Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Related Advanced Technologies with participants from China and Korea ( Kyoto University, Uji, Japan, Feb.
Advertisements

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
17. April 2015 Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Application of a multiscale transport model for magnetized plasmas in cylindrical configuration Workshop.
ASIPP HT-7 belt limiter Houyang Guo, Sizhen Zhu and Jiangang Li Investigation of EAST Divertor Asymmetry in Plasma Detachment & Target Power Loading Using.
9th TTF Spain September 11, 2002 B. J. Peterson, NIFS, Japan page 1 Radiative Collapse and Density Limit in the Large Helical Device.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
Inter-ELM Edge Profile and Ion Transport Evolution on DIII-D John-Patrick Floyd, W. M. Stacey, S. Mellard (Georgia Tech), and R. J. Groebner (General Atomics)
DPP 2006 Reduction of Particle and Heat Transport in HSX with Quasisymmetry J.M. Canik, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, K.M. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, K. Zhai.
RFP Workshop, Stockholm 9-11 /10/ 2008 Numerical studies of particle transport mechanisms in RFX-mod low chaos regimes M.Gobbin, L.Marrelli, L.Carraro,
Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)
Atomic collisions in fusion plasma physics An introduction to the course Atomic Physics in Fusion, ED2235 Henric Bergsåker 26 Oct 2011.
Physics of fusion power
HEAT TRANSPORT andCONFINEMENTin EXTRAP T2R L. Frassinetti, P.R. Brunsell, M. Cecconello, S. Menmuir and J.R. Drake.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
N EOCLASSICAL T OROIDAL A NGULAR M OMENTUM T RANSPORT IN A R OTATING I MPURE P LASMA S. Newton & P. Helander This work was funded jointly by EURATOM and.
Plasma particle fuelling a general view of methods and issues David Terranova.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
pkm- NCSX CDR, 5/21-23/ Power and Particle Handling in NCSX Peter Mioduszewski 1 for the NCSX Boundary Group: for the NCSX Boundary Group: M. Fenstermacher.
TOTAL Simulation of ITER Plasmas Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya Univ., Chikusa-ku, Nagoya , Japan 1.
Model prediction of impurity retention in ergodic layer and comparison with edge carbon emission in LHD (Impurity retention in the ergodic layer of LHD)
Edge Localized Modes propagation and fluctuations in the JET SOL region presented by Bruno Gonçalves EURATOM/IST, Portugal.
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
The study of MARFE during long pulse discharges in the HT-7 tokamak W.Gao, X.Gao, M.Asif, Z.W.Wu, B.L.Ling, and J.G.Li Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP E ~ 0 V/m in Locked Discharges Average potential ~ 580 V  ~ V less than in standard rotating plasmas Drop in potential.
12/03/2013, Praga 1 Plasma MHD Activity Observations via Magnetics Diagnostics: Magnetic island Analysis Magnetic island Analysis Frederik Ostyn (UGent)
Rotation effects in MGI rapid shutdown simulations V.A. Izzo, P.B. Parks, D. Shiraki, N. Eidietis, E. Hollmann, N. Commaux TSD Workshop 2015 Princeton,
第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
1 Super dense core plasma due to Internal Diffusion Barrier in LHD N. Ohyabu 1), T. Morisaki 1), S. Masuzaki 1), R. Sakamoto 1), M. Kobayashi 1), J. Miyazawa.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Transport in three-dimensional magnetic field: examples from JT-60U and LHD Katsumi Ida and LHD experiment group and JT-60 group 14th IEA-RFP Workshop.
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
Radial Electric Field Formation by Charge Exchange Reaction at Boundary of Fusion Device* K.C. Lee U.C. Davis *submitted to Physics of Plasmas.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
TEC Trilateral Euregio Cluster Institut für PlasmaphysikAssoziation EURATOM-Forschungszentrum Jülich 21st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, October.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
Fast response of the divertor plasma and PWI at ELMs in JT-60U 1. Temporal evolutions of electron temperature, density and carbon flux at ELMs (outer divertor)
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:
25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (FEC 2014) St. Petersburg, Russia, October 2014 OV/4-4 3D effects of edge magnetic field configuration on divertor/SOL.
17th ISHW Oct. 12, 2009, Princeton, NJ, USA Effect of Nonaxisymmetric Perturbation on Profile Formation I-08 T. Morisaki, Y. Suzuki, J. Miyazawa, M. Kobayashi,
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Member of the Helmholtz Association Meike Clever | Institute of Energy Research – Plasma Physics | Association EURATOM – FZJ Graduiertenkolleg 1203 Dynamics.
Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
Similarities and differences in SOL physics
Major aims of IPP-NIFS collaboration on divertor physics
24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – IAEA CN-197
11th IAEA Technical Meeting on H-mode Physics and Transport Barriers" , September, 2007 Tsukuba International Congress Center "EPOCHAL Tsukuba",
Integrated discharge scenario
Recycling and impurity retention in high-density,
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Yasuhiro Suzuki for the LHD experiment group
T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group
K. Ida1,2, R. Sakamoto1,2, M. Yoshinuma1,2, K. Yamasaki3, T
KTM & CWGM 2006 Kyoto University, Kyoto ( Sep., 2006)
T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group
H. Nakano1,3, S. Murakami5, K. Ida1,3, M. Yoshinuma1,3, S. Ohdachi1,3,
Presentation transcript:

Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD 18th PSI (May 26, 2008, Toledo, Spain) Edge plasma physics/ Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD S. Masuzaki for A. Komori and the LHD Experimental Groupp

OUTLINE Introduction Edge plasma control for high density operation in LHD Superdense core plasma with Internal Diffusion Barrier (IDB) Characteristics of the edge plasma in SDC-IDB discharges Edge magnetic field structure and plasma profiles Divertor plasma properties Impurity behavior Summary

Introduction One of the characteristics of heliotron/stellarator plasma is rather large tolerative for high density operation, and the central density of over 11021m-3 was achieved Density limit in LHD is observed as nc = 0.25 {(Ptot – dWp/dt)B/(a2R)}0.5 nc: critical edge density When the edge density reaches the nc, detachment occur. If the edge density continues to increase, plasma is collapsed by radiation. Edge plasma control is a key issue for high density operation.  Divertor Time evolutions of plasma parameters with and without radiation collapse.

Divertors in LHD Helical Divertor (HD) Local Island Divertor (LID) Intrinsic double-null divertor in the heliotron-type magnetic configuration. Ergodic boundary Now, it is ‘OPEN’ type. Closure plan is under way. Utilize m/n=1/1 island gerenated by perturbation coils LID is a ‘CLOSED’ divertor High pumping efficiency(> 50 %) has been achieved. P2-02 M. Shoji Demonstrate a high performance of a reactor-relavant helical plasma

Finding an Internal Diffusion Barrier (IDB) in LID discharges Center fueling by repetitive pellet injection + strong edge pumping by LID - achievement of superdense core plasma. formation of IDB - relatively high Te at the center. - strongly high pressure at the center ( ~0.1MPa ). - relatively low edge ne prevents radiation collapse keV 1019/m3 Superdense Core (SDC) Plasma * ne(0) ~ 5x1020 m-3, * Te(0) ~ 0.85 keV, * P(0) ~ 130kPa * Wdia ~ 980kJ * (0) ~ 4.2%, * highest fusion triple product nT ~ 4.4 x1019 keVsm-3 - large Shafranov shift (more than a/2) ne Te Formation of IDB & SDC plasma depends on magnetic axis position.

Promising results from HD experiment IDB-SDC plasma has been revealed that it is not specific to LID. Necessary condition (not sufficient) for IDB-SDC Plasma Center fueling by pellet injection + proper pumping by pumps and wall pump ne (1019/m3) HD LID Te (keV) Exhaustive wall conditioning w/o LID --> similar peaked profiles to LID Formation of IDB-SDC plasma depends on magnetic axis position, same as LID.

Effect of edge neutral pressure n0 on IDB formation Sequential operation degrades IDB  radiation collapse Edge ne high n0 high edge ne degradation or termination of discharge (no IDB) Edge Te radiation power Suppression of the neutral pressure in the edge region is a key parameter for IDB formation Stored energy

OUTLINE Introduction Edge plasma control for high density operation in LHD Superdense core plasma with Internal Diffusion Barrier (IDB) Characteristics of the edge plasma in IDB-SDC discharges Edge magnetic field structure and plasma profiles Divertor plasma properties Impurity behavior Summary

Edge magnetic structure LCFS (vacuum) Magnetic axis (vacuum) High central pressure induces large Shafranov shift 3D equilibrium  HINT code Strong edge modification - increase of ergodicity - increase of thickness of ergodic layer

Edge density and temperature profiles in the ergodic region DIII-D Exp. LHD exp. Edge Te begins to increase in the ergodic region, whereas the ne profile is flat. Similar trend is seen in DIII-D exp. T.E. Evans et al., Nucl. Fusion These results seems to be not consistent with the R-R model which predicts large c in ergodic layer.

OUTLINE Introduction Edge plasma control for high density operation in LHD Superdense core plasma with Internal Diffusion Barrier (IDB) Characteristics of the edge plasma in IDB -SDC discharges Edge magnetic field structure and plasma profiles Divertor plasma properties Impurity behavior Summary

Time evolutions of particle flux profiles on divertor plates Private region Connection length profile on the divertor plate at the time of maximum center pressure P0. Divertor flux profiles on the divertor plates drastically change during IDB discharge due to the modification of edge magnetic structure.

Modification of the particle deposition profile on the divertor induced by high central pressure D is assumed to be about 1 m2/s LHD divertor plate array w/o IDB IDB Numerical calculation simulating diffusing particles from core to divertor plates shows little difference between normal and SDC discharge. Divertor instruments (target plates, baffle, pump) for the IDB -SDC discharge is compatible with low density discharge.

Particle flux to divertor plates and neutral pressure Difference of ne_bar is ~10 times, but that of divertor flux is < ~3 times Divertor flux and neutral pressure are insensitive to the core plasma density, but well correlated to the edge plasma density as those during w/o IDB discharges.

OUTLINE Introduction Edge plasma control for high density operation in LHD Superdense core plasma with Internal Diffusion Barrier (IDB) Characteristics of the edge plasma in IDB-SDC discharges Edge magnetic field structure and plasma profiles Divertor plasma properties Impurity behavior Summary

Impurity behavior during SDC-IDB discharges Neoclassical ambipolar diffusion  ion root  negative radial electric field  impurity accumulation ? Harmful impurity accumulation has not been observed in IDB-SDC discharge. Implication of a possible mechanism of impurity screening in the edge region. negative Er : verified by CXRS

Impurity screening by friction force in the ergodic region Thermal force dominant friction force by plasma flow divertor core plasma nLCMS=2×1019 m-3 1018 m-3 thermal force 1.0 //-B field Increase ne //-impurity velocity 3×1019 0.1 friction force by plasma flow thermal force (Z-independent) Condition for impurity retention  Vz// > 0 0.01 4×1019 Friction force dominant The more collisional, the more effective screening in the ergodic layer Carbon density distribution (EMC3-EIRENE)

Experimental evidence of the screening Ionization potential : CIII (C+2) : 48 eV CIV (C+3) : 65 eV CV (C+4) : 392 eV CVI (C+5) : 490 eV big gap Clear separation of profile between C+1~C+3 & C+4~C+6 In the case of impurity screening : C+1,C+2,C+3 C+4,C+5,C+6 Ratio (CV+CVI) / (CIII+CIV) as a measure of carbon screening. Spectroscopic measurement suggests that impurity screening appear in the ergodic layer. O-03: M. Kobayashi

Summary IDB-SDC plasma has been obtained in LHD with the central fueling and proper edge pumping. 2) In the ergodic region, ne profile is relatively flat. On the other hand, Te profile has a steep gradient, which is not consistent with the classical model. 3) In spite of the strong edge modification by the large Shafranov shift in the IDB- SDC discharge, the PSI-related phenomena is not so different from those in the discharges without IDB. It is attributed to the similar edge density and temperature in IDB-SDC plasma to those in discharges without IDB. 4) Harmful impurity accumulation has not been observed in IDB-SDC discharges. Impurities are considered to be well shielded in the ergodic region by friction force. Results obtained in this experiments encourage us to study the new approach to the reactor plasma with IDB-SDC regime.

IDB-SDC discharge Scenario high density core + low density mantle high ne at core high Te at pedestal low recycling (lown0, edge ne ) central fueling high density core + low density mantle Edge Plasma Control by pumps * particle recycling Center fueling with pellet injection * 1.5-2.0x2021 atoms/pellet * 1000-1200m/s

Principle of LID LID is a divertor that uses an m/n = 1/1 island. heat & particle fluxes Closed geometry Outward heat and particle fluxes crossing island separatrix flow along field lines to backside of the island. High pumping efficiency of  50% Technical ease of pumping is the advantage of LID over closed full helical divertor because recycling is toroidally localized. Highly efficient pumping, combined with core fueling, is the key to improve plasma confinement.

Sustaining IDB using repetitive pellet injection