The PHENIX Forward Silicon Vertex Tracker Eric J. Mannel IEEE NSS/MIC October 29, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Advertisements

Commissioning the PHENIX RPC Forward Trigger Upgrade Michael Daugherity Abilene Christian University for the PHENIX Collaboration.
An SiPM Based Readout for the sPHENIX Calorimeters Eric J. Mannel IEEE NSS/MIC October 30, 2013.
1 Run 9 PHENIX Goals and Performance John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory June 4, 2009.
PHENIX Decadal Plan o Midterm upgrades until 2015 o Long term evolution after 2015 Dynamical origins of spin- dependent interactions New probes of longitudinal.
1 The Forward Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the PHENIX Experiment at RHIC Douglas Fields University of New Mexico Feb. 12, 2011 Douglas Fields, WWND11,
July 10, 2008 PHENIX RPC review C.Y. Chi 1 RPC Front End Electronics On chamber discriminator  The strips  The CMS discriminator chips  The discriminator.
PHENIX Vertex Tracker Atsushi Taketani for PHENIX collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Over view of Vertex detector 2.Physics.
Muon Tracker Overview The PHENIX Muon Arms detect vector mesons decaying into muon pairs, allow the study of the Drell-Yan process, and provide muon detection.
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
The Physics Potential of the PHENIX VTX and FVTX Detectors Eric J. Mannel WWND 13-Apr-2012.
Sourav Tarafdar Banaras Hindu University For the PHENIX Collaboration Hard Probes 2012 Measurement of electrons from Heavy Quarks at PHENIX.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
David L. Winter for the PHENIX Collaboration PHENIX Silicon Detector Upgrades RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop 3 RHIC Future: New Physics Through.
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
Zhengyun YOU, FVTX Review Nov FVTX Software and Simulation Zhengyun You Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Jon S Kapustinsky 11/17/2010 Jon S Kapustinsky FVTX Commissioning Plan 1.71 Jon S Kapustinsky 1.
M. Brooks, LANL 1 Physics and Simulation Status and To-Dos Physics Section could probably use a top-down re-write. Most of the info is probably there but.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
PHENIX Silicon Pixel Detector Construction, Operation, and the first Results Atsushi Taketani RIKEN Nishina center RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center Outline.
1. LANL-led silicon detector project (FVTX) installed into RHIC this FY, 4.5 cm from beam pipe Increased leakage current in detectors implies somewhat.
U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger 1.
Observation of W decay in 500GeV p+p collisions at RHIC Kensuke Okada for the PHENIX collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute February 20, /20/20101.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
Study of Charged Hadrons Spectra with the Time Expansion Chamber of the PHENIX Experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Dmitri Kotchetkov University.
M. Brooks, LANL 1 02/19/07 Review Schedule The FVTX upgrade project Melynda Brooks Silicon Sensor, Chip, ReadoutJon Kapustinsky Mechanics Walt Sondheim.
The W program at PHENIX R. Seidl (University of Illinois and RBRC) for the PHENIX Collaboration Workshop on Parity Violating Spin Asymmetries BNL, April.
Takao Sakaguchi, BNL Run-11 PHENIX Run Coordinator PHENIX Run-11 Report Sakaguchi, RHIC retreat 1 RHIC retreat version.
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Technical Design – Electronics DAQ Readout electronics split into two parts – Near the detector (ROC) – Compresses and.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Time of Flight Detectors at RHIC Time of Flight Measurements at RHIC  TOF detector as a PID devices  PHENIX-TOF and BRAHMS-TOF PHENIX Time-of-Flight.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Spin Physics with the PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker Junji Tojo RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration Advanced Studies Institutes - Symmetries and Spin July.
 The zigzag readout board is divided into eight η-sectors; each sector has a length of ~12 cm and comprises 128 zigzag strips; zigzag strips run in radial.
Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs Cost Schedule.
FVTX Electronics (WBS 1.5.2, 1.5.3) Sergey Butsyk University of New Mexico Sergey Butsyk DOE FVTX review
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
1/27/2016 R.Seidl: status of simulation1 W muon analysis in PHENIX Status of the background understanding, signal, smearing and asymmetries R.Seidl (RBRC)
U N C L A S S I F I E D Precision Tracking for the PHENIX Muon Arms Gerd J. Kunde ASI Prague 2005.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Feasibility study of Heavy Flavor tagging with charged kaons in Au-Au Collisions at √s=200 GeV triggered by High Transverse Momentum Electrons. E.Kistenev,
Pixel Atsushi Taketani RIKEN RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Overview of Pixel subsystem 2.Test beam 3.Each Components 4.Schedule 5.Summary.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Tracking at the Fermilab Test Beam Facility Matthew Jones, Lorenzo Uplegger April 29 th Infieri Workshop.
Craig Ogilvie1 Silicon Vertex Upgrade for PHENIX  A+A: from discovery to characterizing properties dense phase – Need broad range of early probes: charm,
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
International Workshop on Radiation Imaging Detectors, Glasgow, July 25-29, 2004 Johann M. Heuser, RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration - RHIC and PHENIX.
Reduction of Background in Observation of W Decay Using the Forward Vertex (FVTX) detector at PHENIX Abraham Meles New Mexico State University APS April.
Muon Arm Physics Program Past, Present + Future Patrick L. McGaughey Los Alamos National Laboratory Santa Fe June 17, 2003.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
SPHENIX Mid-rapidity extensions: Additional Tracking system and pre-shower Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) sPHENIX workfest July 29,
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
David M. Lee Los Alamos National Laboratory DOE Review of the Heavy Ion Program Agenda Introduction – Joel Moss 1. David M. Lee – KB02 program.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Evidence for Strongly Interacting Opaque Plasma
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
RadLab PHENIX Meeting Feb
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Tatia Engelmore, Columbia University
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
Heavy Ion Physics in RUN14-16
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
RPC Front End Electronics
PHENIX forward trigger review
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

The PHENIX Forward Silicon Vertex Tracker Eric J. Mannel IEEE NSS/MIC October 29, 2013

The PHENIX Experiment 2 Counter-circulating rings, 3.8Km circumference Energies: – Up to 200 GeV/Nucleon A+A – Up to 510 GeV polarized p+p Understand the source of proton spin Study the properties of the Quark-Gluon plasma 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL2

The PHENIX Detector FVTX for forward tracking Muons and Hadrons in the forward regions – FVTX – Mu ID – Mu Trackers – RPCs Hadrons, photons and electrons in central arms – VTX, Drift, and Pad chambers for charged particle tracking. – Ring Imaging Cerenkov and electromagnetic calorimeter for electron ID 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL3

The Physics of the FVTX Single Muons: Precision heavy flavor and hadron measurements at forward rapidity Separation of charm and beauty W background rejection improved Dimuons: Direct measurement of bottom via B  J/  Separation of J/  from  ’ with improved resolution. Direct measurement of c-cbar events via  +  - becomes possible Physics: Precise heavy flavor measurements of R AA and flow. Detection of  ’ plus heavy quark allows detailed understanding of vector meson production and modification Precise gluon polarization and sea quark measurements over large x range 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL4

The FVTX Detector Consists of 2 end-caps. 4 planes of silicon mini-strip sensors per end-cap. Covers – 1.2 < |  | < 2.2 – 2  in  –  cm < | z | < 38 cm Resolution: – Hit ~20  m – DCA < 200  m Muon rejection from decays of  ’s and K  and K 0 L. Identify decays of open heavy flavor particles by displaced vertices 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL5

Wedge Sensor Module Silicon Sensors: – Contains 2  segments – Strip length 3.4 mm to 11.5 mm, Radial pitch: 75  m – Covers in  with an angle of with respect to the centerline. – p-implants on 320  m thick n- type substrate. – AC coupled with 1.5 M  polysilicon resistors to bias voltage. – 2 p-implant guard rings with n + surround between guard rings and sensor edges. FPHX Chip Design – Custom 128-channel ASIC, trigger-less, data push design. – Integrator/shaper stage – Programmable parameters (gain, threshold, rise/fall time, …) – 3 bit ADC, Time and Channel ID – Process up to 4 hits in 4 RHIC beam crossings, ~424 nSec – 2 LVDS Serial output lines at 200 MHz – Radiation hard by design – Designed at FNAL 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL6

Wedge Sensor Modules (2) 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL7

Read Out Card (ROC) Primary Functions: – Receive, combine and synchronize data from 16 Wedges. – Transmit data to Front End Modules in counting room – Process slow control commands – Provide calibration circuitry. Hardware: – 4 ACTEL A3PE300-FG896 FPGAs for data processing – bit Serializer/Deserializer chips (TLK 2711) – 4 12 channel fiber optic transmitters 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL8

Front End Module (FEM) Primary functions: – Receive data from ROCs and sort date according to time stamp – Buffer data for last 64 beam crossings – Upon LVL1 trigger decision, send corresponding data to PHENIX DAQ system. – Process slow control commands Hardware: – Single Xilinx Virtex-4 FPGA (XC4VSX55) for data processing – channel optical receivers – Internal clock speed for reading/writing data is 300 MHz to minimize latencies. 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL9

Current Status Engineering run in 2012 (PHENIX Run-12) – Fully installed prior to start of run – Full commissioning with greater then 80% of the channels operational. – Physics data taken during the second half of the run First Physics run in 2013 (PHENIX Run-13) – Fully functional at start of run (> 95% of channels operational) – Low failure rate during the run, < 1% of the channels, with most failures recovered during maintenance periods. Currently undergoing routine maintenance in preparation for PHENIX Run-14 (January 2014 expected start) 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL10

FVTX Performance (1) Timing – Compare FVTX hit time relative to collision time – Vary the FVTX trigger with respect to the RHIC beam clock – Most hits fall in a 30nSec wide window – 2 timing configurations used, 2 BCO (~212nSec) for low intensity heavy ion running and 1 BCO (106nSec) for high intensity p-p running 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL11

FVTX Performance (2) Hit Efficiency – Use p+p data (low occupancy events) – Form tracks using hits in 3 planes – Project track into 4 th plane and look for corresponding hit. – Hit efficiency for station 2 as a function of phi – Overall efficiency is > 95%. No correction for dead channels. Low efficiency in north arm is due to known hardware failure. 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL12

FVTX Performance (3) Alignment and Residuals – Use magnet off data (straight line tracks) – Match tracks found in the PHENIX muon system to FVTX tracks (p > 3 GeV/c) using 3 stations. – Calculate the residual for the 4 th station by projecting to the 4 th station and using the nearest hit – Average detector resolution is ~26  m 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL13

FVTX Performance (4) Electronic Noise – Determined periodically. – Scan discriminator threshold with changing amplitude pulses – Noise level characterized by broadening of the hit efficiency threshold – Fit distribution with a normal cumulative distribution function – Noise level parameterized by the width 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL14

Conclusions FVTX Detector successfully installed for PHENIX RUN-12 Single particle hit efficiencies > 95% Hit position resolution < 30  m Electronic noise level below 500 electrons First physics results in preparation for publication. 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL15

Acknowledgements The FVTX Group: Columbia University, Charles University, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Dapnia CEA Saclay, Georgia State University, Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico State University, University of New Mexico Thanks to the technical staff from the SiDet Facility at Fermi National Laboratory for their assistance during the assembly of the wedge modules and the staff at LLNL for production of the carbon composite components. Special thanks to the technical staffs of Brookhaven National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory. 10/29/2013E.J. Mannel, BNL16