Transportation 2035 Survey Results Presented to: MTC Planning Committee November 9, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Findings from Recent Illinois Voter Survey Survey Conducted: May 12-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy.
Advertisements

Connect Nevada Residential Technology Assessment Results.
Perceptions Of Homelessness In Canada GCI Group November, 2005.
A Public Opinion Research Project Exploring Attitudes About Government Emily Ekins | Polling Director at Reason Foundation reason.com/poll.
Sustainable Transportation Brock University March 2008.
EU Democrats Poll December 2013 Job No: RED Express - Methodology /1,003 interviews were conducted by phone using a random digit dial sample to.
HART Community Survey Ilium Associates Inc. July–August 2009.
2 Presentation Overview Study Objectives Survey Design Trip Purpose and Trip Chaining Overview – Satisfaction with Roadways and Transportation in Communities.
Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.
Remittances and the Dominican Republic Survey of Recipients in the Dominican Republic Survey of Senders in the United States Columbia University New York.
Methodology Results in this presentation were collected during two different community sessions: 1.September 1, 2009 in Apache Junction Among 238 attendees.
The Future of Technology 2003 IEEE Fellows Technology Survey Prepared for IEEE Spectrum By The Response Center December 2002.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
Alabama 2003 Survey of Rural Land Issues College of Agriculture Auburn University.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
Integrated Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Modeling Alan Borning, University of Washington Mark Simonson, Puget Sound Regional Council NSF.
National New Home Building Trends 2013 Cash Transactions Up Investor Home Purchases Up First Time Home Buyers Home Purchases Down Home Building at Historic.
Texas Transportation Poll Testimony of Ginger Goodin Transportation Policy Research Center Texas A&M Transportation Institute before the Senate Select.
2008 Survey of Cape Cod Second Homeowners Overview of Findings May 19, 2009.
URBAN SERVICE INNOVATIONS Public Transit : The One Bay Area Project May 15 th, 2013 PA 800 Robin Havens.
BRi Changing Times: U.S. Public Opinion about Nuclear Energy Ann S. Bisconti, Ph.D. Wisconsin Public Utility Institute March 26, 2008 BRi
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Executive Summary July SURVEY OVERVIEW Methodology Penn Schoen Berland conducted 1,650 telephone interviews between March 27, 2015 and May 4, 2015.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Portraits of Canada Portraits of Canada CRIC survey conducted by Environics Research Group and CROP. 2,939 adult Canadians were surveyed by telephone.
Fresno County Library Revenue Measure Survey Survey Conducted March 9-14, 2012.
Orange County Voter Perceptions: Water and Desalination Survey Analysis October 14, 2008.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
CONFIDENCE INTERVALS Feb. 18 th, A STATS PROFESSOR ASKED HER STUDENTS WHETHER OR NOT THEY WERE REGISTERED TO VOTE. IN A SAMPLE OF 50 OF HER STUDENTS.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
Richard Y. Nelson Jr. Director Montgomery County Department of Housing and Community Affairs Wednesday, May 9th.
Nobody’s Unpredictable Smoke-Free Spaces Survey August 2011.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
The General Plan UPDATE City Council Meeting September 19, 2011.
Pacific resource partnership THE POWER OF PARTNERSHIP YDHI-YDA 2015 PACIFIC REGION CONFERENCE John White, Executive Director.
National Survey of Likely Voters April AHUA National Survey of Likely Voters - April Methodology Universe: Likely Voters Sample Size: 1,000.
SB 375: CREATING GREAT COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
1 Climate & Transportation: Change is Coming Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission December 2010.
Page 1 May 2015 Los Trancos County Water District: Household Survey May 2015.
Fayette County USA Expansion Opinion Survey Prepared for Cornett-IMS/Fayette Alliance The Matrix Group, Inc August 2006.
Sustainable Communities Strategies 101: An Introduction to California’s New Planning Law SCANPH conference October 1, 2010.
SBC Omnibus 2012 Cooperative Program Findings Survey of 1,066 SBC Pastors.
Protestant Pastors’ Views on Seminary Education Survey of 1,004 Protestant Pastors.
Pastors Report Mixed Economic Signs Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
Gillian Adams FOCUS on Bay Area Housing June 28, 2007.
Financial Downturn for Churches in 2010 Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors October 2010.
The aim of the study: to analyse attitudes of Lithuania residents towards third- country nationals Method of the survey: representative survey by personal.
Transportation 2035: S.F. Bay Area Targeting Health through Environment Metropolitan Transportation Commission Therese W. McMillan, Deputy Executive Director,
2004 City Budget Allocation Survey January Since 1997, tracking of City of Vancouver residents’ attitudes on: Main local issues of concern Perceptions.
American Views of Churches in Schools Survey of Over 2,000 American Adults.
Transportation Authority of Marin SB83/VRF Feasibility Survey June 2010.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
Priority Based Budgeting Update Board of County Commissioners Workshop December 10, 2012.
Methodology – Phone Survey
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
Vice President, Health Care Coverage and Access
How the Affordable Care Act Has Improved Americans’ Ability to Buy Health Insurance on Their Own Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance.
Presentation transcript:

Transportation 2035 Survey Results Presented to: MTC Planning Committee November 9, 2007

Research Objectives Explore attitudes related to transportation, land use and global warming Identify residents’ willingness to pay to reduce or limit greenhouse gas emissions Assess residents’ opinions as they relate to current and future transportation investments, and local/regional governance

Methodology Data Collection Methodology: Telephone Survey  Random Digit Dial (RDD)  Survey length: 15 minutes Sample Size: n=1,800  Adult Residents in 9 County Bay Area (5.31 million)  Margin of error +/- 2.3%  Offered in English, Spanish and Cantonese Field Dates: September 27 to October 22, 2007

Issues of Importance in the Bay Area

Transportation Priorities

Perception of the Environment 58% of Bay Area residents believe the condition of the environment will be worse 20 years from today.

Importance of Global Warming 65% of Bay Area residents believe Global Warming is extremely important and should be one of the region’s highest planning priorities.

Willingness to Pay to Reduce GhG 69% of Bay Area residents would consider (yes + possibly) paying 25 cents more for a gallon of gasoline if it was used to limit or reduce global warming.

Programs to Reduce GhG Emissions

Maintaining vs. Building New 49% of residents preferred maintaining the existing transportation infrastructure to 44% who preferred building new components to the transportation infrastructure

Transportation Investment Priorities

Budget Allocation 36% of residents preferred keeping the same proportion of resources allocated to public transit (2/3) and freeways and roads (1/3)

Housing/Commute Trade-off Over the last four years Bay Area residents increased their preference for smaller home with a short commute over a larger home with a long commute by 17 percentage points 2007 Bay Area RTP Results2003 Bay Area RTP Results

Housing Density Trade-off 67% of residents indicated they would be willing to accept more homes & traffic in their community, if it protected open space and air quality in the Bay Area.

Regional Policy Priorities

Conclusions The condition of the environment is a great concern among Bay Area residents:  Over half (58%) of residents indicated they thought the environment would worsen over the next 20 years  Approximately 2/3rds of residents think global warming is extremely important and should be one of the region’s highest priorities  Residents are willing to accept increased density to maintain or improve the environment  Residents indicated they would prefer a smaller home and shorter commute over a larger home and longer commute

Conclusions cont. Public Transit is a high priority for most Bay Area residents:  ‘Maintaining the public transit systems’ has increased in perceived importance (extremely or very) by almost 10 percentage points from 2003  2/3rds of residents believe extending rail lines should be a high priority and almost 60 percent agree it should be the highest transportation priority  64 percent of residents believe at least 2/3rds of transportation money should be allocated to public transit