Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
Engaging Online Faculty and Administrators in the Assessment Process at the American Public University System Assessment and Student Learning: Direct and.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
The Periodic Review Report and the Assessment of Institutional Effectiveness Presentation by: Karen Froslid Jones and Robin Beads, American University.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Renewed Outcomes-based Curriculum 6-9. Purpose for Renewal Teacher feedback –Provide concise & coherent curriculum –Time allocations have not changed.
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE Introduce policies and programs that create the seamless movement of students and faculty 1.Summary of the Strategy: Remove or minimize.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Launch of Quality Management System
Program Assessment, WASC and Cal Poly Pomona Bob Hurt Faculty Associate for Program Assessment and Academic Program Review.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Purdue University Academic Advising Assessment Team CODO-IN Survey January 20, 2012.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Student Success  What is it?  How can we assess it?  Whose responsibility is it?  What role do you play?
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Advising as Teaching and Learning
PESB Standards Standard 4: Program Design. How Standards are Judged Standards are deemed unmet, met or exemplary. A standard is deemed ‘met’ if: A program.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
1 GOAL: Provide students with a quality educational experience that enables them to complete their educational goals in a timely fashion. Review and restructure.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
The assessment process For Administrative units
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
NWCCU update February 13, 2018.
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and services (administration and student services) Identification and measurement of outcomes across all units The use of data and assessment results to inform decision making All of these ongoing, systematic actions, processes, steps are accomplished with the purpose of improving programs and services and increasing student success and institutional quality.

Faculty and Staff will be able to: Develop curricula or programs that align with divisional and college goals Improve curriculum /program development Determine student or program areas of strength and weakness Illustrate course of program value to the college Provide evidence based feedback to colleagues and students Contribute to creating a culture of excellence

Administrators will be able to: Evaluate and allocate resources efficiently based on evidence Increase effectiveness of providing direction and deciding policy Track and demonstrate program progress and contribution to the institution Create a cohesive and meaningful strategic plan Align curricula or services across courses/programs Contribute to creating a culture of excellence

Rust College will be able to: Obtain better information to evaluate policies and practices Draw on evidence to make changes Use results to seek grant or foundation funding Demonstrate responsiveness to community needs and concerns Align learning across the curriculum Place students appropriately Generate higher student academic success Demonstrate how the college is making a difference Improve communications with stakeholders Achieve more thorough curriculum review and revision

Students will be able to: Engage in more rigorous and coordinated learning experience Learn more and better

Reflection Questions How well informed are faculty and staff about what your program is trying to do regarding continuous improvement? How well informed are students, staff, faculty,administrators, advisors, alumni about what you are trying to do regarding continuous improvement?

Reflection Questions cont’d… How well does your program put the assessment plan into action? What processes does your program have in place to ensure that the information you gather is used to make decisions about changes? What processes do you have in place to determine whether the changes have produced what you intended?

How do program administrators use information for strategic decision making? How does the current plan relate to long term goals for the program? Reflection Questions cont’d…