Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
Advertisements

19-24 May 2003K. Goulianos, CIPANP Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University & The CDF Collaboration CIPANP-2003, New York City, May.
Manchester Dec Dynamic Alignment of Roman Pots Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University The Future of Forward Physics at the LHC Manchester,
Recent Results on Diffraction and Exclusive Production from CDF Christina Mesropian The Rockefeller University.
23-28 June 2003K. Goulianos, Blois Workshop, Helsinki, Finland1 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University & The CDF Collaboration Xth Blois Workshop.
June 2003 M.Mulders - Fermilab 1 Diffractive results from DØ and prospects for Run II Martijn Mulders Fermilab for the DØ collaboration (with special thanks.
Diffractive W and Z Production at Tevatron Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University and the CDF collaboration Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions.
4-7 June 2003K. Goulianos, Low-x Workshop, Nafplion1 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University & The CDF Collaboration Low-x Workshop, Nafplion,
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University Diffraction at the Tevatron: CDF Results Diffraction 2006 Milos island, Greece, 5-10 September 2006  presented.
Diffractive Results from Workshop on low x physics, Antwerp 2002 Brian Cox   E Diffractive W and Z Observation of double diffractive dijets Run 1 highlights.
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
1 Diffractive Studies at the Tevatron Gregory R. Snow University of Nebraska (For the D0 and CDF Collaborations) Introduction Hard Color Singlet Exchange.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
Michael Strang Lishep02, Feb 5, 2002, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Hard Diffraction at DØ During Run I Michael Strang DØ Collaboration / Fermilab University.
Jorge Barreto Low_x Prague1 Status of Diffractive Physics at DØ Run II Jorge Barreto Instituto de Física - UFRJ Rio de Janeiro – RJ - Brazil Outline.
THE FORWARD PROTON DETECTOR AT DZERO Gilvan Alves Lafex/CBPF 1) MOTIVATION 2) DETECTOR OPTIONS 3) FPD R&D 4) OUTLOOK Lishep 98 Lafex/CBPF Feb 17, 1998.
Forward Proton Detector Update  9 momentum spectrometers comprised of 18 Roman Pots  Scintillating fiber detectors can be brought close (~6 mm) to the.
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University (Representing the CDF Collaboration) DIS April – 1 May Madison, Wisconsin Update on CDF Results on Diffraction.
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
1 PID & FPD Software Gilvan Alves (Lafex/CBPF) Q4Q4 D S Q2Q2 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 S A 1Q A1SA1S A 2Q A 2S P 1Q P 2S P 1S P 2Q p p Z(m) A D1 Detector Roman.
Elastic Scattering and Diffraction at DØ Tamsin Edwards for the DØ collaboration 14 th - 18 th April, 2004 XII International Workshop on Deep Inelastic.
Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto IF – UFRJ/CBPF D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.
Diffraction at DØ: Past, Present, and Future E   Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington Future QCD Workshop May 20, 2004 Fermilab A1UA2U P2DP1D.
Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto UFRJ/CBPF - Brazil D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.
CERN Jan 2005Alignment of CDF Run II Roman Pots K. Goulianos1 HERA and the LHC K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University CERN January 2005 (talk.
Diffractive Physics at D0 Kyle Stevenson DIS 2003.
Why study Diffractive W Boson?. Data Samples Z boson sample: Start with Run1b Z ee candidate sample Central and forward electron W boson sample: Start.
Diffractive Physics E   Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington DØ Physics Workshop July 30, 2004 Fermilab A1UA2U P2DP1D P Pbar LM VC Focus on mature analyses:
Low Luminosity Opportunities Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington DØ ADM November 18, 2005 “easy” “really hard”
Diffractive W/Z Bosons Andrew Brandt UTA Run I Diffractive W/Z Boson Production Recap Run II Preliminary Search for Diffractive Z Bosons (Courtesy of Tamsin.
Andrew Brandt FPD Rio Workshop Mar Forward Proton Detector Overview Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington.
__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep ELASTIC SCATTERING IN D0 EXPERIMENT Carlos Avila Universidad de Los Andes Bogota,
DIS 2001 Bologna Hard Diffraction at DØ Run I and Run II Christophe Royon DØ Collaboration / DAPNIA-SPP Saclay, UT Arlington, Brookhaven.
Michael Strang Physics 5391, 22/July/02 Diffraction and the Forward Proton Detector at DØ Michael Strang Physics 5391.
UPDATE ON THE FORWARD PROTON DETECTOR Gilvan Alves Lafex/CBPF Introduction Accelerator Roman Pots Detector Future Plans April 1, 1998 (no kidding)
FPD Status and Plans Andrew Brandt UTA Q4 D S Q3S A1A2 P 1 UP p p Z(m) D1 Detector Bellows Roman Pot P 2 OUT Q2 P 1 DN P 2 IN D2 Q4Q3Q2.
FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Diffraction at Tevatron p p  p p p p  p (p) + X p p  p (p) + j j p p  p p + j j.
Diffraction at DØ Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington E   Run IRun II Low-x Workshop June 6, 2003 Nafplion, Greece.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Mayda M. Velasco MBUEWO Sept. 6-7, 2010 Latest CMS Minimum Bias Results.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Roman Pots and Microstations based on talk by Jaak Lippmaa Helsinki CERN 2005.
Diffraction at DØ Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington Intro and Run I Hard Diffraction Results Run II and Forward Proton Detector Physics Colloquium.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
Backgrounds at FP420 Henri Kowalski DESY 18 th of May 2006.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Diffraction at DØ E   Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington Future QCD Workshop May 20, 2004 Fermilab A1UA2U P2DP1D P Pbar LM VC.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Charged particle yields and spectra in p+p and Heavy Ion Collisions with ATLAS at the LHC Jiří Dolejší (Charles University Prague) for the ATLAS collaboration.
An FPD quadrupole castle Elastic Scattering and High Mass Exclusive Dijets at DØ (  s=1.96 TeV) Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington on behalf.
DØ Hard Diffraction in Run I and Prospects for Run II Andrew Brandt DØ / University of Texas, Arlington Intro and Run I Hard Diffraction Results Forward.
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Results of dN/dt Elastic
FPD Status and Data Quality Andrew Brandt
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Aspects of Diffraction at the Tevatron
On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration:
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
What is the CNI experiment
Presentation transcript:

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves2 Why Diffraction?  We want to understand the strong interactions ♦ ~ 40% of  tot is related to diffraction ♦ QCD needs diffraction soft x hard ♦ What is this Pomeron anyway? Virtual particle which carries no net charge, isospin, baryon number or color IP IP

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves3 Diffractive signatures

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves4 RunI Gaps - Calorimeter and L  EM Calorimeter L0 Detector (n l0 = # tiles in L0 detector with signal 2.3 < |  | < 4.3) Central Drift Chamber (n trk = # charged tracks with |  | < 1.0) End Calorimeter Central Calorimeter (n cal = # cal towers with energy above threshold) Hadronic Calorimeter Central Gaps EM Calorimeter E T > 200 MeV |  | < 1.0 Forward Gaps EM Calorimeter E > 150 MeV 2.0 < |  | < 4.1 Had. Calorimeter E > 500 MeV 3.2 < |  | < 5.2) beam

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves5 D  RunI Observed events w/double

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves6 Calorimeter+LM+VC  New Gap  Use signals from Luminosity Monitor (and later Veto Counters) to trigger on rapidity gaps with calorimeter towers for gap signal  Use calorimeter at Level 2 to further refine rapidity gaps VC: 5.2 < |  < 5.9 LM: 2.5 < |  < 4.4

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves7 RunII Improvements Forward Proton Detector  9 momentum spectrometers composed of 18 Roman Pots  Scintillating fiber detectors can be brought close (~6 mm) to the beam to track scattered protons and anti- protons  Reconstructed track is used to calculate momentum fraction and scattering angle ♦ Much better resolution than available with gaps alone  Cover a t region (0 < t < 3 GeV 2 ) never before explored at Tevatron energies  Allows combination of tracks with high-p T scattering in the central detector

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves8 beam Roman Pot Layout D SQ 4 Q 3 Q 2 S A 1 A 2 P 1 P 2 p p z (m) D 2 D 1 A 2 Q 2 Q 3 Q ● 6 layers per detector in 3 planes and a trigger scintillator ● U and V at 45 degrees to X, 90 degrees to each other ● U and V planes have 20 fibers, X planes have 16 fibers ● Layers in a plane offset by ~2/3 fiber ● Each channel filled with four fibers ● 2 detectors in a spectrometer 0.8 mm 3.2 mm 1 mm mm U U’ X X’ V V’ Trigger beam Scat. p

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves9 Dipole Data (Running since 2003)  In events with hits in each detector of the spectrometer, the hits tend to fall in correlation bands  Due to the location of the dipole spectrometer, particles from the next incoming bunch can be passing through the detector at the same time as outgoing particles.  Diffracted antiprotons have lost a fraction of their momentum, and therefore are bent more by the dipole magnets leading to a noticeable angle between hits in the detector  Halo particles have beam momentum and therefore do not exhibit this angle  Particles in the upper y d correlation band are candidate tracks beam view top view

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves10 Hit Resolution and Hit Map  Hit resolution (after mapping correction) gives: ♦ 159  m for D1I ♦ 160  m for D2I  Hit maps for validated hits (independent for each detector) fills out the detector showing the expected edges

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves11  Diffractive Z (GAP)  Diffractive W  Diffractive HF  Diffractive Forward Jets  Diffractive Structure Function  Double Pomeron + Jets  Inclusive Double Pomeron  Exclusive Events in Double Pomeron  Elastic FPD Theses 10 PhD Students

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves12 Current Triggers (Oct. 05)

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves13 FPGA based L1 trigger Fiber segments

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves14 A2UA2UA1UA1U P2DP1D LUMINOSITY MONITOR DØ VETO COUNTERS p p p P P1D · P2D · A1U · A2U · (VT + LM + EAU + EPD ) VETO COUNTERS LUMINOSITY MONITOR Triggering on D 

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves15 New tool for halo rejection

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves16 FPD Triggered data

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves17 Requested Special Stores

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves18 Good gain on acceptance

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves19 MC expectations

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves20 Limits on |t| acceptance t range accessible with injection tune pot positioninteg. luminosity

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves21 Spectrometer Correlations

Lishep06 Gilvan Alves22 Outlook  DØ has a rich diffractive program with several analyses underway.  FPD is performing as expected  Track based trigger working  enlarge our data sample  Requested low luminosity (low+high  *) – Millions of events on tape. ♦ Better understanding of alignment. ♦ Kinematical region previously unexplored.  New tools for Background/Halo rejection.  Optimization of proton ID, reconstruction and alignment will lead to better measurements with lower systematic effects.