BELPRE CITY SCHOOLS TIF PROGRAM Presented by: Strategic Compensation Committee August 2011 [insert district logo]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kara Hanges, Martha Slamer, Maribeth Pennekamp, Debbie Dye, Rhonda Parker, and Kim Davidson.
Advertisements

Ohio TIF Maysville Local School District TIF Award Model Presentation.
June 1, 2011 FLSD TIF PROGRAM. OHIO TIF OVERVIEW Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education Franklin Local is one of 24 participating Ohio.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
1 Career Ladder Informational Meeting Fall
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Bloom-Vernon Schools OHIO TIF Bloom-Vernon’s TIF Award Model Overview.
District Accreditation February 20, 2015 Colleen Rohowsky Office of the Director, DoDDS-Europe,
TIF Award Model Overview New Boston Local School District.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
January, 2012 Governing Board Retreat. PUSD Strategic Plan Student Learning Data-Driven Decision Making Capacity Development Community Connectedness.
Strategic Compensation BFKAward® Payout Process Overview August 8, 2012.
Data Coaching Getting to the human side of data. Session Goals  Identify the purpose of using data in an educational setting.  Describe ways to connect.
Observations Pre observation (optional) Observations (minimum of 2 thirty minute) Post observation Rubric
Ohio TIF A collaboration of 24 Ohio districts, ODE and Battelle for Kids Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE TIF AWARD PAYOUT PROCESS [insert district logo]
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Mid-Course Adjustments in Learning Results Implementation CAEA Summer Conference Patrick R. Phillips, Deputy Commissioner August 15, 2005.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE TIF AWARD PAYOUT PROCESS [insert district logo]
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
OTES AND TESTING AND BEARS… OH MY!!! WHAT IS HAPPENI NG?
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 19,
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Implementing Race to the Top
Presentation transcript:

BELPRE CITY SCHOOLS TIF PROGRAM Presented by: Strategic Compensation Committee August 2011 [insert district logo]

 Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education  Twenty-four participating Ohio districts  Collaborative effort among districts, the Ohio Department of Education and Battelle for Kids Ohio TIF Overview

 All students graduate from high school college- and career-ready Ohio TIF Goals  Achieve nation’s highest college attendance and completion rates  Eliminate achievement gaps among under- represented student groups

 Recognizes excellent teaching and leadership  Is part of district’s overall improvement plan  Aligns with Race to the Top (RttT) Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Ohio Appalachian Collaborative (OAC) BCS District Vision Ohio TIF and Belpre Goals

 A collaborative process:  TIF Steering Committee: Tony Dunn, Larry Lorentz, Deb Edgar, Angie Henniger, Kathy Scimia, Alexis Seebaugh, William VanPelt and Eva Yeager  District TIF Coordinator: Ruth Kunze  Staff throughout district  ODE and BFK  Ongoing and comprehensive communication [ Collaboration for Success [insert photo showing staff collaboration]

 Supports work already engaged in:  Principal and teacher evaluations  Measuring effectiveness  Targeted professional development  Formative instructional practices How TIF Aligns with District Goals

 Recognizing Student Achievement: Improve Local Report Card Indicators and Performance Index at both Belpre Elementary and Belpre High School.  Building School Capacity: All Professional Staff will continue to Learn and Grow  Recognizing Student Growth: All students will show measurable growth  Fostering Leadership: Leaders will be developed within the system Belpre City Schools TIF Plan

 Achieve one of the following two Building goals: Belpre High School 1. 70% of LRC Indicators (76% Current) 2. PI 92.2 or greater (3.0 improvement on two year average. Will adjust to three year average to include FY11) (88.9) Belpre Elementary School 1. 70% of LRC Indicators (50% Current) 2. PI 94.7 or greater (See above) (92.4)  All K-12 teachers, librarian, counselors, speech pathologist, building principals and assistants are eligible.  Maximum Award: $357 minus benefits=$303 LRC=Local Report Card PI=Performance Index Recognizing Student Achievement

 Professional staff will attend Professional Development on Formative Instructional Practices. (FIP) and implement into the classroom.  Goal based on attendance and participation in PD. Additional awards will be given to those who implement the FIP within the classroom. Evidence based on two-thirty minute observation by the building administrator.  Eligibility: All K-12 classroom teachers including librarian, counselors, speech pathologist, building principals and assistants.  Maximum Award: $179 + $179 = $358 Including Benefits (152 + $152 = $304) Building School Capacity

 Increase student growth  Goal based on at least 60% at BHS and 67% at BE of individual teacher Value-Added reports at or above expected growth.  All K-12 teachers including librarian, counselors, speech pathologist, building principals and assistants.  Maximum Award: $715 minus benefits=$608 Recognizing Student Growth

 Empower and Develop Leaders within BCS Staff  Goal based on Participation in required meetings and perform duties expected of one or more of the following teacher Leadership Teams: 1. District Leadership Team (14 positions) 2. Data leadership (2 positions to work with CLP) 3. Peer Assisted Review Leadership (3 positions) 1 administrator + 2 teachers  Maximum Award: $2,600 minus benefits = $2,210 ($1,300 will be awarded based on meeting Goal #3). Fostering Leadership

 All teachers including guidance counselors, librarians, speech pathologist, building principals and assistant principals.  Must be employed on a full time basis within Belpre City Schools at least during the period of October 1, 2011 and May 15,  Must be in “Good Standing” with the district. There shall be no pending legal actions con- cerning the employee and the district.  Must complete the SCS Goal Attainment Plan (GAP) and submit no later than October 7, 2011 [ TIF Award Program Eligibility [insert photo of teachers with students]

 School year : Baseline data gathered for the TIF program through Terra Nova and ACT End-of- Course Exams  Will establish baseline data against which improvement in future years will be measured  School year : Data collected throughout the year to measure progress against the goals established in our TIF model Timeline

 Fall 2012: Data from school year used to calculate award amounts; preliminary results made available for review by teachers and principals  Fall/Winter 2012: Eligible teachers and principals receive finalized awards earned in the school year Timeline

 Data being collected during school year.  Linkage process in the spring  Will use BFK Award to report, verify and calculate awards  Payouts for Year 1 will be made in late 2012 or early 2013 Data [Insert district logo]

 The following appeals process will be enacted if an employee disagrees with his/her earned award amount: 1. Employee must submit a written appeal to the Superintendent’s office by December 1, Appeal must include reasons for the appeal and evidence. 2. The superintendent will convene the Strategic Compensation Committee to review 3. SCC will seek additional information 4. SCC will make a decision and notify employee 5. SCC decision will be final  BFK  Award™ will capture staff inquiries  Belpre City Schools will use this process to review and resolve inquiries Inquiry and Appeals Process

 Award model will be enhanced for Year 2 of the grant  BCS Strategic Compensation Committee has been meeting on a regular basis  SCC is looking at other plans and learning more in- depth about Strategic Compensation  SCC focusing on a more robust plan for future years with movement from a global plan to more individualized Year 2 Award Model Enhancement [Insert district logo]

Questions? logo] logo] logo] logo] Ruth Kunze Please visit our website at Click on the Race to the Top Buttonhttp://