edition) Version 1.0 Presented by the Office of Organizational Research and Data Management School.
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
MARS Merit Appraisal Recognition Scheme
IT-CM Group Meeting Tim Bell 12th January 2016
Personnel actions in People Admin PD module
Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
Learning and Development at CERN
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
New Merit Recognition Scheme
Annual Assessment of Progress 2017/18 Briefing for Research Students Research Student Registry Mar/Apr 2018.
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Streamline, Simplify, Organize, Automate
RECRUITING Staff and Student
Performance Achievement a quick reference guide to
Progression and Advancement
ePerformance: A Process Crosswalk May 2010
Presentation transcript:

1 HR-SMC and HR-SPS – 7 January MARS 2010 REFRESHER PRESENTATION HR presentations to staff members: 7 January 2010 – AT Auditorium 11 January 2010 – Prévessin 12 January 2010 – Main Auditorium Classification & Remuneration Services, Organisation and Procedures Unit

2 T ABLE OF C ONTENT 1.Introduction 2.Stages of the MARS Exercise 3.Useful Information 4.MARS 2010 Calendar 5.MARS Coordinators & HRAs 6.MARS 2010 EDH Form 7.Time for Questions

3 1.1.INTRODUCTION MARS= MERIT, APPRAISAL & RECOGNITION SCHEME

Performance Appraisal = opportunity for DIALOGUE Staff + Supervisor  Not recommended! Recommended! Recommended! INTRODUCTION: AIM OF THE SCHEME

Review of PAST work Reflection on Performance Measurement – assessing performance against agreed targets Feedback – information to staff on performance + progress Exchange of views – what happened? what support staff need? How to improve?+ FUTURE objectives / Development / Improvement –New objectives – for the year to come Training needs Actions – what actions need to be carried out by staff + supervisor ► AGREEMENT! INTRODUCTION: AIM OF THE SCHEME

6 2.STAGES OF THE MARS EXERCISE Stages: Actions / Decisions taken by: Interview Supervisor Appraisal (Evaluations in MARS form) Supervisor & Group Leader Performance rating Non meritorious Meritorious Particularly Meritorious Group Leaders + HRA consulted by  Department Head Advancement (steps) Periodic Exceptional Group Leaders + HRA consulted by  Department Head Department Heads consult GLs + advise  Director-General Promotion Salary Band change Career Path change Exceptional Career Path Extension Career reviews (interview with Assessor + HR) Advisory bodies (e.g.: SSAC) Department Heads + HR consulted by  Director-General

7 3.USEFUL INFORMATION: HR-GUIDE.WEB.CERN.CH/HR-EGUIDE/MARS Stages: INFORMATION AVAILABLE: Interview how, when, with whom...? Admin Circular 26 HR Website:HR Website: MARS FAQMARS FAQ HRA / MARS Coordinator Evaluation: MARS Form Admin Circular 26 HR Website: e-MARS Guide Performance rating Admin Circular 26 Advancement (steps) Non meritorious = 0 step Meritorious = 1 step Part. Meritorious ≥ 2 steps Promotion Career review - Documentation - Advisory bodies - WHO takes decision? HOW is it taken and WHEN? Admin Circular 26 HR Website: MARS FAQ HRA / MARS Coordinator

3.1. USEFUL INFORMATION: ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR N°26 ► 8

9 4.MARS 2010 CALENDAR Dates MARS interview Dates Merit recognition PROPOSALS Start of interviews Complete interviews F&G PROMOTIONS MARS Form signed by GL for comments to Staff member Career review interviews for CP changes A-E A to E PROMOTIONS ADVANCEMENT Review of proposals by HR Enlarged Directorate (E.D.) for Sr. Staff promotions Review of other proposals in E.D. and APPROVAL by DG Congratulation letters to Staff members Release of MARS Form to Staff member

10 DEPT/UNITMARS COORDINATORHRA BE L. Van Cauter-Tanner J.-P. Matheys C. Lehtinen DG C. Pettenati F.Rabier G. Guinot DGS E. CenniniG. Guinot EN F. ZieslerM. Dorn FP C. EcarnotM-L. Falipou GS V. MarchalK. Fox HR P. Berry IT A. Silverman & A. CookF. Licci-Ounnough PH N. Knoors & M. BurriC. Granier & M-L. Falipou TE D. Duret & G. HobgenB. Delille 5.MARS Coordinators & HRAs

– Slide MARS 2010 EDH FORM Subjects 1.Persons involved 2.The e-MARS Report 3.Routing of the Report 4.Access to the Report 5.Forward with Rights 6.More information

– Slide Persons involved & 1. Persons involved & their Functions Staff member Supervisor(s)  evaluation of results, assessment and new objectives Group Leader(s)  assessment and validation of new objectives Department Head  performance rating MARS Coordinator  dep. coordination HRA  HR & dep. coordination

– Slide The e-MARS Report General –Personal and contractual data –Hierarchy I. Annual Interview –Results and new objectives max. 5 new work objectives Supervisory objectives → Work objectives II. Assessment –Appraisal of Supervisor(s) and GL(s) –Staff member’s comments III. Proposals & Decisions –DH’s performance rating, periodic advancement decision and other proposals –DG’s decisions

– Slide Routing of the Report 1.Creator sends 2.SV 2009 signs (if still at CERN) 3.SV 2010 signs (if <> SV 2009) 4.GL 2009 signs (if still at CERN) 5.GL 2010 signs (if <> GL 2009) 6.Staff notified (comments possible within 10 working days) 7.Wait status : Distribution & End

– Slide Access to the Report (1) Depending on document status and user: Edition phase (report not yet sent) –Staff edits Annual Interview part –Supervisor edits Annual Interview part + SV Assessment box Supervisors signature phase –Supervisors edit Annual Interview part + SV Assessment box Group Leaders signature phase –Group Leaders edit GL Assessment boxes  History information for report content available at each phase (tracked changes)

– Slide Access to the Report (2) Staff member signature phase –Staff member can edit comments box and has read access to Interview and Assessment part Wait status –Staff and SV have read access to Interview and Assessment part –GL, DH, HRA, MARS Coordinator have read access to the whole report –DH can edit comments field –HRA can edit comments field on DG’s decisions Everytime –MARS Coordinator can access all reports for his dep. and update hierarchy information and send the report backwards

– Slide Forward with Rights Can be used on sending and signing Always check “Re-sign after these approvals”, if not: complete delegation of responsibilities Grants forwardee access to the same fields as the signatory Should be used to involve another person with same/similar responsibilities Should never be used by staff member on sending the report after creation in order to involve SV (and/or GL), because –…SV would not have access to his assessment fields –…SV’s signature during the real routing would be skipped –...SV has automatically read and write access to the report during the edition phase, independently on the creator. Easy: Staff member communicates EDH doc.no. to SV! Therefore: use to be limited to SV and GL!

– Slide More information about e-MARS In the e-MARS report –Help for each field –Quick Reference Guide On the HR web site –e-MARS FAQ –MARS procedure Via your MARS Coordinator Via your HRA

Many Thanks! Now: Time for Questions