Future Ancillary Services: Description of Pricing Proposals ERCOT Staff September 15, 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Advertisements

March 13, 2013 Day-Ahead Market (DAM) Clearing Process follow-up from February WMS Matt Mereness, ERCOT Manager DAM & CRR.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Discussion: Use of RAPs in system operations Kris Dixit 1.
FAST Procurement and Pricing May 18, 2015 FAST Workshop 1.
Ancillary Services Methodology Changes for 2015 Sandip Sharma Bill Blevins Dan Woodfin.
5  Systems of Linear Equations: ✦ An Introduction ✦ Unique Solutions ✦ Underdetermined and Overdetermined Systems  Matrices  Multiplication of Matrices.
FAST Procurement and Pricing May 28, 2015 TAC Meeting 1.
Tricolor Attenuation Model for Shadow Detection. INTRODUCTION Shadows may cause some undesirable problems in many computer vision and image analysis tasks,
ERS Procurement Methodology 09/04/2013 ERS Workshop Presented By: ERCOT Staff.
December 2, 2011 QMWG Summary of Potential Issues with NPRR385 Price Floor ERCOT.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Introduction to Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Agency Energy ManagerLife-Cycle Cost Methodology Mike Mills, CPA, BEP.
September 23, 2015 Sacramento, CA Frédéric DINGUIRARD PMR Expert Overview Presentation on Registry Procurement and Specifications Workshop “Building Registries.
Future Ancillary Services (NPRR 667) Update March 26, 2015 TAC meeting 1.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
March 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott April 7, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
PRS - RPRS Task Force Status Summary - August 14, PRS RPRS Task Force Status Summary Prepared for WMS and PRS August 2006.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
Chapter 1 Variables, Real Numbers and Mathematical Models.
Demand Side Working Group Chairman Slides June 27, 2008 Mary Anne Brelinsky Vice President 1.
ARIN Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate.
Slack Bus Change and Impact to Market Market Analysis, ERCOT QMWG Sep. 4, 2015.
Photovoltaic and Storage Integration Workshop “Operational Issues” Kenneth Ragsdale October 15, 2012 ERCOT.
Future Ancillary Service Team (FAST) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Workshop #2 ERCOT Staff August 25,
1 IMM Pricing Concerns with PFR and FFR Proposed pricing structure provides incentive for FFR to offer at less than cost. Dual clearing price pricing structure.
Market Participant Data Access 1 Market Participant Data Access Jan Stephen Kerr.
Final Report on Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) Pilot Project TAC March 27th, 2014.
CMWG Update WMS September 2015 Meeting. CRR Balancing Account Fund Discussion The CRR Balancing Account fund appears to be working as expected The cap.
Nodal Credit DAM Non-Business Day Treatment of Available Credit Limit (ACL)
EILS Cost Comparison WMS Jan. 28, Background ERCOT procures Emergency Interruptible Load Service three times annually by Contract Period –February-May.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Key Performance Area (Optional) Performance Criteria Considerations 1. Major Concerns 2. Minor Concerns 3. Meeting Expectations 4. Exceeding Expectations.
PDCWG Report to ROS David Kee Chair CPS Energy Sydney Niemeyer Vice Chair NRG Energy.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
1 RPRS Market the issue of capacity inadequacy solved by the Local Congestion procurements ERCOT Feb 19, 2004.
TCR to CRR Transition Plan Proposed method for TCR Auction Revenue refunds Contingency plans For TAC Nov 1st, 2007.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) August 8, 2012 PDCWG August 9, 2012 ETWG/QMWG.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
ERCOT Public 1 Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services Co-ordination of Power Balance Penalty Curve, VOLL, SWOC for AS Demand Curves.
Ancillary Services Replacement Presenter: Ino González Wholesale Market Subcommittee July 8, 2015 ERCOT Public.
Final Report on ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) PDCWG March 26th, 2014.
ERCOT Public 1 Overview of ERCOT Concept Paper on Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services & Multi-Interval Real-Time Market.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April In Brief Two Working Group reports Two Working Group reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports BENA presentation.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) Update April 24, 2014 TAC Meeting 1.
DAM Self-Commitment Issues & Solutions Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. (512) March 3, 2008.
Analysis of August 13, 2015: ORDC, RRS & PRC Changes Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) November 13, 2015.
NPRR680 background concept Carrie Bivens Manager, Day-Ahead Market PRS February 12, 2015.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
2% Shift Factor dispatchable rule discussion and alternatives for the 2% rule Kris Dixit 1.
Preliminary Report on ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 12th, 2013.
RDTF June 1, Purpose “The effect of the Shadow Price cap for the Power Balance Constraint is to limit the cost calculated by the SCED optimization.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 13, 2012 WMS and June 14, 2012 ROS.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) PDCWG April 26, 2013.
Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis Overview Julia Matevosyan February 1, 2016 FAS Workshop.
WMS Meeting- February 13, 2013 Day-Ahead Market (DAM) Analysis of Feb. 6 Ancillary Service Prices ERCOT- Matt Mereness (DAM/CRR Manager) IMM- Dan Jones.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis - Additional Runs and Analysis Julie Jin March 10, PRS.
ERCOT Public 1 Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Workshop ERCOT Staff July 25, 2014.
Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy New Policy Effective Autumn session 2011.
Ancillary Services Replacement
Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis - Additional Runs and Analysis Julie Jin March 10, PRS.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
Settlement Update Austin Rosel ERCOT October 11, 2017.
Session 6: TENDER WRITING: HOW TO WRITE A WINNING TENDER
Equivalent Ratios.
Lesson 7.1 How do you write ratios and find unit rates?
Understanding Behaviour
Presentation transcript:

Future Ancillary Services: Description of Pricing Proposals ERCOT Staff September 15,

There is general consensus that the proposed AS procurement constraints are appropriate –The constraints allow substitutability between different AS where applicable, and hence mitigate liquidity concerns At the August 25 th FAST/TAC workshop concerns were raised about the proposed formula for FFR (FFR1 & FFR2) MCPC that came out of the discussions of the various FAST work sessions and workshops The following slides describe the FAST proposal and the Alternate Proposal 1 and Alternate Proposal 2 Introduction 2

Keeps the current policy of pricing equivalent AS MW awards the same for equivalent AS types. i.e. –FRRS-Up, FRRS-Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2, SR2 awards priced the same as the corresponding equivalent RegUp, RegDown, PFRS, CR1, SR1 AS respectively –In the case of FFR, the ratio (R) determines the equivalence of R MW of PFR to 1 MW of FFR –If the RegUp, RegDown, PFR, CR1, SR1 MCPCs reflect opportunity costs, then the corresponding equivalent FRRS-Up, FRRS-Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2, SR2 MCPCs will also reflect the same opportunity costs FAST Proposal 3 ASMCPC FRRS-UpRegUp MCPC FRRS-DownRegDown MCPC FFR1Min(Ratio * PFR MCPC, VOLL) FFR2Min(Ratio * PFR MCPC, VOLL) CR2CR1 MCPC SR2SR1 MCPC

In case there is a need to replace FRRS-Up, FRRS- Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2 or SR2 responsibility with an equivalent RegUp, RegDown, PFR, CR1 or SR1, the FAST proposal will, in general, make the cost of replacement of these AS consistent with the cost of replacing a given AS type with exactly the same AS type (i.e. PFR for PFR, etc.) FAST Proposal 4

This proposal attempts to keep the current policy of pricing equivalent AS MW awards the same for equivalent AS types The only difference from the FAST proposal is with the determination of MCPC for FFR1 and FFR2 –Starting with the FAST formula for MCPC for FRRS-Up, FRRS- Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2, SR2, subtract the shadow price of the constraint that limits how much of that AS can be procured. This shadow price includes any opportunity costs if present –The resulting computed price for each of the FRRS-Up, FRRS- Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2 and SR2 is compared to each of the respective equivalent MCPCs for RegUp, RegDown, PFR, CR1, and SR1. –If this computed price is less than the MCPC for RegUp, RegDown, PFR, CR1, and SR1, then the MCPC for FRRS-Up, FRRS-Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2, and SR2 is set to the equivalent MCPC of RegUp, RegDown, PFR, CR1, and SR1 respectively –The end result is that the MCPC for FRRS-Up, FRRS-Down, CR2, SR2 are the same as the MCPC from the FAST proposal Alternate Proposal 1 5

6 ASMCPC FRRS-UpRegUp MCPC FRRS-DownRegDown MCPC FFR1Max( PFR MCPC, Ratio * PFR MCPC – Shadow Price of FFRmax constraint 1 – Shadow price of FFR1max constraint 1 ) FFR2Max( PFR MCPC, Ratio * PFR MCPC – Shadow Price of FFRmax constraint 1 ) CR2CR1 MCPC SR2SR1 MCPC 1 Opportunity costs, if present, will be included in the shadow prices

In case there is a need to replace FFR1 or FFR2 responsibility with an equivalent PFR, then this proposal leads (when the ratio is greater than 1) to a replacement cost that may be inconsistent with the cost of replacing PFR MW with another PFR MW Occurs when Shadow price of FFRmax constraint and/or FFR1max constraints is binding and the Ratio (R) is greater than 1 Alternate Proposal 1 7

This proposal changes the current policy of pricing equivalent AS MW awards the same for equivalent AS types –Starting with the FAST formula for MCPC for FRRS-Up, FRRS- Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2, SR2, subtract the shadow price of the constraint that limits how much of that AS can be procured. This shadow price includes any opportunity costs if present –This resulting computed price is the MCPC for each of the FRRS-Up, FRRS-Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2, and SR2 –The end result is that even though substitutability is maintained, the resulting MCPCs for FRRS-Up, FRRS-Down, FFR1, FFR2 CR2, SR2 are as if they were cleared on their own offer stack Alternate Proposal 2 8

Alternative Proposal 2 9 ASMCPC FRRS-UpRegUp MCPC – Shadow price of FRRS-Upmax constraint* FRRS-DownRegDown MCPC – Shadow price of FRRS-Downmax constraint* FFR1Ratio * PFR MCPC – Shadow Price of FFRmax constraint* – Shadow price of FFR1max constraint* FFR2Ratio * PFR MCPC – Shadow Price of FFRmax constraint* CR2CR1 MCPC – Shadow price of CR1min constraint* SR2SR1 MCPC – Shadow price of SR1min constraint* *Opportunity costs, if present, are included in the shadow price

In case there is a need to replace FRRS-Up, FRRS- Down, FFR1, FFR2, CR2, SR2 responsibility with an equivalent RegUp, RegDown, PFR, CR1, SR1, then this proposal leads to a replacement cost that may be inconsistent with the cost of replacing a given AS type with exactly the same AS type (i.e. PFR for PFR, etc.) Occurs when the shadow price of the constraint that is subtracted is binding Alternate Proposal 2 10