Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposals for Extended Parameterization in SINEX Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;

Advertisements

04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;

Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research

VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.

Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.

2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.

Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.

DFG-Research Unit “Earth rotation and Global Dynamic processes” Poznan, 13 – 17 October 2008 N. Panafidina, M. Rothacher, D. Thaller Comparison and Combination.

International Terrestrial Reference Frame - Latest Developments Horst Müller 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, Poland, October

VieVS User Workshop 14 – 21 September, 2011 Vienna Reprocessing the complete history of VLBI observations with VieVS Sigrid Böhm.

ILRS Workshop, Poznan, Poland, October Status of ITRF Development and SLR Contribution Zuheir Altamimi Xavier Collilieux David Coulot IGN France.

VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna High frequency EOP estimated from the CONT campaigns Tobias Nilsson.

VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_SCHED Jing SUN.

VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.

Recent IERS Site Survey of Multiple Co-located Geodetic Techniques by NGS Kendall Fancher, Dru Smith, Steve Breidenbach, Jeff Olsen, Nagendra Paudel NOAA’s.

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.

GNSS Observations of Earth Orientation Jim Ray, NOAA/NGS 1. Polar motion observability using GNSS – concepts, complications, & error sources – subdaily.

DORIS - DAYS Toulouse May 2-3, 2000 DORIS Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite  Basic system concept  Main missions  Schedules.

Future IGS & inter-technique SINEX combinations: Issues and challenges D. Lavallée (aka Peter Clarke), R. Ferland, D. Thaller, T. Herring, R. Biancale.

SRI Seminar 2005 Time series of GPS stations For reference, monitoring and geophysics Günter Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying.

NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.

Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,

How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.

The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.

IGS Workshop, June 02, Validation of GNSS Satellite Orbits C. Flohrer, G. Beutler, R. Dach, W. Gurtner, U. Hugentobler 1, S. Schaer, T. Springer.

01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.

AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.

SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT

RECENT ENHANCEMENTS TO THE CDDIS IGS Network Systems Workshop November 2-5, 1998 Annapolis, MD Carey E. Noll Manager, CDDIS NASA GSFC Greenbelt, MD.

G51C-0694 Development of the Estimation Service of the Earth‘s Surface Fluid Load Effects for Space Geodetic Techniques for Space Geodetic Techniques Hiroshi.

ESOC Navigation Support Office IGS Workshop 2008 Miami ESOC IGS Reprocessing T.A. Springer, F. Dilssner, E. Schoenemann, I. Romero, J. Tegedor, F. Pereira,

Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.

Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,

2011 COURSE IN NEUROINFORMATICS MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY WOODS HOLE, MA Introduction to Spline Models or Advanced Connect-the-Dots Uri Eden BU Department.

January 14, 2003GPS Meteorology Workshop1 Information from a Numerical Weather Model for Improving Atmosphere Delay Estimation in Geodesy Arthur Niell.

M. Gende, C. Brunini Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Improving Single Frequency Positioning Using SIRGAS Ionospheric Products.

Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.

Combination of long time series of tropospheric parameters observed by VLBI R. Heinkelmann, J. Boehm, H. Schuh Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, TU.

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Current Status of the IGS Reprocessing Peter Steigenberger Technische Universität München Gerd.

Do Annual Geopotential Variations Affect IGS Products ? J. Ray NOAA/NGS with major help from S. Bettadpur, J. Ries U. Texas/CSR T.-S. Bae Sejong U. X.

Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany.

PENDING & PROPOSED MODEL CHANGES: SESSION RECOMMENDATIONS IGS core products AC modeling documentation Troposphere modeling Higher-order ionospheric corrections.

Interactive Graphics Lecture 10: Slide 1 Interactive Computer Graphics Lecture 10 Introduction to Surface Construction.

View on GPS and Galileo ‘From across the Atlantic…’ Ruth E. Neilan International GNSS Service (IGS) Central Bureau Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California.

Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.

A proposal for a consistent model of air pressure loading as part of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) Conventions Plag, H.-P. (1),

Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.

12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 On the use of temporal gravity field models derived from GRACE for altimeter satellite orbit determination.

NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy

Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.

How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.

Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.

Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.

Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.

Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT

Sub-Daily ERP Investigations

Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective

Presentation of Public ESA Multi-GNSS Products

Assessing the Compatibility of Microwave Geodetic Systems

Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm

Troposphere and Clock Parameterization During Continuous VLBI Campaigns Kamil Teke1, 2, Johannes Boehm1, Hana Spicakova1, Andrea Pany1, Harald Schuh1 1.

Proposal for long station names in SINEX format Paul Rebischung Unified Analysis Workshop, Paris, July 2017 Good morning. So I’m going to.

T. Hobiger R. Ichikawa Y. Koyama T. Gotoh T. Otsubo T. Kubooka

Correlation coefficients

Motivation Time Series Analysis Spectra and Results Conclusions

Presentation transcript:

Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposals for Extended Parameterization in SINEX Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ) Unified Analysis Workshop December 5-7, 2007 Beach Resort Monterey, CA

Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S General: For the future more flexibility is needed in the SINEX format to allow for other parameters to be combined and other representations Combination of Troposphere Parameters: Troposphere zenith delay parameters are heavily correlated with station heights (0.98 at 15deg), gradients with horizontal position Troposphere parameters can serve as a local tie between techniques (VLBI, GPS and DORIS values have to be identical) Most analysis centers are representing troposphere by piece-wise linear functions (simple and physical) Motivation (1)

Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Combination of Clock Parameters (IVS): Clock pararmeters are also heavily correlated with station height Combination of clock parameters in the future will strengthen quality of station heights Most IVS analysis centers are representing clocks by piece- wise linear functions (simple and physical) Very distant goal: combination with clocks from GPS, etc. Motivation (2)

Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Subdaily resolution of ERPs and other parameters: The representation of ERPs as an offset and drift per day might be critical with the increasing precision (VLBI2020, Galileo, Compass, …) Higher resolution is already done by some VLBI and GPS analysis centers (tidal, non-tidal, episodic signals) 2-hour resolution: estimation of offsets and drifts for each subinterval does not make sense any more: Offset/drift: 12*2=24 parameters with jumps at boundaries Piece-wise linear: 13 parameters with continuity Similar arguments for subdaily coordinates (interesting tidal and non-tidal subdaily signals) Motivation (3)

Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Homogeneous GGOS-D SINEX Time Series: Reprocessed global solutions for GPS, VLBI, SLR with two software pakages each Daily resolution for GPS Troposphere parameters, nutation, radio source coordinates and low-degree harmonics included 1-hour ERP resolution Very interesting data sets for combination studies But: No official SINEX format supporting the distribution of these series to the space geodetic community Motivation (4)

Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposal 1: A simple, but not elegant extension of the parameter space to allow new parameters and for a piece-wise linear representation Additional names of parameters defined (quite confusing) Not future-oriented Proposal 2: Generic and flexible naming of parameters concerning different representations, easy to interpret Flexibility to go for other parameterizations in the future (e.g. cubic splines, polynomials of higher degree, …) Generic use in software packages (e.g. offsets/drifts) Two Possibilities

Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Examples: STAX_0 (station coord. x-comp. as constant offset) TRO0DN (troposphere north gradient as piece-wise linear) Character 1-3: Parameter group (station coordinates, pole, UT/LOD, nutation, troposphere, satellite orbits, radio sources, geocenter coordinates, potential coefficients, biases, antennas, …) Character 4: Distinction of the component (e.g. x/y/z, north/east/up, right ascension/declination, cosine/sine,...) Character 5: Distinction between different parameter representations _ = Constant offset D = Offsets of a piece-wise linear, contin. repres. P= Nodes of a polygon S= Spline representation Character 6: Distinction between offsets and rates (could be extended, if necessary) 0 = Offset 1 = Rate Proposal 2: Parameter Naming

Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S New SINEX, but just the usual parameters: 1.Combination Centers: modify their software to translated the new names to their internal parameter naming convention 2.Analysis Centers: modify their software to write the new names and the new SINEX version number New SINEX, new parameters (only based on an agreement of the Services): 1.Analysis Centers: modify their software to write the new parameters 2.Combination Centers: modify their software to process and combine the new parameters Consequences of Proposal 2